History of Shi'ism: From the Advent of Islam up to the End of Minor Occultation

History of Shi'ism: From the Advent of Islam up to the End of Minor Occultation 11%

History of Shi'ism: From the Advent of Islam up to the End of Minor Occultation Author:
Translator: Mansoor L. Limba
Publisher: ABWA Publishing and Printing Center
Category: Various Books

History of Shi'ism: From the Advent of Islam up to the End of Minor Occultation
  • Start
  • Previous
  • 73 /
  • Next
  • End
  •  
  • Download HTML
  • Download Word
  • Download PDF
  • visits: 24914 / Download: 5842
Size Size Size
History of Shi'ism: From the Advent of Islam up to the End of Minor Occultation

History of Shi'ism: From the Advent of Islam up to the End of Minor Occultation

Author:
Publisher: ABWA Publishing and Printing Center
English

1- This book is taken from www.al-islam.org.

2- We have edited and put it in several formats for easier access and free download.


1

Lesson 12: The Beginning of the ‘Abbasid Campaign and Its Effect upon the Spread of Shi‘ism

The campaign of the ‘Abbasids started in 111 AH.1 On the one hand, it contributed to the spread of Shi‘ism in the various territories of the Muslim world, and on the other, the acts of strangulation of the Umayyads were lessened. As a result, the Shi‘ah were able to have a relative breathing space.

During this period, the infallible Imams (‘a ) laid down the Shi‘ah juristic and scholastic foundations and Shi‘ism entered a new stage.

In general, during the Umayyad period there was no split between the descendants of ‘Ali (‘a ) and the descendants of ‘Abbas ibn ‘Abd al-Muttalib and there was no quarrel between them. In this regard Sayyid Muhsin Amin says: “The descendants of ‘Ali (‘a ) and the descendants of ‘Abbas during the Umayyad rule were treading the same path. The people who assisted them believing them to be more qualified to the caliphate than the Umayyads were known as the Shi‘ah of Muhammad’s (S) progeny.

During this period, there was no difference in religious opinion between the descendants of ‘Ali (‘a ) and that of ‘Abbas. But when the ‘Abbasids came to power, Satan hatched the seed of discord between them and the descendants of ‘Ali (‘a ), and they perpetrated numerous acts of oppression against the descendants of ‘Ali (‘a ).2 For this reason, the ‘Abbasid campaigners were calling the people to please the progeny of Muhammad (S) while recounting the states of oppression the Prophet’s (S) progeny were enduring. Abu’l-Faraj al-Isfahani says:

After the killing of Walid ibn Yazid and the emergence of differences among the Marwanis (descendants of Marwan ibn al-Hakam), Banu Hashim’s campaigners and propagandists went to various places, and the first thing they were expressing was the merits of ‘Ali ibn Abi Talib and his descendants. The said to the people: “How could the Umayyads afford to kill and displace the descendants of ‘Ali?”3

As a result, during this period Shi‘ism remarkably spread. Even thehadith s related to Hadrat al-Mahdi (‘a ) spread rapidly among the people of various regions. Khurasan was the main sphere of activity of the ‘Abbasid campaigners. For this reason, the Shi‘ah numbers there increased rapidly to such an extent that, as narrated by Ya‘qubi,

After the martyrdom of Zayd (ibn ‘Ali ibn al-Husayn) in 121 AH, the Shi‘ah in Khurasan were agitated and stirred up. The Shi‘ah publicized their belief. Many of the ‘Abbasid campaigners used to approach them and recount the crimes committed by the Umayyads against the progeny of the Prophet (S). This subject and news was imparted to people in every city in Khurasan by ‘Abbasid campaigners who went there and dreams and aspirations in this regard were seen and books were taught.4

Mas‘udi also narrates a subject which expresses the spread and prevalence of Shi‘ism in Khurasan. He thus writes: “In 125 AH when Yahya ibn Zayd was killed in Juzjan, the people named all the male infants born in that year were named Yahya.”5

The influence of the ‘Abbasids in Khurasan was greater as Abu’l-Faraj thus says while stating the profile of ‘Abd Allah ibn Muhammad ibn ‘Ali ibn Abi Talib:

The Khurasani Shi‘ah thought that ‘Abd Allah was his father Muhammad al-Hanafiyyah’s heir and that he was the Imam, and appointed Muhammad ibn ‘Ali ibn ‘Abd Allah ibn al-‘Abbas as his successor, and that the successor of Muhammad, Ibrahim, was the Imam from whom the Imamate extents to the ‘Abbasids through inheritance.6

As such, the bulk of the ‘Abbasid army was constituted by the Khurasanis. In this regard, Muqaddasi says:

As God saw the oppression and injustice of the Umayyads against the family of the Prophet (S), He gathered an army from the different parts of that Khurasan and sent it to them at the darkness of the night. During the advent of the Mahdi there is more expectation from the people of Khurasan.7

Given this, theAhl al-Bayt ( ‘a ) of the Prophet (S) had occupied a distinct position among the people such that after the victory of the ‘Abbasids, a person named Sharik ibn Shaykh al-Mahdi in Bukhara staged an uprising because of the ‘Abbasids’ acts of injustice against the progeny of the Prophet (S), saying: “We did not pay allegiance to them for us to commit oppression, shed the blood of people unjustly and commit acts against the truth.” He was repressed and killed by Abu Muslim. 8

Shi‘ism during the Period of Imam al-Baqir and Imam as-Sadiq (‘a)

The second period of the Imamate of Imam Muhammad al-Baqir (‘a ) and the initial period of Imam Ja‘far as-Sadiq’s (‘a ) Imamate coincide with the ‘Abbasid campaigns and ‘Alawi uprisings such as that of Zayd ibn ‘Ali, Yahya ibn Zayd, and ‘Abd Allah ibn Mu‘awiyah—one of the grandchildren of Ja‘far ibn Abi Talib at-Tayyar9—and the emergence of Abu Muslim al-Khurasani as the deputy of the ‘Abbasid campaigners in Khurasan in inciting the people against the Umayyads.10

Meanwhile, the Umayyads had internal factional disputes and problems among their supporters because there was a serious clash between the Mudhiris and Yamanis among the Umayyad supporters in their respective spheres of influence.11 These revolts and entanglements made the Umayyads negligent of the Shi‘ah.

As such, the Shi‘ah were able to enjoy a relative breathing space; relaxation from the state of intense dissimulation {taqiyyah }; reorganize themselves; and reestablish contacts with their leaders.

