The Revolution of Al-Husayn

The Revolution of Al-Husayn50%

The Revolution of Al-Husayn Author:
Translator: I.K.A Howard (Ph.D)
Publisher: www.alhassanain.org/english
Category: Imam Hussein

The Revolution of Al-Husayn
  • Start
  • Previous
  • 10 /
  • Next
  • End
  •  
  • Download HTML
  • Download Word
  • Download PDF
  • visits: 9965 / Download: 4189
Size Size Size
The Revolution of Al-Husayn

The Revolution of Al-Husayn

Author:
Publisher: www.alhassanain.org/english
English

The Revolution of Imam al-Husayn (a.s)

&

Its Impact on the Consciousness of Muslim Society

The impact of Karbala on the consciousness of Muslim society. Ziyara (pilgrimage), lamentation poetry, remembering Imam Husayn (a), and weeping.

Author(s): Shaykh Muhammad Mahdi Shams ad-Din Al-Amili

Translator(s): I.K.A. Howard

Publisher(s): Muhammadi Trust of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

WWW.ALHASSANAIN.ORG/ENGLISH

Table of Contents

Publisher’s Foreword 5

The Book 5

The Author5

Author’s Preface7

Notes8

Introduction 9

I. Explanation of The Use of Terminology 9

II. The Attitude Towards The Revolution 10

1. The Eve of the Revolution 10

2. The Aftermath of the Revolution 12

III. The Motives And Aims Which The Revolution Implanted In Popular Consciousness14

The First Tendency 14

The Second Tendency 15

IV. The Ways the Revolution Flowed Into Popular Consciousness21

The Doctrinal Factor22

The Call of the Holy Family 22

The Nature of the Tragedy 23

The Psychological Situation of the Shi'ite Muslim 23

Notes24

The Ziyara 27

I. The Legality Of The Ziyara27

II. The History Of The Ziyara Before Al-Husayn 28

III. The Ziyara To Al-Husayn: Its Objectives And Aims30

IV. The Ziyara In The Legal Texts34

V. Two Examples Of The Ziyara To Al-Husayn 42

1. The First Example42

2. The Second Example46

VI. The Ziyara in the Poetry of Lament for Al-Husayn 50

VII. Three Other Ziyaras Concerned With the Revolution of Al-Husayn 53

1. The ziyara to al-'Abbas ibn 'Ali ibn Abi Talib 53

i53

ii54

iii54

2. The ziyara of 'Ali (al-Akbar) ibn al-Husayn ibn 'Ali ibn Abi Talib 57

i57

ii58

i60

ii62

iii63

Notes65

Lamentation Poetry 68

I. The Doctrinal Background To The Literature Of Lamentation For Al-Husayn As A Manifestation Of The Revolution Of Al-Husayn In Popular Consciousness68

II. The Hostile Attitude of the Authorities71

III. Poetic Content And Man S Psychological Disposition 74

1. The Umayyad Period 75

2. The Early 'Abbasid Period 78

3. The Later 'Abbasid Period 83

IV. The Themes Of The Poetry Of Lamentation For Al-Husayn 97

1. Human Grief97

2. Nature's Grief98

3. The Grief of the Angels and the Jinn 99

4. The Virtues of the Holy Family 99

Their Personal Virtues99

Their Religious Virtues99

Their Family Background as Direct Descendants of the Apostle of God 99

The Human Enemies of the Revolution 102

The Muslims102

The Kufans and the Iraqis102

The Umayyads103

Other men and Women 103

The Women of the Holy Family 103

The Children and the Young Men of the Holy Family 104

The Story of the Battle104

Water and Thirst104

Karbala': The Bank of the Euphrates and the Graves105

The Humiliation of Quraysh and the Humiliation of Islam and the Muslims106

The Meeting with the Apostle of God and the Holy Family 107

The Martyrs107

The Hardship the Poets Faced because of their Allegiance108

Support with the Tongue108

V. The Value Of The Poetry About Al-Husayn 109

We consider that the responsibility for this weakness of quality in the artistic aspect of this poetry of lament for al-Husayn is due to a number of reasons109

The first reason 110

The second reason 110

The third reason: The profusion of verses in lament for al-Husayn 110

Notes111

Rites of Remembrance for al-Husayn114

I. Funeral And Remembrance Rites For Al-Husayn Held By The Family And Spontaneously By The People114

1. Introduction 114

2. The Funeral And Remembrance Rites Of The Family 114

a) At Karbala114

b) In Damascus115

c) In Medina116

3. The General Rites Of Remembrance Which Occurred Spontaneously 117

a) In Kufa118

b) In Medina118

II. The Public Rites of Remembrance for Al-Husayn 120

III. The Stages of the Rites of Remembrance for Al-Husayn 129

The First Stage132

The Second Stage143

The Language of the Rites of Remembrance144

Historical Accuracy 146

Poetry 146

The Virtues of the Holy Family 147

The Other Imams148

Acts of Renunciation of the World 149

The Third Stage151

IV. The Present and Thoughts on The Future159

Notes169

Weeping 171

I. The Phenomenon of Weeping 171

II. The Legal Texts171

III. Analysis Of The Phenomenon Of Weeping 172

Note175

Alhassanain (p) Network for Heritage and Islamic Thought176

Publisher’s Foreword

We are pleased to present this book, The Revolution of al-Husayn: Its Impact on the Consciousness of Muslim Society, by Hujjat al-Islam Shaykh Muhammad Mahdi Shams al-Din, Vice-President of the Supreme Shi’ite Council in the Lebanon, to the reading public.

The Book

Imam al-Husayn, peace be with him, created a momentous Islamic revolution, which has continued to live as history has gone by and still provides writers with vitality and inspiring material. Despite the passing of time, it is a revolutionary torch whose light guides revolutionaries and those who struggle to proclaim and support the truth and to resist and oppose the symbols of falsehood. For more than thirteen centuries, writers of different groups, inclinations and ideas have continued to write books and studies about this revolution.

Yet neither has its spring been exhausted nor have the streams which flow from it run dry. It is the same as it was at the blessed time it took place in terms of its great significance.

This book about the revolution of al-Husayn is considered one of the most original works on the subject, an originality which the author indicates in his own preface. With this in mind, we wanted to have this work translated from its original Arabic into English for two important purposes.

Firstly, we wanted to make those non-Muslims, who only speak English in many parts of the world, aware of the eternal quality of al-Husayn’s revolution so that they could understand its social circumstances and its influence on men.

This revolution is unique when considering the history of revolutions aimed at reforming society which abound in Islamic history, in terms of its ideology and its heroism. Similarly it represents the highest degree of self-sacrifice for the sake of religious principles and to free man from slavery and individualistic despotism.

Secondly, the secret of the lasting nature of this pioneering revolution, which, despite the passing of thirteen centuries still keeps alive the crucial position, which it had on the day it took place, as a vital agent in creating acts of heroism, embodying self-sacrifice and teaching men the way of noble sacrifice for the sake of achieving a noble aim.

The rising of al-Husayn was not merely a tragedy arising spontaneously out of the injustice of man. Nor was it a manifestation of family or personal struggle against the government or authority. It was much more exalted and greater than that. It was for the sake of preserving the Islamic religion and its great benefits for saving humanity from persecution and slavery.

The Author

The author, Hujjat al-Islam Shaykh Muhammad Mahdi Shams al-Din, is one of the scholars and illustrious personalities of the Ithna ‘Ashari’Shi’ites. He is from a family whose roots in learning are deep, going back to al-Shahid al-Awwal, Jamal al-Din Muhammad ibn Makki al-‘Amili (d.786 A.H.) This family has been well-known in Mount ‘Amil in the Lebanon since the rise of scholarship in that region.

The author was educated at the Religious College in Najaf where he studied the Arabic language, rhetoric, logic, jurisprudence, the principles of jurisprudence and Tradition under the great figures and teachers of that college. At the same time he acquired great knowledge of literature, history and other aspects of human learning.

However, he did not consolidate his great ability as a scholar and extend the area of his horizons until, after he had passed the first stage of the studies required for students of religious education, he moved on to the stage of being lectured directly by the mujtahids and marji’s (the most important Shi’ite scholars who lead the Shi’ite community in all aspects of faith while the twelfth Imam is in occultation).

Then he studied under such great authorities in the sciences of jurisprudence and the principles of jurisprudence as the late Ayatullah Sayyid Muhsin al-Hakim and Ayatullah Sayyid Abu’l Qasim al-Khu’i.

He participated in the foundation of some of the cultural organizations in Najaf and the College of Law, where he gave lessons in Islamic history and jurisprudence. He represented the late Ayatullah Sayyid al-Hakim, for a number of years, in the province of Diwaniyya, which is one of the important tribal provinces in Iraq. He also took part in many of the religious and cultural celebrations in Iraq.

After that he moved to Beirut in the Lebanon. There he worked with great effort to initiate cultural and religious schemes, especially in matters concerned with raising the standards in the south of the country. He was given the office of Vice-President of the Supreme Shi’ite Islamic Council. He has had to work there in a presidential capacity since the disappearance of Musa al-Sadr.

Despite his being occupied with events in the Lebanon and the civil war there, he has continued to support the Islamic Publishing House with his valuable works which give expression to basic Islamic ideals and spiritual direction to those setting out to study Islamic culture.

Among those works produced by Hujjat al-Islam Shaykh Muhammad Mahdi Shams al-Din is this book, The Revolution of al-Husayn, which we present to the English reading public. We have every confidence that we have made a good choice. God, may He be exalted, is the One Who guides in the right direction.

The Muhammadi Trust

Author’s Preface

What is the significance of giving the quality of immortality to any one man, to any one historical event, or to any great accomplishment of mind and heart which one man has achieved?

We constantly, or at least sometimes, feel the need for it. We go back to such an immortal man to read, to listen and to see his story, and we recall his life. We go back to such an immortal event so that we can make it live again in our minds and hearts. We enrich our life by it, we ennoble our existence through it, and we illuminate our paths through it and its author. We go back to the glories of the human genius so that we may quench our hearts’ thirst for truth and beauty through them.

How and why is immortality ordained for some men, or some events, or some great acts?

It is because they encompass the eternally living reality.

There are men, events and impressions which are concerned with what is false, counterfeit and artificial. However, the latter will not endure in the life of man. Soon the false and the counterfeit in them will be revealed, and then people will dismiss them from their lives which constantly seek to correct themselves.

There are others which encompass only a limited extent of the reality. The life of such a man is limited by his contribution to the life of man.

There are others which encompass the eternal living reality which is associated with the unceasing creative activity of mind and heart. This is always immortal because it answers an increasing need in the mind and heart of man and in his greatest aspirations and hopes.

