History of Shi'ism: From the Advent of Islam up to the End of Minor Occultation

History of Shi'ism: From the Advent of Islam up to the End of Minor Occultation 11%

History of Shi'ism: From the Advent of Islam up to the End of Minor Occultation Author:
Translator: Mansoor L. Limba
Publisher: ABWA Publishing and Printing Center
Category: Various Books

History of Shi'ism: From the Advent of Islam up to the End of Minor Occultation
  • Start
  • Previous
  • 73 /
  • Next
  • End
  •  
  • Download HTML
  • Download Word
  • Download PDF
  • visits: 24983 / Download: 5865
Size Size Size
History of Shi'ism: From the Advent of Islam up to the End of Minor Occultation

History of Shi'ism: From the Advent of Islam up to the End of Minor Occultation

Author:
Publisher: ABWA Publishing and Printing Center
English

1- This book is taken from www.al-islam.org.

2- We have edited and put it in several formats for easier access and free download.


1

2

3

Lesson 24: The Intellectual Legacy of the Shi‘ah

The importance of writing and compilation in the sacred laws of Islam is proverbial to all and sundry. For, one of the most significant ways of transferring knowledge and learning is through writing. The Arab society, prior to the advent of Islam had acquired the least benefit from this blessing, and only very few were able to read and write.1

But the need to record and put into writing the verses of the Qur’an for learning and teaching were only felt immediately after the Prophetic mission and the receipt of revelations. As Ibn Hisham has narrated:

Before ‘Umar ibn al-Khattab became Muslim, his sister, Fatimah bint al-Khattab and her husband Sa‘id ibn Zayd had become Muslims and covertly and away from the attention of ‘Umar, Khabbab ibn Irt was teaching themSurah Ta Ha on a writing parchment which was calledsahifah .2

In Medina, the Noble Messenger (S) had selected a group of Muslims who were able to put into writing the divine revelation. The Commander of the Faithful ‘Ali (‘a ), in addition to being the regular scribe of the revelation, the Holy Prophet (S) constantly explained to him the definitive verses {muhkamat } and allegorical verses {mutashabihat }3 as well as the abrogator {nasukh } and abrogated {mansukh } verses.

‘Ali (‘a ) had also written a book entitled, “Sahifah al-Jami‘ah ” as dictated by the Messenger of Allah (S), which encompassed the lawful {halal } and the unlawful {haram }, obligatory {wajib } and recommended {mustahab } acts, as well as laws and that which the people need in this world and in their life in the hereafter.4 Two other books—one entitled “Sahifah ” about penalties {diyyat } and another book entitled “Fara’idh ”—have also been attributed to the Imam.5

Other companions of the Holy Prophet (S) also compiled collections of his sayings and traditions, which they called “sahifah ”. Abu Hurayrah has been narrated by Bukhari to have said:

Of all the companions of the Prophet, I have the most number of narrating the Prophet’shadith s with the exception of ‘Abd Allah ibn ‘Amru because he used to write whatever he would hear from the Prophet while I was not writing them.6

After the demise of the Prophet (S), however, the second caliph ‘Umar ibn al-Khattab prohibited the writing ofhadith .7 This state of affairs persisted until such time that ‘Umar ibn ‘Abd al-‘Aziz during the latter part of the first century AH annulled this prohibition and he wrote to Abu Bakr ibn Hazm to record in writing thehadith s of the Messenger of Allah (S).8

This task was not realized until the end of the first half of the second century AH because according to Ghazzali, the first writers of books onhadith among the Ahl as-Sunnah were Ibn Jarih, Mu‘ammar ibn Rashid, Malik ibn Anas, and Sufyan ath-Thawri9 who were related to the second half of the second century AH and the years of their demise were 150, 152, 179, and 161 AH respectively.

Yet, this process was never suspended among the Shi‘ah, and great Shi‘ah among the companions of the Prophet (S) such as Salman al-Farsi, Abu Dharr al-Ghiffari and Abu Rafi‘ al-Qibti made the pioneering steps in the field of writing and composition. Ibn Shahr Ashub says,

Ghazzali believes that the first book written in the Muslim world is the book of Ibn Jarih on the works and types of exegeses {tafasir } narrated from Mujahid and ‘Ata’ in Mecca. Next to his book is the book of Mu‘ammar ibn Rashid San‘ani in Yemen; then, the bookMuwatta’ of Malik ibn Anas in Medina; followed by the bookJami‘ah of Sufyan ath-Thawri. This is not correct, however, for the first book in the Muslim world is written by the Commander of the Faithful (‘a ) who compiled the Qur’an. Next to him, Salman al-Farsi, Abu Dharr al-Ghiffari, Asbagh ibn Nubatah, and ‘Abd Allah ibn Abi Rafi‘ had also made steps in writing and composition. And after them, Imam Zayn al-‘Abidin (‘a ) composed theSahifah al-Kamilah .10

Ibn Nadim also regard the first account of writing among the Shi‘ah as related to the first century AH.11 In view of the Shi‘ah’s lead in writing, composition and compiling the Prophetic works, Dhahabi in describing the status of Aban ibn Taghlib thus says: “If the reliability of persons such as Aban is not accepted because of his inclination to Shi‘ism, so many of the Prophetic works andhadith s will perish.”12

As such, the jurists andhadith scholars {muhaddithun } of the Ahl as-Sunnah, particularly the founders of the four schools of thought {madhahib }, in addition to utilizing intermediaries to Imam as-Sadiq (‘a ), had also learned from the Shi‘ahmuhaddithun and receivedhadith s from them.13

Meanwhile, regarding the number of books written by Shi‘ah during the first three centuries AH, the author ofWasa’il ash-Shi‘ah has said:

“The scholars andmuhaddithun during the period of the pure Imams (‘a ), from the time of the Commander of the Faithful (‘a ) up to the time of Imam Hasan al-‘Askari (‘a ), have written six thousand and six hundred books.”14

The Shi‘ah during those periods made remarkable accomplishments in the various fields of knowledge of the day such as literature, lexicography, poetry, sciences of the Qur’an {‘ulum al-qur’an }, exegesis {tafsir },hadith , principles of jurisprudence {usul al-fiqh }, scholastic theology {‘ilm al-kalam or simplykalam }, history, life conduct of the Prophet (S) {sirah },rijal , and ethics.

They have made many writings and literary works while leading in most fields. Abu’l-Aswad Daw’ili, a Shi‘ah poet, was the founder of the science of Arabic syntax {nahw }.15 He was the first to put the dots in the copies of the Qur’an.16 The first book on lexicography among the Muslims isKitab al-‘Ayn written by Khalil ibn Ahmad17 who has been one of the Shi‘ah scholars.18

In the field of the life conduct {sirah } and battles {maghazi } of the Prophet (S), the first book was written by Ibn Ishaq who, according to Ibn Hajr, was a Shi‘ah.19

After undertaking this cursory glance, we shall now explain a bit about the sciences ofhadith , jurisprudence and scholastic theology that the Shi‘ah school has a particular disposition, keeping into account its fundamentals and principles in these fields.

Hadith

Next to the Qur’an, thehadith or thesunnah which is the second source of Islamic jurisprudence, means the saying, action and tacit approval of the Infallibles (‘a ). The Ahl as-Sunnah confine thehadith to only the saying, action and tacit approval of the Prophet (S). The Shi‘ah, however, regard the saying, action and tacit approval of the infallible Imams (‘a ) as proof {hujjah } and part of the corpus ofhadith .20

Now, we shall survey the works onhadith during the period of the presence of the Imams (‘a ) in four categories, which consist of four phases:

First Category

Based on the opinion of Najashi, the first category of the Shi‘ahhadith recorders were Abu Rafi‘ al-Qibti, ‘Ali ibn Abi Rafi‘, Rabi‘ah ibn Sumi‘, Sulaym ibn Qays Hilali, Asbagh ibn Nabatah Majashi‘i, and ‘Abd Allah ibn Hurr Ju‘fi.21 They were among the companions of the Commander of the Faithful, Imam al-Hasan and Imam al-Husayn (‘a ).

Second Category

According to some scholars, there were twelve persons who had written books and treatises among the companions of Imam as-Sajjad and Imam al-Baqir (‘a ).22 One may mention Aban ibn Taghlib among them. He occupied a special station in the eyes of the pure Imams (‘a ) so much so that Imam al-Baqir (‘a ) said to him: “In the mosque of Medina you give religious edicts {fatawa } to the people as I want individuals like you to be seen among my Shi‘ah.”23

Najashi says, “Aban ibn Taghlib, may Allah be pleased with him, was one of the forerunners in the various fields of knowledge such as the Qur’an, jurisprudence,hadith , literature, lexicography, and syntax.” Aban has written about these fields such as hisTafsir ,Gharib al-Qur’an andKitab al-Fadha’il .24

The same is true regarding Abu Hamzah ath-Thumali about whom Imam as-Sadiq (‘a ) has said: “Abu Hamzah was like Salman (al-Farsi) of my time.”25 Among his books and treatises areKitab an-Nawadir ,Kitab az-Zuhd andTafsir al-Qur’an .26

Third Category

The time of Imam as-Sadiq (‘a ) was a period of scientific progress and advancement in the Muslim society while the Shi‘ah had enjoyed relative freedom. According to Shaykh al-Mufid, the number of students of Imam as-Sadiq (‘a ) was approximately four thousands.27

Hasan ibn ‘Ali Washa’, a companion of Imam ar-Ridha (‘a ) says that he has seen nine hundred people in Masjid Kufah who have all been narratinghadith s from Imam as-Sadiq (‘a ).28 So, out of the Imam’s replies to the questions posed to him, four hundred books have been written29 all of which have been known asAl-Asl {The Principle or Essence}.

There have also been other books, apart from the ones mentioned, in various fields and sciences written by the companions and students of Imam as-Sadiq (‘a ).

Fourth Category

During this period which was after the time of Imam as-Sadiq (‘a ), many books onhadith have been written. For example, Husayn ibn Sa‘id al-Kufi, a companion of Imam ar-Ridha (‘a ), has written thirty books onhadith .30

Muhammad ibn Abi ‘Umayr, another companion of Imam ar-Ridha (‘a ), has written ninety four books while Safwan ibn Bajli, a companion of both Imam ar-Ridha and Imam al-Jawad (‘a ), have authored thirty books most of which have the titular appellation ofJami‘ {collection, compendium or anthology}. The latter compilers ofhadith such as Thiqat al-Islam al-Kulayni, Shaykh as-Saduq and Shaykh at-Tusi have benefited from those books in writing their own collections.