It was at this period when the people turned toward Imam al-Baqir (‘a ) to benefit from the blessings of which they had been deprived for many years. The Imam ( ‘a ) rose up in order to keep alive the school { maktab } of the Ahl al-Bayt ( ‘a ). He ( ‘a ) engaged in guiding and enlightening people conducting teaching sessions in Medina and Masjid an-Nabi in particular. He served as the reference authority for people, solving their scientific and juristic problems, as such his view served as proof for them. Qays ibn Rabi‘ narrates that he asked Abu Ishaq about wiping { masa’ } of slippers (during the performance of ablution { wudhu‘ }) and Abu Ishaq said:

Like other people, I used to wipe my slippers (in ablution) until such time that I met a man from the Banu Hashim whose equal I have never met

before. I asked him about the case of wiping the slippers (in ablution). He prohibited me from doing it, saying: “The Commander of the Faithful did not do it.” From then on, I stopped doing it.

Qays ibn Rabi‘ also says: “After hearing this statement, I also stopped wiping my slippers (in ablution).”

A certain man from among theKhawarij (Kharijites) came to Imam al-Baqir (‘a ). While addressing the Imam (‘a ), he said: “O Abu Ja‘far! What do you worship?” The Imam (‘a ) said: “God.” The man asked: “Can you see Him?” The Imam (‘a ) replied: “Yes, but the vision cannot witness Him while hearts with the truth of faith can see Him. He cannot be discerned through analogy {qiyas }. He cannot be perceived through the senses. He is not like human beings…” The Kharijite man left the Imam (‘a ) while saying: “God knows well to whom He shall entrust His message {risalah }.”

The scholars such as ‘Amru ibn ‘Ubayd, Tawus al-Yamani, Hasan al-Basri, and Nafi‘ Mawla ibn ‘Umar used to refer to the Imam (‘a ) for solving scientific and juristic problems and issues.12

When the Imam (‘a ) would arrive in Mecca, people would rush to ask him questions on matters pertaining to the lawful {halal } and the prohibited {haram }, considering the chance of asking the Imam (‘a ) a boon and a means of acquiring more knowledge. Imam al-Baqir’s (‘a ) teaching sessions were attended not only by students but also the scholars of the time.13 When Hisham ibn ‘Abd al-Malik arrived in Mecca forHajj , he witnessed these teaching sessions that were an opportunity for him.

He sent someone to ask the Imam (‘a ) on his behalf as to what the people will be eating on the Day of Judgment {mahshar }. In reply the Imam (‘a ) said: “On the Day of Judgment there are trees whose fruits shall be eaten by the people and rivers whose water the people shall drink so as to feel easiness for the Reckoning.” Hisham again sent that person to ask the Imam (‘a ), hence: “Shall the people have time to eat and drink?” The Imam (‘a ) said: “Even in hell there shall be opportunity to eat and drink, and the dwellers of hell shall also ask for water and other graces of God.”

Zurarah (ibn A‘yan) says:

I, along with Imam al-Baqir (‘a ), was sitting beside theKa‘bah , while the Imam (‘a ) was facing theKa‘bah . The Imam (‘a ) said: “Looking at theKa‘bah is indeed an act of worship.” Then a certain man (from Bajilah) came and said: “Ka‘b al-Ahbar used to say: ‘TheKa‘bah prostrates to the Temple of Jerusalem everyday’.” The Imam (‘a ) said to the man: “What do you think about what Ka‘b was saying?” The man answered: “Ka‘b was telling the truth.” The Imam (‘a ) was annoyed and retorted, saying: “No, you have lied and Ka‘b has lied.”14

Great‘ulama’ , jurists {fuqaha } andhadith scholars {muhaddithun } were trained under the blessed feet of the Imam (‘a ), such as Zurarah ibn A‘yan about whom Imam as-Sadiq (‘a ) said: “If it were not for Zurarah, there was a probability for thehadith s of my father to be lost forever.”15

Muhammad ibn Muslim heard thirty thousandhadith s from Imam al-Baqir (‘a ).16 Another scholar who learned from the Imam (‘a ) was Abu Basir about whom Imam as-Sadiq (‘a ) said: “Had it not been for them, the

works of prophethood {nubuwwah } will be terminated and be antiquated.”17

Other prominent figures such as Yazid ibn Mu‘awiyah al-‘Ajali, Jabir ibn Yazid, Hamran ibn A‘yan, and Hisham ibn Salim were among those who were trained in the school {maktab } of the Imam (‘a ).

In addition to the Shi‘ah scholars, many of the Sunni‘ulama’ have also studied under the Imam (‘a ) and narratedhadith s on the authority of the Imam (‘a ). As Sabt ibn al-Jawzi says, “(Imam) Ja‘far used to narratehadith s of the Prophet (S) from his father.” As such, a number of the Followers {tabi‘un } such as ‘Ata’ ibn Abi Rubah, Sufyan ath-Thawri, Malik ibn Anas (founder of the Maliki school of thought {madhhab }), Shu‘bah, and Abu Ayyub Sijistani have narratedhadith s from the Imam (‘a ).18

Furthermore, thousands of learned men in jurisprudence andhadith attained progress in the Imam’s ( ‘a ) school and his hadith s were spread far and wide so much so that Jabir al-Ju‘fi, who was a great muhaddith , has narrated seventy thousand hadith s on the authority of the Imam ( ‘a ). 19This state of affairs continued until Imam al-Baqir ( ‘a ) attained martyrdom on Dhu’l-Hijjah 7, 114 AH. 20

The University of Imam as-Sadiq (‘a)

In view of the then prevailing conducive political atmosphere, Imam Ja‘far as-Sadiq (‘a ) pursued his father’s scientific movement and established a large university and center of learning whose horizon reached far and wide. Shaykh al-Mufid says:

The knowledge of the Imam (‘a ) has been so widely narrated that it became proverbial to various many and its fame spread to every nook and corner. None of the progeny of the Prophet (S) match him (in this regard) whose knowledge and learning have been so widely transmitted.21

Amir ‘Ali thus writes about the Imam (‘a ):

Those philosophical discussions and debates in all the Islamic centers became widespread and the guidance and instructions given in this regard were made possible only by the university that has been established in Medina under the supervision of Hadrat Sadiq, a great grandchild of Hadrat ‘Ali. He has been one of the great‘ulama’ with precise views, a deep understanding, and well-versed in all the branches of knowledge of the time. In reality, it is he who is the founder of the rational academy in Islam.22

As such, those who were lovers of knowledge {‘ilm } and thirsty for the Muhammadan (S) gnosis {ma‘rifah } rushed from different parts of the then Muslim world to that heroic Imam (‘a ) in multitude, and benefited from his abundant spring of knowledge and wisdom. Sayyid Ilahil says: “In Kufah, Basrah, Wasit, and Hijaz, people of every tribe sent their children to Ja‘far ibn Muhammad. Many of the Arabs and Persians, the people of Qum in particular, came to him.”23

In hisAl-Mu‘tabar , the late Muhaqqiq (al-Hilli) thus writes:

During the period of Imam as-Sadiq (‘a ) various branches of knowledge that were transmitted from him astonished the great thinkers. A group of about four thousandrijali scholars have narratedhadith s from him, and by his teachings a great number of people in the various sciences attained

mastery to such an extent that his answers to their questions were compiled in four hundred books {musannafat }, which were called “Usul ”.24

In his book,Dhikra , Shahid al-Awwal also says: “Four thousand people from Iraq, Hijaz, Khurasan, and Sham put into writing the answers of Abu ‘Abd Allah Imam as-Sadiq (‘a ) to the questions.”25

In this manner, the seekers and lovers of knowledge and learning used to benefit from the Imam (‘a ). Outstanding scholars in various branches of the revealed {naqli } and rational {‘aqli } sciences of the day such as Hisham ibn Hakam, Muhammad ibn Muslim, Aban ibn Taghlib, Hisham ibn Salim, Mu’min Taq, Mufadhdhal ibn ‘Umar, Jabir ibn Hayyan, etc. were trained under the blessing of his presence.