This is the factor which applies, with a miraculous exactitude, to al-Husayn and his revolution. We go back to him in all the stages of his life and we go back to him in the climax of that life, his revolution. We make it live again and we try to understand it. We live with him in all its stages, from its beginning to its bloody but resplendent ending. We are affected by it because, after we have discovered it, we have discovered ourselves in it: we have discovered part of our heart, part of our aspirations, part of our humanity in it. From it we have heard more than a call which summons the noblest things which human creativity encompasses.

This is the underlying reason for the fact that his revolution has penetrated into the depths of the popular consciousness of the Islamic community, in general, and of Shi’ite Muslims, in particular, so that it has becomes part of the general cultural environment of a Shi’ite, which has shared, and continues to share even now, an important role in the formation of his cultural identity and his social and political morality.

We should observe that the revolution of al-Husayn, among all the revolutions in the history of Islam which, itself, abound in revolutions, is the only revolution whose memory is still as alive and fresh to Muslims in the present time as it was to Muslims in the past.

Of all the revolutions it is the only one which has entered into the depths of popular consciousness so that it has enriched it and been enriched by it. It has enriched popular consciousness by its slogans, its ideas, its morality and its noble aims. It has been enriched by popular consciousness by the latter’s endeavours and aspirations through the ages.

That is only because it is the matrix of revolutions in the history of Islam. It is, as we said in our book The Rising of al-Husayn: Its Social Circumstances and Its Human Effects, ‘…the spearhead in revolutionary history. It is the first revolution which mobilized people and set them on the long bloody path, the path of struggle, after they had been about to lose their spirit for struggle through the effects of the policy of the Umayyads’.1

It is the only one among the revolutions in Islamic history which has set in motion a torrent of poetic and intellectual creativity, which began in the year 61 A.H. and has not ceased to the present day.

This book is a pioneering attempt to study the existence of the revolution of Imam al-Husayn and its manifestations in popular consciousness. It follows my previous books about the revolutions of al-Husayn:

(i) The Rising of al-Husayn: Its Social Circumstances and Its Human Effects2 and,

(ii) The Supporters of al-Husayn: A Study of the Martyrs of the Revolution of al-Husayn – the Men and the Evidence.3

If God grants us success, a fourth book about the revolution of al-Husayn will follow these with the title, The Story of the Rising. With that our study of all aspects of the revolution of al-Husayn will be complete.

Then God willing, we shall be able to apply ourselves to the revolutions which follow al-Husayn’s revolution, thereby fulfilling the promise we made in The Revolution of al-Husayn when we said: The study of Islamic history, by means of the revolution, will give a truer and more exact picture than what emerges when this history is studied in the traditional manner which has no difference between whether it is a study of epochs or ruling dynasties.

We pray to God Almighty that He makes this work of ours and our other works a step towards attaining His approval and that He accepts it favorably and makes it of use. Praise be to God, Lord of the Universe.

The Author

Notes

1. Thawrat al-Husayn: Zurufuha al-Ijtima’iyya wa-Atharuha al-Insaniyya (5th ed., Beirut, 1977), 236.

2. Op.cit.

3. Ansar al-Husayn: Dirasa ‘an Shuhada’ Thawrat al-Husayn – al-Rijal wa al-Dalalat (Beirut, 1975).

Volume 7: Surah Ale-Imran, Verses 121-129

وَإِذْ غَدَوْتَ مِنْ أَهْلِكَ تُبَوِّئُ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ مَقَاعِدَ لِلْقِتَالِۗ وَاللَّـهُ سَمِيعٌ عَلِيمٌ ﴿١٢١﴾ إِذْ هَمَّت طَّائِفَتَانِ مِنكُمْ أَن تَفْشَلَا وَاللَّـهُ وَلِيُّهُمَاۗ وَعَلَى اللَّـهِ فَلْيَتَوَكَّلِ الْمُؤْمِنُونَ ﴿١٢٢﴾ وَلَقَدْ نَصَرَكُمُ اللَّـهُ بِبَدْرٍ وَأَنتُمْ أَذِلَّةٌۖ فَاتَّقُوا اللَّـهَ لَعَلَّكُمْ تَشْكُرُونَ ﴿١٢٣﴾ إِذْ تَقُولُ لِلْمُؤْمِنِينَ أَلَن يَكْفِيَكُمْ أَن يُمِدَّكُمْ رَبُّكُم بِثَلَاثَةِ آلَافٍ مِّنَ الْمَلَائِكَةِ مُنزَلِينَ ﴿١٢٤﴾ بَلَىٰۚ إِن تَصْبِرُوا وَتَتَّقُوا وَيَأْتُوكُم مِّن فَوْرِهِمْ هَـٰذَا يُمْدِدْكُمْ رَبُّكُم بِخَمْسَةِ آلَافٍ مِّنَ الْمَلَائِكَةِ مُسَوِّمِينَ ﴿١٢٥﴾ وَمَا جَعَلَهُ اللَّـهُ إِلَّا بُشْرَىٰ لَكُمْ وَلِتَطْمَئِنَّ قُلُوبُكُم بِهِۗ وَمَا النَّصْرُ إِلَّا مِنْ عِندِ اللَّـهِ الْعَزِيزِ الْحَكِيمِ ﴿١٢٦﴾ لِيَقْطَعَ طَرَفًا مِّنَ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا أَوْ يَكْبِتَهُمْ فَيَنقَلِبُوا خَائِبِينَ ﴿١٢٧﴾ لَيْسَ لَكَ مِنَ الْأَمْرِ شَيْءٌ أَوْ يَتُوبَ عَلَيْهِمْ أَوْ يُعَذِّبَهُمْ فَإِنَّهُمْ ظَالِمُونَ ﴿١٢٨﴾ وَلِلَّـهِ مَا فِي السَّمَاوَاتِ وَمَا فِي الْأَرْضِۚ يَغْفِرُ لِمَن يَشَاءُ وَيُعَذِّبُ مَن يَشَاءُۚ وَاللَّـهُ غَفُورٌ رَّحِيمٌ ﴿١٢٩﴾

And when you did go forth early in the morning from your family to lodge the believers in encampments for war; and Allah is Hearing, Knowing (121). When two parties from among you had determined that they should show cowardice and Allah was the guardian of them both, and in Allah should the believers trust (122). And Allah did certainly assist you at Badr when you were weak; fear Allah then that you may give thanks (123). When you said to the believers: “Does it not suffice you that your Lord should assist you with three thousand of the angels sent down? (124). Yea! if you remain patient and are on your guard (against evil), and they come upon you in a headlong manner, your Lord will assist you with five thousand of the havoc-making angels” (125). And Allah did not make it but as good news for you, and that your hearts might be at ease thereby, and help is only from Allah, the Mighty, the Wise (126). That He may cut off a portion from among those who disbelieve, or abase them so that they should return disappointed of attaining what they desired (127). You have no concern in the affair whether He turns to them (mercifully) or chastises them, for surely they are unjust (128). And whatever is in the heavens and whatever is in the earth is Allah's; He forgives whom He pleases and chastises whom He pleases; and Allah is Forgiving, Merciful (129).

COMMENTARY

Now the discourse turns back to what the chapter had begun with: Warning the believers of the serious situation they were in; reminding them of Allah's favors bestowed on them, that is, true belief, divine help and the fact that Allah is sufficient for them; teaching them what would lead them to their noble goal; and guiding them to what would make them happy in this life and the hereafter.

It describes the battle of Uhud. There are some verses referring to the battle of Badr, but they are like supplement inserted here for cross-reference, and as we shall explain later, they are not meant as main topic here.

QUR'AN: And when you did go forth early in the morning from your family to lodge the believers in encampments for war:

“When” in Arabic is adverb of time related to a deleted verb e.g. “Remember” or similar verbs; “ghadawta ” translated here as “you did go forth early in the morning” is derived from al-ghadw (to come out early in the morning); attabwi'ah means to prepare a place for someone, or to put him in a place; ma-qa'id is plural (of seat; translated here as encampment). Ahl of a man, according to ar-Raghib, are those who are joined to him in genealogy or house or other such things like religion, town or handicraft. Thus ahl of a man refers to his wife and all those who are in his house, like wife, child, servant, etc.; also it denotes all who are related to him like his family or clan; residents of a town or followers of a religion are called ahl of that town or religion; artisans and masters of a handicraft are called ahl of that art or handicraft. The word “ahl” is used for masculine and feminine both; also for singular and plural alike. Its use is exclusively reserved for human beings; ahl of a thing are the people related to it exclusively.

“Ahl” of the Messenger of Allah are therefore the people exclusively related to him. Here it refers to a group - not to a single person. It may be understood from the expression, “you did go forth early in the morning from your family”, because it may be said, “You went forth from your relatives and your group “; but it cannot be said, “You went forth from your wife “ or “from your mother”. An exegete mistakenly has thought that ahl refers to singular only, and therefore has had to say that there was some word deleted (but understood) from the verse; according to him the verse means, “did go forth . from the house of your family” But as you have seen nothing in this verse demands such interpretation.

The preceding and following verses are addressed to the believers as a group. But the verses under discussion turn from plural to singular; they are addressed not to the believers but to the Messenger of Allah alone. Apparently this diversion has some connection with the shade of displeasure found in the verses dealing with this battle: there is an undercurrent of reproach, censure and stricture running throughout for what the Muslims had done (in the battle of Uhud) where they had shown cowardice and lack of will-power and courage. Therefore, whenever a topic comes which exclusively concerns the Prophet, Allah ignores and disregards the believers and speaks to the Prophet alone. Thus Allah says: And when you did go forth early in the morning from your family; When you said to the believers: “Does it not suffice you that your Lord should assist you. . “; You have no concern in the affair; Say: “Surely the affair is wholly (in the hands) of Allah “ (3:154); Thus it is due to the mercy from Allah that you deal with them gently, and had you been rough, hardhearted, they would certainly have dispersed from around you (3:159); And reckon not those who are killed in Allah's way as dead (3:169).

In all the above verses plural verbs and pronouns have been changed to singular. It seems as though the speaker is not in a mood to continue the preceding style (of speaking to the whole community) because he is very much annoyed and displeased with them.

It is unlike some other verses coming in between where effectiveness and sharpness of admonition depended on direct talk with the believers and therefore the plural was used. For example: And Muhammad is no more than a messenger, the messengers have already passed away before him; if then he dies or is killed, will you turn back upon your heals? (3:144); When you ran off precipitately and did not turn towards any one, and the Messenger was calling you from your rear (3:153) .

