The Shia Rebuts

The Shia Rebuts0%

The Shia Rebuts Author:
Translator: Mansoor L. Limba
Publisher: ABWA Publishing and Printing Center
Category: Debates and Replies

The Shia Rebuts

Author: Sayyid Rida Husayni Nasab
Translator: Mansoor L. Limba
Publisher: ABWA Publishing and Printing Center
Category:

visits: 11653
Download: 3260

Comments:

The Shia Rebuts
search inside book
  • Start
  • Previous
  • 45 /
  • Next
  • End
  •  
  • Download HTML
  • Download Word
  • Download PDF
  • visits: 11653 / Download: 3260
Size Size Size
The Shia Rebuts

The Shia Rebuts

Author:
Publisher: ABWA Publishing and Printing Center
English

Question 1 : Which is correct, “wa ‘itrati” {and my progeny}, or “wa sunnati” {and my tradition}?

The hadith scholars{muhaddithun} have narrated hadith ath-thaqalayn{Tradition on the Two Weighty Things} in two ways and it has been recorded in the books of hadith. An examination must be made to see which way is correct:

1.“Kitab Allah wa ‘itrati ahli bayti” {“The Book of Allah and my progeny, the members of my Household” }, or

2.“Kitab Allah wa sunnati” {“The Book of Allah and my tradition” }.

Reply: The authentic{sahih} and established{thabit} hadith of the Holy Prophet (S)1 is the one with the phrase,“wa ahl bayti” {and the members of my Household} . The chain of transmission{sanad} of the narration which contains the phrase,“sunnati” {my tradition} instead of“ahla bayti” {the members of my Household} is invalid, therefore it is rejected{mardud} and the chain of transmission of the hadith,“wa ahla bayti” is absolutely sound.

The chain of transmission of the narration, “wa ahli bayti” {and my Household}

This text has been narrated by two prominent muhaddiths{hadith scholars} :

1. In his Sahih, Muslim narrates from Zayd ibn al-Arqam, thus: One day Allah’s Messenger (S) stood up to deliver sermon near a pool known as Khumm situated between Mecca and Medina. In the said sermon, he extolled Allah and exhorted the people, and then he said:

“ألا أيها الناس فانما أنا بشر يوشك أن يأتي رسول ربِّي فأجيب وأنا تاك فيكم الثَّقلين: أولهما كتاب الله فيه والهدى النور فخذو بكتاب الله واستمسكوا به - فحث لى كتاب والله رغب فيه ثم قال: أذكركم الله في أهل بيتي .”

Now to our purpose: O people, I am a human being. I am about to receive a messenger (the angel of death) from my Lord and I, in response to Allah’s call, (would bid goodbye to you), but I am leaving among you two weighty things: the one being the Book of Allah in which there is right guidance and light, so hold fast to the Book of Allah and adhere to it.

He exhorted (us) (to hold fast) to the Book of Allah and then said: The second are the members of my Household; I remind you (of your duties) to the members of my family. I remind you (of your duties) to the members of my family. I remind you (of your duties) to the members of my family.2

Darmi has also mentioned this text in his Sunan.3 It must be said that the chain of transmission of each of the two is as bright as the sun and there is no room for doubt about it.

2. In his narration which contains the phrase,“And my progeny, the members of my Household” {wa ‘itrati ahla bayti} , Tirmidhi writes that the Prophet (S) has said:

“إني تارك فيكم ما ان تمسكتم به لن تضلوا بعدي ، أحدهما أعظم من الأخر: كتاب الله حبل ممدود من السماء

إلى والأرض عترتي أهل بيتي لن يفتقا حتى يردا عليَّ الحوض فانظروا كيف تخلفوني فيها ”

Verily, I am leaving among you two weighty things to which if you hold fast, you shall never go astray. One is greater than the other: the Book of Allah, which is the cord extending from the heaven to the earth and my progeny, the members of my Household. These two will never separate from each other until they meet me at the Pond {hawd} (of Kawthar). Be careful as to how you will behave toward them after me. 4

Both Muslim and Tirmidhi, who are among the compilers of Sahihs and Sunans (compilations of hadiths regarded as authentic by the Ahl as-Sunnah), highlight the phrase,“Ahl al-Bayt” , and this evidence supports our view, and the chains of transmission of both hadiths enjoy such accuracy and special reliability that they need no discussion and argumentation.

The chain of transmission of the narration, “wa sunnati” {and my tradition}

The tradition, which mentions the phrase,“sunnati” {my tradition} instead of“ahli bayti” {members of my Household} , is a fabricated hadith, which apart from the weakness of its chain of transmission, was concocted and transmitted by the ‘Umayyad agents:

1. In his Mustadrak (‘ala’s-Sahihayn), Hakim al-Nayshaburi relates this narration with the following chain of transmission:

عباس عن بن أبي أويس عن ابي اويس عن ثور بن زيد الدّيلمي عن عكمة عن ابن عباس قال رسول الله: “يا

أيها الناس إني قد تركت فيكم ان اعتصمتم به فلن تضلّوا أبداً كتاب الله وسنّة نبيّه ”

‘Abbas ibn Abi Uways narrates on the authority of Abi Uways from Thawr ibn Zayd ad-Daylami from ‘Ukrumah from Ibn ‘Abbas: The Messenger of Allah (S) said:

“O people, I am leaving among you two things to which if you hold fast, you shall never go astray: the Book of Allah and the tradition of His prophet!”5

Among the transmitters of this narration are Isma‘il ibn Abi Uways and Abu Uways - a father and a son who were not found trustworthy, and they were also accused of lying, fabrication and forgery.

