A VICTIM LOST IN SAQIFAH Volume 1
0%
Author: Ali Labbaf
Translator: Dr. Hassan Najafi
Publisher: Ansariyan Publications – Qum
Category: Imam Ali
ISBN: 978-964-438-976-8
Author: Ali Labbaf
Translator: Dr. Hassan Najafi
Publisher: Ansariyan Publications – Qum
Category:
visits: 11933
Download: 3544
Comments:
Volume 1
Volume 2
Volume 3
Volume 4
- Dedicated to
- Acknowledgement
- Preface
- Introduction: Fundamentals of Evaluation and Criticism of Writings on Islamic Unity
- First Introduction: Necessity of thought for Islamic unity
- Second Introduction: Valuable Standards of Worksheet of the Thought of Islamic Unity
- Third Introduction: Familiarity with Writings on Thoughts of Islamic Unity
- Beginning of Discussion: Awareness of Basics of Intellectual Movement - Research towards Creating Islamic Unity
- Introduction to Applications of Two Tendencies by way of Criticism and Narration
- Discourse One: Keeping Quiet and Prohibiting Difference-Creating Activities
- Introduction
- Criticism and Analysis
- Invitation to Silence as Open-mindedness
- Invitation to Keep Quiet as Mark of Sympathy
- Invitation to Keep Quiet for Confidentiality
- Discourse Two: Adopt Common Things and Ignore Differences between Islamic sects
- Introduction
- Criticism and Analysis
- Discourse Three: To Make Difference between Two Schools so light as to appear depthless
- Introduction
- Criticism and Analysis
- Deviation in Principles and Branches of Faith
- Introduction
- Criticism and Analysis
- Conclusion
- Conclusion
- Reminder
- Deviated Side-effects of this Conjecture
- First Wrong Result
- Second Wrong Result
- Third Wrong Result
- Fourth Wrong Result
- 1 - This Difference must be acknowledged
- 2 - This Difference in Religion is neither rejected nor blamed
- 3 - This Difference is desirable and useful
- 4 - This Difference is not Harmful, it solves difficulty
- 5 - This Difference is Good - there is nothing wrong in it
- Discourse Four: Excusing those who turn away from Imamate and School of Ahle Bayt (a.s.)
- Introduction
- Criticism and Analysis
- Another Criticism and Analysis
- Discourse Five: Alterations in Beliefs of Shia Ja’fari Twelve Imamite Faith
- First Alteration: Imamate and Rulership
- Introduction
- First Batch: Three types of Separations between Imamate and Rulership
- Introductory conjecture
- Type A):Separation of Imamate from Rulership in the sense of setting aside Caliphate and considering it out of discussion
- Type B): Separation of Imamate from Rulership in the sense of Caliphate being independent of Imamate
- Deviated Repercussions of this Conjecture
- First Wrong Result
- Second Wrong Result
- Third Wrong Result
- Type C): Separation of Imamate from rulership in a frame of Great Imamate and Great Caliphate
- Particulars of this Oblique new thought about the Great Caliphate
- Deviated Repercussions of this Conjecture
- First Wrong Result
- Second Wrong Result
- Third Wrong Result
- Reminder
- Criticism and Opinion
- Guardianship and Imamate is inseparable from apparent Caliphate
- Reminder
- Another Criticism
- The Result
- Second Batch: To show Rulership of less value than Imamate
- Introduction
- Criticism and Analysis
- Second Alteration: Removing Imamate from Principles of Faith and making it a Fundamental of School
- Introduction
- Criticism and Analysis
- Third Alteration: Aim of Eschewing Shia teachings
- Introduction
- A question that arises in the mind is that
- A - Taking benefit of a deviated thought, silence, an excuse to maintain Islamic demeanor?
- B - To show differences between Ali and Caliphs as friendly
- C - Denial of Enmity in a sense of blame, to show relations were intimate between Ali and Caliph
- D - To Show Rulership Worthless from Ali’s Viewpoint
- E - Mending the Method of Shia Propaganda
- Closing Reminder
- Discourse Six: Deviation in the Meaning of Divinely-Granted Caliphate of Ali
- Introduction
- Criticism and Analysis
- First Conjecture: Imamate and Guardianship in Islam are only for the sake of Rulership!
- Second Conjecture: Rulership in Islam is an Elected post!
- How to utilize these Conjectures to Create Deviation in the Meaning of Divinely-given Caliphate of Ali
- Conjecture A: Deviation in the Sense of Guardianship by Separating Imamate and Rulership
- Conjecture B: Deviation in the Sense of Text following Deviation in the Meaning of Imamate
- Result of this Manipulation
- Deviated Repercussion of these Conjectures
- First Wrong Result: Caliphate is not a Monopoly of Amirul Momineen (a.s.)!
- Second Wrong Result: Caliph cannot be Exclusively Ali after the Prophet
- Third Wrong Result: Usurpation of Ali’s Caliphate is no more in Question!
- Fourth Wrong Result: Caliphate of Caliphs is not illegitimate!
- Warning: Propagation of these Conjectures in the Name of Open-mindedness
- Relation of Imamate and Caliphate from Shia Viewpoint
- The wrong framing of the issue
- Discourse Seven: Denial of Differences between Ali and Caliphs
- Introduction
- Criticism and Analysis
- What History says?
- The Result
- Reminder
- A Note
- Deviation in Criticism of Ali about Caliphs
- Introduction
- Criticism and Scrutiny
- Discourse Eight: To Acknowledge the Legitimacy of Caliphs’ Government
- Introduction
- Scrutiny and Criticism
- Unanswered Questions
- Addendum: Solution of Shia to Create Islamic unity
- First Point
- Second Point
- End: Reflection on Shia Ideal of Islamic Unity in the Zahra’s speech (s.a.)
- Notes
search inside book