Also it is unlike another intervening verse, that is: Certainly Allah conferred a benefit upon the believers when He raised among them a Messenger from among themselves, reciting to them His communications (3:164). Here Allah describes His favor on the believers of sending the Prophet to them; and it could be effective and more impressive only if it was supposed as if the Prophet himself were not present there. Ponder on all these verses and you will appreciate the relevance of what we have written.

The verse under discussion means as follows: O Prophet, remember when you did go forth early in the morning from your family in order that you should place the believers in their sectors for war; and Allah is Hearing (He had heard what was said there) and Knowing (He had known what was hidden in their hearts). The expression, “you did go forth early in the morning from your family”, indicates that the battleground was nearer to the Prophet's house. It clearly shows that the two verses refer to the battle of Uhud, and in this way they are related to other verses, which would follow later, and which describe the battle of Uhud. All these verses fit the events, which had taken place in Uhud.

This shows the weakness of the claim that these two verses were revealed about the battle of Badr, or, as someone else said, about the battle of the Confederates. And it is obvious (from the context).

QUR'AN: and Allah is Hearing, Knowing:

He is Hearing, He had heard what was spoken there; and Knowing, He knew what was hidden in their hearts. It indicates that some Muslims had spoken there some (undesirable) things, and there were other things, which they had not disclosed to others.

Apparently the next clause, “When two parties from among you had determined that they should show cowardice”, is related to these two attributes, (i.e., Allah heard and knew the conspiracy and intention of the two parties when they had determined to show cowardice).

QUR'AN: When two parties from among you had determined that they should show cowardice, and Allah was the guardian of them both:

“al-Hamm” what you determine in your heart; intention); al-fashl (weakness with cowardice).

“and Allah was the guardian of them both”: This is a circumstantial clause, related to the verb, “had determined “. It is meant as an admonition and reproof, as is the concluding sentence, “and in Allah should the believers trust”. The connotation is as follows: The two parties had determined to show cowardice although Allah was their guardian - and a believer should not show weakness and cowardice when he believes that Allah is his guardian and when he is supposed to entrust all his affairs to Allah, and whoever trusts in Allah then He is sufficient for him.

This explanation shows the weakness of an interpretation offered by an exegete who says: This intention of the two parties was merely a thought, a notion, not a determination, because Allah has praised them and said that He was their guardian. Had it been a firm determination and intention, they should have been blamed rather than praised.

But I do not understand what he means when he says that it was merely a thought, a notion. Does he mean merely a passing thought, a knowledge what cowardice means? If so, then everyone present there knew the meaning of cowardice, and it makes no sense to mention it in this context; nor is it called “determination” in Arabic language. Or, does he mean knowledge of cowardice coupled with some intention; a notion with determination to act upon it? (If so, then it was not merely a thought or a notion.) Also, the verse shows that the condition of the two parties was obvious to the others; had it been merely a passing thought without showing any effect on their behavior, others would not have known that they had determined to show weakness and cowardice. Moreover, the reminder that Allah was their guardian and that the believers must put their trust in Allah, dovetails with firm determination, not with a passing thought. And in any case, we have explained that in the present context, the clause, “and Allah was the guardian of them both”, is not intended as a praise, it is a reproof, an admonition.

Perhaps this misunderstanding has sprung up from a tradition attributed to Jabir ibn 'Abdillah al-Ansar; in which he says: “(This verse) was revealed about us; and I would not prefer if it were not revealed, because Allah has said, and Allah was the guardian of them both.” The said exegete probably thought that Jabir had taken the clause as a praise.

Even if the said tradition were accepted as correct, Jabir's theme is different from what that exegete has thought. Jabir means that Allah then accepted their belief and confirmed that they were believers, because He counted Himself as their guardian, and Allah is the guardian of those who believe, a d as for that this clause implies any praise, when it has been put in this contact of clear reprimand and censure.

QUR'AN: And Allah did certainly assist you at Badr when you were weak; fear Allah then, that you may give thanks:

The context obviously shows that this verse has been revealed here as a supporting evidence to emphasize the stricture, to complete the reproof. If so, then this too would be a circumstantial clause, like the preceding one, “and Allah was the guardian of them both.” Its connotation then would be as follows: You should not have determined to show cowardice while Allah had certainly assisted you at Badr when you were weak. On the other-hand, it might be an independent sentence revealed here to remind them of the wonderful assistance provided to them at Badr, when Allah had sent down the angels to help them when they were weak.

Allah mentions here the help sent by Him to them at Badr, and compares their present condition with that; and it is known that whoever becomes strong, does so only with Allah's help and His assistance, because man, per se, has nothing except neediness and weakness. That is why Allah says: “when you were weak”.

It many be understood from the above that the statement, “when you were weak”, does not disagree with such other divine words as, and to Allah belongs the might and to His Messenger and to the believers 163:8), because the believers' might springs from the might of Allah, as He says: Then surely all might is for Allah (4:139); and it proceeds from the divine help given to the believers, as Allah says: And certainly We sent before you messengers to their people, so they came to them with clear arguments, then We gave the punishment to those who were guilty; and helping the believers is ever incumbent upon Us (30:47). In this situation if we look at the condition of the believers, per se, they have got nothing except weakness.

Apart from that, if we look at the believers' condition in Badr, we shall have to admit that they were certainly weaker in comparison to the strength, might and élan the polytheists had had. And there is no difficulty in ascribing a relative weakness to otherwise mighty ones. Allah has ascribed it to a people whom

He has praised very extensively, when He says: . then soon Allah will bring a people that He shall love them and they shall love Him, humble (adhillah, lit: weak) before the believers, mighty against the unbelievers. . (5:54).

QUR'AN: When you said to the believers: “Does it not suffice you that your Lord should assist you ....

“al-Imdad “ is derived from al-madd and signifies giving al-madad (help) continuously.

QUR'AN: “Yea! if you remain patient and are on your guard (against evil), and they come upon you in a headlong manner. “:

“Bala” (Yea) is used for affirmation; al-fawr and al-fawran means to boil; they say, fara 'l-qidr (the cooking-pot boiled up); then the word was used to denote hurry and haste. Thus the phrase, min fawrihim hadha (- translated here as, in a headlong manner) means, ' at once ', 'immediately '.

Obviously, the promise refers to the battle of Badr. It is a conditional promise, and the conditions are given in these clauses, “if you remain patient and are on your guard and they come upon you in a headlong manner”.

An exegete has written that it is a promise to send down the angels if they came upon the believers (not “immediately”, i.e. not on the day of Badr, but) after the immediate time, i.e. after the battle of Badr. Another one has written that it is a promise to send down the angels in all the battles after the Badr, like Uhud, Hunayn and the Confederates. But the wording of the verse does not agree with it.

As for Uhud, there is obviously nothing in the verses that might allude to coming of the angels on that day. So far as the battles of the Confederates and Hunayn are concerned, the Qur'an, of course, says (in other places) that the angels were sent on those days: It says about the battle of the Confederates: . when there came down upon you hosts, so We sent against them a strong wind and hosts that you saw not . (33:9). And it says about the day of Hunayn: … and on the day of Hunayn …and sent down hosts which you did not see. (9:25-26). Nevertheless, the wording of the verse under discussions, “Yea! if you remain patient and are on your guard (against evil) and they come upon you in a headlong manner”, does not show any general promise.

There is no conflict between this verse which speaks of three thousand angels being sent down at Badr, and the statement of the chapter of al-Anfal, which says: . so He answered you: “I will assist you with a thousand of angels following (after others) “ (8:9) The word, “following”, indicates that they would follow others - the “others” referring to the remaining two thousand who would complete the number promised in this verse.

QUR'AN: And Allah did not make it but as good news for you, . and help is only form Allah, the Mighty, the Wise:

The pronoun “it” refers to the help. 'Ind (near) is an adverb of place, indicating presence. Initially it was used for nearness and presence in place; obviously it was reserved for physical things. Then its circle widened and it was used for nearness in time. Finally it was used for general, and even spiritual, nearness. The Qur'an has used it in various connotations.

The theme of the statement, “and help is only from Allah, the Mighty, the Wise”, when seen in conjunction with the preceding words, “And Allah did not make it but as good news for you, and that your hearts might be at ease thereby “, implies that the phrase, min 'indi 'llah (= lit: from near Allah) refers to that “station” of Lordship which every affair and every order emanates from; and without which nothing can suffice, nor can any cause be independent of it. The meaning therefore is as follows: The helper angels have in fact no concern with the promised help; they are merely apparent causes - they bring to you good news and satisfaction of heart. The reality of help is from Allah, nothing can suffice from Him; He is Allah, the final destination of every thing; the Mighty Who cannot be subdued, the Wise Who is not unaware of any thing.

QUR'AN: That He may cut off a portion from among those who disbelieve, or abase them . and chastises whom He pleases; and Allah is Forgiving, Merciful:

“That” is related to the verb, “And Allah did certainly assist you at Badr”. (He assisted you so that He may cut off...). 'Cutting off a portion' metaphorically means decreasing their number and debilitating them with slaying and imprisoning, as had happened at Badr where seventy idol worshippers were killed and seventy arrested. al-Kabt (to abase, to exasperate).

The clause, “You have no concern in the affair”, is a parenthetic one. It emphasizes the proposition that the authority of cutting off a portion from, or abasing them, is entirely in the hand of Allah; the Prophet has no concern in this matter - that they should praise and acclaim him if they vanquished and defeated their enemy, and should blame him and remonstrate with him if things went against them; they should not be infirm and grieving, as they had done on the day of Uhud - as Allah has narrated.

The next clause, “whether He turns to them (mercifully) or chastises them”, is in conjunction with the preceding, “That He may cut off . .”, and the sentence is continuing. The next verse, “And whatever is in the heavens and whatever is in the earth is Allah's”, is explicative clause describing why the matter of repentance and forgiveness rests exclusively in the hand of Allah. The meaning is as follows: The sound arrangement (at Badr) were made by Allah in order that He might cut off a portion of the polytheists through slaughter and imprisonment, or abase them and disappoint them of attaining what they had desired, or that He might turn to them mercifully or chastise them. As for the cutting off a portion of them and abasing them, it is because all affairs are in His hands, you have no concern in it, (so they should neither praise nor blame you in this affair); and as for repentance and forgiveness, it is because Allah is the Owner of everything, He forgives whom He pleases and chastises whom He pleases. Even then, His forgiveness and mercy surpasses His chastisement and anger, because He is Forgiving, Merciful.

We have treated the sentence, “And whatever is in the heaven and whatever is in the earth is Allah's”, as explaining the reason for the preceding two clauses (whether He turns to them (mercifully) or chastises them), because the concluding clauses specifically explain this matter: “He forgives whom He pleases and chastises whom He pleases.”