Their compilations which are known as theUsul Arba‘ami’ah , are the basis of the four Shi‘ah books onhadith , viz.Al-Kafi ,Man La Yahdharah al-Faqih ,At-Tahdhib , andAl-Istibsar .

The disciples of Imam as-Sadiq (‘a ) were not all Shi‘ah as most of the Sunni scholars of the day have also studied under his guidance. Ibn Hajar al-Haythami, a Sunni author, thus writes in this regard: “The leading figures (in jurisprudence andhadith ) such as Yahya ibn Sa‘d, Ibn Jarih, Malik, Sufyan ath-Thawri, Sufyan ibn ‘Uyaynah, Abu Hanifah, Sha‘bi, and Ayyub Sijistani have narratedhadith s on his authority.”26

Abu Hanifah, the founder of the Hanafi school of thought, has said:

I used to go to Ja‘far ibn Muhammad for sometime. I used to see him in one of the three conditions: either he was praying, in the state of fasting, or reading the Qur’an. I never saw him narrating thehadith without performing ablution.27 The one superior to Ja‘far ibn Muhammad in knowledge, devotion and piety has not been seen by any eye, heard by any ear, or perceived by any heart.28

The Imam’s (‘a ) teaching sessions were attended by those who later founded schools of jurisprudence attending as philosophers, as well as students of philosophy from far and wide. After learning the sciences from their Imam (‘a ), they would return to their homelands and conduct teaching sessions of their own.

The Muslims used to gather around them and they in turn impart the teachings of theAhl al-Bayt (‘a ) propagating Shi‘ism. When Aban ibn Taghlib would come to Masjid an-Nabi, the people would reserve for him the pillar against which the Prophet (S) used to lean, and he would narratehadith s to them. Imam as-Sadiq (‘a ) used to say to him: “Sit in the mosque of Medina and issue religious edicts to the people as I like persons like you to be seen among my Shi‘ah.”

Aban was the first person to have written something on the sciences of the Qur’an {‘ulum al-Qur’an } and he was also so well-versed inhadith that he used to sit in Masjid an-Nabi and the people would come and ask him. Through his various styles of speaking, he would answer them and impart thehadith s of theAhl al-Bayt (‘a ) to them.29

InMizan al-I‘tidal , adh-Dhahabi thus says regarding him: “If thehadith of individuals such as Aban who are accused of being Shi‘ah is rejected, a great part of the Prophetic works would have perished.”30

Abu Khalid al-Kabuli says: “I saw Abu Ja‘far Mu’min Taq sitting in Masjid an-Nabi while the people of Medina gathered around him and posed their questions on jurisprudence {masa’il } to him and he would answer them.”31

Shi‘ism during that period was so spread that some people, in a bid to acquire social standing among the people, resorted to fabricatinghadith s from the Imams (‘a ) to draw people’s attention by interpreting the traditions in their own favor.

For example, Imam as-Sadiq (‘a )—in reply to one of his companions named Faydh ibn Mukhtar who asked about the reason behind the contradiction in hadith s—thus says: “These people are not seeking the pleasure of Allah in narrating the hadith s and expressing our views. They are rather seeking the world and each of them is aspiring to be leader.” 32

Lesson 12: Summary

The ‘Abbasid campaign started in 111 AH. During that time, there was no division between the descendants of ‘Ali {‘Alawi } and the descendants of ‘Abbas ibn ‘Abd al-Muttalib {‘Abbasi }. The Umayyads were busy repressing the ‘Abbasid uprisings as a result of which Shi‘ism spread remarkably.

Imam al-Baqir and Imam as-Sadiq (‘a ) in this opportune time trained their disciples establishing the Jafari University, and many jurists { fuqaha } and scholastic theologians { mutakallimun } benefited from these two personages. Shaykh al-Mufid regards the number of the disciples of Imam as-Sadiq to be four thousand.

Lesson 12: Questions

1. What was the impact of the ‘Abbasid campaign upon the spread of Shi‘ism?

2. What was the trend of Shi‘ism during the period of Imam al-Baqir and Imam as-Sadiq (‘a )?

3. How did Imam as-Sadiq (‘a ) take advantage of the then existing opportune time?

References

1. Ahmad ibn Abi Ya‘qub ibn Wadhih, Tarikh al-Ya‘qubi, 1st edition (Qum: Manshurat ash-Sharif ar-Radi, 1414 AH), vol. 2, p. 319.

2. Sayyid Muhsin Amin, A‘yan ash-Shi‘ah (Beirut: Dar at-Ta‘aruf Li’l-Matbu‘at, n.d.), vol. 1, p. 19.

3. ‘Ali ibn al-Husayn Abu’l-Faraj al-Isfahani, Maqatil at-Talibiyyin (Qum: Manshurat ash-Sharif ar-Radi, 1416 AH), p. 207.

4. Ibn Wadhih, Tarikh al-Ya‘qubi, vol. 2, p. 326.

5. ‘Ali ibn Husayn ibn ‘Ali Mas‘udi, Murawwij adh-Dhahab (Beirut: Manshurat Mu’assasah al-A‘lami Li’l-Matbu‘at, 1411 AH), vol. 3, p. 236.

6. Abu’l-Faraj al-Isfahani, Maqatil at-Talibiyyin, p. 133.

7. Abu ‘Abd Allah Muhammad ibn Ahmad Muqaddasi, Ahsan at-Taqasim fi Ma‘rifah al-Aqalim, trans. Dr. ‘Ali Naqi Manzawi (n.p.: Shirkat-e Mu’allifan va Mutarjiman-e Iran, 1361 AHS), vol. 2, pp. 426-427.

8. Ibn Wadhih, Tarikh al-Ya‘qubi, vol. 2, p. 345.

9. Abu’l-Faraj al-Isfahani, Maqatil at-Talibiyyin, vol. 2, p. 345.

10. Ibn Wadhih, Tarikh al-Ya‘qubi, vol. 2, p. 332.

11. Ibid., p. 333.

12. Asad Haydar, Al-Imam as-Sadiq wa’l-Madhahib al-Arba‘ah, 2nd edition (Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Arabiyyah, 1390 AH), vol. 1, pp. 452-453.