Lesson 24: Summary

The importance of writing in the sacred laws of Islam is proverbial to all and sundry. With the receipt of the divine revelation, the need for recording it in writing was felt, and a number of scribes of the revelation were known.

The Commander of the Faithful (‘a ) and a number of other companions of the Prophet (S) had compiled some collections of thehadith s of the Prophet (S) which were known together asSahifah .

Among the Ahl as-Sunnah, the first books onhadith have been related to the second half of the second century AH because the second caliph ‘Umar ibn al-Khattab had prohibited the writing ofhadith . This prohibition among the Shi‘ah, however, did not prevail, and the first writers among the companions of the Prophet (S) were Salman al-Farsi, Abu Dharr al-Ghiffari and Abu Rafi‘ al-Qibti.

Shi‘ah up to the time of Imam Hasan al-‘Askari (‘a ) had written six thousand and six hundred books.

We shall survey the works onhadith written by the Shi‘ah during the whole period of the presence of the pure Imams (‘a ) in four categories that consist of four phases.

First category: Companions of the Commander of the Faithful, Imam al-Hasan and Imam al-Husayn (‘a ).

Second category: Companions of Imam as-Sajjad and Imam al-Baqir (‘a ).

Third category: Companions of Imam as-Sadiq (‘a ).

Fourth category: Companions of Imam al-Kazim, Imam ar-Ridha, Imam al-Jawad, Imam al-Hadi, and Imam Hasan al-‘Askari (‘a ).

Lesson 24: Questions

1. How was the writing of the Qur’an during the time of the Prophet (S)?

2. Were the companions of the Prophet (S) keeping written records of hishadith s?

3. Which period were the first writers of the books onhadith among the Ahl as-Sunnah related to?

4. Who were the pioneers in writing among the Shi‘ah?

5. What is the number of the books written by the Shi‘ah up to the time of Imam Hasan al-‘Askari (‘a )?

6. The first category of the Shi‘ah scholars ofhadith {muhaddithun } was the companions of which of the infallible Imams (‘a )?

7. How was the writing ofhadith during the time of Imam as-Sadiq (‘a )?

8. The books onhadith collectively known asJami‘ {collection, compendium or anthology} were related to which period?

References

1. ‘Abd ar-Rahman ibn Muhammad ibn al-Khaldun, Al-Muqaddimah (Beirut: Dar Ihya’ at-Turath al-‘Arabi, 1408 AH), p. 417.

2. Abu Muhammad ‘Abd al-Malik ibn Hisham, As-Sirah an-Nabawiyyah (Beirut: Dar al-Ma‘rifah, n.d.), vol. 1, p. 344.

3. Surah Al ‘Imran 3:7: “It is He who has sent down to you the Book. Parts of it are definitive verses, which are the mother of the Book, while others are metaphorical.”

4. Abu’l-‘Abbas Ahmad ibn ‘Ali ibn Ahmad ibn al-‘Abbas Najashi, Fihrist Asma’ Musanfa ash-Shi‘ah (Rijal Najashi) (Qum: Islamic Publications Office affiliated to the Society of Teachers of the Islamic Seminary in Qum, 1407 AH), p. 360; Abi ‘Ali al-Fadhl ibn al-Hasan Tabarsi, I‘lam al-Wara bi A‘lam al-Huda (Qum: Mu’assasah Al al-Bayt Li Ihya’ at-Turath, 1417 AH), vol. 1, p. 536.

5. Shaykh at-Tusi, Tahdhib al-Ahkam (n.p: Maktabah as-Saduq, 1376 AHS/1418 AH), vol. 1, pp. 338, 342.

6. Sahih al-Bukhari (Beirut: Dar al-Fikr Li’t-Taba‘ah wa’n-Nashr wa’t-Tawzi‘, n.d.), vol. 1, p. 36.

7. Asad Haydar, Al-Imam as-Sadiq wa’l-Madhahib al-Arba‘ah, 2nd edition (Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Arabiyyah, 1390 AH), vol. 1, p. 544.

8. Sahih al-Bukhari, vol. 1, p. 36.

9. Ibn Shahr Ashub Mazandarani, Ma‘alim al-‘Ulama’ (Najaf: Manshurat al-Matba‘ah al-Haydariyyah, 1380 AH), p. 2.

10. Ibid.

11. Ibn Nadim. Al-Fihrist (Beirut: Dar al-Ma‘rifah Li’t-Taba‘ah wa’n-Nashar, n.d.), p. 307.

12. Shams ad-Din Muhammad ibn Ahmad Dhahabi, Mizan al-I‘tidal (Beirut: Dar al-Fikr Li’t-Taba‘ah wa’n-Nashr wa’t-Tawzi‘, n.d.), vol. 1, p. 4.

13. ‘Abd al-Hamid ibn Abi’l-Hadid, Sharh Nahj al-Balaghah, researched by Muhammad Abu’l-Fadhl Ibrahim (Beirut: Dar Ihya’ at-Turath al-‘Arabi, 1378 AH), vol. 1, p. 18.

14. Muhammad ibn al-Hasan al-Hurr al-‘Amili, Wasa’il ash-Shi‘ah, 6th edition (Tehran: Maktabah al-Islamiyyah, 1403 AH), vol. 20, p. 49.

15. Al-Fihrist, p. 61.

16. Bastani, Da’irah al-Ma‘arif (Beirut: Dar al-Ma‘rifah, n.d.), vol. 1, p. 788.

17. Al-Fihrist, p. 63.

18. Muhammad ibn ‘Ali Ardebili al-Gharawi al-Ha’iri, Jami‘ ar-Ruwah (Qum: Manshurat Maktabah Ayatullah al-‘Uzma al-Mar‘ashi an-Najafi, 1403 AH), vol. 1, p. 298.

19. Shahab ad-Din ibn ‘Ali ibn Hajar al-‘Asqalani, Tahrir Taqrib at-Tahdhib, 1st edition (Beirut: Mu’assasah ar-Risalah, 1417 AH/1997), vol. 3, pp. 211-212.

20. Shaykh Zayn ad-Din Shahid ath-Thani, Dhikra ash-Shi‘ah fi Ahkam ash-Shari‘ah, lithography, p. 4; Ar-Ri‘ayah fi ‘Ilm ad-Dirayah, 1st edition (Qum: Manshurat Maktabah Ayatullah al-‘Uzma al-Mar‘ashi an-Najafi, 1408 AH), pp. 50, 52.

21. Fihrist Asma’ Musanfa ash-Shi‘ah (Rijal Najashi), pp. 4-9.

22. These twelve persons were Bard al-Askaf, Thabit ibn Abi Safiyyah Abu Hamzah ath-Thumali, Thabit ibn Hormuz, Bassam ibn ‘Abd Allah Sayrafi, Muhammad ibn Qays Bajli, Hujr ibn Za’idah Hadhrami, Zakariyya ibn ‘Abd Allah Fiyadh, Abu Juham al-Kufi, Husayn ibn Thawir, ‘Abd al-Mu’min ibn Qasim al-Ansari, ‘Abd al-Ghaffar ibn Qasim al-Ansari, and Aban ibn Taghlib. See ‘Abd ar-Rahim Rabbani Shirazi, Muqaddamah Wasa’il ash-Shi‘ah, 6th edition (Tehran: Maktabah Islamiyyah, 1403 AH), p. ي.

23. Fihrist Asma’ Musanfa ash-Shi‘ah (Rijal Najashi), p. 10.

24. Ibid., p. 11.

25. Ibid., p. 115.

26. Ma‘alim al-‘Ulama’, p. 30.

27. Shaykh al-Mufid, Al-Irshad, trans. Muhammad Baqir Sa‘idi Khurasani, 2nd edition (Tehran: Kitabfurushi-ye Islamiyyeh, 1376 AHS), p. 525.

28. Fihrist Asma’ Musanfa ash-Shi‘ah (Rijal Najashi), pp. 39-40.

29. Abi ‘Ali al-Fadhl ibn al-Hasan Tabarsi, I‘lam al-Wara bi A‘lam al-Huda (Qum: Mu’assasah Al al-Bayt Li Ihya’ at-Turath, 1417 AH), vol. 1, p. 535.

30. Ma‘alim al-‘Ulama’, p. 40.

Lesson 25: The Science of Jurisprudence

The totality of man’s actions, which is his relationship with God and fellow men, is in need of rules that embrace the science of jurisprudence. The laws of Islam have a divine origin emanating from the will of God. Of course, the will of God is never dependent upon contract and consent. It is rather based on intrinsic and true felicity and adversity. The Noble Messenger (S) is the messenger of God and his decree is the decree of God:

﴿ وَ ما يَنْطِقُ عَنِ ٱلْهَوَى إِنْ هُوَ إِلاَّ وَحْيٌ يُوْحى ﴾

“Nor doth he speak of (his own) desire. It is naught save an inspiration that is inspired.” 1

And it is based on the verse,“Obey Allah and obey the Apostle and those vested with authority among you” 2 that obedience to ‘those vested with authority’ {uli’l-amr }—the true successors of the Prophet (S)—has been placed along with obedience to God and the Messenger (S). The statements of the infallible Imams (‘a ) are nothing but an inspiration from God, and like the statements of the Prophet (S), obedience to them is obligatory.

The State of Jurisprudence during the Period of the Companions and the Followers {tabi‘un}

But after the demise of the Prophet (S) when the true path of Islam was changed and people were kept away from the rightful successors of the Prophet (S), they refer to the companions {sahabah } of the Prophet (S) concerning religious issues and problems. Of course, a number of thesahabah were forerunners in this matter. As Ibn Sa‘d says, during the caliphate of Abu Bakr, ‘Umar, ‘Uthman, ‘Ali, ‘Abd ar-Rahman ibn ‘Awf, Mu‘adh ibn Jabal, Ubayy ibn Ka‘b, and Zayd ibn Thabit issued religious edicts {fatawa }.3

The pure Imams (‘a ) and a number of the Shi‘ah among thesahabah such as ‘Abd Allah ibn al-‘Abbas and Abu Sa‘id al-Khudri were also recognized generally by the Ahl as-Sunnah as jurists and well-informed of the laws of Islam, and were referred by them.4

Of course, during that period, the Shi‘ah used to refer to the infallible Imams (‘a ) and leaders of theAhl al-Bayt (‘a ) in matters of jurisprudence and Islamic teachings in general. So, jurisprudence andijtihad 5, as they are applied today, were not existent then. But after the end of the period of thesahabah , on account of the emergence of new issues in jurisprudence, a number of the Followers {tabi‘un } (the generation succeeding thesahabah ) had engaged in matters of jurisprudence {fiqh } and the termfaqih {jurist or jurisprudent} was applied to them. Among them were the “seven jurists” of Medina.6

The State of Jurisprudence among the Shi‘ah

The state of jurisprudence among the Shi‘ah was different owing to the presence of the infallible Imams (‘a ) andijtihad , then discussed among the Ahl as-Sunnah, was not developed among the Shi‘ah.