The exegetes have described other ways to show the connection of the words, “That He may cut off a portion . “, and the significance of conjunction in the words, “whether He turns to them or chastises them”; also, they have given other justifications for the words, “You have no concern in the affair”, and for the sentence, “And whatever is in the heavens and whatever is in the earth is Allah's “. We have ignored them, as there was no use of commenting upon them, because they go against the apparent meanings and the context of the verses. Anyone wanting to see them should consult other bigger commentaries.

TRADITIONS

as-Sadiq (a.s.) said: “The cause of the battle of Uhud was as follows: When the Quraysh returned from Badr to Mecca - and it had befallen to them from slaughter and imprisonment what had befallen, because seventy of them were killed and seventy imprisoned - Abu Sufyan said: 'O people of Quraysh! Do not let your women weep on your dead, because if tear is shed it would remove the grief and (lessen) the hatred of Muhammad.' And when they fought the Messenger of Allah on the day of Uhud, they allowed their women to weep and lament; and they proceeded from Mecca with three thousand horse and two thousand-foot and brought their women with them.

“When the news reached the Messenger of Allah, he gathered his companions and exhorted them to fight. 'Abdullah ibn Ubayy ibn Salul said: 'O Messenger of Allah! Do not go out of Medina, so that we fight in its alleys; thus even a weak man, a woman, a slave-boy and a slave-girl would fight on the entrances of the lanes and on the roofs; because never did any people (who attacked us) defeat us when we were within our fortresses and homes; and never did we go out to meet an enemy of ours but they vanquished us.'

“Then Sa'd ibn Mu'adh and others from the tribe of Aws stood up and said: 'O Messenger of Allah! Never did anyone from the Arabs have any ambition against us while we were polytheist worshipping idols; how can they then be emboldened against us and you are among us? No: (we shall not rest) until we go out to them and fight them; whoever then among us will be killed shall be a martyr, and whoever among us is saved will have fought in the way of Allah.'

“So, the Messenger of Allah accepted his advice and came out with a group of his companions, fixing their places at the battle-ground; as Allah says: And when you did go forth early in the morning from your family . But 'Abdullah ibn Ubayy ibn Salul and a group of Khazraj who followed his opinion, held back from lthe Prophet).

“The Quraysh appeared at Uhud. The Messenger of Allah had positioned his companions - they were seven hundred men - and lodged 'Abdullah ibn Jubayr with fifty archers at the mouth of the mountain-pass; (the Prophet) was worried that the (enemy) might ambush from that side. Therefore, he said to 'Abdullah ibn Jubayr and his companions: 'If you see that we have defeated them until we have pushed them inside Mecca, you should not leave this place; and if you see that they have overcome us until they have pushed us into Medina, you should not leave (here), but stick to your posts.

“Abu Sufyan hid Khalid ibn Walid with two hundred horse with this (very idea of) ambush, and said to him: 'When you see that we (two forces) have mixed together, you come over to them from this mountain-pass, so that you will be (attacking them from) behind them.'

“The Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.a.) mobilized his companions; and gave the standard to the Commander of the faithful ('Ali a.s.). The Helpers attacked the polytheists of the Quraysh, and (the enemy) suffered an ignominious defeat. The companions of the Messenger of Allah laid hold of the masses of the (Quraysh). Khalid ibn Walid came with his two hundred horse over 'Abdullah ibn Jubayr; but they confronted them with arrows, and Khalid retreated. The group of 'Abdullah ibn Jubayr saw the companions of the Messenger of Allah looting the masses of the enemy; they said to 'Abdullah ibn Jubayr: 'Our companions are taking away (all) the booty; should we remain without any booty?' 'Abdullah told them: 'Fear Allah, because the Messenger of Allah had indeed directed us not to leave our post.' But they did not listen to him, and began slinking away one by one, until they left their station unattended, and 'Abdullah ibn Jubayr was left there with (only) twelve men.

“The standard of the Quraysh was in the hand of Talhah ibn Abi Talhah al-'Abdi (from Banu 'Abdu 'd-Dar); 'Ali- (a.s.) killed him; then Abu Sa'id ibn Abi Talhah took the standard and 'Ali killed him. The standard fell down. Then Musafi' ibn Abi Talhah took it but 'Ali killed him too until he killed nine people from Banu 'Abdu 'd-Dar. Finally their standard was taken up by a black-slave of theirs, Sawfib by name. 'All reached him and cut off his right hand; he took the standard in his left hand; 'All struck at it and cut it off too, but he embraced it to his chest with his two amputated hands. Then he turned towards Abu Sufyfin and said: 'Have I absolved Banu 'Abdu 'd-Dar from blame? ' Then 'Ali struck at his head and killed him. The standard fell down; then Ghamrah bint 'Alqamah al-Kinaniyyah took and raised it.

“Khalid ibn Walid came down to 'Abdullah ibn Jubayr - and his companions had fled leaving him with a few persons. (Khalid) killed (all of) them at the mouth of the pass, and then attacked the Muslims from behind. Quraysh were fleeing away when they saw their standard raised again, and they gathered around it, and the companions of the Messenger of Allah suffered utter defeat. They started climbing the mountains helter-skelter.

“When the Messenger of Allah saw the rout, he removed the helmet from his head and called (them, saying): 'Come to me; I am the Messenger of Allah; come to me; where are you running away from Allah and His Apostle?' Hind bint 'Utbah was in the middle of the (Quraysh's) army; whenever any Qurayshite fled, she offered him a kohl-stick and a kohl-container, telling him: 'You are but a woman, better use this kohl.'

“Hamzah ibn 'Abdi 'I-Muttalib was attacking the enemy. When they saw him, they fled; none stood against him. Hind had promised Wahshi that if he killed Muhammad or 'Ali or Hamzah, she would give him so-and-so much. (Wahshi was an Ethiopian slave of Jubayr ibn Mut'im). Wahshi said: 'As for Muhammad, I was unable (to harm) him; and as for 'Ali, I found him on his guard, always looking (all around him), so there was no hope of getting at him; therefore, I decided to ambush Hamzah. I saw him knocking the people down, destroying them. Then he passed by me, stepped on an undercut bank of a stream and fell down; I took my spear, shook it (taking aim) and threw it to him; it pierced his waist and came out between his legs (pubic region); then I went to him, ripped his stomach open, took out his liver and brought it to Hind; I said to her, “This is Hamzah's liver.” She put it into her mouth trying to chew it. But Allah made it in her mouth like a knee-cap, so she took it out and threw it.' (The Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.a.) said: 'Allah sent an angel who took it and returned it to its place.') Wahshi said: 'Then I came (back) to him, and I cut his genitals, removed his ears and amputated his hands and legs.'

“There remained no one with the Messenger of Allah except Abu Dujanah Simfik ibn Kharashah and 'Ali. Whenever any group attacked the Messenger of Allah, 'Ali faced them and repulsed them; (it continued) until his sword was broken; then the Messenger of Allah gave him his sword, Dhu 'l-Fiqar. The Messenger of Allah retired to a side of Uhud and stood there; and 'Ali continued fighting them so (valiantly) that he had got seventy wounds on his head, face, body, belly and legs - as narrated by 'Ali ibn Ibrahim in his at-Tafsir. Thereupon, Jibrial said: 'Verily, this is indeed the support, O Muhammad!' Muhammad (s.a.w.a.) replied; 'Surely he is from me and I am from him.' Jibril said: 'And I am from you two.' “

Abu 'Abdillah (a.s.) said: “The Messenger of Allah looked at Jibrial (sitting) on a golden chair between the heaven and the earth, and he was saying: 'There is no sword except Dhul 'l-Fiqar, and there is no hero except 'Ali. ' “ (Majma'u 'I-bayan)

al-Qummi narrates: “There (also) remained with the Messenger of Allah Nasibah bint Ka'b al-Maziniyyah - and she used to go with the Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.a.) in his battles to treat the wounded - and her son was with her. He wanted to retreat and go back (to Medina); but she attacked him and said: 'O my son, where are you fleeing from Allah and His Messenger?' Thus she made him come back. Then a man attacked and killed him. Thereupon, she took her son's sword and attacked that man, and striking at his thigh she killed him. The Messenger of Allah said (to her): 'May Allah bless you, O Nasibah.' She was protecting the Messenger of Allah with her chest and breasts until she was extensively wounded.

“Ibn Qami'ah attacked the Messenger of Allah; and he had said: 'Show me Muhammad. May I be damned if he gets away (from me).' Then he hit (the Messenger of Allah) on his shoulder and cried: l have killed Muhammad, by al-Lat and al-'Uzza.' “ (at- Talsir)

The author say: There are some other traditions about the events of Uhud, some of them disagree with this one in some details. For example:

a) This tradition gives the number of the polytheists as five thousand, while most of the traditions say three thousand.

b) It says that it was 'Ali (a.s.) who killed all the nine standard-bearers of the enemy. Other traditions support it; and Ibnu 'l-Athir has narrated it in his history, al-kenil, from Abu Rafi'. But another group of narrations attributes slaying of some of them to some others. But meditation on these events supports what the present tradition says.

c) It says that it was Hind who made a covenant with Wahshi regarding the murder of Hamzah. Some Sunni narrations say that' it was not Hind but Wahshi's master, Jubayr ibn Mut'im, who had entrusted this task to Wahshi, promising to emancipate him on his slaying Hamzah. But the fact that Wahshi had taken Hamzah's liver, not to Jubayr, but to Hind, supports the present tradition.

d) This tradition says that all Muslims had fled away, except 'Ali and Abu Dujanah. It is agreed upon by almost all traditions. But some other narrations add some more names, and if you add all the names it would appear that there had remained about thirty persons with the Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.a.). But those traditions cancel each other. If you ponder on the events and the circumstantial evidence, the truth will become clear to you. You should not forget that these stories and traditions are a sort of witness for various tendencies - for and against - and have passed through many bright and dark strata before reaching us.

e) This tradition says that Allah sent an angel who returned Hamzah's liver to its place. This statement is not found in most of the traditions. A different version is found in some other narrations. For example, (the author of) ad-Durru'l-manthur, narrates from Ibn Abi Shaybah, Ahmad and Ibn al-Mundhir from Ibn Mas'ud, inter alia, in a hadith that he said: “Then Abu Sufyan said: 'There was some mutilation of the people (i.e.- of Muslim martyrs), although it was not done by the majority of us. Neither I ordered it nor forbade it; neither I liked it nor disliked it; neither it pleased me nor displeased me.' “ (Ibn Mas'ud) said: “Then they looked, and there was Hamzah with his belly ripped open. Hind took his liver and chewed it, but she could not eat it. The Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.a.) asked: 'Did she eat any part of it?' They said: 'No.' (The Messenger of Allah) said: 'Allah could not allow any part of Hamzah to enter the Fire.' “

Traditions, both ours and others', say that the Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.a.) was seriously wounded that day; there was skull fracture in his forehead, and his incisors were broken and middle incisor damaged. .