13. ‘Allamah Muhammad Baqir Majlisi, Bihar al-Anwar, 2nd edition (Tehran: Al-Maktabah al-Islamiyyah, 1394 AH), vol. 46, p. 355.

14. Ibid.

15. Abi Ja‘far Muhammad ibn al-Hasan ibn ‘Ali (Shaykh) at-Tusi, Ikhtiyar Ma‘rifah ar-Rijal (Rijal Kashi) (Qum: Mu’assasah Al al-Bayt at-Turath, 1404 AH), vol. 1, p. 345.

16. Ibid., p. 386.

17. Ibid., p. 398.

18. Sabt ibn al-Jawzi, Tadhkirah al-Khawas (Qum: Manshurat ash-Sharif ar-Radhi, 1376 AHS/1418 AH), p. 311.

19. Muhammad Husayn Muzaffar, Tarikh ash-Shi‘ah. Qum: Manshurat Maktabah Basirati, n.d.

20. Abi Ja‘far Muhammad ibn Ya‘qub ibn Ishaq Kulayni, Usul al-Kafi (Tehran: Dar al-Kutub al-Islamiyyah, 1363 AHS), vol. 1, p. 472.

21. Shaykh Muhammad ibn Muhammad ibn an-Nu‘man al-Mufid, Al-Irshad, trans. Muhammad Baqir Sa‘idi Khurasani, 2nd edition (Tehran: Kitabfurushi-ye Islamiyyeh, 1376 AHS), p. 525.

22. Amir ‘Ali, Tarikh-e Gharb va Islam {History of the West and Islam}, trans. Fakhr Da‘i Gilani, 3rd edition. Tehran: Intisharat-e Ganjineh, 1366 AHS), p. 213.

23. Asad Haydar, Al-Imam as-Sadiq wa’l-Madhahib al-Arba‘ah, 3rd edition (Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Arabiyyah, 1403 AH).

24. Abu’l-Qasim Ja‘far ibn al-Hasan ibn Yahya ibn Sa‘id Muhaqqiq al-Hilli, Al-Mu‘tabar (Lithography), pp. 4-5.

25. Muhammad ibn Makki Shahid al-Awwal, Dhikra (Lithography), p. 6.

26. Ahmad Ibn Hajar Haythami al-Makki, As-Sawa‘iq al-Mahriqah fi’r-Radd ‘ala Ahl al-Bid‘a waz-Zindiqah, 2nd edition (Cairo: Maktabah al-Qahirah, 1385 AH), p. 201.

27. Shahab ad-Din ibn ‘Ali Ibn Hajar al-‘Asqalani, Tahdhib at-Tahdhib, 1st edition (Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 1404 AH), vol. 1, p. 88.

28. Asad Haydar, Al-Imam as-Sadiq wa’l-Madhahib al-Arba‘ah, vol. 1, p. 53.

29. Ibid., vol. 1, p. 55.

30. Shams ad-Din Muhammad ibn Ahmad adh-Dhahabi, Mizan al-I‘tidal (Beirut: Dar al-Ma‘rifah, n.d.), vol. 1, p. 4.

31. Shaykh at-Tusi, Ikhtiyar Ma‘rifah ar-Rijal (Rijal Kashi), vol. 2, p. 581.

32. Ibid., vol. 1, p. 347.

Leswson 2: General References

After having a general survey of some of the special references on the history of Shi‘ism, we shall examine the general references for this history. The general references with respect to their subjects are as follows:

1.Tarikh-e ‘Umumi {General History};

2.Zendeginameh-ye Imaman (‘a) {Biography of the Imams (‘a )};

3.Kitab-ha-ye Fitan va Hurub {Books on Revolts and Wars};

4.Kitab-ha-ye Rijal va Tabaqat {Books onRijal and Classes};

5.Kitab-ha-ye Jughrafiya {Books on Geography};

6.Kitab-ha-ye Akhbar {Books on Narrations};

7.Kitab-ha-ye Nasab {Books on Genealogy};

8.Kitab-ha-ye Hadith {Books onHadith s};

9.Kitab-ha-ye Milal va Nihal {Books on Nations and Religions}.

1. General History

In this book’s survey of the history of Shi‘ism, the most widely used books are those relating to the general history of the first centurieshijri and the history of the caliphate, such asTarikh al-Ya‘qubi ,Murawwij adh-Dhahab ,Tarikh at-Tabari ,Al-Kamil fi’t-Tarikh ,Al-‘Abr ,Al-Imammah wa’s-Siyasah ,Tarikh al-Khulafa’ ,Sharh Nahj al-Balaghah of Ibn Abi’l-Hadid, including even the analytical history research and books written by contemporary writers. Among the general history books, I have usedTarikh al-Ya‘qubi andMurawwij adh-Dhahab extensively.

In these two books, historical events and occurrences have been recorded fairly impartially and without any attempt at concealing the truth. Ya‘qubi has expressed in detail the oppositions of Companions of the Prophet (S) with the caliphate of Abubakr, criticizing the groupings after the demise of the Prophet (S).1

He has embarked, as far as he could, on mentioning the events relevant to the history of the Shi‘ah such as the government of the Commander of the Faithful (‘a ),2 the peace treaty of Imam al-Hasan (‘a ),3 the martyrdom of Hujr ibn al-‘Addi,4 ‘Amru ibn Hamq5 and that of Imam al-Husayn (‘a ),6 more or less presenteing the truth of the matter.

Mas‘udi is also among the historians who had no intention of concealing the truth. Although he has only dealt in passing with the event of Saqifah in the booksMurawwij adh-Dhahab andAt-Tanbiyyah wa’l-Ashraf , he nevertheless has mentioned the differences of the Companions and the Banu Hashim’s refusal to pay allegiance to Abubakr.7

In another part of the first book, Mas‘udi wrote the issue of Fadak8 and discussed in detail the events that took place during the caliphate of the Commander of the Faithful (‘a ) and the martyrdom of Imam al-Hasan (‘a ).9

He has mentioned the names of the Shi‘ah and their tribes as well as the enemies of theAhl al-Bayt ( ‘a ) in various parts of Murawwij adh-Dhahab . 10Also, in the years of the Holy Imams’ ( ‘a ) demise, he has given a short account of their lives. 11He has, in particular, detailed the uprisings of the ‘Alawis during the 2nd century hijri . 12

2. Biography of the Imams (‘a)

Among the books relevant to the life accounts of the Imams (‘a ), the book,Al-Irshad , by Shaykh al-Mufid andTadhkirah al-Khawas by Ibn al-Jawzi occupy (special) importance.Al-Irshad is the first and most important available Shi‘ah reference authority on the life account of the twelve Imams (‘a ).

