The Family in Islam

The Family in Islam0%

The Family in Islam Author:
Translator: Ali Adam
Publisher: Fountain Books
Category: Family and Child
ISBN: 1-903323-00-2

The Family in Islam

Author: Ayatullah Seyyed Muhammad Redha Shirazi
Translator: Ali Adam
Publisher: Fountain Books
Category:

ISBN: 1-903323-00-2
visits: 4564
Download: 1987

Comments:

The Family in Islam
search inside book
  • Start
  • Previous
  • 19 /
  • Next
  • End
  •  
  • Download HTML
  • Download Word
  • Download PDF
  • visits: 4564 / Download: 1987
Size Size Size
The Family in Islam

The Family in Islam

Author:
Publisher: Fountain Books
ISBN: 1-903323-00-2
English

PartSix : Challenges Facing the Family and Society

Divorce Yesterday and Today

It was usual in Islamic countries for marriages to take place in a context of common sense and compatibility. It was the family who would find the appropriate partner with regard to religion, moralbehaviour , financialstatus and physical character. For this reason,marriages on the whole were successful.

The family's choosing for their offspring did not negate the choice and contentment of the prospective couple but rather confirmed it and steered it in the required direction, because of the families knowledge and links to other family circles was more than that of the young man or woman.Further more , the family by possessing a means of exerting pressure on those who wished to divorce could act to prevent splits taking place.Hence the families acted in truth as a kind of safety valve against the recklessness and haste of youth as in theQur'anic verse:

'Then appoint two arbiters, one from his family, one from hers; if they seek to set things to rights then Allah will cause their reconciliation'80 . This God grantedsuccess as with everything else that He causes in this world must be preceded by human action, for God has disdained to run affairs other than through their causes.

I have been told by one of the persons responsible for marriage and divorce in the city of Karbala forty years ago that he only presided over the divorce of one person a year. Today however, now that society has taken up with Western values or has plunged intoWesternisation and the misplaced imitation of its laws and customs,it is the youngsters who choose their partners in isolation and without consulting their parents. It is evident now that thecriteria for marriage is a mixture of emotion, sexualfervour , inexperience, and immaturity. This is fuelled by the pressure of such values and their false notions of freedom and its attack on authenticcustoms which it describes as being reactionary or backward and senile.Hence a large proportion of marriages now end in separation and divorce.

For those that fall into these traps the calamities are great. For these reasons, it is imperative that we return to the Islamic lifestyle ofhappiness which our forefathers lived in the lands of Islam until half a century ago.

Conciliation is Best

The prevalence of divorce in the latter half of this century81 is attributable to a number of reasons including:

1. A short sighted and arbitrary way of choosing a partner for life because of emotions and the like.

2. A tendency towards over expectation by one partner of the other and an excess ofidealising .

3. The pressure ofman made laws limiting real freedoms, opportunities for work,travel and obtaining free goods and so on.

4. The spread of exhibitionism, social mingling,licence and dissipation, whereby a man can find someone apparently more beautiful than his wife and a woman can find a man more preferable than her husband.

5. The decline of the restraint promoted by religion and morals and a moving away from the Islamic way. However, this notwithstanding, it is imperative that marital problems be solved without resort to divorce, for divorce is described as being the most detestable of all that God has made lawful. The emissary of God hassaid: 'There is no permissible thing more beloved in the sight of God than marriage, nor is there any permissible thing more detestable in the sight of God than divorce'82 .

Imam Al-Sadiq hassaid: 'God loves the house in which there is matrimony and hates the house in which there is divorce for there is nothing more detestable in the sight of God than divorce'83 . In another tradition from ImamAl-Sadiq he commands: 'Marry and do not divorce for the heavenly throne verily shakes as a consequence of divorce'84 .

Why then has God not outlawed divorce altogether? The answer is that the home may have become an unbearable hell on earth. Alternatively, many things may add up to make reconciliation impossible.

In the case of the Christian church when it forbade divorce, millions of men and women remained partner less, after finding their natures incompatible.Hence corruption andlicence and perversity flourished as each partner found, in the air of poisonous freedoms promulgated by the West, all manner of means to prostitution and adultery put in front of them while the media and advertising egg them on.