Ibn Ishaq, 'Abd ibn Hamid, Ibn Jarir and Ibn al-Mundhir narrate from Ibn Shahab, Muhammad ibn Yahya ibn Hayyan, 'Asim ibn 'Amr ibn Qatadah and al-Hasin ibn 'Abdi 'r-Rahman ibn 'Amr ibn Sa'd ibn Mu'adh and others - all have narrated some of the events of the battle of Uhud: They have said: “When Quraysh suffered on the day of Badr, and the scattered remnants of their army reached Mecca, and Abu Sufyan too returned with his trade - caravan, then 'Abdullah ibn Abi Rabi 'ah, 'Ikrimah ibn Abi Jahl and Safwan ibn Umayyah together with some other Qurayshites (whose fathers, sons and/or brothers were killed in Badr), went to him. They talked with Abu Sufyan and all those who had any trade-goods in that caravan and suggested (as follows): 'O people of Quraysh, surely Muhammad has aggrieved you and killed your best personalities. Therefore, help us with this wealth to fight against him, in order that we may take revenge of our casualties from him.' They did so. Then the Quraysh resolved to fight the Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.a.), and came out with the flower of their army. They also took their women with them for their protection and also in order that they would not flee (from the battle-ground). Abu Sufyan came out at the head of the army. They proceeded until they came down at 'Aynayn - a mountain in the depth of as-Sanjah on a canal in the valley adjoining Medina.

“When the Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.a.) and the Muslims heard about the polytheists that they had come down where they did, the Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.a.) said: 'I have seen (in dream) a cow slaughtered, and saw the tip of my sword jagged, and saw that I had put my hand in an invulnerable coat of mail, and I interpreted it (to mean) Medina. Therefore, if you think (it advisable), you should stay inside Medina and leave them where they have come down; then if they stayed (there) they would be staying in the worst place, and if they entered (our City) we should fight them in it.'

“The Quraysh occupied their position at Uhud on Wednesday, and stayed there on Thursday and Friday. The Messenger of Allah proceeded after praying the Friday-prayer and reached the mountain-pass of the Uhud. The two (forces) met on Saturday, 15th Shawwal, the third year (of hijrah).

“ 'Abdullah ibn Ubayy agreed with the opinion of the Messenger of Allah that they should not go out to meet the enemy; and the Messenger of Allah disliked going out of Medina. But some Muslims - some from among those whom Allah later honoured with martyrdom in Uhud, and some others who had missed the battle of Badr and were not present on that occasion - said: 'O Messenger of Allah, come out with us against our enemies, so that they should not think that we were afraid of them or felt weaker.' 'Abdullah ibn Ubayy said: 'O Messenger of Allah, stay inside Medina and do not go out to meet them. Because, by God, we never went out of it to meet an enemy of us but he bested us, and never did an enemy enter Medina to fight us but we vanquished them. Therefore, let them be, O Messenger of Allah; then if they stayed they would stay with difficulty; and if they entered (the City) even the women, children and men would fight them with stones from above (the roofs); and if they returned, they would return disappointed as they had come.'

“But the people were still urging the Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.a.) (to proceed out of Medina) - these were the people who wanted to fight against the enemy. (This continued) until the Messenger of Allah entered (his house) and wore his cuirasses - and it was on Friday after the prayer - then he came out to (the companions). In the meantime the people regretted (their persistence) and said (to the Prophet): ' We have compelled the Messenger of Allah and it was not good of us. Therefore you may sit back if you wish.' The Messenger of Allah said: ' It is not proper for a prophet - once he has put on his cuirasses - to remove them without waging the war.'

“The Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.a.) came out with one thousand of his companions. When they were proceeding between Medina and Uhud, 'Abdullah ibn Ubayy went back with one-third of the people, (leaving the Prophet). The Messenger of Allah proceeded on. When he was passing through the story field of Banu Harithah, a horse whisked its tail which caught the sword-tip (of the rider) and pulled it out. The Messenger of Allah (who liked good omens but did not believe in bad ones) said to the owner of the sword:: 'Gather your sword, because I find that swords will surely be drawn today.' The Messenger of Allah went on until he came down at the mountain-pass of the Uhud from the run of the valley to the mountain. He kept Uhud at his back, and took position for the battle - and there were seven hundred persons with him.

“The Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.a.) gave the command of the archers - and they were fifty in number - to 'Abdullah ibn Jubayr, and said to him: 'Protect us from the mountain (side) by arrow, so that they do not come to us from our behind; you stay at your place, no matter the battle goes against us or for us; (because) we shall be attached from your side.' The Messenger of Allah was wearing two coats of mail.” (ad-Durru 'I-manthur)

Ibn Jarir narrates from as-Suddi in a hadith, enter alia: “The Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.a.) proceeded to Uhud with one thousand men. He had promised them victory if they would remain patient. Then 'Abdullah ibn Ubayy returned back with three hundred persons. Abu Jabir as-Salami persued them to call them back; but they thwarted his efforts and said to him: 'We do not know how to fight; and if you listen to us you too should come back (to Medina) with us.' “ (ibid.)

as-Suddi said about the words: When two parties from among you had determined that they should show cowardice: “They were Banu Salmah and Banu Harithah who wanted to return when 'Abdullah ibn Ubayy went back, but Allah protected them; and the Messenger of Allah remained with seven hundred men.” (ibid.)

The author says: These were two clans from among the Helpers: Banu Salmah from the Khazraj and Banu Harithah from the Aws.

Ibn Abi Ishaq, as-Suddi, al-Waqidi, Ibn Jarir and others have narrated: “The polytheists reached Uhud on Wednesday in Shawwal, 3 A.H., and the Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.a.) proceeded to meet them on Friday; and the battle took place on Saturday, 15th Shawwal. The incisors of the Messenger of Allah were broken and his face was wounded. Then the Emigrants and the Helpers returned after fleeing away; and seventy of the Muslims were martyred. The Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.a.) stood firm accompanied by those who had remained with him until he removed (the enemies). The polytheists had mutilated a group (of martyrs), but Hamzah was mutilated worst of all.” (Majma 'u 'l-bayan)

The author says: There is a great number of traditions about the events of Uhud. We have narrated, and shall narrate later, only a few of them, on which depends understanding of the verses revealed on this subject. These verses throw light on its various aspects:

Some deal with the cowardice of those who retreated or disagreed with each other or wanted to return to Medina cowardly.

Others admonish and censure those who had fled leaving the Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.a.) in the thick of the battle - although Allah had forbidden them to do so.

Still others praise those who were martyred before the others had fled, and those who bravely stood firm and did not leave the Prophet, and continued to fight till their last breath.

Lastly, there are verses extolling those who steadfastly continued to fight till the end of the battle but were not martyred.

Volume 7: Surah Ale-Imran, Verses 121-129

وَإِذْ غَدَوْتَ مِنْ أَهْلِكَ تُبَوِّئُ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ مَقَاعِدَ لِلْقِتَالِۗ وَاللَّـهُ سَمِيعٌ عَلِيمٌ ﴿١٢١﴾ إِذْ هَمَّت طَّائِفَتَانِ مِنكُمْ أَن تَفْشَلَا وَاللَّـهُ وَلِيُّهُمَاۗ وَعَلَى اللَّـهِ فَلْيَتَوَكَّلِ الْمُؤْمِنُونَ ﴿١٢٢﴾ وَلَقَدْ نَصَرَكُمُ اللَّـهُ بِبَدْرٍ وَأَنتُمْ أَذِلَّةٌۖ فَاتَّقُوا اللَّـهَ لَعَلَّكُمْ تَشْكُرُونَ ﴿١٢٣﴾ إِذْ تَقُولُ لِلْمُؤْمِنِينَ أَلَن يَكْفِيَكُمْ أَن يُمِدَّكُمْ رَبُّكُم بِثَلَاثَةِ آلَافٍ مِّنَ الْمَلَائِكَةِ مُنزَلِينَ ﴿١٢٤﴾ بَلَىٰۚ إِن تَصْبِرُوا وَتَتَّقُوا وَيَأْتُوكُم مِّن فَوْرِهِمْ هَـٰذَا يُمْدِدْكُمْ رَبُّكُم بِخَمْسَةِ آلَافٍ مِّنَ الْمَلَائِكَةِ مُسَوِّمِينَ ﴿١٢٥﴾ وَمَا جَعَلَهُ اللَّـهُ إِلَّا بُشْرَىٰ لَكُمْ وَلِتَطْمَئِنَّ قُلُوبُكُم بِهِۗ وَمَا النَّصْرُ إِلَّا مِنْ عِندِ اللَّـهِ الْعَزِيزِ الْحَكِيمِ ﴿١٢٦﴾ لِيَقْطَعَ طَرَفًا مِّنَ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا أَوْ يَكْبِتَهُمْ فَيَنقَلِبُوا خَائِبِينَ ﴿١٢٧﴾ لَيْسَ لَكَ مِنَ الْأَمْرِ شَيْءٌ أَوْ يَتُوبَ عَلَيْهِمْ أَوْ يُعَذِّبَهُمْ فَإِنَّهُمْ ظَالِمُونَ ﴿١٢٨﴾ وَلِلَّـهِ مَا فِي السَّمَاوَاتِ وَمَا فِي الْأَرْضِۚ يَغْفِرُ لِمَن يَشَاءُ وَيُعَذِّبُ مَن يَشَاءُۚ وَاللَّـهُ غَفُورٌ رَّحِيمٌ ﴿١٢٩﴾

And when you did go forth early in the morning from your family to lodge the believers in encampments for war; and Allah is Hearing, Knowing (121). When two parties from among you had determined that they should show cowardice and Allah was the guardian of them both, and in Allah should the believers trust (122). And Allah did certainly assist you at Badr when you were weak; fear Allah then that you may give thanks (123). When you said to the believers: “Does it not suffice you that your Lord should assist you with three thousand of the angels sent down? (124). Yea! if you remain patient and are on your guard (against evil), and they come upon you in a headlong manner, your Lord will assist you with five thousand of the havoc-making angels” (125). And Allah did not make it but as good news for you, and that your hearts might be at ease thereby, and help is only from Allah, the Mighty, the Wise (126). That He may cut off a portion from among those who disbelieve, or abase them so that they should return disappointed of attaining what they desired (127). You have no concern in the affair whether He turns to them (mercifully) or chastises them, for surely they are unjust (128). And whatever is in the heavens and whatever is in the earth is Allah's; He forgives whom He pleases and chastises whom He pleases; and Allah is Forgiving, Merciful (129).