It can be said in general that the Shi‘ah jurisprudence during the periods of the presence of the infallible Imams (‘a ) up to the end of the minor

occultation {ghaybah as-sughra } has been at the period of settlement and preparation forijtihad .7 With the presence of the infallible Imams (‘a ), keeping open the door of knowledge and accessibility of the textual sources, the need forijtihad , which largely depends on intellectual bases, had not been much felt then.

Shi‘ah jurisprudence on the basis ofijtihad was first founded by Ibn Abi ‘Aqil ‘Ummani (died in the first part of the fourth century AH), a contemporary of al-Kulayni. After him, Muhammad ibn Junayd Askafi (died mid-fourth century AH) continued his way and fortified the edifices ofijtihad and juristic deduction {istinbat }.

They are known as the “Qadimayn ” {the two seniors}. Shaykh al-Mufid (died 413 AH) and Sayyid Murtadha ‘Alam al-Huda (died 436 AH) also followed the path ofijtihad until it was the turn of Shaykh at-Tusi (460 AH). The Shi‘ah jurisprudence attained a glorious stage through this great man. Apart from writing reliable books onhadith ,At-Tahdhib andAl-Istibsar , he also strived to collect books on jurisprudence andijtihad , authoring such books on jurisprudence asAn-Nihayah ,Mabsut andKhilaf .

Of course, it does not mean thatijtihad and jurisprudence had never been discussed during the presence of the pure Imams (‘a ). As a matter of fact, some people had no direct access to the pure Imams (‘a ) due to location and peculiar conditions.

So, in this regard, the pure Imams (‘a ) presented to the people the criteria by which to identify the jurists to whom they could refer in case of necessity, dealing in a sense with the preliminaryijtihad as well as answering the inquiries of people. For example, it is stated in theMaqbulah of ‘Umar ibn Hanzalah that he asked Imam as-Sadiq (‘a ) about two persons from among the Shi‘ah who were in conflict over religious issues such as liability and debt {dayn } and inheritance {mirath }.

The Imam said, “They have to look for a person who could narrate ourhadith s, give opinion about what we declared lawful {halal } and unlawful {haram }, and know our decrees {ahkam } for I declare such a person as the judge and arbiter for you.”8

Sometimes also the pure Imams (‘a ) would appoint certain persons to whom the Shi‘ah refer in matters of jurisprudence and religious laws. For instance, according to Shaykh at-Tusi, ‘Ali ibn Musayyab said to Imam ar-Ridha (‘a ): “There is a long way and I cannot come to you whenever I want. From whom should I ask about your religious decrees?”

The Imam replied: “{You may ask} from Zakariyya ibn Adam as he is trustworthy in {matters of} religion and the world.”9 Similarly, Imam al-Baqir (‘a ) commanded Aban ibn Taghlib to sit in the mosque and issue religious edicts {fatawa } for the people.10

The Beginning of Ijtihad

During the period of the pure Imams (‘a ), they used to teach their students the principles of jurisprudence {usul al-fiqh } and the rules of deducing them. For this reason, books attributed to the infallible Imams (‘a ) have been written by Shi‘ah scholars; for example, the bookUsul Al ar-Rasul written by Hashim Khwansari;Usul Asliyyah authored by Sayyid ‘Abd Allah ibn Muhammad-Ridha Husayn; and the bookFusul al-

Muhimmah on the principles of the Imams (‘a ) penned by Muhammad ibn al-Hasan Hurr al-‘Amili.11

In the books onrijal , some of the great companions of the pure Imams (‘a ) have been described as jurists {fuqaha }. For example, Najashi thus says about Fadhl ibn Shadhan: “…He was one of our reliable companions among the jurists {fuqaha } and scholastic theologians {mutakallimun }.”12

The Jurists among the Companions of the Imams (‘a)

Shaykh at-Tusi has introduced eighteen persons from among the companions of Imam al-Baqir, Imam as-Sadiq, Imam al-Kazim, and Imam ar-Ridha (‘a ) as the Imams’ jurist-companions, describing them as “jurists among the companions of Abu Ja‘far (‘a ),” “jurists among the companions of Abu ‘Abd Allah (‘a ),” ),” and “jurists among the companions of Abu Ibrahim and Abu’l-Hasan ar-Ridha (‘a ).”

In continuation, Shaykh at-Tusi has added that the Shi‘ah have consensus of opinion regarding the authenticity of their narrations and acknowledge their expertise in jurisprudence among the companions of the pure Imams (‘a ). He then introduced them in three categories.

First category: The jurists among the companions of Imam al-Baqir (‘a ) such as Zurarah known as Kharbud, Barid, Abu Basir Asadi, Fadhil ibn Yasar, and Muhammad ibn Muslim at-Ta’ifi, among whom Zurarah was the most learned. The six were also considered among the companions of Imam as-Sadiq (‘a ).

Second category: The jurists among the companions of Imam as-Sadiq (‘a ) such as Jamil ibn Darraj, ‘Abd Allah ibn Maskan, ‘Abd Allah ibn Bakir, Hammad ibn ‘Isa, and Hammad ibn ‘Uthman.

Third category: The jurists among the companions of Imam al-Kazim and Imam ar-Ridha (‘a ) such as Yunus ibn ‘Abd ar-Rahman, Safwan ibn Yahya, Biya‘ as-Sabiri Muhammad ibn Abi ‘Umayr, ‘Abd Allah ibn al-Mughayrah, Hasan ibn Mahbub, and Ahmad ibn Muhammad ibn Abi Nasr.13

In the section about the reports {akhbar } of the Shi‘ah jurists and their written books, Ibn Nadim has also mentioned a number of the jurists among the companions of the pure Imams (‘a ), saying: “They are sheikhs who have narratedfiqh from the Imams.” He has then mentioned them, viz. Salih ibn Abu’l-Aswad, ‘Ali ibn Ghurrab, Abu Yahya Layth Muradi, Zurayq ibn Zubayr, Abu Salmah al-Basri, Isma‘il ibn Ziyad, Abu Ahmad ‘Umar ibn ar-Radhi‘, Dawud ibn Farqad, ‘Ali ibn Ri’ab,

‘Ali ibn Ibrahim Mu‘alli, Hisham ibn Salim, Muhammad ibn Hasan al-‘Attar, ‘Abd al-Mu’min ibn Qasim al-Ansari, Sayf ibn ‘Umayrah Nakha‘i, Ibrahim ibn ‘Umar San‘ani, ‘Abd Allah ibn Maymun, Qadah, Rabi‘ ibn Madrak, ‘Umar ibn Abi Ziyad Abzari, Zaykar ibn Yahya Wasiti, Abu Khalid ibn ‘Amru ibn Khalid Wasiti,

Hariz ibn ‘Abd Allah Azadi Sijistani, ‘Abd Allah Halabi, Zakariyya Mu’min, Thabit Ḍarari, Mathna ibn Asad Khayyat, ‘Umar ibn Adhinah, ‘Ammar ibn Mu‘awiyah Dahni ‘Abdi Kufi, Mu‘awiyah ibn ‘Ammar Dahani, and Hasan ibn Mahbub Sarad, for each of whom one book has been mentioned.14

Lesson 25: Summary

The totality of actions of man is in need of rules which embrace the science of jurisprudence.

After the Holy Prophet (S) when the people were kept away from the rightful successors, they referred to the companions {sahabah } of the Prophet (S).

By the end of the period of thesahabah , a number of jurists {fuqaha } emerged from among the Ahl as-Sunnah.

But the condition of jurisprudence {fiqh } among the Shi‘ah was different because the Infallibles (‘a ) were present and the need forijtihad was not so much felt. Jurisprudence during these periods was at the stage of preparation forijitihad . In fact, jurisprudence base onijtihad was first discussed at the time of Ibn Abi ‘Aqil ‘Ummani during the fourth century AH.

Of course, during the periods of the Imams (‘a ) a sort ofijtihad was also discussed. At times, the pure Imams (‘a ) would teach the way and method ofijtihad to their companions. For this reason, books on the principles of jurisprudence {usul al-fiqh } attributed to those personages were written.

Shaykh at-Tusi has introduced eighteen persons from among the companions of Imam al-Baqir, Imam as-Sadiq, Imam al-Kazim, and Imam ar-Ridha (‘a ) as “jurists among the companions of the Imams (‘a )”.

Lesson 25: Questions

1. What was the condition of jurisprudence during the period of thesahabah , and who did the Shi‘ah refer to in matters of jurisprudence?

2. What was the condition of jurisprudence among the Shi‘ah during the presence of the Infallible Imams (‘a )?

3. How has the initiation of jurisprudence taken place among the Shi‘ah?

4. How many were the jurists {fuqaha } among the companions of the pure Imams (‘a )?

References

1. Surah al-Najm 53:3-4.

2. Surah an-Nisa’ 4:59.

3. Muhammad ibn Sa‘d, At-Tabaqat al-Kubra (Beirut: Dar Ihya’ at-Turath al-‘Arabi, 1410 AH), vol. 2, p. 267.

4. Ibid., pp. 279, 285.

5. Ijtihad: juristic derivation of laws applicable to new conditions on the basis of the general principles laid down in the Qur’an and the Sunnah. {Trans.}

6. Ibn Sa‘d has said: “Those who were referred to by the people in Medina and whose statements were trusted by the people were Sa‘id ibn Musayyab, Abu Bakr ibn ‘Abd ar-Rahman, ‘Urwah ibn Zubayr, ‘Abd Allah ibn ‘Abd Allah ibn ‘Utbah, Qasim ibn Muhammad, Kharijah ibn Zayd, and Sulayman ibn Sayyar. Ibid., p. 23.