What the ‘ulama’ of rijal say about the two versions

In Tahdhib al-Kamal, Hafiz al-Mizzi,6 one of the researchers of the science of rijal,7 writes about Isma‘il and his father as follows:

Yahya ibn Mu‘in (who is one of the prominent ‘ulama’ of ‘ilm ar-rijal) says:“Abu Uways and his son (Isma‘il) are ‘weak’ {da‘if}. It is also reported that Yahya ibn Mu‘in used to say: “These two persons used to steal hadith.” Ibn Mu‘in also says about the son (Isma‘il):“He cannot be trusted.”

Regarding the son (Isma‘il), Nisa’i says:“He is ‘weak’ and not trustworthy.”

Abu’l-Qasim Lalka’i says:“Nisa’i has said a lot against him, concluding that his narration must be rejected.”

Ibn ‘Adi, one of the ‘ulama’ of rijal, says:“Ibn Abi Uways, a maternal uncle of Malik, narrates strange hadiths, which nobody accepts.” 8

In the Introduction to Fath al-Barri, Ibn Hajar (al-‘Asqalani) has stated:“One can never refer (as proof) to the hadith of Ibn Abi Uways on account of the reproach which Nisa’i has heaped on him.” 9

In the book, Fath al-Mulk al-‘Ala, Hafiz Sayyid Ahmad ibn Sadiq narrates on the authority of Salmah ibn Shayb, thus:“Isma‘il ibn Abi Uways was heard to have said: ‘Whenever the people of Medina split into two over an issue, I fabricated a hadith’.” 10

Therefore, the son (Isma‘il ibn Abi Uways) is charged with fabricating hadith and Ibn Mu‘in says that he lies. In addition, his narration has come neither in the Sahih of Muslim nor in the Sunan of Tirmidhi or any other Sahih books.

Concerning Abu Uways, it is enough to state that Abu Hatam ar-Razi in the book, Al-Jarah wa’t-Ta‘dil, says:“His narration may be recorded but it must not be referred to (as proof), and his narration is neither strong {qawi} nor firm {muhkam}.” 11

Abu Hatam who relates on the authority of Ibn Mu‘in says that Abu Uways is unreliable.

Any narration{riwayah} related by any of these two is by no means authentic{sahih} . Moreover, it does not accord with authentic and sound narrations.

It is worth considering that the narrator of the hadith, viz. Hakim al-Nayshaburi has acknowledged the weakness of the hadith and instead of putting right its chain of transmission, he has brought forth a witness who speaks in favor of it and whose chain of transmission is also weak and devoid of any credibility and so, instead of strengthening the hadith, he has made its weakness more distinct. Now, let us see the following weak witness:

The second chain of transmission of the narration, “wa sunnati” {and my tradition}

With a chain of transmission that will come later on, Hakim al-Nayshaburi thus relates on the authority of Abu Hurayrah in a narration termed marfu‘:12

“إني قد ترتكت فيكم شيئين لن تضلّوا بعدهما: كتاب الله وسنتي لن يفترقا حتى يردا عليَّ الحوض”

Verily, I am leaving among you two things to which (if you hold fast) you shall never go astray: the Book of Allah and my Sunnah {tradition} and they will never separate (from each other) until they meet me at the Pond {hawd} (of Kawthar). 13

Hakim has transmitted this narration with the following chain of transmission:

“Ad-Dabi relating on the authority of Salih ibn Musa at-Talhi from ‘Abd al-‘Aziz ibn Rafi‘ from Abi Salih from Abu Hurayrah.”

Like the previous narration, this narration is a fabricated one, and Salih ibn Musa at-Talhi is one of its transmitters about whom great figures of ‘ilm ar-rijal say:

Yahya ibn Mu‘in says:“Salih ibn Musa is unreliable.” Abu Hatam ar-Razi says:“His hadith is ‘weak’ {da‘if} and ‘unusual’ {munkar}; he narrates many of his ‘unusual’ hadiths from trustworthy individuals.” Nisa’i says:“His hadith cannot be recorded.” In another place, he says:“His hadith is rejected {matruk}.” 14

In Tahdhib at-Tahdhib, Ibn Hajar (al-‘Asqalani) writes:“Ibn Hibban says: ‘Salih ibn Musa attributes to trustworthy individuals, things which do not correspond with their words.’ He then says: ‘His hadith does not represent a sound proof’ and Abu Na‘im says: ‘His hadith is rejected and he always narrates unusual hadiths’.” 15

Also, in At-Taqrib,16 Ibn Hajar says:“His hadith is rejected.” In Al-Kashif,17 Dhahabi says:“His hadith is weak.” In Mizan al-I‘tidal,18 Dhahabi relates a disputable hadith from him, and says that it is among his ‘usual’ hadiths.