COMMENTARY

Now the discourse turns back to what the chapter had begun with: Warning the believers of the serious situation they were in; reminding them of Allah's favors bestowed on them, that is, true belief, divine help and the fact that Allah is sufficient for them; teaching them what would lead them to their noble goal; and guiding them to what would make them happy in this life and the hereafter.

It describes the battle of Uhud. There are some verses referring to the battle of Badr, but they are like supplement inserted here for cross-reference, and as we shall explain later, they are not meant as main topic here.

QUR'AN: And when you did go forth early in the morning from your family to lodge the believers in encampments for war:

“When” in Arabic is adverb of time related to a deleted verb e.g. “Remember” or similar verbs; “ghadawta ” translated here as “you did go forth early in the morning” is derived from al-ghadw (to come out early in the morning); attabwi'ah means to prepare a place for someone, or to put him in a place; ma-qa'id is plural (of seat; translated here as encampment). Ahl of a man, according to ar-Raghib, are those who are joined to him in genealogy or house or other such things like religion, town or handicraft. Thus ahl of a man refers to his wife and all those who are in his house, like wife, child, servant, etc.; also it denotes all who are related to him like his family or clan; residents of a town or followers of a religion are called ahl of that town or religion; artisans and masters of a handicraft are called ahl of that art or handicraft. The word “ahl” is used for masculine and feminine both; also for singular and plural alike. Its use is exclusively reserved for human beings; ahl of a thing are the people related to it exclusively.

“Ahl” of the Messenger of Allah are therefore the people exclusively related to him. Here it refers to a group - not to a single person. It may be understood from the expression, “you did go forth early in the morning from your family”, because it may be said, “You went forth from your relatives and your group “; but it cannot be said, “You went forth from your wife “ or “from your mother”. An exegete mistakenly has thought that ahl refers to singular only, and therefore has had to say that there was some word deleted (but understood) from the verse; according to him the verse means, “did go forth . from the house of your family” But as you have seen nothing in this verse demands such interpretation.

The preceding and following verses are addressed to the believers as a group. But the verses under discussion turn from plural to singular; they are addressed not to the believers but to the Messenger of Allah alone. Apparently this diversion has some connection with the shade of displeasure found in the verses dealing with this battle: there is an undercurrent of reproach, censure and stricture running throughout for what the Muslims had done (in the battle of Uhud) where they had shown cowardice and lack of will-power and courage. Therefore, whenever a topic comes which exclusively concerns the Prophet, Allah ignores and disregards the believers and speaks to the Prophet alone. Thus Allah says: And when you did go forth early in the morning from your family; When you said to the believers: “Does it not suffice you that your Lord should assist you. . “; You have no concern in the affair; Say: “Surely the affair is wholly (in the hands) of Allah “ (3:154); Thus it is due to the mercy from Allah that you deal with them gently, and had you been rough, hardhearted, they would certainly have dispersed from around you (3:159); And reckon not those who are killed in Allah's way as dead (3:169).

In all the above verses plural verbs and pronouns have been changed to singular. It seems as though the speaker is not in a mood to continue the preceding style (of speaking to the whole community) because he is very much annoyed and displeased with them.

It is unlike some other verses coming in between where effectiveness and sharpness of admonition depended on direct talk with the believers and therefore the plural was used. For example: And Muhammad is no more than a messenger, the messengers have already passed away before him; if then he dies or is killed, will you turn back upon your heals? (3:144); When you ran off precipitately and did not turn towards any one, and the Messenger was calling you from your rear (3:153) .

Also it is unlike another intervening verse, that is: Certainly Allah conferred a benefit upon the believers when He raised among them a Messenger from among themselves, reciting to them His communications (3:164). Here Allah describes His favor on the believers of sending the Prophet to them; and it could be effective and more impressive only if it was supposed as if the Prophet himself were not present there. Ponder on all these verses and you will appreciate the relevance of what we have written.

The verse under discussion means as follows: O Prophet, remember when you did go forth early in the morning from your family in order that you should place the believers in their sectors for war; and Allah is Hearing (He had heard what was said there) and Knowing (He had known what was hidden in their hearts). The expression, “you did go forth early in the morning from your family”, indicates that the battleground was nearer to the Prophet's house. It clearly shows that the two verses refer to the battle of Uhud, and in this way they are related to other verses, which would follow later, and which describe the battle of Uhud. All these verses fit the events, which had taken place in Uhud.

This shows the weakness of the claim that these two verses were revealed about the battle of Badr, or, as someone else said, about the battle of the Confederates. And it is obvious (from the context).

QUR'AN: and Allah is Hearing, Knowing:

He is Hearing, He had heard what was spoken there; and Knowing, He knew what was hidden in their hearts. It indicates that some Muslims had spoken there some (undesirable) things, and there were other things, which they had not disclosed to others.

Apparently the next clause, “When two parties from among you had determined that they should show cowardice”, is related to these two attributes, (i.e., Allah heard and knew the conspiracy and intention of the two parties when they had determined to show cowardice).

QUR'AN: When two parties from among you had determined that they should show cowardice, and Allah was the guardian of them both:

“al-Hamm” what you determine in your heart; intention); al-fashl (weakness with cowardice).

“and Allah was the guardian of them both”: This is a circumstantial clause, related to the verb, “had determined “. It is meant as an admonition and reproof, as is the concluding sentence, “and in Allah should the believers trust”. The connotation is as follows: The two parties had determined to show cowardice although Allah was their guardian - and a believer should not show weakness and cowardice when he believes that Allah is his guardian and when he is supposed to entrust all his affairs to Allah, and whoever trusts in Allah then He is sufficient for him.

This explanation shows the weakness of an interpretation offered by an exegete who says: This intention of the two parties was merely a thought, a notion, not a determination, because Allah has praised them and said that He was their guardian. Had it been a firm determination and intention, they should have been blamed rather than praised.

But I do not understand what he means when he says that it was merely a thought, a notion. Does he mean merely a passing thought, a knowledge what cowardice means? If so, then everyone present there knew the meaning of cowardice, and it makes no sense to mention it in this context; nor is it called “determination” in Arabic language. Or, does he mean knowledge of cowardice coupled with some intention; a notion with determination to act upon it? (If so, then it was not merely a thought or a notion.) Also, the verse shows that the condition of the two parties was obvious to the others; had it been merely a passing thought without showing any effect on their behavior, others would not have known that they had determined to show weakness and cowardice. Moreover, the reminder that Allah was their guardian and that the believers must put their trust in Allah, dovetails with firm determination, not with a passing thought. And in any case, we have explained that in the present context, the clause, “and Allah was the guardian of them both”, is not intended as a praise, it is a reproof, an admonition.

Perhaps this misunderstanding has sprung up from a tradition attributed to Jabir ibn 'Abdillah al-Ansar; in which he says: “(This verse) was revealed about us; and I would not prefer if it were not revealed, because Allah has said, and Allah was the guardian of them both.” The said exegete probably thought that Jabir had taken the clause as a praise.

Even if the said tradition were accepted as correct, Jabir's theme is different from what that exegete has thought. Jabir means that Allah then accepted their belief and confirmed that they were believers, because He counted Himself as their guardian, and Allah is the guardian of those who believe, a d as for that this clause implies any praise, when it has been put in this contact of clear reprimand and censure.

QUR'AN: And Allah did certainly assist you at Badr when you were weak; fear Allah then, that you may give thanks:

The context obviously shows that this verse has been revealed here as a supporting evidence to emphasize the stricture, to complete the reproof. If so, then this too would be a circumstantial clause, like the preceding one, “and Allah was the guardian of them both.” Its connotation then would be as follows: You should not have determined to show cowardice while Allah had certainly assisted you at Badr when you were weak. On the other-hand, it might be an independent sentence revealed here to remind them of the wonderful assistance provided to them at Badr, when Allah had sent down the angels to help them when they were weak.

Allah mentions here the help sent by Him to them at Badr, and compares their present condition with that; and it is known that whoever becomes strong, does so only with Allah's help and His assistance, because man, per se, has nothing except neediness and weakness. That is why Allah says: “when you were weak”.

It many be understood from the above that the statement, “when you were weak”, does not disagree with such other divine words as, and to Allah belongs the might and to His Messenger and to the believers 163:8), because the believers' might springs from the might of Allah, as He says: Then surely all might is for Allah (4:139); and it proceeds from the divine help given to the believers, as Allah says: And certainly We sent before you messengers to their people, so they came to them with clear arguments, then We gave the punishment to those who were guilty; and helping the believers is ever incumbent upon Us (30:47). In this situation if we look at the condition of the believers, per se, they have got nothing except weakness.

Apart from that, if we look at the believers' condition in Badr, we shall have to admit that they were certainly weaker in comparison to the strength, might and élan the polytheists had had. And there is no difficulty in ascribing a relative weakness to otherwise mighty ones. Allah has ascribed it to a people whom

He has praised very extensively, when He says: . then soon Allah will bring a people that He shall love them and they shall love Him, humble (adhillah, lit: weak) before the believers, mighty against the unbelievers. . (5:54).

QUR'AN: When you said to the believers: “Does it not suffice you that your Lord should assist you ....

“al-Imdad “ is derived from al-madd and signifies giving al-madad (help) continuously.

QUR'AN: “Yea! if you remain patient and are on your guard (against evil), and they come upon you in a headlong manner. “:

“Bala” (Yea) is used for affirmation; al-fawr and al-fawran means to boil; they say, fara 'l-qidr (the cooking-pot boiled up); then the word was used to denote hurry and haste. Thus the phrase, min fawrihim hadha (- translated here as, in a headlong manner) means, ' at once ', 'immediately '.

Obviously, the promise refers to the battle of Badr. It is a conditional promise, and the conditions are given in these clauses, “if you remain patient and are on your guard and they come upon you in a headlong manner”.

An exegete has written that it is a promise to send down the angels if they came upon the believers (not “immediately”, i.e. not on the day of Badr, but) after the immediate time, i.e. after the battle of Badr. Another one has written that it is a promise to send down the angels in all the battles after the Badr, like Uhud, Hunayn and the Confederates. But the wording of the verse does not agree with it.

As for Uhud, there is obviously nothing in the verses that might allude to coming of the angels on that day. So far as the battles of the Confederates and Hunayn are concerned, the Qur'an, of course, says (in other places) that the angels were sent on those days: It says about the battle of the Confederates: . when there came down upon you hosts, so We sent against them a strong wind and hosts that you saw not . (33:9). And it says about the day of Hunayn: … and on the day of Hunayn …and sent down hosts which you did not see. (9:25-26). Nevertheless, the wording of the verse under discussions, “Yea! if you remain patient and are on your guard (against evil) and they come upon you in a headlong manner”, does not show any general promise.