7. Ayatullah Ibrahim Jannati believes that the Shi‘ah jurisprudence from the advent of Islam up to the present has passed through eight periods:

First period: the period of the emergence of the elements of ijtihad starting from the migration {hijrah} of the Prophet (S) to Medina up to 11 AH.

Second period: the period of contrivance and preparation for the application of ijtihad starting from the demise of the Prophet (S) up to the end of the minor occultation {ghaybah as-sughra}.

Third period: the period of conceiving the fundamental rules and common elements of ijtihad beginning with the time of Ibn Abi ‘Aqil (died 329 AH) up to the time of Shaykh at-Tusi (died 460 AH).

Fourth period: the period of application of the common elements of ijtihad in the textual sources commencing from the time of Shaykh at-Tusi up to the time of Nawadah Aw Ibn Idris (died 598 AH).

Fifth period: The period of expansion of the argument concerning issues on ijtihad starting from the time of Ibn Idris up to the time of Wahid Behbahani (died 1205 AH).

Sixth period: The evolutionary period of ijtihad beginning with the time of Wahid Bahbahani up to the time of Shaykh al-Ansari (died 1281 AH).

Seventh period: The period of profound thinking in matters of ijtihad commencing from the time of Shaykh al-Ansari up to the time of Imam Khomeini.

Eight period: The period of general application of ijtihad with modern methodology started by Imam Khomeini. Ayatullah Ibrahim Jannati, Idwar-e Ijtihad, 1st edition (Tehran: Sazman-e Intisharat-e Kayhan, 1372 AHS), starting from chapter 2.

8. Muhammad ibn al-Hasan al-Hurr al-‘Amili, Wasa’il ash-Shi‘ah, 6th edition (Tehran: Maktabah al-Islamiyyah, 1403 AH), vol. 18, p. 99, kitab al-qadha’, abwab sifat al-qadhi, bab 11, hadith 1.

9. Shaykh at-Tusi, Ikhtiyar Ma‘rifah ar-Rijal (Rijal Kashi), researched by Sayyid Mahdi Raja’i (Qum: Mu’assasah Al al-Bayt at-Turath, 1404 AH), vol. 2, p. 857.

10. Abu’l-‘Abbas Ahmad ibn ‘Ali ibn Ahmad ibn al-‘Abbas Najashi, Fihrist Asma’ Musanfa ash-Shi‘ah (Rijal Najashi) (Qum: Islamic Publications Office affiliated to the Society of Teachers of the Islamic Seminary in Qum, 1407 AH), p. 10.

11. Sayyid Hasan Sadr, Ta’sis ash-Shi‘ah Li ‘Ulum al-Islam (Tehran: Manshurat al-A‘lami, n.d.), p. 310.

12. Fihrist Asma’ Musanfa ash-Shi‘ah (Rijal Najashi), p. 307.

13. Ikhtiyar Ma‘rifah ar-Rijal (Rijal Kashi), vol. 2, pp. 376, 507, 830.

14. Ibn Nadim, Al-Fihrist (Beirut: Dar al-Ma‘rifah Li’t-Taba‘ah wa’n-Nashr, n.d.), p. 308.

Lesson 26: The Science of Scholastic Theology {‘ilm al-kalam}

The science of scholastic theology {‘ilm al-kalam } is the science about the totality of doctrines that every Muslim must believe. In other words, it is the science that deals with the discussion and study of the principles of religion {usul ad-din }.

The first difference in the principles of religion over the issue of Imamate {imamah } emerged immediately after the demise of the Holy Prophet (S). Shahristani says, “The most significant difference in Islam is the difference over the Imamate, and over none of the other principles of religion was swords unsheathed.”1

Nawbakhti also says:

The Messenger of Allah (S) passed away in Rabi‘ al-Awwal2 ten years after the migration {hijrah } at the age of 63 and with 23 years of apostolic mission… At the time, theummah of Islam was divided into three groups: A group was called “Shi‘ah” which was composed of the followers {shi‘ah } of ‘Ali ibn Abi Talib (‘a ) from which all the Shi‘ah subgroups separated. The second group claiming leadership and rule were the “Ansar ” and the third group was inclined toward Abu Bakr ibn Abi Quhafah, saying: “The Holy Prophet (S) did not specified a certain person as the successor, and left the decision for it to theummah .”3

As such, there have always been discussions and debates between the Shi‘ah and other Muslims over the issue of Imamate.

Yet, the difference on other principles and fundamentals of the religion emerged during the latter part of the first century and early second century AH.

As Shahristani says:

Difference on the principles emerged during the last days of thesahabah such as Ma‘bad Jahanni, Ghilan Damishqi and Yunus Aswari regarding predestination {qadr }, the relationship of good {khayr } and evil {sharr } to predestination. Wasil ibn ‘Ata’, a student of Hasan al-Basri and ‘Amru ibn ‘Ubayd, had added things to the questions of predestination.4

Among the scholastic {kalami } sects during those periods were the Wa‘idiyyah, Khawarij, Murji’ah, and Jabariyyah.

Of course, the scholastic discussion had reached its optimal point when Wasil ibn ‘Ata’ separated from the assembly of Hasan al-Basri and founded the Mu‘tazilah sect.5 In this manner, the Mu‘tazilah school, based mainly on rational deductions, was against the Ahl al-Hadith which was called “Hashawiyyah”.

It was so until such time that at the end of the third century AH, Abu’l-Hasan al-Ash‘ari separated from the Mu‘tazilah school and engaged in defending the Ahl al-Hadith school of thought within rational frameworks, and his school became known later as the Ash‘ari school.6 After that, the Mu‘tazilah made no progress, and kept on withdrawing in face of the Ahl al-Hadith so much so that now, the official scholastic theology of the Ahl as-Sunnah is the Ash‘ari scholasticism.

The Shi‘ah scholastic theology is the oldest of all Muslim scholastic shools. ‘Ali (‘a ), the first infallible Imam acknowledged by the Shi‘ah has

discussed the questions on beliefs such as monotheism {tawhid }, predestination and freewill, and Attributes of God, and this kind of discussions has been recorded inNahj al-Balaghah in the language of the Imam himself.

The scholastic discussions about Imamate among the Shi‘ah, however, commenced immediately after the demise of the Holy Prophet (S) in defending the right of the Commander of the Faithful (‘a ) (over the issue of Imamate and caliphate). As narrated by Shaykh as-Saduq, the first to defend the right of ‘Ali (‘a ) vis-à-vis the architects of Saqifah were twelve persons from among the great companions of the Prophet (S).

Few days after the event of Saqifah, they debated with Abu Bakr at the Mosque of the Prophet (S) and cornered him.7 After them, a person such as Abu Dharr al-Ghiffari had also not remained silent vis-à-vis the usurpers of the right of the Commander of the Faithful (‘a ) to such an extent that ‘Uthman ibn al-‘Affan was finally convinced to banish him to Sham and Rabdhah.

‘Abd Allah ibn al-‘Abbas, the Prophet’s (‘a ) cousin, a student of ‘Ali (‘a ), exegete {mufassir } of the Qur’an, scholar, and an outstanding Hashimite statesman, was one of the defenders of the Shi‘ah school and always championing the rightfulness of ‘Ali (‘a ) to such an extent that ‘Umar ibn al-Khattab found fault with him for always saying, “Our right has been usurped.”

Ibn al-‘Abbas became blind in his old age and one day he heard some people in a certain place uttering abusive language against the Commander of the Faithful (‘a ). He said to his son ‘Ali: “Hold my hand and take me there.” When he was near them, he addressed them, saying: “Which of you was abusing God?!” They replied, “None.” He asked, “Which is you was abusing the Prophet?” “None,” they answered.

He inquired, “Which of you was abusing ‘Ali?” This time they responded, “All of us.” He said, “Bear witness that I heard the Messenger of Allah (S) saying: “He who abuses ‘Ali abuses me, and he who abuses me abuses God, and he who abuses God shall be thrown in an inverted position by God to the hellfire.” He then returned and while walking, he asked his son, “How do you see them?” His son recited this poem:

نظروا اليك باعين محمّره نظر التيوس الى شفار الجازر

They are looking at you with a ‘reddish look’ like the gaze of the animal to be slaughtered to the lancet of the slaughterer.

Ibn al-‘Abbas said, “You continue.” His son said:

خزر الحواجب ناكسي اذقانهم نظر الذّليل إلى العزيز القادر

They were humiliated and disgraced; they are looking at you like that of the subject to his master.

Ibn al-‘Abbas said, “You continue!” His son answered, “I can say nothing more.” Ibn al-‘Abbas himself recited this poem:

احياؤهم خزى على أمواتهم و الميتون فضيحة للغابر

Their living ones are the source of abjectness for their dead ones while their dead ones were the source of disgrace for their ancestors. 8

Among the companions of the Commander of the Faithful (‘a ), prominent figures such as Sa‘sa‘ah ibn Sawhan, Maytham at-Tammar, Kumayl ibn Ziyad, Awis Qarni, Salim ibn Qays, Harith Hamdani, and Asbagh ibn Nabatah also engaged in defending the right of ‘Ali (‘a ), debating with the enemies of the Imam in this regard.

Meanwhile, concerning the first person among the Shi‘ah to have written a book about scholastic theology, Ibn Nadim and Ibn Shahr Ashub regard Isma‘il ibn Maytham at-Tammar to be the first author on Shi‘ah scholastic theology as he has written the booksAl-Imamah andAl-Istihqaq on this subject.9 The late Sayyid Hasan Sadr, however, considers ‘Isa ibn Rawdhah as the first Shi‘ah writer on scholastic theology.10 Of course, the oldest existing book on Shi‘ahkalam is the bookAl-Aydhah of Fadhl ibn Shadhan an-Nayshaburi (died 260 AH) who was among the companions of Imam al-Hadi and Imam al-‘Askari (‘a ).

During the period of Imam as-Sadiq (‘a ), this science, like other sciences, also flourished tremendously and a number of his students such as Hisham ibn Hakam, Hisham ibn Salim, Mu’min Taq, Fadhal ibn Hasan, and Jabir ibn Yazid Ju‘fi, among others, excelled in this field writing many books and treatises in this regard. They had discussions and debates with the scholars of other schools.