There is no doubt that if there were present in society institutions dedicated to conciliation and trained conciliators together with charitable bodies, these problems which cause damage to the family, harm the children and come between relatives and at times end up in murder and suicide would certainly reduce. Certain divorce lawyers who do not heed God and do not experience any barrier from government or society can exploit the will of one of the partners to separate. He then fills his coffers at the expense of religion,conscience and morals. If he were to heedGod however he would make haste to resolve matters between them, as in theQur'anic verse: 'Conciliation is best'86 .

Polygamy - A Spurious Crisis

The law of the universe runs according to the perfect balance of pairs, as in theQur'anic verse: 'We have created of everything in pairs so that perhaps you may take heed'.87 However, this does not necessarily mean equality in terms of numbers but rather compatibility in terms of type, whereby each pair is ensured of fulfilling its natural role in life. For example in the world of ants and bees, the queen capable of procreation is one only, whereas themales which compete with each other for the prize offertilising her are many. This is true of most of the animal kingdom.

Human beings by virtue of being alive like the remainder of living things in this existence are no exception to this rule.Granted, they have their own particularities but so does every other living thing, and just as the divine will has ensured for human beings perfect compatibility in terms of type, as with the rest of existents, it has also defined and shaped humanity in a way particular to itself wherebyfulfilment , concord and continuance are ensured, each having its own proof and wisdom.

Among the teachings of ImamSadiq to Al-Maffadal Ibn 'Amr are his words: ‘Humanity was not created masculine and feminine except in order to be able to reproduce . .Had an organism given birth to males only or females only then reproduction would cease and the species would become extinct.Therefore some of the offspring came as males and others as females so that reproduction would continue and not be cut off'.88 Imam Al-Rida , speaking about the prohibition of adultery and of violating the law of nature which was created by God toharmonise with the human species and his needs, said: 'God has prohibited adultery because of the corruption it can cause, from murder to loss of lineage and neglect to the children's upbringing and corruption of inheritances and other forms of corruption'.89 It is possible to posit no more than the following four different marital systems between the two sexes:

1. Complete sexual freedom.

2. Polyandry.

3. Monogamy.

4. Polygamy.

There is no doubt that the first two are both invalid from an intellectual and religious point of view as the preceding report from ImamRida points out. There only remains the latter two. Statistics and surveys show that women outnumber men, particularly around the ages of puberty and sexual maturity despite the fact that some statistics in some countries show a relative parity between the sexes.

As to why women should outnumber men, that is one of the secrets of nature. However, its wisdomshould not be lost on anyone who reflects upon it.

This phenomenon also gives rise to the fact that women are morelong lived in comparison to men, perhaps as men are generally occupied with heavy work which can shorten their lives. Men are more often affected by wars and imprisonment or long absences; which necessitates the right of divorce by their wives in religiouslaw, or by the men if they know that they will not be able to maintain the relationship because of imprisonment or the like. Furthermore, those who are marrying a second, third or fourth wife are obviously not marrying a woman who is already married but one who is free of a husband.

What then is the intellectual problem with polygamy? If we do not solve this problem through polygamy, thenwe will either see women without husbands or we will see them taking lovers both of which are in opposition to the balances of rationale and of nature.

Since the beginning of Islam, and for a long time there was no barrier to polygamy. It was in facttotally normal. Disputes amongst wives were as seldom as disputes amongst sisters or between mother and daughter. Then however, the matter became corrupted; by men through their oppression towards women in the context of polygamy, and by women because of their desire forfavouritism and being singled out for benefits. Then the majority of women began to detest the concept of polygamy in many Islamic countries, even though polygamywaspractised without mishap in countries like Chad and other African countries. It is then necessary to adjust this situation so that so many women are no longer condemned tospinster hood which is one of the greatest forms of oppression against women. If the man were to die, then society should take care to facilitate her marriage to someone else or, in the case of divorce, to try to bring about her return to her former husband where possible as is prevalent in countriespractising polygamy.

The Prophet married the greater number of his wives after their divorces from former husbands or after the death of their first husbands as waspractised from the beginning of Islam and for centuries onward and is stillpractised now in certain countries. Is it not a kind of injustice that a young woman, or one who has lost her husband through divorce or by some accident, should remain single when she is a human being with emotions relating to sex, abode,children and so on. In the main though, the corrupted customs of some people deny her all of this. Customs though if transcended will fall. All thatis needed is an agent - a powerful current in society, and an authentic culture - to transcend this situation.