The third chain of transmission of the narration, “wa sunnati” {and my tradition}

In At-Tamhid, Ibn ‘Abd al-Barr relates this narration with the following chain of transmission:

‘Abd ar-Rahman ibn Yahya relating on the authority of Ahmad ibn Sa‘id from Muhammad ibn Ibrahim ad-Dubayli from ‘Ali ibn Zayd al-Fara’idi from al-Hunayni from Kathir ibn ‘Abd Allah ibn ‘Amru ibn ‘Awf from his father from his grandfather.19

Concerning Kathir ibn ‘Abd Allah, Imam ash-Shafi‘i says:“He is one of the pillars of lying.” 20 Abu Dawud says:“He is one of the mendacious and liars.” 21 Ibn Hibban says:“‘Abd Allah ibn Kathir narrates from his father and grandfather a book of hadith based on forgery. Relating any narration from that book and any of ‘Abd Allah’s narration is unlawful except if it is intended to express surprise or for the sake of criticism.” 22

Nisa’i and Darqutni say:“His hadith is rejected.” Imam Ahmad (ibn Hanbal) says:“He is munkar al-hadith (he who relates odd hadiths) and he is not reliable” . And Ibn Mu‘in has the same view about him.

It is surprising that in the biographical account of Kathir, At-Taqrib, Ibn Hajar has contented himself with the term,“weak” {da‘if} , regarding those who have accused him of lying as fanatic. Meanwhile the forerunners of ‘ilm al-rijal have charged him with lying and forgery. Moreover, Dhahabi says:“His statement is unfounded and weak.”

Narration without a chain of transmission

In Al-Muwatta’ Malik has narrated it as mursal23 without mentioning the chain of transmission,24 and we all know that such a narration is devoid of any value.

This survey has clearly shown that the narration,“wa sunnati” {and my tradition} has been forged and concocted by the mendacious narrators affiliated to the ‘Umayyads who have fabricated it as opposed to the authentic hadith,“wa ‘itrati” {and my progeny} .

As such, it is necessary for those who deliver sermons in mosques, religious orators, and prayer leaders to abandon the unfounded narration attributed to the Messenger of Allah (S), and to familiarize, instead, the people with the authentic hadith - the hadith which has been narrated by Muslim in his Sahih with the phrase“ahla bayti” {members of my Household} and Tirmidhi (in his Sunan) with the words“‘itrati ahla bayti” {my progeny, the members of my Household} . It is incumbent upon the seekers of knowledge to observe the rules of the science of hadith and distinguish between the authentic hadith and the ‘weak’ one.

In conclusion, we have to note that by the term,“ahla bayti” the Prophet (S) is referring to his offspring{dhurriyyah} , namely Hadrat Fatimah, Hasan and Husayn (‘a)25 as Muslim in his Sahih26 and Tirmidhi in his Sunan27 have narrated on the authority of ‘A’ishah:

نزلت هذه الأية على النّبي صلى الله عليه وأله وسّلم - إنما يُريد الله ليُذهب عنكم الرّجس أهل البيت ويُطهِّركم تطهيراً - في بيت أم سلمة فدعا النبيّ صلى الله عليه وأله وسلم وفاطمة وحسناً وحسيناً فجللهم وبكساء على خلف ظهره فجلّله بكساء ثم قال: اللهم هؤلاء أهل بيتي فاذهب عنهم الرّجس وطهِّرهم تطهياً. قالت أم سلمة: وأنا معهم يا نبيّ الله؟ قال: أنت على مكانك وأنت إلى خير ”

The verse,“Indeed, Allah desires to repel all impurity from you, O People of the Household, and purify you with a thorough purification” 28 was revealed in the house of Umm Salamah.

The Prophet wrapped Fatimah, Hasan and Husayn in a cloak, and ‘Ali was behind him. He wrapped him in it and then said:“O God! They are the members of my Household {ahl al-bayt}. Repel all impurity from them and purify them with a thorough purification.” Umm Salmah said:“O Prophet of Allah! Am I with them?” He said:“Remain where you are and you are in good (position).” 29

The meaning of Hadith ath-Thaqalayn {Tradition on the Two Weighty Things}

As the Holy Prophet has mentioned ‘itrah{progeny} alongside the Qur’an, describing both of them as the proofs of Allah for the ummah, two conclusions can be deduced from it:

1. The words of the Prophet’s progeny{‘itrah} , like the very Qur’an, is a proof{hujjah} , and so in religious affairs - both ideological and jurisprudential - their words must have to be adhered and with the existence of the proof that they have to be followed, one must not turn away from them and follow others.