Fadhl ibn Shadhan an-Nayshaburi has been among the most outstanding Shi‘ah scholastic theologians {mutakallimun }. He met Imam ar-Ridha, Imam al-Jawad and Imam al-Hadi (‘a ), and has written many book on the subjects ofkalam , beliefs and deviant schools of thought.11

Hasan ibn Nawbakhti (died 310 AH) was one of the Shi‘ahmutakallimun and among his books isFirq ash-Shi‘ah .12

Lesson 26: Summary

Scholastic theology {kalam } deals with the discussion about the principles of religion {usul ad-din }. The first difference in religion was over the question of Imamate {imamah } which emerged immediately after the demise of the Prophet (S) and the event of Saqifah. But the difference on other principles and fundamentals is related to the end of the first century AH.

Scholastic {kalami } discussions reached their optimal point after the founding of the Mu‘tazilah school of thought.

The Shi‘ahkalam is the oldest Muslim scholastic school because the scholastic discussions about the Imamate started immediately after the demise of the Prophet (S) on account of defending the rightfulness of ‘Ali (‘a ).

The first book onkalam among the Shi‘ah was written by ‘Isa ibn Rawdhah while the oldest existing book onkalam isAl-Aydhah of Fadhl ibn Shadhan.

The Shi‘ahkalam flourished much during the period of Imam as-Sadiq (‘a ) and some of his companions excelled in it.

Lesson 26: Questions

1. The first difference among the Muslim has been over which principle?

2. When did the scholastic discussions among the Shi‘ah commence?

3. The first Shi‘ah book onkalam has been written by whom?

References

1. Shahristani, Kitab al-Milal wa’n-Nihal (Qum: Manshurat ash-Sharif ar-Radi, 1364 AHS), vol. 1, p. 30.

2. What is more popular is that the Messenger of Allah (S) passed away on the 27th of the lunar month of Safar.

3. Nawbakhti, Abi Muhammad al-Hasan ibn Musa. Firq ash-Shi‘ah. Najaf: Al-Matba‘ah al-Haydariyyah, 1355 AH/1936.

4. Kitab al-Milal wa’n-Nihal, p. 35.

5. Ibid., p. 500.

6. Ibid., pp. 85-86.

7. Shaykh as-Saduq, Al-Khisal (Qum: Manshurat Jami‘ah al-Mudarrisin fi al-Hawzah al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1403 AH), pp. 461-465.

8. Sayyid ‘Ali Khan ash-Shirazi, Ad-Darajat ar-Rafi‘ah fi Tabaqat ash-Shi‘ah (Qum: Manshurat Maktabah Basirati, n.d.), p. 127.

9. Ibn Nadim, Al-Fihrist (Beirut: Dar al-Ma‘rifah Li’t-Taba‘ah wa’n-Nashr, n.d.), p. 249; Ibn Shahr Ashub Mazandarani, Ma‘alim al-‘Ulama’ (Najaf: Manshurat al-Matba‘ah al-Haydariyyah, 1380 AH/1961), p. 62.

10. Sayyid Hasan Sadr, Ta’sis ash-Shi‘ah Li ‘Ulum al-Islam (Tehran: Manshurat al-A‘lami, n.d.), p. 350.

11. Abu’l-‘Abbas Ahmad ibn ‘Ali ibn Ahmad ibn al-‘Abbas Najashi, Fihrist Asma’ Musanfa ash-Shi‘ah (Rijal Najashi) (Qum: Islamic Publications Office affiliated to the Society of Teachers of the Islamic Seminary in Qum, 1407 AH), p. 306.

12. Ibid., p. 63.

Part 8: The Role of the Shi‘ah Poets in the Spread of Shi‘ism

Lesson 5: The Other Terms for the “Shi‘ah”

After the caliphate of the Commander of the Faithful ‘Ali (‘a ) and with the spread of Shi‘ism, in addition to the name “Shi‘ah”, other appellations such as ‘Alawi, Imamah, Husayniyyah, ‘Ithna ‘Ashari, Khassah, Ja‘fari, Turabi, and Rafidhi were gradually applied to the friends of the family of the Prophet (S). Although theAhl al-Bayt ’s (‘a ) adherents as a whole were called “Shi‘ah” as usual, these appellations and titles were also applied to the Shi‘ah on various occasions.

Sometimes, the enemies also used to give certain titles to the Shi‘ah with the aim of belittling and degrading them. During the time of Mu‘awiyah, for example, the Banu Umayyah and the people of Sham1 used the epithet “Abu Turab” {literally, “Father of the Earth/Soil”} for ‘Ali (‘a ) among all his epithets and sobriquets and they used to call his Shi‘ah as “Turabis ”.

After the Battle of Siffin and the rule of ‘Ali (‘a ), whenever Mu‘awiyah wanted to dispatch ‘Abd Allah ibn Hadhrami to Basrah, he would give instructions regarding the tribes but concerning the tribe of Rabi‘ah, he said: “Leave alone the Rabi‘ah as all of them areturabi s.”2 According to Mas‘udi, Abu Mikhnaf had a book entitled,Akhbar at-Turabiyyin , from which he has narrated the event of ‘Ayn al-Warad.3

The enemies of the Shi‘ah used to apply to them the label, “Rafidhi” and in most cases, whenever they liked to accuse somebody of abandoning religion, they would brand him arafidhi , just as ash-Shafi‘i says:

إن كان رفضاً حبّ آل محمّد فليشهد الثّقلان أنّى رافضى

If loving the progeny {al} of Muhammad is rafdh, the two worlds (of mankind and jinn) shall therefore be the witness that I am indeed a rafidhi. 4

It has been recorded in history that after the uprising of Zayd ibn ‘Ali, the Shi‘ah were then calledRafidhi . Shahristani thus says:

When the Shi‘ah of Kufah learned from Zayd ibn ‘Ali that he does not declare disavowal against the two sheikhs {shaykhayn } (Abubakr and ‘Umar) and regard as permissible the Imamate of a deserving one {mafdhul } in the existence of the most deserving one {afdhal }, they abandoned him. Therefore, they were then identified asRafidhi becauserafdh means “abandonment”.5

Regarding the label,‘Alawi , Sayyid Muhsin Amin says:

After the murder of ‘Uthman and the confrontation between Mu‘awiyah and ‘Ali (‘a ), the supporters and followers of Mu‘awiyah were called “‘Uthmanis” as they used to love ‘Uthman and be inimical to ‘Ali ( ‘a ). In addition to “Shi‘ah”, the followers of ‘Ali ( ‘a ) were also called “‘Alawis”, and this practice persisted till the end of the Umayyad rule. During the ‘Abbasid period, the labels “Uthmani” and “‘Alawi” were abrogated and only “Shi‘ah” and “Sunni” were used. 6

“Imamis” was another term applied to the Shi‘ah usually in contradistinction to the Zaydis. As Ibn al-Khaldun writes,

Some Shi‘ah believe in explicit traditions substantiating the proposition that Imamate {imamah } is solely in the person of ‘Ali and after it will also be transferred to his descendants. They are Imamiyyah with aversion toward the two sheikhs {shaykhayn } (Abubakr and ‘Umar) for not considering ‘Ali

as superior and not paying allegiance to him. They do not accept the Imamate of Abubakr and ‘Umar. Other Shi‘ah believe that God did not appoint a specific person but described the characteristics of the Imam which conform to the personality of ‘Ali and the people were at fault in not recognizing this. They do not abuse the two sheikhs and they are Zaydis.7

Keeping in view of the surviving poems from the supporters and companions of Imam al-Husayn (‘a ), it can be discerned that after his martyrdom, his Shi‘ah and supporters were also called “Husaynis”. In many of their poems they introduced themselves as “Husaynis” or “of the religion of Husayn”.8

In this regard, Ibn ‘Abd Rabbih thus says: “Among therafidhi s are the Husayniyyah and they are companions of Ibrahim al-Ashtar who used to roam around the alleys of Kufah shouting: “Ya litharat al-Husayn! ” They were called Husayniyyah.”9

Meanwhile, the term “Qat‘iyyah” {lit. “Decisiveness”} was applied to the Shi‘ah after the martyrdom of Imam Musa al-Kazim (‘a ) in contradistinction to the Waqifiyyah.

That is to say that they were certain and decisive with respect to the martyrdom of Imam al-Kazim (‘a ) and believed in the Imamate of Imam ar-Rida (‘a ) and the Imams after him, whereas the Waqifiyyah were not convinced of the death of Imam al-Kazim (‘a ).10

Nowadays, the label “Ja‘fariyyah” is applied to the Shi‘ah more on account of jurisprudence in contradistinction to the four Sunni schools of jurisprudence {madhahib }. The reason for this term is that the Shi‘ah jurisprudence took form more through Imam Ja‘far as-Sadiq (‘a ) compared to all the Imams (‘a ) and most traditions on our jurisprudence are narrated by him (‘a ).

Nonetheless, keeping in view a poem we have from Sayyid Humayri, it can be understood that only on account of jurisprudence during Imam as-Sadiq’s (‘a ) period the term “Ja‘fari” was applied to the Shi‘ah, but this term has also been applied to them in terms of principles of religion { usul } in contradistinction to other sects. The poem of Humayri is as follows:

تجعفرت باسم الله و الله أكبر

In the Name of Allah, I became a Ja‘fari, and Allah is the great .11

By becoming a Ja‘fari, Sayyid Humayri is referring to the correct course of the Shi‘ah Imamiyyah in contradistinction to the Kaysaniyyah.

The Status of ‘Ali (‘a) among the Companions {sahabah}

The Commander of the Faithful ‘Ali (‘a ) occupied a special position among the Companions of the Prophet (S). Mas‘udi says:

In terms of all the virtues and merits that the Companions of the Prophet (S) possessed, such as precedence in Islam;hijrah {emigration}; helping the Prophet; kinship with him; contentment {qina‘ah }; sacrifice {ithar }; knowledge of the Book of Allah;jihad ; piety {wara‘ }; asceticism {zuhd }; judgment {qadha’ }; jurisprudence {fiqh }; etc., ‘Ali (‘a ) had abundant share and perfect delight.

This is apart from the fact that some of the virtues are possessed by him alone such as brotherhood {ukhuwwah } of the Prophet and statements of the

Prophet such as: “You are to me as Harun (Aaron) is to Musa (Moses),” “Of whomsoever I am master {mawla }, ‘Ali is also his master. O God! Befriend him who befriends him and be inimical to him who is inimical to him”; and also the supplication of the Prophet for him; when Anas brought a cooked bird to the Prophet (S), he said: “O God! Let the most beloved creature (after him) come in so as to partake with me.” Then, ‘Ali (‘a ) came in and partook with the Prophet. This is while the other Companions did not possess those virtues.12

Among the Banu Hashim, ‘Ali (‘a ) was also the nearest person to the Prophet (S). He grew up in the house of the Prophet (S) and under his training.13 He (‘a ) slept in the Prophet’s (S) bed during the night ofhijrah , returned to their respective owners the possessions entrusted to the Prophet (S) and joined the Prophet (S) in Medina.14

The most important of all is ‘Ali’s (‘a ) position in Islam. The Most Noble Messenger (S) determined this position at the very beginning of the Prophetic mission.