There is no conflict between this verse which speaks of three thousand angels being sent down at Badr, and the statement of the chapter of al-Anfal, which says: . so He answered you: “I will assist you with a thousand of angels following (after others) “ (8:9) The word, “following”, indicates that they would follow others - the “others” referring to the remaining two thousand who would complete the number promised in this verse.

QUR'AN: And Allah did not make it but as good news for you, . and help is only form Allah, the Mighty, the Wise:

The pronoun “it” refers to the help. 'Ind (near) is an adverb of place, indicating presence. Initially it was used for nearness and presence in place; obviously it was reserved for physical things. Then its circle widened and it was used for nearness in time. Finally it was used for general, and even spiritual, nearness. The Qur'an has used it in various connotations.

The theme of the statement, “and help is only from Allah, the Mighty, the Wise”, when seen in conjunction with the preceding words, “And Allah did not make it but as good news for you, and that your hearts might be at ease thereby “, implies that the phrase, min 'indi 'llah (= lit: from near Allah) refers to that “station” of Lordship which every affair and every order emanates from; and without which nothing can suffice, nor can any cause be independent of it. The meaning therefore is as follows: The helper angels have in fact no concern with the promised help; they are merely apparent causes - they bring to you good news and satisfaction of heart. The reality of help is from Allah, nothing can suffice from Him; He is Allah, the final destination of every thing; the Mighty Who cannot be subdued, the Wise Who is not unaware of any thing.

QUR'AN: That He may cut off a portion from among those who disbelieve, or abase them . and chastises whom He pleases; and Allah is Forgiving, Merciful:

“That” is related to the verb, “And Allah did certainly assist you at Badr”. (He assisted you so that He may cut off...). 'Cutting off a portion' metaphorically means decreasing their number and debilitating them with slaying and imprisoning, as had happened at Badr where seventy idol worshippers were killed and seventy arrested. al-Kabt (to abase, to exasperate).

The clause, “You have no concern in the affair”, is a parenthetic one. It emphasizes the proposition that the authority of cutting off a portion from, or abasing them, is entirely in the hand of Allah; the Prophet has no concern in this matter - that they should praise and acclaim him if they vanquished and defeated their enemy, and should blame him and remonstrate with him if things went against them; they should not be infirm and grieving, as they had done on the day of Uhud - as Allah has narrated.

The next clause, “whether He turns to them (mercifully) or chastises them”, is in conjunction with the preceding, “That He may cut off . .”, and the sentence is continuing. The next verse, “And whatever is in the heavens and whatever is in the earth is Allah's”, is explicative clause describing why the matter of repentance and forgiveness rests exclusively in the hand of Allah. The meaning is as follows: The sound arrangement (at Badr) were made by Allah in order that He might cut off a portion of the polytheists through slaughter and imprisonment, or abase them and disappoint them of attaining what they had desired, or that He might turn to them mercifully or chastise them. As for the cutting off a portion of them and abasing them, it is because all affairs are in His hands, you have no concern in it, (so they should neither praise nor blame you in this affair); and as for repentance and forgiveness, it is because Allah is the Owner of everything, He forgives whom He pleases and chastises whom He pleases. Even then, His forgiveness and mercy surpasses His chastisement and anger, because He is Forgiving, Merciful.

We have treated the sentence, “And whatever is in the heaven and whatever is in the earth is Allah's”, as explaining the reason for the preceding two clauses (whether He turns to them (mercifully) or chastises them), because the concluding clauses specifically explain this matter: “He forgives whom He pleases and chastises whom He pleases.”

The exegetes have described other ways to show the connection of the words, “That He may cut off a portion . “, and the significance of conjunction in the words, “whether He turns to them or chastises them”; also, they have given other justifications for the words, “You have no concern in the affair”, and for the sentence, “And whatever is in the heavens and whatever is in the earth is Allah's “. We have ignored them, as there was no use of commenting upon them, because they go against the apparent meanings and the context of the verses. Anyone wanting to see them should consult other bigger commentaries.

TRADITIONS

as-Sadiq (a.s.) said: “The cause of the battle of Uhud was as follows: When the Quraysh returned from Badr to Mecca - and it had befallen to them from slaughter and imprisonment what had befallen, because seventy of them were killed and seventy imprisoned - Abu Sufyan said: 'O people of Quraysh! Do not let your women weep on your dead, because if tear is shed it would remove the grief and (lessen) the hatred of Muhammad.' And when they fought the Messenger of Allah on the day of Uhud, they allowed their women to weep and lament; and they proceeded from Mecca with three thousand horse and two thousand-foot and brought their women with them.

“When the news reached the Messenger of Allah, he gathered his companions and exhorted them to fight. 'Abdullah ibn Ubayy ibn Salul said: 'O Messenger of Allah! Do not go out of Medina, so that we fight in its alleys; thus even a weak man, a woman, a slave-boy and a slave-girl would fight on the entrances of the lanes and on the roofs; because never did any people (who attacked us) defeat us when we were within our fortresses and homes; and never did we go out to meet an enemy of ours but they vanquished us.'

“Then Sa'd ibn Mu'adh and others from the tribe of Aws stood up and said: 'O Messenger of Allah! Never did anyone from the Arabs have any ambition against us while we were polytheist worshipping idols; how can they then be emboldened against us and you are among us? No: (we shall not rest) until we go out to them and fight them; whoever then among us will be killed shall be a martyr, and whoever among us is saved will have fought in the way of Allah.'

“So, the Messenger of Allah accepted his advice and came out with a group of his companions, fixing their places at the battle-ground; as Allah says: And when you did go forth early in the morning from your family . But 'Abdullah ibn Ubayy ibn Salul and a group of Khazraj who followed his opinion, held back from lthe Prophet).

“The Quraysh appeared at Uhud. The Messenger of Allah had positioned his companions - they were seven hundred men - and lodged 'Abdullah ibn Jubayr with fifty archers at the mouth of the mountain-pass; (the Prophet) was worried that the (enemy) might ambush from that side. Therefore, he said to 'Abdullah ibn Jubayr and his companions: 'If you see that we have defeated them until we have pushed them inside Mecca, you should not leave this place; and if you see that they have overcome us until they have pushed us into Medina, you should not leave (here), but stick to your posts.

“Abu Sufyan hid Khalid ibn Walid with two hundred horse with this (very idea of) ambush, and said to him: 'When you see that we (two forces) have mixed together, you come over to them from this mountain-pass, so that you will be (attacking them from) behind them.'

“The Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.a.) mobilized his companions; and gave the standard to the Commander of the faithful ('Ali a.s.). The Helpers attacked the polytheists of the Quraysh, and (the enemy) suffered an ignominious defeat. The companions of the Messenger of Allah laid hold of the masses of the (Quraysh). Khalid ibn Walid came with his two hundred horse over 'Abdullah ibn Jubayr; but they confronted them with arrows, and Khalid retreated. The group of 'Abdullah ibn Jubayr saw the companions of the Messenger of Allah looting the masses of the enemy; they said to 'Abdullah ibn Jubayr: 'Our companions are taking away (all) the booty; should we remain without any booty?' 'Abdullah told them: 'Fear Allah, because the Messenger of Allah had indeed directed us not to leave our post.' But they did not listen to him, and began slinking away one by one, until they left their station unattended, and 'Abdullah ibn Jubayr was left there with (only) twelve men.

“The standard of the Quraysh was in the hand of Talhah ibn Abi Talhah al-'Abdi (from Banu 'Abdu 'd-Dar); 'Ali- (a.s.) killed him; then Abu Sa'id ibn Abi Talhah took the standard and 'Ali killed him. The standard fell down. Then Musafi' ibn Abi Talhah took it but 'Ali killed him too until he killed nine people from Banu 'Abdu 'd-Dar. Finally their standard was taken up by a black-slave of theirs, Sawfib by name. 'All reached him and cut off his right hand; he took the standard in his left hand; 'All struck at it and cut it off too, but he embraced it to his chest with his two amputated hands. Then he turned towards Abu Sufyfin and said: 'Have I absolved Banu 'Abdu 'd-Dar from blame? ' Then 'Ali struck at his head and killed him. The standard fell down; then Ghamrah bint 'Alqamah al-Kinaniyyah took and raised it.

“Khalid ibn Walid came down to 'Abdullah ibn Jubayr - and his companions had fled leaving him with a few persons. (Khalid) killed (all of) them at the mouth of the pass, and then attacked the Muslims from behind. Quraysh were fleeing away when they saw their standard raised again, and they gathered around it, and the companions of the Messenger of Allah suffered utter defeat. They started climbing the mountains helter-skelter.

“When the Messenger of Allah saw the rout, he removed the helmet from his head and called (them, saying): 'Come to me; I am the Messenger of Allah; come to me; where are you running away from Allah and His Apostle?' Hind bint 'Utbah was in the middle of the (Quraysh's) army; whenever any Qurayshite fled, she offered him a kohl-stick and a kohl-container, telling him: 'You are but a woman, better use this kohl.'

“Hamzah ibn 'Abdi 'I-Muttalib was attacking the enemy. When they saw him, they fled; none stood against him. Hind had promised Wahshi that if he killed Muhammad or 'Ali or Hamzah, she would give him so-and-so much. (Wahshi was an Ethiopian slave of Jubayr ibn Mut'im). Wahshi said: 'As for Muhammad, I was unable (to harm) him; and as for 'Ali, I found him on his guard, always looking (all around him), so there was no hope of getting at him; therefore, I decided to ambush Hamzah. I saw him knocking the people down, destroying them. Then he passed by me, stepped on an undercut bank of a stream and fell down; I took my spear, shook it (taking aim) and threw it to him; it pierced his waist and came out between his legs (pubic region); then I went to him, ripped his stomach open, took out his liver and brought it to Hind; I said to her, “This is Hamzah's liver.” She put it into her mouth trying to chew it. But Allah made it in her mouth like a knee-cap, so she took it out and threw it.' (The Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.a.) said: 'Allah sent an angel who took it and returned it to its place.') Wahshi said: 'Then I came (back) to him, and I cut his genitals, removed his ears and amputated his hands and legs.'