Although after the demise of the Prophet (S) the Muslims split over the issue of caliphate and administering the political affairs of the ummah and they became two groups each of which has its own logic and basis, they ought to have no disagreement about the intellectual authority of the Ahl al-Bayt (‘a) because all Muslims confirm the authenticity of Hadith ath-Thaqalayn, which regards the Qur’an and the Prophet’s Ahl al-Bayt (‘a) as the authority on beliefs and laws, and if the Muslim ummah abide by this hadith, the scope of difference will be narrowed and this will pave the way to the unity of the Muslims.

2. The Qur’an, the Word of Allah, is preserved from error and mistake. So how could it include errors when God says about it:

﴿ لاَ يَأْتِيهِ الْبَاطِلُ مِن بَيْنِ يَدَيْهِ وَلَا مِنْ خَلْفِهِ تَنزِيلٌ مِّنْ حَكِيمٍ حَمِيدٍ ﴾

“Falsehood cannot approach it, from before it nor from behind it, a {gradually} sent down {revelation} from One all-wise, all-laudable” 30 ?

If the Qur’an is preserved from error, then its partner and counterpart, i.e. the ‘itrah must also be preserved from error because it is incorrect to couple an errant person or errant people with the Qur’an.

This hadith is a testimony to their immunity from any sort of impurity. It must be observed here that infallibility{‘ismah} is not a special privilege which only prophets (‘a) enjoy. It is not impossible for an individual to be immune from sin even though he or she is not a prophet. Based on the following verse,

إن الله اصطفاك وطهّرك واصطفاك على نساء العالمين

“Allah has chosen you and purified you, and He has chosen you above the world’s women,” 31

Hadrat Maryam (Saint Mary) is free from sin though she is not a prophet.

Notes

1. The abbreviation, “S”, stands for the Arabic invocative phrase, sallallahu ‘alayhi wa alihi wa sallam {may God’s blessings and peace be upon him and his progeny}, which is mentioned after the name of the Holy Prophet Muhammad (S). {Trans.}

2. Muslim, Sahih, vol. 4, p. 1803, hadith no. 2408 (‘Abd al-Baqi Edition).

Abdul-Hamid Siddiqui (trans.), Sahih Muslim (English Translation), vol. 4, hadith no. 5920. {Trans.}

3. Darmi, Sunan, vol. 2, pp. 431-432.

4. Tirmidhi, Sunan, vol. 5, p. 663, hadith no. 37788.

5. Hakim al-Nayshaburi, Mustadrak (‘ala’s-Sahihayn), vol. 1, p. 93.

6. Hafiz: literally means ‘memorizer’ and is used in hadith terminology, as in the case of this book, to describe a scholar who has an excellent memory and has memorized a great number of traditions. {Trans.}

7. Rijal or ‘Ilm ar-Rijal: a branch of the science of hadith dealing with the biography of the hadith transmitters or reporters. {Trans.}

8. Hafiz al-Mazzi, Tahdhib al-Kamal, vol. 3, p. 127.

9. Ibn Hajar al-‘Asqalani, Introduction to Fath al-Barri (Dar al-Ma‘rifah Edition), p. 391.

10. Hafiz Sayyid Ahmad, Fath al-Mulk al-‘Ala, p. 15.

11. Abu Hatam ar-Razi, Al-Jarah wa’t-Ta‘dil, vol. 5, p. 92.

12. Marfu‘: ‘traceable’ - refers to any tradition that can be traced back to a Ma‘sum (infallible - referring specifically to the Prophet (S) and the Imams (‘a)), regardless of the continuity in its chain of transmission. {Trans.}

13. Hakim al-Nayshaburi, Mustadrak (‘ala’s-Sahihayn), vol. 1, p. 93.

14. Hafiz al-Mazzi, Tahdhib al-Kamal, vol. 13, p. 96.

15. Ibn Hajar (al-‘Asqalani), Tahdhib at-Tahdhib, vol. 4, p. 355.

16. Ibn Hajar (al-‘Asqalani), At-Taqrib (translated version), no. 2891.

17. Dhahabi, Al-Kashif (translated version), no. 2412.

18. Dhahabi, Mizan al-I‘tidal, vol. 2, p. 302.

19. At-Tamhid, vol. 24, p. 331.

20. Ibn Hajar (al-‘Asqalani), Tahdhib at-Tahdhib (Dar al-Fikr), vol. 8, p. 377; Tahdhib al-Kamal, vol. 24, p. 138.

21. Ibid.

22. Ibn Hibban, Al-Majruhin, vol. 2, p. 221.

23. Mursal: ‘hurried’ - a tradition, whose complete chain of transmission is unknown, i.e. the names of one or more of its narrators are missing or unknown. The word ‘mursal’ literally means ‘forwarded on’ because often the tradition is forwarded on by a Follower {Tabi’i}, missing out the name of the Companion {Sahib} who narrated it to him. {Trans.}

24. Malik ibn Anas, Al-Muwatta’, p. 889, hadith no. 3.

25. The abbreviation, “‘a” stands for the Arabic invocative phrase, ‘alayhis-salam, ‘alayhimus-salam, or ‘alayhas-salam {may peace be upon him/them/her}, which is mentioned after the names of the prophets, angels, Imams from the Prophet’s progeny, and saints (‘a). {Trans.}

26. Muslim, Sahih, vol. 4, p. 1883, hadith no. 2424.

Abdul-Hamid Siddiqui (trans.), Sahih Muslim (English Translation), vol. 4, hadith no. 5955. {Trans.}

27. Tirmidhi, Sunan, vol. 5, p. 663.

28. Surah al-Ahzab 33:33. {Trans.}

29. Quoted from Hasan ibn ‘Ali ash-Shaqqaf, Sahih Sifah Salat an-Nabi (S), pp. 289-294.

30. Surah Fussilat 41:42.

31. Surah Al ‘Imran 3:42.

Question 2 : What does “Shi‘ah” mean?