When the Prophet received instruction from God to invite his kith and kin, it was only ‘Ali in the assembly who was ready to assist and accompany the Holy Prophet (‘a ). Then, in that very assembly, the Most Noble Messenger (S) announced before the elders among his relatives that ‘Ali is the executor of his will {wasi }, minister {wazir }, caliph {khalif }, and successor notwithstanding the fact the he was the youngest among those who were present.15

The Holy Prophet (S) informed his Companions on several occasions of the status and position of ‘Ali (‘a ), admonishing them to recognize his position. The Holy Prophet (S) was watchful of his their attitude toward ‘Ali ( ‘a ) particularly after the spread of Islam when many individuals with diverse motives joined the ranks of Muslims. This is especially true with respect to the Quraysh whose envy toward the Banu Hashim had amplified by then. Ibn Shahr Ashub thus narrates on the authority of ‘Umar ibn al-Khattab:

I used to annoy ‘Ali, the Prophet (S) once came to me and said: “You are annoying me, O ‘Umar!” I said: “I seek refuge in God from annoying the Messenger of Allah!” He said: “You are annoying ‘Ali and he who annoys him annoys me”.

Mus‘ab ibn Sa‘d has narrated from his father, Sa‘d ibn Abi Waqqas, that: “I and another person were in the mosque and we were abusing ‘Ali. Infuriated, the Prophet came to us and said: ‘Why do you annoy me? He who annoys ‘Ali annoys me’.”16

Haythami has narrated:

Buraydah al-Aslami, who is one of those who had gone to Yemen under the commandership of ‘Ali, says: “I went back to Medina earlier than the army. The people asked me: ‘What news?’ I said: ‘There is news. God made the Muslims victorious.’ They asked: ‘Why did you come earlier (than the army contingent)?’ I said: ‘‘Ali has allocated a bondwoman from thekhums for himself. I have come to inform the Prophet of it…’

When the Prophet was informed of it, he was annoyed and said: ‘Why are some people belittling ‘Ali? Anyone who finds fault with ‘Ali finds fault

with me. Anyone who would separate from ‘Ali has separated from me. ‘Ali is from me and I from him. He has been created out of my essence and I from the essence of Ibrahim (Abraham) though I am superior to Ibrahim… O Buraydah! Don’t you know that ‘Ali deserves more than one bondswoman? He is your guardian {wali } after me.17

Ibn Shahr Ashub also narrates a similarhadith from Sunnimuhaddithun such as Tirmidhi, Abu Na‘im, al-Bukhari, and Musalli.18

As such, ‘Ali (‘a ) had earned special respect among the Companions. Again, Ibn Shahr Ashub has thus narrated from Anas ibn Malik:

During the period of the Holy Prophet (S) whenever we wanted to know if a certain person is a bastard or not, we would know it from the spite of ‘Ali ibn Abi Talib. After the Battle of Khaybar, every man would hug his child and go. If ever he would see ‘Ali along the way, he would point to ‘Ali with his hand to the child and ask him: “Do you like this man?” If the child would say, “Yes,” he would kiss his child and if the child would say, “No,” he would put the child on the ground and say, “Go to your mother!” ‘Ubadah ibn Samit also says: “We used to test our children with the love for ‘Ali ibn Abi Talib. If we found out that one of them does not like him, we would know that he will never be an upright person.”19

During the latter years of the Prophet’s (S) life, the issue of ‘Ali’s (‘a ) position was more publicized so much so that the title wasi {executor of one’s will} became one of his widely known titles, which was accepted by both his friends and foes especially after the Holy Prophet (S) said to ‘Ali ( ‘a ) before going to the Tabuk expedition:

أنت منّي بمنزلة هارون من موسىٰ إلاّ أنّه لانبيّ بعدي.

“You are to me as Harun (Aaron) is to Musa (Moses) with the only difference that there shall be no prophet after me.”20

In the course of the Farewell Pilgrimage {Hajj al-Wida‘ } in Mina and in ‘Arafah also, the Holy Prophet (S) informed the people in several speeches about twelve persons shall be his successors and all of whom are from Banu Hashim.21

Finally, on the return from Mecca in Ghadir Khumm, he (S) received instruction from God to announce the succession of ‘Ali (‘a ) to all the Muslims. He ordered the Muslims to halt and mounting a pulpit made out of the camel saddles he delivered a long speech. He then said:

من كنت مولاه فهذا عليّ مولاه اللّهمّ وال من والاه و عاد من عاداه وانصر من نصره واخذل من خذله.

Of whosoever I am Master {mawla }, then ‘Ali is also his Master {mawla }. O Allah! Be Thou a Friend of him who is a friend of him (‘Ali), and be Thou an Enemy of him who is his enemy. Help him whoever helps him, and forsake him whoever forsakes him.

Then, he asked the people to pay allegiance to ‘Ali (‘a ). ‘Allamah al-Amini has given a comprehensive explanation of this subject in the first volume of the book,Al-Ghadir .

In this manner, the Messenger of Allah (S) asserted his successor’s identity to the people. Thus, the public was of the opinion that after ‘Ali (‘a )

would succeed (as the leader of Muslims) the Prophet (S) after his demise. In this regard, Zubayr ibn Bakkar says: “All the Muhajirun 22and the Ansar 23had no doubt that ‘Ali will be the caliph and master of the affairs after the Messenger of Allah (S).” 24

This subject is so clear in the poems that have been recorded from the time of Saqifah and these poems bespeak of a smaller degree of distortion that has ever happened in poetry. ‘Utbah ibn Abi Lahab recited this poem after the event of Saqifah and Abubakr’s inauguration:

ما كنت أحسب أن الأمر منصرف عن هاشم ثمّ منها عن أبي حسن

أليس أوّل من صلّی لقبلتكم و أعلم النّاس بالقرآن و السّنن

و أقرب النّاس عهداً بالنبي و من جبرئيل عون له في الغسل و الكفن

ما فيه ما فيهم لايمترون به و ليس في القوم ما فيه من الحسن

ماذا الّذي ردهم عنه فنعلمه ها أن ذاغبناً من أعظم الغبن

I was not imagining that the caliphate affair would be withdrawn from the Banu Hashim and much less to Abu’l-Hasan (‘Ali).

Is he not the first person to pray facing your qiblah and of the people the most knowledgeable of the Qur’an and the Sunnah?

He is the last person to look at the face of the Prophet; Jibra’il (Archangel Gabriel) was his aid in bathing and enshrouding him (the Prophet).

They do not think about what he has and what they have; whereas within the community {qawm} there is nobody who possesses his points of goodness.

What is it that made them withdraw from him? Say that this loss of ours is the gravest of all losses!

After ‘Utbah’s recitation of this poem, ‘Ali (‘a ) asked him not to recite it again and said: “For us the safety of religion is more important than anything else.”25

Ibn Abi ‘Abrah Qurshi has also said:

شكراً لمن هو باثناء قيق ذهب اللّجاج و بويع الصديق

كنّا نقول لها على و الرضا عمر و أولاهم بذاك عتيق

Thanks to Him Who is worthy to be praised! The dispute was no more and the allegiance was paid to Sadiq (Abubakr).

We were saying: “‘Ali is the owner of caliphate; we were also pleased with ‘Umar; but the best of them in this case is the old {‘atiq} (Abubakr)!” 26

During the course of the dispute between theAnsar and Quraysh that had surfaced on the event of Saqifah, ‘Amru ibn al-‘As has spoken against the Ansar . In reply to him, Nu‘man ibn al-‘Ajlan—one of the poets of the Ansar —has recited a poem in which ‘Ali’s ( ‘a ) right has been emphasized:

فقل لقريش نحن أصحاب مكّة و يوم حنين و الفوارس في بدر

و قلتم حرام نصب سعد و نصبكمعتيق بن عثمان حلال أبابكر

و أهل أبوبكر لها خير قائم و أن علياً كان أخلق بالأمر

و كان هوانا في عليٍّ و أنهلأهل لها يا عمر و من حيث لاتدري

فذلك بعون الله يدعو إلى الهدىو ينهى عن الفحشاء و البغي و النّكر

وصيّ النّبي المصطفى و ابن عمه و قاتل فرسان الضلالة و الكفر

Say to the Quraysh: “We are the army of (the Conquest of) Mecca and the Battle of Hunayn, and the cavalry of Badr!”

You said that appointment of Sa‘d to the caliphate is unlawful {haram}, but your appointment, ‘Atiq ibn ‘Uthman, of Abubakr is lawful {halal}.

{And you said:} Abubakr is the man of this task and can perform it well, but ‘Ali was the most deserving of people to the caliphate.

We were on ‘Ali’s side and he was the man for this job, but you do not understand, O ‘Amru!

This man (‘Ali), by the help of Allah, calls (us) toward guidance, and forbids perversion, oppression and evil.

He is the executor of will {wasi} of al-Mustafa the Prophet, his cousin, and the killer of the champions of disbelief {kufr} and misguidance {dhalalah}. 27

With the aim of thanking Fadhl ibn al-‘Abbas who, under ‘Ali’s (‘a ) order, had defended the Ansar , Hassan ibn Thabit has recited this poem:

جزى الله عنّا و الجزاء بكفّه أبا حسن عنا و من كان كابى حسن

سبقت قريشاً بالذي أنت أهل هفصدرك مشروح و قلبك ممتحن

حفظت رسول الله فينا و عهده إليك و من أولى به منك من و من

ألست أخاه في الهدى و وصيّهو أعلم منهم بالكتاب و بالسّنن

May God give good reward to Abu’l-Hasan for us as the reward is in his hand. Who, by the way, is like Abu’l-Hasan?

Concerning which you were a member, you were ahead of the Quraysh. Your breast is expansive and your heart tested (pure and sincere).

You preserved what the Messenger of Allah instructed regarding us. Except you, who could be foremost for him, and who could be?