The Crisis of Celibacy

Today in Islamic countries, women are suffering from social oppression since these countries have adopted corrupt foreign traditions in this vital area of life. Society oppresses them by delaying their marriage90 , by preventing their re-marriage after the death of their husbands, or when the numbers of unmarried women are great, or for many other reasons. All of this needs to be transcended and overcome with the return to the land of Islamictradition which conforms to nature and the intellect. It is also imperative that society be educated inharmonising the characters of the married couple as a precaution against marital breakdown,separation and divorce.

This problem of the abundance of celibates or single women may be solved by charitableorganisations and socialinstitutions which specialise in the demands of this crisis and the numerous financial, medical and psychological problems associated with it. A woman who is celibate or unmarried is subject tobeing exposed to physical and mental illness as medical science has shown. In manycases she may not have any means of subsistence91 and turns to prostitution or other activities like thieving.

Is it right that a large section of the community remains in this state?

Simplifying marriage together with thepractise of polygamy and the application of public funds in solving financial problems and the aforementioned laws of precedence92 and land93 adds up to an Islamic solution to this problem.However because of the absence of vital Islamic law there is no alternative to charitableorganisations and communal weddings as a way towards solving these problems as much as possible. From drops of water and grains of sand oceans anddeserts are formed .

A group of friends ofmine in Teheran saw to the marriage of 1000 young couples at the one time. The same thing happened with another group in the Eastern province of theHijaz when theyorganised the marriage of 300 people. It is clear that: 'The complexity of a task should not prevent the attempt of achievable tasks'94 and 'What is not totallyrealisable as a whole should not be discarded as awhole.'95 , these being among the best principles with regard to these matters. Birth Control;Who is behind it?

The emissary of Allah has said: 'Marry, procreate and proliferate! 96 He alsosaid: 'Marry, procreate and proliferate so that I may be proud of you as a nation on the day ofjudgement even if the child is stillborn'.97 These two traditions contain laws albeit in the form ofrecommendations which like all recommendations should only be neglected in the case of strict necessity. The night prayer for example is a recommendedact which does not lose its status as such except through necessity. The same goes for proliferation of offspring.

What is taking place todayhowever, goes against this completely. The idea of proliferation has become foreign amongst Muslims whilst the notion of birth control, previously abominable to Muslims, has taken its place. Even in the most desperate periods of Islamic history98 , no promoter of theseideas which go against the intellect and nature was ever witnessed. It is true that certain rulers used to perpetrate gross acts but the law of Islam was in force - generally - throughout society where the economy was Islamic as was the rest of society. Today however, after the appearance of Western colonialism in our lands everything has been overturned. Forbidden things have become permissible. Gambling is commonplace. Taxes and duties, geographical borders, confiscation of freedoms, oppression and terrorism and prevention from fulfilling the Hajj pilgrimage have become permissible. In this atmosphere of opposition to Islam comes a call from the West for Muslims to practice birth control99 using the argument of the dwindling economic level of the family and the fall in GNP of the countries concerned which are unable tofulfil their commitments to provide enough schools and hospitals and other social services. At the same time they themselves in the West are encouraging their children to marry early and propagate.100 This call for marriage and childbearing begins with the instruction of children at primary level upwards. There exists amongst Western leaders a great fear that the European nations are on their way to extinction if the negative trend in population growth continues. They also know that the most important cause of this trend lies in the promotion of birth control which swept through Europe during the 1960's and sowed in the European mindset the notion that having children is an erroneous act. Europeans have continued to carry this notion with them until their birth rate has dwindled.

Today they have rediscovered that the error does not lie in the act of bearing children but in the promotion of birth control.101 Unfortunately they have exported this call to us after having experienced the tragedy of it themselves. They have come to the Islamic world to call Muslims to birth control.

Let us examine the goals of the West in their call for birth control. The goal is to drive Muslims to decline. Inthis they have found a most effective and devastating weapon capable of weakening Muslims after the failure of all their other weapons. We wonder why the West does not demand the Jews in Palestine topractise birth control. Why do we not see the Jews paying the slightest heed to this call? Why is the state of Israel strongly encouraging childbirth so that it has become commonplace according to visiting journalists to see pregnant women walking the streets or working in shops or teaching or working aspolicewomen ? Why does the state of Israel prohibit birth control while we Muslims allow it and some of us think that it is compulsory like fasting andprayer. The case of birth control is political propaganda aimed at weakening Muslims. It has no connection whatsoever with economics despite whatis said .

