Painting and sculpture
No Islamic discussion on Islamic art can ignore figurative painting and aniconism (opposition to the use of icons or visual images to depict living creatures or religious figures). Two sayings attributed to the Prophet of Islam set the law for aniconism and directed the painting away from the naturalistic figurative tradition. These sayings are : “on the day of judgment artists will be asked to give life to their own artistic works, and when they fail to do so, they will be severely punished”, and the other saying is: “ those who will be most strictly punished by God on the Day of judgment will be the painters and sculptors”. Other sayings explain that the idea was to combat idolatry and pride expressed by the act of imitating living beings created by God.
Artistic creativity not aiming to emulate God in his creation was not condemned by these sayings. Islam was not forbidding the artistic creativity as such, but was safeguarding the absolute monotheism so central to the new message. Artistic creativity effectively found other ways to fulfill and manifest itself.
In Islam, aniconism means above all the prohibition of the portraiture of the Divine, or any plastic representation of God who is beyond any possible description or representation. Pictorial art in Islam adhered to the concept of representing spiritual beauty, rather than simply banning natural representation and depicted personages, nature and objects through stylization and abstraction, in order to portray them as prototypes or ideal models.
Stylization and abstraction show a kind of rejection of the material world. Because of this rejection, the Muslim artist did not try to represent the Prophet in concrete terms, even though his physical attributes were accurately described in early manuscripts.
For the Muslims, the Prophet Muhammad is the embodiment of the ideal man not to be presented through temporal and physical properties. We can see the development of the image of the Prophet Muhammad well illustrated in the Turkish and Iranian traditions where in the early years of conversion to Islam, his face was shown as in a portrait. In later years, when the spirit of the religion was fully comprehended, he is represented symbolically, with his face covered; finally, in the Ottoman Hilya-I sharif of the eighteenth century, he is represented linguistically in a calligraphic portrait that enumerates both his physical and spiritual qualities, embellished with illumination.
Painting in Islam does not convey a religious message. In the Islamic tradition, the Arabic language is sufficient for spiritual and physical expression and fully replaces imagery with its illustrative vocabulary. In the early stages of non- Arabs’ conversion to Islam, images filled a pedagogical need, which can be seen in the miniature painting of religious subject that flourished among the Mongols, Turks, and Iranians. Some Muslims limited the prohibition concerning the representation of living creatures to those paintings and sculptures made for worshipping purposes and allowed it for the purpose of decoration. It has to be said that this was not the opinion of the religious experts on the matter. But every body agreed not to allow any of these representations in the worshipping places.
Islamic figurative artists gained some legitimacy among Arabs, Mongols, Iranians, Indians and Turks by avoiding naturalism, particularly the use of three- dimensional perspective and modeling the human figure in light and shade. Through stylization of forms pertaining to living beings, the Islamic artist was able to fulfill his creative instincts and adhere to his religious beliefs.
Muslims, by opposition to other cultures and peoples who have taken humankind as the “mesure of all things” and nature as the ultimate determiner, have focused on the transcendence of God. The Islamic arts have the same objective as theQuran
: to enlighten men and strengthen their comprehension of Divine transcendence. Accordingly Islamic aesthetics seek to represent the spiritual and intangible qualities of a subject, to free art from the confines of its period and to render it timeless by leaving aside natural imitation.