Are you not his brother {akh} in guidance and the executor of his will {wasi}, and among them, the most knowledgeable of the Book and the Sunnah? 28

Initially, Abu Sufyan opposed the institution of (Abubakr’s) as caliphate and defended the Commander of the Faithful (‘a ). Apart from the speeches he delivered in this regard, he also composed the following poem:

بني هاشم لا تطمعوا النّاس فيكم و لا سيّما تيم بن مرّه أو عدي

فما الأمر الاّ فيكم و إليكم و ليس لها الاّ أبو حسن عليّ

O Bani Hashim! Do not allow others to get involve in your affair especially Taym ibn Murrah or ‘Adi. 29

The affair of caliphate belongs to you alone and it is only Abu’l-Hasan ‘Ali who is its man. 30

Finally, on that very day of Ghadir Khumm, the Prophet’s poet, Hassan ibn Thabit, asked the Messenger of Allah’s (S) permission to narrate the event of Ghadir in poetry, and thus recites:

يناديهم يوم الغدير نبيّهم بخمّ واسمع بالرّسول مناديا

وقد جاء جبرئيل عن أمر ربّه بانّك معصوم فلاتك وانيا

و بلغهم ما أنزل الله ربّهم إليك و لا تخش هناك الأعاديا

و قام به اذ ذاك رافع كفّه بكف عليّ معلن الصوت عاليا

فقال فمن مولاكم و نبيّكم؟ فقالوا و لم يبدا أهناك التّعاميا

إلهكَ مولانا و أنت نبيّنا و لم تلق منّا في الولاية عاصيا

فقال له: قم يا عليّ فإنّني رضيتك من بعدي إماماً و هاديا

فمن كنت مولاه فهذا وليّه فكونوا له اتباع صدق مواليا

هناك دعا: أللّهمّ وال وليّه وكن للّذي عادى عليّاً معاديا

فيا ربّ انصر ناصريه لنصرهم إمام هدى كالبدر يجلو الدياجيا

Their Prophet calls on them on the day of Ghadir Khumm; now, listen to the call of the Prophet:

Jibra’il brought a message from God that “You are under the protection of God; so, do not be dejected.”

Convey what has been revealed by Allah, their Lord, and here do not be afraid of the enemies.

He raises ‘Ali along with him; while he raises the hand of ‘Ali along with his hand, he announces in a loud voice.

Then he said to the people: “Who is your Master {mawla} and your guardian {wali}? Then, without showing inattention, they said:

“Your Lord is our Master {mawla} and you are our guardian {wali}, and no one among us today disobeys you.”

Then he said: “Stand up O ‘Ali! For, I am indeed well pleased that you are the Imam and guide after me.”

{He then said:} “Therefore, of whomsoever I am master, ‘Ali is his master also. May you be their true supporters!”

He then prayed, saying: “O Allah! Be Thou a Friend of those who are his {‘Ali’s} friends, and be Thou an Enemy of those who are his enemies.

So, O Lord! Help his supporters as they help the Imam of guidance who is like the moon during a dark night” 31

As is evident from this poem, in transcribing the Prophet of Islam’s (S) speeches about ‘Ali (‘a ), Hassan has called him Imam, guardian {wali } and guide {hadi }, which clearly stipulates the leadership and headship of theummah .

Yes, the masses of Muslims did not imagine that after the Holy Prophet’s (S) demise, somebody would contest ‘Ali (‘a ) on the issue of caliphate and succession to the Prophet (S). As Mu‘awiyah has written in reply to the letter of Muhammad ibn Abubakr,

We and your father during the period of the Messenger of Allah (S) used to consider obedience to the son of Abu Talib as expedient for us and his virtues were not concealed to us. After the demise of the Prophet (S), your father and ‘Umar were the first persons to trample upon his position and called on the people to pay allegiance to them.32

This is why those who were not around Medina during the last months of the Prophet’s (S) life and were uninformed of the conspiracies—such as Khalid ibn Sa‘id and Abu Sufyan—were vehemently agitated when they returned to Medina, after the demise of the Prophet (S), to see Abubakr sitting in the Prophet’s (S) lieu introducing himself as the Prophet’s (S) caliph.33 Even Abu Sufyan—when he returned from a journey and saw the situation as such—came to ‘Abbas ibn ‘Abd al-Muttalib and ‘Ali (‘a ) and asked them to revolt in order to get their rights but they refused.34 Of course, Abu Sufyan has no intention in these moves.

In conclusion, although most of the Prophet’s (S) Companions recognized the caliphate of Abubakr officially, they did not forget ‘Ali (‘a ) as being the most deserving {afdhal }. Whenever he was in the mosque, no know except him would issue edict {fatwa } on religious issues as they used to regard him as “the leading judge of theummah ” {aqdhi’l-ummah } as stipulated by the Most Noble Messenger (S).35

‘Umar used to say: “May God forbid that day when a problem would arise and Abu’l-Hasan is not present.”36 As he used to say to the Companions of the Prophet (S): “Whenever ‘Ali is in the mosque, no one except him has the right to issue any religious edict.”37

Although after the demise of the Prophet (S), ‘Ali (‘a ) was not able to acquire political power, his virtues and distinctions were narrated by the same Companions of the Prophet (S). Ibn Haythami—who is one of the staunched Sunni‘ulama’ —regarded the number of narrators of thehadith about Ghadir as 30 persons from among the Companions,38 but Ibn Shahr Ashub has counted 80 narrators of thehadith on Ghadir from among the Companions.39

Meanwhile, the late ‘Allamah Amini has counted the following 110 narrators of thehadith on Ghadir from among the Companions:

Abu Hurayrah; Abu Layla al-Ansari; Abu Zaynab al-Ansari; Abu Fudhalah al-Ansari; Abu Qudamah al-Ansari; Abu ‘Umra ibn ‘Amru ibn Muhsin al-Ansari; Abu’l-Haytham ibn Tayyihan; Abu Rafi‘; Abu Dha’ib; Abubakr ibn Abi Quhafah; Usamah ibn Zayd; Uba ibn Ka‘b; As‘ad ibn Zurarah al-Ansari; Asma’ bint ‘Umays; Umm Salmah; Umm Hani; Abu Hamzah Anas ibn Malik al-Ansari; Bara’ ibn ‘Azib; Zubaydah Aslami; Abu Sa‘id Thabit ibn Wadi‘ah al-Ansari; Jabir ibn Sumayrah; Jabir ibn ‘Abd Allah al-Ansari; Jublah ibn ‘Amru al-Ansari; Jabir ibn Mut‘am al-Qurshi; Jarir ibn ‘Abd Allah Bajli; Abu Dharr Jundab ibn Junadah;

Abu Junaydah al-Ansari; Hubbah ibn Jawin ‘Arni; Habashi ibn Junadah as-Saluli; Habib ibn Badil ibn Warqa’ Khaza‘i; Hudhayfah ibn Asi

Ghaffari; Abu Ayyub Khalid ibn Zayd al-Ansari; Khalid ibn Walid al-Makhzumi; Khuzaymah ibn Thabit; Abu Sharih Khuwaylid ibn ‘Amru Khaza‘i; Rafa‘ah ibn ‘Abd al-Mundhir al-Ansari; Zubayr ibn ‘Awwam; Zayd ibn al-Arqam; Zayd ibn Thabit; Zayd ibn Yazid al-Ansari; Zayd ibn ‘Abd Allah al-Ansari; Sa‘d ibn Abi Waqqas; Sa‘d ibn Junadah; Salmah ibn ‘Amru ibn Aku‘; Samrah ibn Jundab; Sahl ibn Hanif; Sahl ibn Sa‘d al-Ansari; Sadi ibn ‘Ajlan; Ḍamirah al-Asadi; Talhah ibn ‘Ubayd Allah;

‘Amir ibn ‘Amir; ‘Amir ibn Layla; ‘Amir ibn Layla al-Ghaffari; ‘Amir ibn Wathilah; ‘A’ishah bint Abibakr; ‘Abbas ibn ‘Abd al-Muttalib; ‘Abd ar-Rahman ibn ‘Abd Rabbih al-Ansari; ‘Abd ar-Rahman ibn ‘Awf al-Qurshi; ‘Abd ar-Rahman ibn Ya‘mur ad-Dayla; ‘Abd Allah ibn Abi ‘Abd al-Athar al-Makhzumi; ‘Abd Allah ibn Badil; ‘Abd Allah ibn Bashir; ‘Abd Allah ibn Thabit al-Ansari; ‘Abd Allah ibn Ja‘far al-Hashimi; ‘Abd Allah ibn Huntab al-Qurshi; ‘Abd Allah ibn Rabi‘ah; ‘Abd Allah ibn al-‘Abbas; ‘Abd Allah ibn Abi ‘Awf; ‘Abd Allah ibn ‘Umar; ‘Abd Allah ibn Mas‘ud; ‘Abd Allah ibn Yamil; ‘Uthman ibn ‘Affan;

‘Ubayd ibn ‘Azib al-Ansari; Abu Tarif ‘Adi ibn Hatam; ‘Atiyyah ibn Basar; ‘Uqbah ibn ‘Amir; ‘Ali ibn Abi Talib; ‘Ammar ibn Yasir; ‘Umarah al-Khazraji; ‘Amru ibn al-‘As; ‘Amru ibn Murrah Jahni; Fatimah bint Rasul Allah (S); Fatimah bint Hamzah; ‘Umar ibn Abi Salmah; ‘Umran ibn Hasin al-Khaza‘i; ‘Amru ibn Humq al-Khaza‘i; ‘Amru ibn Sharahil; Qays ibn Thabit al-Ansari;

Qays ibn Sa‘d al-Ansari; Ka‘b ibn ‘Ujrah al-Ansari; Malik ibn Huwayrath al-Laythi; Miqdad ibn ‘Amru; Najiyah ibn ‘Amru; al-Khaza‘i’ Abu Burzah Fadhlah ibn ‘Utbah Aslami; Nu‘man ibn ‘Ajlan al-Ansari; Hashim Marqal; Wahshi ibn Harb; Wahhab ibn Hamzah; Abu Juhayfah; Wahhab ibn ‘Abd Allah; and Yu‘la ibn Murrah.40

Among the narrators of thehadith on Ghadir, individuals who had hostile relationship with ‘Ali (‘a )—such as Abubakr, ‘Umar ‘Uthman, Talhah, ‘Abd ar-Rahman ibn ‘Awf, Zayd ibn Thabit, Usamah ibn Zayd, Hassan ibn Thabit, Khalid ibn Walid, and ‘A’ishah—can also be noticed. Even those Companions who sometimes disagreed with him defended him against his enemies.