We wonder: why birthcontrol? Is it that the laws of Allah have changed in the universe?Have nature and Allah's creation been replaced ?Or is it that the laws of Allah apply only to one particular epoch rather than another? Is it because we lacklands or water or resources or opportunities?

The Islamic world comprises vast lands suitable for farming and developing.102 It also has a great store of water and is furnished with unquantifiable resources and potentials. It is therefore wrong to bang the drums of birth control when there is no need for it.103

Iraq for example, which used to be called 'The FertileLand' supported 40 million people during the 'Abbasid period according to some historians. Nowadays, Iraq's population is no more than half that figure. A country like Sudan would probably be able to feed the entire African continent from the arable land and water resources it has104 . The same could be said of the rest of the Islamiclands which own a tremendous amount of agricultural, mineral and oil wealth.

Where are these resourcesgoing to? Why are these riches stagnating? These are thequestions which require answers. This is theproblem which needs to be solved. All other problems arise from this problem. The population explosion, the economic crisis, underdevelopment, and the lack of political vision all stem from the tyranny, oppression, dictatorship, and despotism of the rulers, their control over Muslims, and their running of the affairs of the land according to their vain desires and not according to sound planning and the interests of the people.

One such ruler in an Islamic land - Saddam -has, according to some statistics, stolen 300 billion dollars from the people, not to mention the wealth he has destroyed in internecine wars. If we add to that the embezzlements of other rulers across history in Islamic lands then how much of the wealth of Muslimshas been squandered on the desires and whims of these rulers?

Where there is someone stealing the people's sustenance he must be called to account and confronted with the problem and told he is a thief and demands made for the return of the peoples wealth to them. We should not demand that the people suffer hunger to tell them to restrain from marriage and having children because there is not enough food to go round.

A large portion of the wealth of Islamic lands has gone to the countries of the West. Statistics show that one-fifth of humanity (those living in theindustrialised nations) consume four-fifths of the world's wealth. The remaining four-fifths of humanity - the poor living in what is known as the third world - only consume a mere one-fifth of the world's resources.

Herein Lies the Catastrophe

The lack of justice in the world and the neglect of Islamic laws of development like the aforementioned two laws of precedence105 and ownership of land.106 The stranglehold of governments and their control over affairs.The excess of bureaucrats who deny people's freedoms. Poor distribution of wealth. The lack of a vociferous opposition. The poorpeoples are battered and their nobility destroyed. Weare denied a voice, then we are denied food and now today we are told to stop having children. The problem of progenycan be solved within the context of an Islamic system based on justice and pluralism. Through justice, Islam endspoverty and closes the gap between rich and poor, ruler and ruled. Through pluralism, the peopleare given a strong voice with which to speak freely.

The Islamic viewof mankind differs to that of other systems. Some systems see man as a heavy burden and views every newborn child as an unwelcome guest and yet another mouth to feed. Islam however, views man as a vital and active force.The Qur'an sees man as the most powerful creation upon the face of the earth and sees within him the secret of advancement in the world: '...Man can have nothing but what he strives for; and that his striving will be in sight; then he will be rewarded with a reward complete'.108 Islam sees in each new child as a form of progress and advancement. In the words attributed to Imam 'Ali:

'Do you think that you are a mere germ? While within you is concealed the greater realm.'109 The prophet sees in every birth a new reason to be proud before the other nations of the world.Even if this child was stillborn and had no life. Was it not he who said: 'Marry, procreate and proliferate so that I may be proud of you as a nation on the day ofjudgement even if the child is stillborn'.110

The newborn may become ascholar or an inventor or an engineer or anything else. He will add to life his potential for work and add a new value and genius to history. Lifeis not built by tools and machines but by the efforts of men.Life is not run by computers and satellites but by the intelligence of mankind and every new infant is a new intellect, a new arm and a new step forward.Why then all this fear? Has not Allah promised us and His promise is good and true: 'We shall provide sustenance for them and for you'.111

He has also said: 'Marry those among you who are single, and the virtuous ones among your slaves, male or female: If they are in poverty, Allah will give them means out of his grace'.112 Marriage then eradicates poverty and children are a cause of increased wealth. This is the logic of the Qur'an and the Sacred Law. As for those who believe the opposite of this, believing that marriage and children diminish wealth, then they are far from Allah and the Qur'an and from the logic of the intellect and wisdom.