In view of the fact that part of ‘Ali’s (‘a ) life overlapped that of the life of the Prophet (S), the life account and conduct {sirah } of the Prophet (S) has also been included in this book, especially his battles in all of which ‘Ali (‘a ) had been present, with the exception of the Tabuk expedition. Concerning the book, it is enough to say that no researcher on the history of Shi‘ism and the biography of the infallible Imams (‘a ) is needless of it.

TheTadhrikah al-Khawas of Ibn al-Jawzi occupies special importance in the sense that the biography of the Shi‘ah Imams ( ‘a ) has been expressed through the language of a Hanafi and non-Shi‘ah person, but no sort of negligence of the truth and concealment of the reality has taken place.

3. Books on Revolts and Wars

These references deal particularly with the wars that have great importance in the historiography of Muslims. TheWaq‘ah as-Siffin of Nasr ibn Mazahim al-Munqari (born 212 AH), which deals with the event and confrontation at Siffin, can be regarded as the oldest among them.

This book contains valuable information regarding the correspondence between ‘Ali (‘a ) and Mu‘awiyah as well as the various sermons and speeches of the former. Valuable information concerning the opinion of the Companions of the Prophet (S) regarding ‘Ali and the influence of Shi‘ism among the different tribes can be acquired from the different parts of the book.

The book,Al-Gharat , written by Ibrahim Thaqafi al-Kufi (283 AH), is one of the other references written about this subject. This book is related to the events that occurred during the caliphate of the Commander of the Faithful ( ‘a ), and examines the plunders and pillages committed by Mu‘awiyah’s agents in the realm of ‘Ali’s ( ‘a ) government. The conditions and situations of the Commander of the Faithful’s ( ‘a ) Shi‘ah can be extracted from various sections of the book.

Al-Jamal orNusrah al-Jamal of Shaykh al-Mufid, which examines the event of the Battle of Jamal (Camel) is yet another valuable references in this regard. As it is about the Commander of the Faithful’s (‘a ) first battle during his caliphate, this book illustrates ‘Ali’s (‘a ) station among the people of Iraq prior to his arrival there.

4. Books on Rijal and Classes

‘Ilm ar-Rijal is one of the sciences mentioned in relation to the science ofhadith . Its utility is in the study of the chain of transmission ofhadith through which it deals with the life account and background of thehadith narrators and on the rectification of the Companions of the Prophet (S).

In the Shi‘ahrijal , apart from the Companions of the Prophet (S), the companions of the infallible Imams (‘a ) have also been discussed. The science ofrijal started in the 2nd centuryhijri and continues to exist to the present, having acquired perfection with the passage of time.

Some of the most famous and reputable writings of the Ahl as-Sunnah in this context areAl-Isti‘ab fi Ma‘rifah al-Ashab , written by Ibn ‘Abd al-Barr al-Qurtubi (463 AH);Asad al-Ghabah fi Ma‘rifah as-Sahabah , authored by Ibn Athir al-Juzri (630 AH);Tarikh Baghdad , penned by Khatib al-Baghdadi (392-463 AH); andAl-Isabah fi Ma‘rifah as-Sahabah , written by Ibn Hajar al-‘Asqalani.

Similarly, the most important Shi‘ahrijali books are Ikhtibar Ma‘rifah ar-Rijal , written by Shaykh at-Tusi (385-460 AH); Rijal an-Najasi (Fihrist Asma’ Musannif ash-Shi‘ah) better known as Rijal , Kitab ar-Rijal , and Kitab al-Fihrist of Shaykh at-Tusi (385-460 AH); Rijal al-Burqa , authored by Ahmad ibn Muhammad ibn Khalid al-Burqa (280 AH); Al-Mashaykhah of Shaykh as-Saduq (381 AH).

Ma‘alim al-‘Ulama’ of Ibn Shahr Ashub Mazandarani (488-588 AH); andRijal Ibn Dawud of Taqi ad-Din Hasan ibn ‘Ali ibn Dawud al-Hilli (647-707 AH). Of course, the science ofrijal has acquired greater perfection among the Shi‘ah and has been divided into various branches.

Some books onrijal such asAsad al-Ghabah ,Fihrist Shaykh ,Rijal an-Najashi , andMa‘alim al-‘Ulama’ have been written in (Arabic) alphabetical order while some others such asRijal Shaykh andRijal al-Burqa have been arranged according to the classes of the Companions of the Prophet (S) and the Imams (‘a ).

There are other types ofrijal books in which the people are surveyed according to various classifications, and the most important of them is the Tabaqat of Ibn Sa‘d.

5. Books on Geography

Some of the geography books are travelogues most of which have been written after the third centuryhijri . Since in this book the history of Shi‘ism has been examined in the first three centurieshijri , a number of them have not been used so much, but other geography books which have presented documents are among the references used in this research.

Among them,Mu‘jam al-Buldan has been used most on account of its comprehensiveness. The writer of the book, Yaqut al-Hamawi , has treated the Shi‘ah with bias; mentioning the names of the great families in Kufah, he has failed to mention any of the names of the great Shi‘ah scholars and families.

6. Books on Narrations

What is meant by references and books on narrations {akhbar } is not the books onhadith that dealt on the lawful {halal } and the prohibited {haram }. They referred instead to history books based on the method of writing history during the period of Islam in which historical events and news have been mentioned in narrative form with the inclusion of the chain of narrators; that is, following the method of the people ofhadith in recording and narrating historical events.

This kind of history writing has some salient features. Firstly, any set of news regarding isolated event is mentioned distinct from other events, and it is by itself complete without any link with other news and events. Secondly,

literary characteristics can also be observed in it; that is, sometimes the writer makes use of poem, story and debate.

In most cases, this feature can be seen particularly in narrative works which were influenced by the form ofAyyam al-‘Arab narrations. On account of this, some researchers have regarded the historiography ofkhabar {news, report, narration} to have originated from thekhabar of the stories about the period prior to the advent of Islam.

Thirdly, the chain of narrators is mentioned. In reality, this method of history writing, particularly during the first two centurieshijri , was in most cases the way of presenting the primary sources of history. Significant corpus of the written works of the Islamic period is through this method.

Among the books on narrations {akhbar }, Al-Akhbar al-Mu’affaqiyyat of Zubayr ibn Bakkar occupies special importance. The writer of this book, Zubayr ibn Bakkar, apart from being among the descendants of Zubayr who had ancient hostility to the Ahl al-Bayt of the Prophet (S), had good relations with Mutawakkil, the ‘Abbasid caliph, who was a staunch enemy of the Commander of the Faithful ( ‘a ) and his descendants; the teacher of his children 13and had been appointed as the judge in Mecca. 14In spite of this, valuable information regarding the Companions of the Prophet’s (S) protest against the caliphate of Abubakr has been recorded in this book. The narration of their poems, in particular, which contain their belief on the guardianship { wasayah } of ‘Ali ( ‘a ), is an expression of these protests.