For example, Sa‘d ibn Abi Waqqas—who was among those who voted in favor of ‘Uthman and against ‘Ali (‘a ) at the 6-man council after the death of ‘Umar, and did not extend cooperation with ‘Ali (‘a ) during his caliphate and preferred neutrality—in his conversation with Mu‘awiyah, thus said to Mu‘awiyah:

“You fought and waged war with a person who was more deserving than you to the caliphate.” Mu‘awiyah asked: “Why?” He replied: “One reason is that the Messenger of Allah (S) said concerning: ‘Of whosoever I am Master {mawla }, then ‘Ali is also his Master { mawla }. O Allah! Be Thou a Friend to him who is a friend of him (‘Ali), and be Thou an Enemy to him who is his enemy,’ and other reasons are his virtues and merits.” 41

Similarly, ‘Abd Allah, the son of ‘Amru ibn al-‘As, along with his father was in the army of Mu‘awiyah. When ‘Ammar ibn Yasir was killed and his head was brought before Mu‘awiyah, two persons were in dispute as each of them was claiming to have killed ‘Ammar. ‘Abd Allah said:

“It is better for one of you to relinquish his right to the other because I heard the Messenger of Allah (S) say: ‘‘Ammar shall be killed by a tyrant group’.” Mu‘awiyah was annoyed and said: “So, what is he doing here?!” ‘Abd Allah replied: “Since the Messenger of Allah (S) ordered me to obey my father, I am here with you, but I will not fight.”42

The presence of ‘Ammar in the ranks of the Commander of the Faithful (‘a ) whose killers had been described by the Messenger of Allah (S) as a tyrant group during that chaotic period was a clear testimony to the truthfulness of ‘Ali ( ‘a ) so much so that even the son of ‘Amru ibn al-‘As admitted it.

Lesson 5: Summary

After the caliphate of the Commander of the Faithful ‘Ali (‘a ), other names have also been given to the Shi‘ah. Contemptuous labels such asRafidhi andTurabi were used by the enemies of the Shi‘ah with the aim of debasing them. Some other labels such as ‘Alawi, Imami, Husayniyyah, ‘Ithna ‘Ashari, Khassah, and Ja‘fari were applied to them as well.

‘Ali (‘a ) had a distinguished position among the Companions of the Prophet (S) as well as being the nearest one to the Prophet (S) among the Banu Hashim. He grew up in the Prophet’s (S) house, and most important of all, the Most Noble Messenger (S) had appointed him as his minister { wazir } and successor { khalifah } and the masses of people were aware of it.

Lesson 5: Questions

1. Briefly list the terms used to refer to the Shi‘ah.

2. What labels did the enemies of the Shi‘ah address them with?

3. Why were the Shi‘ah called ‘Alawi or Ja‘fari?

4. What is the statement of Mas‘udi regarding ‘Ali’s (‘a ) position?

5. How many narrators are there for thehadith on Ghadir from among the Companions of the Prophet ( ‘a )?

6. The poems that were recited on the event of Saqifah bespeak of which subject?

7. What was the position of the Companions of the Prophet (S) vis-à-vis abusing ‘Ali (‘a )?

References

1. Sham or Shamat: up until five centuries ago, included Syria of today, Lebanon and parts of Jordan and Palestine. It was then the capital of the Umayyad caliphate. {Trans.}

2. Ahmad ibn Yahya ibn Jabir Baladhuri, Insab al-Ashraf, researched by Muhammad Baqir Mahmudi (Beirut: Ma’assasah al-A‘lami Li’l-Matbu‘at, 1394 AH), vol. 2, p. 423.

3. ‘Ali ibn Husayn ibn ‘Ali Mas‘udi, Murawwij adh-Dhahab (Beirut: Manshurat Mu’assasah al-A‘lami Li’l-Matbu‘at, 1411 AH), vol. 3, p. 110.

4. Haythami al-Makki, As-Sawa’iq al-Muhriqah, p. 123; Sayyid Muhsin Amin, A‘yan ash-Shi‘ah (Beirut: Dar at-Ta‘aruf Li’l-Matbu‘at, n.d.), vol. 1, p. 21.

5. Shahristani. Kitab al-Milal wa’n-Nihal (Qum: Manshurat ash-Sharif ar-Radi, 1364 AHS), vol. 1, p. 139.

6. Sayyid Muhsin Amin, A‘yan ash-Shi‘ah, vol. 1, p. 19.

7. ‘Abd ar-Rahman ibn Muhammad Ibn al-Khaldun, Al-Muqaddimah (Beirut: Dar Ihya’ at-Turath al-‘Arabi, 1408 AH), p. 197.

8. Ibn Shahr Ashub Mazandarani. Manaqib Al Abi Talib (Qum: Mu’assasah Intisharat-e ‘Allameh, n.d.), vol. 4, p. 102.

9. Ibn ‘Abd Rabbih, Ahmad ibn Muhammad. Al-‘Aqd al-Farid. Beirut: Dar Ihya’ at-Turath al-‘Arabi, 1409 AH

10. Shahristani. Kitab al-Milal wa’n-Nihal, p. 150.

11. ‘Ali ibn Husayn ibn ‘Ali Mas‘udi, Murawwij adh-Dhahab (Beirut: Manshurat Mu’assasah al-A‘lami Li’l-Matbu‘at, 1411 AH), vol. 3, p. 92.

12. Ibid., vol. 2, p. 446.

13. ‘Ali ibn al-Husayn Abu’l-Faraj al-Isfahani, Maqatil at-Talibiyyin (Qum: Manshurat ash-Sharif ar-Radi, 1416 AH), p. 41.

14. ‘Ali ibn Husayn ibn ‘Ali Mas‘udi, Murawwij adh-Dhahab, p. 294.

15. Muhammad Hadi Yusufi Gharawi, Mawsu‘ah at-Tarikh Islami, 1st edition (Qum: Majma‘ al-Fikr al-Islami, 1417 AH), vol. 1, p. 410.

16. Ibn Shahr Ashub Mazandarani, Manaqib Al Abi Talib, vol. 3, p. 211. {Trans.}

17. Hafiz Nur ad-Din ‘Ali ibn Abibakr Haythami, Majma‘ az-Zawa’id (Beirut: Dar al-Fikr Li’t-Tiba‘ah wa’n-Nashr wa’t-Tawzi‘, 1414 AH), vol. 9, p. 173.

18. Ibn Shahr Ashub, Munaqib Al Abi Talib, pp. 211-212.

19. Ibid., p. 207.

20. Tarikh at-Tabari, vol. 2, pp. 62-63; Tarikh al-Kamil, vol. 2, pp. 40-41; Musnad Ahmad ibn Hanbal, vol. 1, p. 111; Ibn Abi’l-Hadid, Sharh Nahj al-Balaghah, vol. 13, pp. 210-212.

21. Sayyid Ja‘far Murtada al-Amili, Al-Ghadir wa’l-Mu‘aridhun, 3rd edition (Beirut: Dar as-Sirah, 1418 AH), pp. 62-66.

22. Muhajrun (lit. “Emigrants”): The Meccan Muslims who accompanied the Prophet (S) in his hijrah {emigration} to Medina. {Trans.}

23. Ansar (lit. “Helpers”): The Muslims of Medina who invited the Prophet (S) and Muslims of Mecca to migrate (hijrah) to Medina. {Trans.}

24. Zubayr ibn Bakkar. Al-Akhbar al-Muwaffaqiyyat (Qum: Manshurat ash-Sharif ar-Radi, 1416 AH), p. 580.

25. Zubayr ibn Bakkar. Al-Akhbar al-Muwaffaqiyyat, p. 581.

26. Ibid., p. 580.

27. Ibid., p. 592.

28. Ahmad ibn Abi Ya‘qub Ibn Wadhih, Tarikh al-Ya‘qubi, 1st edition (Qum: Manshurat ash-Sharif ar-Radi, 1414 AH), vol. 2, p. 128.

29. Taym is the tribe to which Abubakr belongs while ‘Adi is the tribe of ‘Umar.

30. Tarikh al-Ya‘qubi, vol. 2, p. 126.

31. ‘Abd al-Husayn Amini, Al-Ghadir fi’l-Kitab wa’s-Sunnah wa’l-Adab (Tehran: Dar al-Kitab al-Islamiyyah, 1366 AHS), vol. 1, p. 11; vol. 2, p. 39.

See also Khwarazmi al-Maliki, Al-Manaqib, p. 80; Sibt ibn Jawzi al-Hanafi, Tadhkirah Khawas al-Ummah, p. 20; Ganji Shafi‘i, Kifayah at-Talib, p. 170; and others. {Trans.}

32. Ahmad ibn Yahya ibn Jabir Baladhuri, Insab al-Ashraf (Beirut: Ma’assasah al-A‘lami Li’l-Matbu‘at, 1394 AH), vol. 2, p. 396.

33. Tarikh al-Ya‘qubi, vol. 2, p. 126.

34. ‘Izz ad-Din Abu’l-Hasan ‘Ali ibn Muhammad Abi’l-Kiram Ibn Athir, Asad al-Ghabah fi Ma‘rifah as-Sahabah (Beirut: Dar Ihya’ at-Turath al-‘Arabi, n.d.), vol. 3, p. 12; Tarikh al-Ya‘qubi, vol. 2, p. 126.

35. Baladhuri, Insab al-Ashraf, vol. 2, p. 97.

36. Ibn Abi’l-Hadid, Sharh Nahj al-Balaghah (Beirut: Dar Ihya’ at-Turath al-‘Arabi, 1378 AH), vol. 1, p. 18.

37. Ibid.

38. Sawa’iq al-Muhriqah (Cairo: Maktabah al-Qahirah, 1385 AH), p. 122.

39. Manaqib Al Abi Talib (Qum: Mu’assaseh-ye Intisharat-e ‘Allameh, n.d.), vol. 3, pp. 25-26.

40. ‘Abd al-Husayn Amini, Al-Ghadir fi’l-Kitab wa’s-Sunnah wa’l-Adab, vol. 1, pp. 14-16.

41. Baladhuri, Insab al-Ashraf, vol. 2, p. 109; Akhtab Khwarazm, Al-Manaqib (Najaf: Manshurat al-Matba‘ah al-Haydariyyah, 1385 AH), pp. 59-60.

42. Baladhuri, Insab al-Ashraf, vol. 2, p. 312-313.


6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18