Reply: In Arabic“Shi‘ah” literally means“follower” . The Glorious Qur’an states:

وإنَّ من شيعته لإبراهيم .

“Indeed Abraham was among his followers {Shi‘ah}.” 1

But the Muslims use the word“Shi‘ah” to mean the group of people who believe that prior to his demise, the Prophet (S) had designated his successor and the caliph of the Muslims in numerous occasions such as the day known as“Ghadir” on Dhu’l-Hijjah 18, 10 AH and in a mammoth assembly (of Muslims) he (S) appointed him as the political, intellectual and religious authority after him (S).

To elucidate, after the Holy Prophet (S), the Muhajirun2 and the Ansar3 were divided into two groups:

1. A group believed that the Prophet of Allah (S) did not ignore the question of caliphate and he designated ‘Ali ibn Abi Talib (‘a) - the first person who believed in him (S) - as his successor.

This group is composed of Muhajirun and Ansar with all the leading figures of the Bani Hashim4 and a number of great Companions{sahabah} 5 such as Salman al-Farsi, Abu Dharr, Miqdad, Khabbab ibn Art, and the like. They remained firm in their belief and were called the“Shi‘ah of ‘Ali (‘a)” .

Of course, this appellation has been given by the Holy Prophet (S) himself during his lifetime to the followers of the Commander of the Faithful (‘a). While pointing to ‘Ali ibn Abi Talib (‘a), he said:

“والذي نفسي بيده إن هذا وشيعته لهم الفائزون يوم القيامة ”

“By Him in Whose hand my life is, verily this man (‘Ali) and his Shi‘ah shall be the triumphant on the Day of Resurrection.” 6

Therefore,“Shi‘ah” means a group of Muslims of the early period of Islam who, on account of the belief that wilayah{guardianship} 7 is based on revelation{tansisi} , are given this appellation, and this group has remained faithful to the Prophet’s Household{Ahl al-Bayt} (‘a) until today.

From this, we realize the station and position of the Shi‘ah, and in this way the groundless statement of some ignorant or spiteful concocters who claim that Shi‘ism is a product of the later periods, becomes clear. For further information on the history of the Shi‘ah, one may refer to such books as Asl ash-Shi‘ah wa Usuluha, Al-Muraja‘at, and A‘yan ash-Shi‘ah.

2. Another group believed that the station of caliphate is an electoral position. As such, they paid allegiance to Abubakr and later on, they were known as the“Ahl as-Sunnah” or“Sunni” .

The result was that notwithstanding the fact that these two Muslim sects have so many common views about the roots of religion, they have different attitudes toward the question of caliphate and succession to the Prophet. The members of each of the two groups were from among the Muhajirun and Ansar.

Notes

1. Surah as-Saffat 37:83.

2. Muhajirun: a title given to the Muslims of Mecca who accompanied the Prophet (S) in his hijrah (migration) to Medina. {Trans.}

3. Ansar: a title given to the Muslims of Medina who received the Prophet (S) and the Muslims of Mecca who migrated (hijrah) to Medina. {Trans.}

4. Bani Hashim: a clan in Mecca to which the Prophet and his descendants belong. {Trans.}

5. Companions {sahabah}: it refers to the Companions of the Prophet (S). In earlier times, the term was given only to his close friends who had close contact with him. Later, the term was extended to include the believers who had seen him, eventhough it was for a brief moment or at an early age. {Trans.}

6. Jalal ad-Din as-Suyuti, Ad-Durr al-Manthur, vol. 6, on the commentary of Surah al-Bayyinah 98:7:

﴿إِنَّ الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا وَعَمِلُوا الصَّالِحَاتِ أُولَٰئِكَ هُمْ خَيْرُ الْبَرِيَّةِ﴾

“Indeed those who have faith and do righteous deeds - it is they who are the best of creatures.”

7. For further information about the idea of guardianship {wilayah} and the guardian {wali}, see Murtada Mutahhari, Wilayah: The Station of the Master, trans. Yahya Cooper (Tehran: World Organization for Islamic Services, 1982). {Trans.}

Question 3 : Why is ‘Ali ibn Abi Talib (‘a) regarded as the wasi {executor of will} and successor of the Prophet (S)?

Reply: As we already stated, the Shi‘ah have a firm belief that the position of caliphate is determined through revelation{tansisi} and that after the Holy Prophet (S) the Imamah{leadership} is in some respects like prophethood{nubuwwah} .