7. Books on Genealogy

Among the books on genealogy,Ansab al-Ashraf of Baladhuri, which is the best reference in this regard, has been used most. On the other hand, this book can be considered as among the books on (personal) backgrounds {ahwal }.

This is in spite of the fact that in terms of genealogical knowledge, the bookJumharah Ansab al-‘Arab is the most comprehensive book, which has also presented a brief explanation of the description of some individuals.

The book,Muntaqilah at-Talibiyyin , has examined the migration of sadat (sing. sayyid ) and descendants of the Prophet (S). By utilizing its subjects, the trend of Shi‘ism during the first centuries hijri in the Muslim lands can be examined.

8. Books on Hadith

Another set of the references on the history of Shi‘ism includes the books onhadith .Hadith in the Sunni usage refers to the Prophet’s (S) sayings, actions and tacit approvals of others’ actions, but the Shi‘ah regards the infallible Imams (‘a ) as also attached to the Prophet (S), treating their sayings, actions and tacit approvals as proofs {hujaj } as well.

Thehadith books of the Ahl as-Sunnah such asAs-Sahih of al-Bukhari (194-256 AH),Al-Musnad of Ahmad ibn Hanbal (164-241 AH), andAl-Mustadrak ‘ala’s-Sahihayn of Hakim an-Nayshaburi (d. 450 AH) are good references for the study of Shi‘ism among the Companions and of the rightfulness of the Commander of the Faithful (‘a ) which is the basis of Shi‘ism.

The Shi‘ah books onhadith such as the “four books” {kutub al-arba‘ah }, viz.Al-Kafi of al-Kulayni (d. 329 AH);Man La Yahdhuruh al-Faqih of Shaykh as-Saduq (d. 381 AH); andTahdhib al-Ahkam andAl-Istibsar of Shaykh at-Tusi (d. 360 AH).

And other books such asAl-Amali , Ghurar al-Fawa’id and Durar al-Qala’id of Sayyid Murtada (355-436 AH); Al-Ihtijaj of at-Tabarsi (6th century hijri ); and the bulky encyclopedia of hadith , Bihar al-Anwar of ‘Allamah Majlisi (d. 1111 AH), apart from having the merit of the books of the Ahl as-Sunnah, can be utilized, by referring to the hadith s of the infallible Imams ( ‘a ), in knowing about the scattering of the Shi‘ah, their resident places, their social relations, and their mode of communication with the infallible Imams ( ‘a ).

9. Books on Nations and Religions

One of the most important references and authorities in this regard is the book,Al-Milal wa’n-Nihal of Shahristani (479-548 AH). In terms of comprehensiveness and oldness, this book is considered a good reference and as a reference authority of researchers and scholars.

This is in spite of the fact that the author has approached the subject with bias. In the beginning of the book, he has quoted thehadith on “73 sects” and introduced the Ahl as-Sunnah as the “saved sect”. As such, he tried his best to highlight the spread of “Shi‘ah sects” so as to prove that the plentitude of the “Shi‘ah sects” is a proof of the falsehood of this school of thought {madhhab }.

He has regarded the sects such as Mukhtariyyah, Baqiriyyah, Ja‘fariyyah, Mufdhalah, Nu‘maniyyah, Hishamiyyah, and Yunusiyyah as “Shi‘ah” although these sects do not exist in reality. Similarly, in the book,Khutat , Maqrizi has said that the “Shi‘ah sects” are 300 all in all, but at the time of enumerating them he failed to mention more than 20 sects.

Among the oldest and most important books on nations and religions areAl-Maqalat wa’l-Firaq of Ash‘ari al-Qummi andFiraq ash-Shi‘ah of Nawbakhti. Ash‘ari al-Qummi and Nawbakhti are among the Shi‘ah scholars who lived in the second half of the 3rd centuryhijri . The book,Al-Maqalat wa’l-Firaq , in terms of presenting information, is so extensive and has good comprehensiveness, but its subjects are diverse with any proper classification.

According to the views expressed by some researchers, the book,Firaq ash-Shi‘ah of Nawbakhti is actually the same book as Al-Maqalat wa’l-Firaq .

Lesson 2: Summary

General references for the history of Shi‘ism are the following:

Books on general history, which have been written in the first centurieshijri , and among themMurawwij adh-Dhahab andTarikh al-Ya‘qubi, occupy special importance;

Books on the biography of the Imams (‘a ) such asAl-Irshad of Shaykh al-Mufid;

Books on revolts and wars such asWaq‘ah as-Siffin ;

Books onrijal and classes as well as books written about (personal) backgrounds { ahwal };

Books on geography such as travelogues and history of cities;

Books on narrations which have been the same in form with the first history writing;

Books on genealogy such asJumharah Ansab al-‘Arab ;

Books onhadith as well as books on nations and religions.

Lesson 2: Questions

1. Among the books on general history, which of the earlier books that have dealt more with the history of Shi‘ism?

2. Briefly describe the books,Al-Irshad andTadhkirah al-Khawas .

3. Which type of books doesWaqi‘ah as-Siffin belong to?

4. Briefly describe the books onrijal .

5. How many types do the books on geography have?

6. What are the salient features of the books on narrations {akhbar }?

7. Name two books on genealogy.

8. What is the relationship between the books onhadith and the history of Shi‘ism?

9. What is the title of one of the most important books written on nations and religions?

References

1. Ahmad ibn Abi Ya‘qub ibn Wadhih, Tarikh al-Ya‘qubi (Qum: Manshurat ash-Sharif ar-Radi, 1414 AH0, vol. 2, p. 123-126.

2. Ibid., pp. 178-179.

3. Ibid., pp. 214-215.

4. Ibid., pp. 230-231.

5. Ibid., pp. 231-232.

6. Ibid., pp. 243-246.

7. ‘Ali ibn al-Husayn Mas‘udi, Murawwij adh-Dhahab (Beirut: Manshurat Mu’assasah al-A‘lami Li’l-Matbu‘at, 1411 AH), vol. 2, p. 316; At-Tanbiyyah wa’l-Ashraf (Cairo: Dar as-Sawi Li’t-Tab‘ wa’n-Nashr wa’t-Ta’lif, n.d.), p. 427.

8. Murawwij adh-Dhahab, vol. 3, p. 262.

9. Ibid., vol. 2, pp. 246-266.

10. Ibid., vol. 3, pp. 59, 74.

11. Ibid., pp. 180, 243, 313, 388.

12. Ibid., pp. 324-326, 358.

13. Al-Hafiz Abubakr Ahmad ibn ‘Ali Khatib al-Baghdadi, Tarikh Baghdad (Egypt: Matba‘ah as-Sa‘adah, 1349 AH), vol. 8, p. 467.