“There remained no one with the Messenger of Allah except Abu Dujanah Simfik ibn Kharashah and 'Ali. Whenever any group attacked the Messenger of Allah, 'Ali faced them and repulsed them; (it continued) until his sword was broken; then the Messenger of Allah gave him his sword, Dhu 'l-Fiqar. The Messenger of Allah retired to a side of Uhud and stood there; and 'Ali continued fighting them so (valiantly) that he had got seventy wounds on his head, face, body, belly and legs - as narrated by 'Ali ibn Ibrahim in his at-Tafsir. Thereupon, Jibrial said: 'Verily, this is indeed the support, O Muhammad!' Muhammad (s.a.w.a.) replied; 'Surely he is from me and I am from him.' Jibril said: 'And I am from you two.' “

Abu 'Abdillah (a.s.) said: “The Messenger of Allah looked at Jibrial (sitting) on a golden chair between the heaven and the earth, and he was saying: 'There is no sword except Dhul 'l-Fiqar, and there is no hero except 'Ali. ' “ (Majma'u 'I-bayan)

al-Qummi narrates: “There (also) remained with the Messenger of Allah Nasibah bint Ka'b al-Maziniyyah - and she used to go with the Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.a.) in his battles to treat the wounded - and her son was with her. He wanted to retreat and go back (to Medina); but she attacked him and said: 'O my son, where are you fleeing from Allah and His Messenger?' Thus she made him come back. Then a man attacked and killed him. Thereupon, she took her son's sword and attacked that man, and striking at his thigh she killed him. The Messenger of Allah said (to her): 'May Allah bless you, O Nasibah.' She was protecting the Messenger of Allah with her chest and breasts until she was extensively wounded.

“Ibn Qami'ah attacked the Messenger of Allah; and he had said: 'Show me Muhammad. May I be damned if he gets away (from me).' Then he hit (the Messenger of Allah) on his shoulder and cried: l have killed Muhammad, by al-Lat and al-'Uzza.' “ (at- Talsir)

The author say: There are some other traditions about the events of Uhud, some of them disagree with this one in some details. For example:

a) This tradition gives the number of the polytheists as five thousand, while most of the traditions say three thousand.

b) It says that it was 'Ali (a.s.) who killed all the nine standard-bearers of the enemy. Other traditions support it; and Ibnu 'l-Athir has narrated it in his history, al-kenil, from Abu Rafi'. But another group of narrations attributes slaying of some of them to some others. But meditation on these events supports what the present tradition says.

c) It says that it was Hind who made a covenant with Wahshi regarding the murder of Hamzah. Some Sunni narrations say that' it was not Hind but Wahshi's master, Jubayr ibn Mut'im, who had entrusted this task to Wahshi, promising to emancipate him on his slaying Hamzah. But the fact that Wahshi had taken Hamzah's liver, not to Jubayr, but to Hind, supports the present tradition.

d) This tradition says that all Muslims had fled away, except 'Ali and Abu Dujanah. It is agreed upon by almost all traditions. But some other narrations add some more names, and if you add all the names it would appear that there had remained about thirty persons with the Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.a.). But those traditions cancel each other. If you ponder on the events and the circumstantial evidence, the truth will become clear to you. You should not forget that these stories and traditions are a sort of witness for various tendencies - for and against - and have passed through many bright and dark strata before reaching us.

e) This tradition says that Allah sent an angel who returned Hamzah's liver to its place. This statement is not found in most of the traditions. A different version is found in some other narrations. For example, (the author of) ad-Durru'l-manthur, narrates from Ibn Abi Shaybah, Ahmad and Ibn al-Mundhir from Ibn Mas'ud, inter alia, in a hadith that he said: “Then Abu Sufyan said: 'There was some mutilation of the people (i.e.- of Muslim martyrs), although it was not done by the majority of us. Neither I ordered it nor forbade it; neither I liked it nor disliked it; neither it pleased me nor displeased me.' “ (Ibn Mas'ud) said: “Then they looked, and there was Hamzah with his belly ripped open. Hind took his liver and chewed it, but she could not eat it. The Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.a.) asked: 'Did she eat any part of it?' They said: 'No.' (The Messenger of Allah) said: 'Allah could not allow any part of Hamzah to enter the Fire.' “

Traditions, both ours and others', say that the Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.a.) was seriously wounded that day; there was skull fracture in his forehead, and his incisors were broken and middle incisor damaged. .

Ibn Ishaq, 'Abd ibn Hamid, Ibn Jarir and Ibn al-Mundhir narrate from Ibn Shahab, Muhammad ibn Yahya ibn Hayyan, 'Asim ibn 'Amr ibn Qatadah and al-Hasin ibn 'Abdi 'r-Rahman ibn 'Amr ibn Sa'd ibn Mu'adh and others - all have narrated some of the events of the battle of Uhud: They have said: “When Quraysh suffered on the day of Badr, and the scattered remnants of their army reached Mecca, and Abu Sufyan too returned with his trade - caravan, then 'Abdullah ibn Abi Rabi 'ah, 'Ikrimah ibn Abi Jahl and Safwan ibn Umayyah together with some other Qurayshites (whose fathers, sons and/or brothers were killed in Badr), went to him. They talked with Abu Sufyan and all those who had any trade-goods in that caravan and suggested (as follows): 'O people of Quraysh, surely Muhammad has aggrieved you and killed your best personalities. Therefore, help us with this wealth to fight against him, in order that we may take revenge of our casualties from him.' They did so. Then the Quraysh resolved to fight the Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.a.), and came out with the flower of their army. They also took their women with them for their protection and also in order that they would not flee (from the battle-ground). Abu Sufyan came out at the head of the army. They proceeded until they came down at 'Aynayn - a mountain in the depth of as-Sanjah on a canal in the valley adjoining Medina.

“When the Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.a.) and the Muslims heard about the polytheists that they had come down where they did, the Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.a.) said: 'I have seen (in dream) a cow slaughtered, and saw the tip of my sword jagged, and saw that I had put my hand in an invulnerable coat of mail, and I interpreted it (to mean) Medina. Therefore, if you think (it advisable), you should stay inside Medina and leave them where they have come down; then if they stayed (there) they would be staying in the worst place, and if they entered (our City) we should fight them in it.'

“The Quraysh occupied their position at Uhud on Wednesday, and stayed there on Thursday and Friday. The Messenger of Allah proceeded after praying the Friday-prayer and reached the mountain-pass of the Uhud. The two (forces) met on Saturday, 15th Shawwal, the third year (of hijrah).

“ 'Abdullah ibn Ubayy agreed with the opinion of the Messenger of Allah that they should not go out to meet the enemy; and the Messenger of Allah disliked going out of Medina. But some Muslims - some from among those whom Allah later honoured with martyrdom in Uhud, and some others who had missed the battle of Badr and were not present on that occasion - said: 'O Messenger of Allah, come out with us against our enemies, so that they should not think that we were afraid of them or felt weaker.' 'Abdullah ibn Ubayy said: 'O Messenger of Allah, stay inside Medina and do not go out to meet them. Because, by God, we never went out of it to meet an enemy of us but he bested us, and never did an enemy enter Medina to fight us but we vanquished them. Therefore, let them be, O Messenger of Allah; then if they stayed they would stay with difficulty; and if they entered (the City) even the women, children and men would fight them with stones from above (the roofs); and if they returned, they would return disappointed as they had come.'

“But the people were still urging the Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.a.) (to proceed out of Medina) - these were the people who wanted to fight against the enemy. (This continued) until the Messenger of Allah entered (his house) and wore his cuirasses - and it was on Friday after the prayer - then he came out to (the companions). In the meantime the people regretted (their persistence) and said (to the Prophet): ' We have compelled the Messenger of Allah and it was not good of us. Therefore you may sit back if you wish.' The Messenger of Allah said: ' It is not proper for a prophet - once he has put on his cuirasses - to remove them without waging the war.'

“The Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.a.) came out with one thousand of his companions. When they were proceeding between Medina and Uhud, 'Abdullah ibn Ubayy went back with one-third of the people, (leaving the Prophet). The Messenger of Allah proceeded on. When he was passing through the story field of Banu Harithah, a horse whisked its tail which caught the sword-tip (of the rider) and pulled it out. The Messenger of Allah (who liked good omens but did not believe in bad ones) said to the owner of the sword:: 'Gather your sword, because I find that swords will surely be drawn today.' The Messenger of Allah went on until he came down at the mountain-pass of the Uhud from the run of the valley to the mountain. He kept Uhud at his back, and took position for the battle - and there were seven hundred persons with him.

“The Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.a.) gave the command of the archers - and they were fifty in number - to 'Abdullah ibn Jubayr, and said to him: 'Protect us from the mountain (side) by arrow, so that they do not come to us from our behind; you stay at your place, no matter the battle goes against us or for us; (because) we shall be attached from your side.' The Messenger of Allah was wearing two coats of mail.” (ad-Durru 'I-manthur)

Ibn Jarir narrates from as-Suddi in a hadith, enter alia: “The Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.a.) proceeded to Uhud with one thousand men. He had promised them victory if they would remain patient. Then 'Abdullah ibn Ubayy returned back with three hundred persons. Abu Jabir as-Salami persued them to call them back; but they thwarted his efforts and said to him: 'We do not know how to fight; and if you listen to us you too should come back (to Medina) with us.' “ (ibid.)

as-Suddi said about the words: When two parties from among you had determined that they should show cowardice: “They were Banu Salmah and Banu Harithah who wanted to return when 'Abdullah ibn Ubayy went back, but Allah protected them; and the Messenger of Allah remained with seven hundred men.” (ibid.)

The author says: These were two clans from among the Helpers: Banu Salmah from the Khazraj and Banu Harithah from the Aws.

Ibn Abi Ishaq, as-Suddi, al-Waqidi, Ibn Jarir and others have narrated: “The polytheists reached Uhud on Wednesday in Shawwal, 3 A.H., and the Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.a.) proceeded to meet them on Friday; and the battle took place on Saturday, 15th Shawwal. The incisors of the Messenger of Allah were broken and his face was wounded. Then the Emigrants and the Helpers returned after fleeing away; and seventy of the Muslims were martyred. The Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.a.) stood firm accompanied by those who had remained with him until he removed (the enemies). The polytheists had mutilated a group (of martyrs), but Hamzah was mutilated worst of all.” (Majma 'u 'l-bayan)

The author says: There is a great number of traditions about the events of Uhud. We have narrated, and shall narrate later, only a few of them, on which depends understanding of the verses revealed on this subject. These verses throw light on its various aspects:

Some deal with the cowardice of those who retreated or disagreed with each other or wanted to return to Medina cowardly.

Others admonish and censure those who had fled leaving the Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.a.) in the thick of the battle - although Allah had forbidden them to do so.

Still others praise those who were martyred before the others had fled, and those who bravely stood firm and did not leave the Prophet, and continued to fight till their last breath.

Lastly, there are verses extolling those who steadfastly continued to fight till the end of the battle but were not martyred.


4

5

6