Just as the Prophet (S) has to be appointed through Divine decree, the wasi{executor of will} of the Prophet (S) too must be designated by Him, the Glorious and Sublime.

The biography of the Messenger of Allah (S) is a testimony to this belief; for, in many occasions he designated ‘Ali (‘a) as his successor{khalifah} . Here, we shall mention only three of these occasions:

1. At the Commencement of the Prophetic Mission

When the Prophet (S) received from God the commission to invite his relatives to the doctrine of monotheism as it is confirmed by the the verse,

وأنذ عشيرتك الأقربين .

“Warn the nearest of your kinsfolk,” 1

he addressed them by saying:

فأيكم يوازرني في هذا الأم على أن يكون أخي ووزيري وخليفتي ووصيّي فيكم؟

“Which of you will assist me in this affair so that he would my brother {akhi}, minister {waziri}, successor {khalifati}, and the executor of my will {wasi} among you?”

The only person who gave a positive response to this heavenly call was ‘Ali ibn Abi Talib (‘a). Then, facing his relatives, the Messenger of Allah (S) said:

“إن هذا أخي ووصيّي خليفتي فيكم فاسمعوا له وأطيعوه ”

“Verily, he (‘Ali) is my brother, the executor of my will and my successor among you. So, listen to him and obey him.” 2

2. During the Tabuk Expedition

The Prophet (S) said to ‘Ali (‘a):

أما ترضى أن تكون منّي بمنزلة هارون من موسى إلا أنه لا نبيّ بعدي؟

“Are you not satisfied that you are to me as Harun (Aaron) is to Musa (Moses) except that there will be no prophet after me?” 3

That is to say,“Just as Harun (‘a) is the executor of will and the immediate successor of Musa (‘a), you are my successor.”

3. In the 10th Year after Hijrah

On his return from the Farewell Pilgrimage{Hajjah al-Wida‘} , at a place called Ghadir Khumm the Messenger of Allah (S) introduced ‘Ali (‘a) before a mammoth assembly (of pilgrims) as the wali{guardian} of the believers, male or female, saying:

“من كُنت مولاه فهذا عليّ مولاه ”

“Of whosoever I am master {mawla}, then ‘Ali is also his master {mawla}.”

The important and noteworthy point is that at the beginning of his speech, the Prophet (S) asked:

ألست أولى بكم من أنفسكم؟

“Have I more authority over you than you have over yourselves?”

And the Muslims unanimously replied in the affirmative. Therefore, it must be noted here that in this hadith the Prophet (S) meant by the word,“mawla” the absolute guardianship over the believers, and we can conclude that the Prophet (S) had established ‘Ali (‘a) in the same position which he had. And on that very day Hassan ibn Thabit versified the historic event of Ghadir as follows:

يناديهم يوم الغدير نبيّهم بخمّ واسمع بالرّسول مناديا فقال: فمن مولاكم ونبيّكم؟ فقالوا: ولم يدلوا أهناك التعاميا إلهك ومولانا أنت نبيّن ولم تلق منا في الولاية عاصيا فقال له: قم يا عليّ فإنني رضيتك من بعدي إماماً وهادياً فمن كنت مولاه فهذا ولّيه فكونوا له اتباع صدق مواليا هناك دعا: اللهم وال وليّه وكن للذي عادى عليّا معاديا

Their Prophet calls on them on the day of Ghadir Khumm; now, listen to the call of the Prophet:

Then he said to the people:“Who is your Master {mawla} and your guardian {wali}? Then, without showing inattention, they said:

“Your Lord is our Master {mawla} and you are our guardian {wali}, and no one among us today disobeys you.”

Then he said:“Stand up O ‘Ali! For, I am indeed well pleased that you are the Imam and guide after me.”

{Then he said:} “Therefore, of whomsoever I am master, ‘Ali is his master also. May you be their true supporters!”

He then prayed, saying:“O Allah! Be Thou a Friend of those who are his (‘Ali s) friends, and be Thou an Enemy of those who are his enemies.” 4

The hadith on Ghadir is among the mutawatir5 hadiths, which is narrated not only by the Shi‘ah ‘ulama’ but also by approximately 360 Sunni scholars6 and the number of transmitters reaches 110 Companions. Twenty six prominent Muslim ‘ulama’ have written a separate book about the chain of transmission and transmitters of this hadith.

Abu Ja‘far Tabari, the renowned Muslim historian, has compiled the chain of transmission and transmitters of this hadith in two bulky volumes. For further information, one may refer to the book, Al-Ghadir.

Notes

1. Surah ash-Shu‘ara’ 26:214.

2. Tarikh at-Tabari, vol. 2, pp. 62-63; Tarikh al-Kamil, vol. 2, pp. 40-41; Musnad Ahmad ibn Hanbal, vol. 1, p. 111; Ibn Abi’l-Hadid, Sharh Nahj al-Balaghah, vol. 13, pp. 210-212.

3. Sirah Ibn Hisham, vol. 2, p. 520; Ibn Hajar (al-‘Asqalani), As-Sawa‘iq al-Muhriqah (Egypt, 2nd Edition), Book 9, Chapter 2, p. 121.