14. Ibn Nadim, Al-Fihrist (Beirut: Dar al-Ma‘rifah, n.d.), p. 160.

Part 2: The Manner of Emergence of the Shi‘ah

Lesson 3: “Shi‘ah” in the Lexicon and the Qur’an

The word “Shi‘ah” in the lexicon is derived from the root-wordشيع {shaya‘a } which means escorting {mushayi‘ah }, victory and bravery {shuja‘ah }.1 It is equally applied to the followers and supporters as it is usually applied to the followers and supporters of ‘Ali (‘a ).2 As Azhari has said, “Shi‘ah refers to a group that loves the progeny {‘itrah } and descendants of the Prophet (S).”3

Ibn al-Khaldun says:

Be aware that ‘Shi‘ah’ in the lexicon means ‘followers’ and ‘supporters’, and in the parlance of the past and present jurists {fiqh } and scholastic theologians {mutakallimun }, it is applied to the followers of ‘Ali and his descendants.4

But Shahristani limits the definitional scope of the word ‘Shi‘ah’, saying:

‘Shi‘ah’ is referring to those who follow ‘Ali alone and believe in his Imamate {imamah } and caliphate {khilafah } to be based on revelation {nass }, and they say: ‘Imamate shall not bypass him except {that it is done} through injustice {zulm }’.5

There are also many cases in the Qur’an in which “Shi‘ah” connotes “followers” and “supporters” such as:

﴿ وَإِنَّ مِنْ شِيعَتِهِ لإبْرَاهِيمَ ﴾

Indeed Abraham was among his followers {shi‘ah} 6

and the verse,

﴿ فَاسْتَغَاثَهُ الَّذِي مِنْ شِيعَتِهِ عَلَى الَّذِي مِنْ عَدُوِّهِ ﴾

“The one who was from his (Moses’) followers {shi‘ah} sought his help against him who was from his enemies.” 7

The word “Shi‘ah” has also been mentioned in the Prophetic traditions to mean “followers and friends of ‘Ali (‘a )”.8

“Shi‘ah” in the Shi‘ah references does not have more than one meaning and conception and that is belief in the succession of ‘Ali (‘a ) and his eleven descendants in which no change has ever taken place since the demise of the Prophet (S) up to the minor occultation {ghaybah as-sughra }. Just as the Shi‘ah of the second half of the third centuryhijri believed in all the twelve Imams (‘a ), the pioneering Shi‘ah among the Companions of the Prophet (S) also believed in this affair because they had been informed of the names of these Imams from the Prophetic traditions.9

Although many of the Shi‘ah had no access to these traditions due to the atmosphere of strangulation maintained by the tyrant rulers, what was obligatory (for them) was to recognize the Imam of their respective times. As the Holy Prophet (S) said, “He who will die without recognizing the Imam of his time dies in a state of ignorance {jahiliyyah }.”10

As such, we can see that when Imam as-Sadiq (‘a ) attained martyrdom, Zurarah who was an old man sent his son, ‘Ubayd, to inquire about the successor of Imam as-Sadiq (‘a ). But before ‘Ubayd was able to return to Kufah, Zurarah, who was about to die, took hold of a copy of the Qur’an and said: “O God! Be my witness that I testify to the Imamate {imamah } of the one who has been designated in this Qur’an.”11

Of course, with the passage of time, the meaning and concept ofShi‘ah assumes an explicit form and its scope is determined. Thus, the infallible Imams (‘a ) have regarded those who are identified with the false sects and faiths as outside Shi‘ah circles, as Shaykh at-Tusi narrates from Hamran ibn A‘in:

I asked Imam al-Baqir (‘a ): “Am I really among your Shi‘ah?” The Imam (‘a ) replied: “Yes, you are among our Shi‘ah in this world and in the hereafter, and the names of the Shi‘ah and their fathers are written for us. Why, are there those who turn their back to us?” I replied: “May I be your ransom! Is it possible for somebody to be your Shi‘ah and to have knowledge of your being in truth, and then to turn his back from you?” The Imam (‘a ) said: “Yes, O Hamran! You will not perceive them.”

Hamzah az-Zayyat, who is one of the narrators of thishadith , thus says:

Concerning thishadith we made a discussion and we were not able to understand the purport of the Imam (‘a ). As such, I wrote a letter to Imam ar-Rida (‘a ) and I asked him (‘a ) (about this). The Imam (‘a ) said: “Imam as-Sadiq (‘a ) was referring to the Waqifiyyah (a deviant sect).”12

It is for this reason that in the parlance of the Shi‘ahrijal writers, the titleShi‘ah is only applied to the Shi‘ah believing in the twelve Imams (‘a ) and in the language of the jurists {fuqaha }, they are sometimes described as “our companions” {ashabuna } or “our Imami companions” {ashabuna al-imamiyyah }.

And those who had inclined toward the deviant sects and drifted away from the course of Shi‘ism have described with such labels as Fathi, Waqifi, Nawusi, etc. and if ever the names of some of them are mentioned in the Shi‘ah books onrijal , the reason is that they had narrated these traditions prior to their deviation, just as the names of a number of Sunni narrators who have narrated from the infallible Imams (‘a ) have been mentioned in these books.

The Sunni scholars andrijal writers, however, have used the wordShi‘ah in broader sense and they have applied it to all the sects that have separated from the body of Shi‘ism and even to theghulat as well.

In addition, they also refer to those who love and admire theAhl al-Bayt ( ‘a ) as “Shi‘ah”. This is while some of these people do not have any sort of belief in the infallibility { ‘ismah } and Imamate { imamah } of the Ahl al-Bayt ( ‘a ), such as Sufyan ath-Thawri, a rector { mufti } in Iraq who issued edicts { fatawa } based on the Ahl as-Sunnah, but Ibn al-Qutaybah has enlisted him along with the Shi‘ah. 13Regarding ash-Shafi‘i, who is the founder of one of the four Sunni schools of thought { madhahib }, Ibn Nadim thus says:

كَانَ الشَّافِعِي شَدِيْداً في التَّشَيُّع.

“Ash-Shafi‘i had extreme Shi‘ism {tashayyu‘ }.”14

Of course, during the second and third centurieshijri , besides the Shi‘ah Imami, the Zaydis constituted the greatest number of Shi‘ah. They were “Shi‘ah” more in the political sense than in ideology because, in terms of jurisprudence {fiqh }, they were not followers of the Ja‘farifiqh ; rather they were followers of the Hanafifiqh .15

From the viewpoint of the ideological principles also, as narrated by Shahristani, “For sometime, Zayd was a student of Wasil ibn ‘Ata’, the founder of the Mu‘tazilah (Mu‘tazilite)madhhab and has learned from him the principles of the Mu‘tazilahmadhhab .”