4. Khwarazmi al-Maliki, Al-Manaqib, p. 80; Sibt ibn Jawzi al-Hanafi, Tadhkirat Khawas al-Ummah, p. 20; Ganji Shafi‘i, Kifayah at-Talib, p. 17; and others.

5. Mutawatir: a tradition from the Prophet (S) or an infallible Imam, repeatedly and widely narrated in an uninterrupted sequence, through successive reliable narrators. {Trans.}

6. See, for example, Ibn Hajar, As-Sawa’iq al-Muhriqah (Egypt, 2nd Edition), Book 9, Chapter 2, p. 122.

Question 4: Who are the Imams?

Reply: During his lifetime, the Holy Prophet (S) declared that after him there shall be twelve caliphs all of whom will be from Quraysh, and through whom Islam shall be exalted.

Jabir ibn Samurah narrates:

“سمعت رسول الله صلى الله عليه وأله وسلم يقول : لا يزال الإسلام عزيزاً إلى اثنى عشر خليفة ثم قال كلمة لم أسمعها فقلت لأبي ما قال؟ فقال: كلهم من قريش ”

I heard the Messenger of Allah (S) saying: ‘Islam will keep its honor through twelve caliphs.’ Then, he said a statement which I failed to catch. So I asked my father,“What did he (S) say?” He (my father) replied that he (S) said:“All of them will be from Quraysh.1

In the history of Islam, there are not twelve caliphs who preserve the honor of Islam except the twelve Imams in whom the Shi‘ah believe; for they are the twelve caliphs whom the Prophet (S) introduced as his successors.

Now, let us see who the twelve caliphs are. If we say that they are the four caliphs who are known by the Ahl as-Sunnah as “Rightly-Guided Caliphs” {khulafa’ ar-rashidun} , there are no other caliphs who contributed to exalting Islam.

The biography of the ‘Umayyad and ‘Abbasid caliphs is a testimony to this fact. As for the twelve Imams in whom the Shi‘ah believe, they were a clear manifestation of piety and virtue during their respective periods.

They were also preservers of the Messenger of Allah’s (S) Sunnah and the people to whom Sahabah{Companions} and Tabi‘un{Followers} were attracted,2 and whose knowledge and trustworthiness are acknowledged by historians. These twelve Imams are:

1. ‘Ali ibn Abi Talib;

2. Hasan ibn ‘Ali (al-Mujtaba);

3. Husayn ibn ‘Ali;

4. ‘Ali ibn al-Husayn (Zayn al-‘Abidin);

5. Muhammad ibn ‘Ali (al-Baqir);

6. Ja‘far ibn Muhammad (as-Sadiq);

7. Musa ibn Ja‘far (al-Kazim);

8. ‘Ali ibn Musa (ar-Rida);

9. Muhammad ibn ‘Ali (at-Taqi);

10. ‘Ali ibn Muhammad (an-Naqi);

11. Hasan ibn ‘Ali (al-‘Askari); and

12. Muhammad ibn al-Hasan (al-Mahdi).

There have been mutawatir traditions related from the Prophet (S) regarding the last Imam who is known as the“Promised Mahdi” transmitted by Muslim hadith scholars{muhaddithun} .

For further information about the life of these great leaders, whom the Messenger of Allah (S) himself has named, one may refer to the following books:

1. Tadhkirat al-Khawas (Tadhkirah Khawas al-Ummah);

2. Kifayat al-Athar;

3. Wafiyat al-A‘yan; and

4. A‘yan ash-Shi‘ah (by Sayyid Muhsin Amin al-‘Amili), which is the most comprehensive of the four books.

Notes

1. Muslim, Sahih (Egypt), vol. 6, p. 2.

Abdul-Hamid Siddiqui (trans.), Sahih Muslim (English Translation), vol. 3, hadith no. 4480. {Trans.}

2. Tabi‘un {‘Followers’ or ‘Successors’} refers to the second generation of Muslims who came after the Companions, who did not know the Prophet (S) but who knew his Companions. {Trans.}

Question 5: Why do Shi’a say “Allahumma salli ‘ala Muhammad wa Ali Muhammad”

When invoking blessings{salawat} on Muhammad (S), why do you also associate his progeny{a} to him by saying,“Allahumma salli ‘ala Muhammad wa Ali Muhammad” {“O Allah! Bless Muhammad and the progeny of Muhammad” }?

Reply: It has been established that the Prophet (S) himself had taught the Muslims how to invoke blessings on him. When the following noble verse,

﴿ إِنَّ اللَّهَ وَمَلَائِكَتَهُ يُصَلُّونَ عَلَى النَّبِيِّ يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا صَلُّوا عَلَيْهِ وَسَلِّمُوا تَسْلِيمًا ﴾

“Indeed Allah and His angels bless the Prophet. O you who have faith! Invoke blessings on him and invoke Peace upon him in a worthy manner,” 1

was revealed, the Muslims asked the Prophet (S):“How should we invoke blessings (on you)?” The Prophet (S) said:

“لا تصلّوا عليّ الصلوة البتراء ”

“Do not invoke ‘incomplete’ blessings on me.”

They again asked:“How should we invoke blessings on you?” He (S) replied: “Say:

اللهم صلّ علی محمد و علی آل محمد

Allahumma salli ‘ala Muhammad wa Ali Muhammad.

“O Allah! Bless Muhammad and the family of Muhammad.” 2

The exceptionally high station of the Prophet’s family{al} (‘a) led Imam ash-Shafi‘i to compose the following famous poem:

يا أهل بيت رسول الله حبّكم فرض من الله في القرأن أنزله كفاكم من عظيم القد أنكم من لم يصل عليكم لا صلوة له ”

O members of the Household {Ahl al-Bayt} of the Messenger of Allah! (Our) love for you is an obligation, which God has revealed in the Qur’an.

Your lofty station such that if one does not invoke blessings on you (while offering prayers) one’s prayer will be of no avail.3

Notes

1. Surah al-Ahzab 33:56.

2. Ibn Hajar, As-Sawa‘iq al-Muhriqah, 2nd edition (Cairo: Maktabat al-Qahirah), Book 11, Chapter 1, p. 146 and a similar one in Jalal ad-Din as-Suyuti, Ad-Durr al-Manthur, vol. 5, commentary of Surah al-Ahzab 33:56 has been narrated by hadith scholars {muhaddithun} and compilers of Sahihs and Musnads such as ‘Abd ar-Razzaq, Ibn Abi Shaybah, Ahmad ibn Hanbal, al-Bukhari, Muslim, Abu Dawud, Tirmidhi, Nisa’i, Ibn Majah, Ibn Mardaway, from Ka‘ab ibn ‘Ujrah from the Holy Prophet (S).

3. As-Sawa‘iq al-Mahriqah, Book 11, Chapter 1, p. 148; Shabrawi, Al-Ithaf, p. 29; Hamzawi Maliki, Mashariq al-Anwar, p. 88; Zarqani, Al-Mawahib; Sabban, Al-As‘af, p. 119.

Question 6: Why do you regard your Imams as “infallible” {ma‘sum}?

Reply: There are numerous proofs which confirm the infallibility{‘ismah} of the Imams who are all members of the Prophet’s Household{Ahl al-Bayt} . We shall mention only one of them:

According to a narration related by both Shi‘ah and Sunni scholars, during the last days of his life the Prophet (S) said:

“إني تارك فيكم الثقلين كتاب الله وأهل بيتي وإنهما لن يفترقا حتى يردا عليّ الحوض ”

Verily, I am leaving among you Two Weighty Things: the Book of Allah (the Qur’an) and the members of my Household {Ahl al-Bayt}, and they will never separate from each other until they meet me at the Pond {Al-Hawd} (of Kawthar on the Day of Resurrection). 1

Here is an interesting point: without an iota of doubt, the Glorious Qur’an is free from any form of deviation and error. How could an error approach the divine revelation when the Sender is God, the messenger is the Angel of Revelation (‘a) and the receiver is the Prophet of God (S)?

Since the infallibility of these three is as crystal clear as the sun; the Muslims of the world regard the Holy Prophet (S) as immune from committing error with respect to receiving, preserving and conveying the revelation and it is clear that the Book of Allah has such a constant and veracious immunity, then the Ahl al-Bayt of the Messenger of Allah (S) are also immune from any sort of lapse and error. For, in this hadith, the progeny{‘itrah} of the Prophet have been described as equal to the Glorious Qur’an in guiding and leading the ummah, which means that they both are equal in terms of infallibility{‘ismah} .

In other words, it is absurd to regard a person or persons who are not infallible as equal to the Book of Allah.

The most explicit testimony to the infallibility of the Imams (‘a) is the following expression of the Prophet (S):

“وإنهما لن يفترقا حتى يردا عليَّ الحوض ”

“And they will never separate from each other (in guidance and leadership) until they meet me at the Pond {Al-Hawd} (of Kawthar on the Day of Resurrection).”

Once the Ahl al-Bayt of the Prophet (S) were not free from lapses and errors, they would be separated from the Qur’an which is free from error and they would go astray, whereas the Holy Prophet (S) has emphatically negated it.

Of course, the“Ahl al-Bayt” according to the statement of the Prophet (S) does not refer to all his consanguineous and affinitive relatives for not all of them were free from lapses.

Therefore, only a specific group of his progeny has such an honor and this station and status is applicable to a limited members of his relatives, and these are the very Imams from the Ahl al-Bayt (‘a) who, throughout history, have been the light of the path of the ummah, the preservers of the Prophet’s Sunnah and the guardians of the Shari‘ah.

Note

1. Mustadrak al-Hakim, vol. 3, p. 148; As-Sawa‘iq al-Muhriqah, Book 11, Chapter 1, p. 149. There is also a similar text in Kanz al-‘Ummal, vol. 1, Bab “Al-I‘tisam bi’l-Kitab wa’s-Sunnah”, p. 44; Musnad Ahmad ibn Hanbal, vol. 5, pp. 182, 189; and others.