Therefore, the Zaydis are Mu‘tazilites in principles {usul }. It is for this reason that they used to regard as permissible {jayiz } the Imamate {imamah } of a deserving person {mafdhul } in the existence of the more deserving person {afdhal } and in that they do not disrespect the two sheikhs {shaykhayn } (Abubakr and ‘Umar).16 And in terms of beliefs, they are closer to the Ahl as-Sunnah, as Ibn al-Qutaybah thus says: “Among therafidhi (Shi‘ah) sects, the Zaydis have the least extremism {ghulu }.”17

It was for this reason that the uprising of Muhammad Nafs az-Zakiyyah—one of the Zaydi leaders—was praised by some jurists {fuqaha } of the Ahl as-Sunnah, and as narrated by Waqidi, Abubakr ibn Sirah,18 Ibn ‘Ajlan,19 and ‘Abd Allah ibn Ja‘far20—who were among the greathadith scholars {muhaddithun } of the Medina school {maktab } and from whom Waqidi himself has narratedhadith —were involved in the uprising of Muhammad Nafs az-Zakiyyah. Also, Shahristani says: “Abu Hanifah was among the followers of Muhammad Nafs az-Zakiyyah.”21

The Mu‘tazilites of Basrah also agreed with the uprising of Muhammad and based on Abu’l-Faraj al-Isfahani’s narration, “A group of the Mu‘tazilites in Basrah such as Wasil ibn ‘Ata’ and ‘Amru ibn ‘Ubayd have paid allegiance to him.”22

As such, the Zaydis can be regarded as Shi‘ah only from the political viewpoint although they believe in the superiority of the descendants of Fatimah (‘a ).

Lesson 3: Summary

Shi‘ah, according to the lexicon, refers to the followers and supporters of ‘Ali (‘a ). In the Shi‘ah references, “Shi‘ah” does not have more than one meaning and that is belief in the succession of ‘Ali (‘a ) and his eleven descendants.

The infallible Imams used to consider those who were identified with the deviant sects as outside the circle of Shi‘ism, but the Sunni scholars andrijal writers have used the word Shi‘ah in broader sense and they have applied it to all the sects that have separated from the body of Shi‘ism as well as to the admirers of the descendants of the Prophet (S). Of course, during the second and third centuries hijri , next to the Shi‘ah Imami, the Zaydis had been regarded by them to have constituted the greatest number of Shi‘ah.

Lesson 3: Questions

1. In the lexicon, what does the word “Shi‘ah” mean? Explain.

2. What is the meaning and connotation of the word “Shi‘ah” in the Shi‘ah references?

3. Were those who were identified with the deviant sects regarded as “Shi‘ah” by the infallible Imams (‘a )? Explain.

4. How the Sunni scholars have been defining the word “Shi‘ah”?

5. Which of the sects is more akin to the Shi‘ah in the political perspective? Why?

References

1. For example, this poem:

والخزرجى قلبه مشيع ليس من الامر الجليل يفزع

Indeed, the Khazraji man has a brave heart and is not afraid of performing a great task.

Al-Khalil ibn Ahmad al-Farahidi, Tartib Kitab al-‘Ayn (Tehran: Instisharat-e Asweh, n.d.), vol. 2, p. 960.

2. Firuz-Abadi, Qamus al-Lughah (Lithography), p. 332.

3. Abu Faydh as-Sayyid Murtada al-Husayni al-Wasiti az-Zaydi al-Hanafi, Taj al-‘Arus, vol. 11, p. 257.

4. ‘Abd ar-Rahman ibn Muhammad ibn al-Khaldun, Al-Muqaddimah (Beirut: Dar Ihya’ at-Turath al-‘Arabi, 1408 AH), p. 196.

5. Shahristani, Kitab al-Milal wa’n-Nihal (Qum: Manshurat ash-Sharif ar-Radi, 1364 AHS), vol. 1, p. 131.

6. Surah as-Saffat 37:83.

7. Surah al-Qasas 28:15.

8. We shall quote these traditions in the next chapter.

9. Ibn Hajar al-Haythami, one of the Sunni scholars, mentions the hadith on the twelve Imams, and with respect to its authenticity, he claims to have consensus of opinion as it has been narrated through various chains. Then, he embarks on interpreting the hadith quoting contradictory statements from Ahl as-Sunnah scholars and ‘ulama’, ultimately failing to reach a decisive conclusion. For example, Qadhi ‘Iyad al-Yahsubi has said: “Perhaps, it means the twelve caliphs who were rulers during the glorified period of caliphate and grandeur of Islam, i.e. up to Walid ibn Yazid’s reign.” Others have said: “It refers to the twelve caliphs in truth who shall rule till the Day of Resurrection, some of whose reigns have already passed, such as the Righteous Caliphs {khulafa’ ar-rashidun}, Imam al-Hasan, Mu‘awiyah, ‘Abd Allah ibn Zubayr, ‘Umar ibn ‘Abd al-‘Aziz, and Mahdi al-‘Abbas. Two more shall come, one of whom is the Awaited Mahdi {mahdi al-muntazar} from the Ahl al-Bayt (‘a).” Some ‘ulama’ have also interpreted the hadith on the twelve Imams to refer to the twelve Imams, in which after Mahdi (‘a), accordingly, six shall come from the descendants of Imam al-Hasan (‘a) while the other five shall come from the descendants of Imam al-Husayn (‘s). As-Sawa‘iq al-Muhriqah, 2nd edition (Cairo: Maktabah al-Qahirah, 1385 AH), pp. 20-21.

10. Al-Kulayni, Usul al-Kafi, 5th printing (Tehran: Dar al-Kutub al-Islamiyyah, 1363 AH), vol. 1, p. 377.

11. Shaykh at-Tusi, Ikhtiyar Ma‘rifah ar-Rijal (Qum: Mu’assasah Al al-Bayt Li Ahya’ at-Turath, 1404 AH), vol. 1, p. 371.

12. Ibid., vol. 2, p. 763.

13. Ibn al-Qutaybah, Al-Ma‘arif, 1st edition (Qum: Manshurat ash-Sharif ar-Radhi, 1410 AH), p. 624.

14. Ibn an-Nadim, Al-Fihrist (Beirut: Dar al-Ma‘rifah Li’l-Matbu‘at wa’n-Nashr, n.d.), p. 295.

15. Shahristani, Al-Milal wa’n-Nihal (Qum: Manshurat ash-Sharif ar-Radhi, 1364 AHS), vol. 1, p. 143.

16. Ibid., p. 138.

17. Ibn al-Qutaybah, Al-Ma‘arif, p. 623.

18. Abu’l-Faraj al-Isfahani, Maqatil at-Talibiyyin, 2nd edition (Qum: Manshurat ash-Sharif ar-Radhi, 1416 AH/1374 AHS), p. 251.

19. Ibid., p. 254.

20. Ibid., p. 256.

21. Shahristani, Al-Milal wa’n-Nihal (Qum: Manshurat ash-Sharif ar-Radhi, 1364 AHS), vol. 1, p. 140.

22. Abu’l-Faraj al-Isfahani, Maqatil at-Talibiyyin, p. 258.


4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18