The Scale of Wisdom: A Compendium of Shi’a Hadith [Mizan al-Hikmah] (Bilingual Edition) Volume 2

The Scale of Wisdom: A Compendium of Shi’a Hadith [Mizan al-Hikmah] (Bilingual Edition)8%

The Scale of Wisdom: A Compendium of Shi’a Hadith [Mizan al-Hikmah] (Bilingual Edition) Author:
Translator: N. Virjee, A. Kadhim, M. Dasht Bozorgi, Z. Alsalami and A. Virjee
Publisher: ICAS Press
Category: Texts of Hadith
ISBN: 978-1-904063-34-6

Volume 1 Volume 2 Volume 3 Volume 4
  • Start
  • Previous
  • 509 /
  • Next
  • End
  •  
  • Download HTML
  • Download Word
  • Download PDF
  • visits: 45522 / Download: 7158
Size Size Size
The Scale of Wisdom: A Compendium of Shi’a Hadith [Mizan al-Hikmah] (Bilingual Edition)

The Scale of Wisdom: A Compendium of Shi’a Hadith [Mizan al-Hikmah] (Bilingual Edition) Volume 2

Author:
Publisher: ICAS Press
ISBN: 978-1-904063-34-6
English

Note!

The original file was more than 50 MG. So, we split it into 4 sections.

Table of Contents

96 - الحرام‏ 58

96 THE PROHIBITED (HARAM) 58

501 - اجتِنابُ المَحارِمِ‏ 58

501 Avoiding the Prohibited 58

Notes 58

502 - أكلُ الحَرامِ‏ 59

502 Consuming the Prohibited 59

Notes 59

503 - ثَوابُ مَن قَدَرَ عَلى‏ حَرامٍ فَتَرَكَهُ‏ 61

503 The Reward of One Who Has Access to the Prohibited But Abandons It 61

Notes 62

97 - الحزب‏ 63

97 THE PARTY 63

504 - حِزبُ اللَّهِ‏ 63

504 The Party of Allah 63

Notes 63

505 - حِزبُ الشَّيطانِ‏ 64

505 The Party of Satan 64

Notes 64

98 - الحزم‏ 65

98 PRUDENCE 65

506 - قِيمَةُ الحَزمِ‏ 65

506 The Value of Prudence 65

Notes 65

507 - خَطَرُ تَركِ النَّظَرِ في عَواقِبِ الاُمورِ 66

507 The Danger of not Forseeing the Consequences of Matters 66

Notes 66

508 - الحَزمُ وَالعَزمُ‏ 67

508 Firm Resolution and Determination 67

Notes 67

509 - تَفسيرُ الحَزمِ‏ 68

509 The Interpretation of Prudence 68

Notes 68

510 - الحازِمُ‏ 69

510 The Prudent 69

Notes 69

511 - أحزَمُ النّاسِ‏ 70

511 The Most Prudent of People 70

Notes 70

99 - الحزن‏ 71

99 SORROW 71

512 - مَضارُّ الحُزنِ‏ 71

512 The Harms Sorrow 71

Notes 71

513 - ما يورِثُ الحُزنَ‏ 72

513 The Causes of Sorrow 72

Notes 72

514 - عِلاجُ الحُزنِ‏ 74

514 Overcoming for Sorrow 74

Notes 75

515 - عِلَّةُ الحُزنِ وَالفَرَحِ مِن غَيرِ سَبَبٍ عرَفُ‏ 77

515 The Reason for Sorrow and Joy for an Unknown Cause 77

Notes 77

516 - الحُزنُ المَمدوحُ‏ 78

516 Praiseworthy Sorrow 78

Notes 78

100 - الحساب‏ 79

100 THE ACCOUNT 79

517 - يَومُ الحِسابِ‏ 79

517 The Day of Account 79

Notes 79

518 - الحَثُّ عَلى‏ مُحاسَبَةِ النَّفسِ‏ 80

518 Enjoinment of Accounting for One's Self 80

Notes 80

519 - ثَمَرَةُ المُحاسَبَةِ 82

519 The Fruit of Taking Account of Oneself 82

Notes 82

520 - أوَّلُ ما يُسألُ عَنهُ المَرءُ 83

520 The First Thing That Man Will Be Asked About 83

Notes 83

521 - ما لا يُحاسَبُ عَلَيهِ‏ 84

521 That Which One is Not Accountable For 84

Notes 84

522 - ما يُحاسَبُ عَلَيهِ‏ 85

522 That Which One Will be Held Accountable For 85

Notes 85

523 - ما يُهَوِّنُ حِسابَ يَومِ القِيامَةِ 86

523 That Which Will Make the Account Easier on the Day of Resurrection 86

Notes 86

524 - أصنافُ النّاسِ فِي الحِسابِ‏ 87

524 The Categories of People during the Account 87

Notes 87

525 - سوءُ الحِسابِ‏ 88

525 The Adverse Account 88

Notes 88

526 - مَن يُحاسَبُ حِساباً يَسيراً 89

526 Those Whose Account Will Be Easy 89

Notes 89

527 - مَن يَدخُلُ الجَنّةَ بِغَيرِ حِسابٍ‏ 90

527 Those Who Will Enter Paradise Without Accounting 90

Notes 91

528 - مَن يَدخُلُ النّارَ بِغَيرِ حِسابٍ‏ 92

528 Those Who Will Enter the Fire Without Accounting 92

Notes 92

101 - الحسد 93

101 JEALOUSY 93

529 - مَضارُّ الحَسَدِ 93

529 THE HARMS OF JEALOUSY 93

Notes 94

530 - كُلُّ ذي نِعمَةٍ مَحسودٌ 95

530 EVERY PROSPEROUS PERSON IS ENVIED 95

Notes 95

531 - الحسدُ والإيمانُ‏ 96

531 JEALOUSY AND FAITH 96

Notes 96

532 - عَلامَةُ الحاسِدِ 97

532 THE SIGNS OF THE JEALOUS PERSON 97

Notes 97

102 - الحسرة 98

102 REGRET 98

533 - أعظَمُ النّاسِ حَسرَةً 98

533 THE PERSON WITH THE GREATEST REGRET 98

Notes 98

103 - الحسنة 100

103 THE GOOD DEEDS 100

534 - بَرَكاتُ الحَسَنَةِ 100

534 THE BLESSINGS OF GOOD DEEDS 100

Notes 100

535 - تَضاعُفُ الحَسَناتِ‏ 101

535 MULTIPLE REQUITAL OF GOOD DEEDS 101

Notes 101

104 - الإحسان‏ 102

104 GOOD-DOING 102

536 - تَفسيرُ الإحسانِ‏ 102

536 THE MEANING OF GOOD-DOING 102

Notes 102

537 - مَن أحسَنَ أحسَنَ لِنَفسِهِ‏ 103

537 HE WHO DOES GOOD BENEFITS HIS OWN SOUL 103

Notes 103

538 - فَضلُ الإحسانِ‏ 104

538 THE VIRTUE OF GOOD-DOING 104

Notes 104

539 - الإحسانُ إلى‏ مَن أساءَ 106

539 GOOD-DOING TO THE WRONGDOER 106

Notes 106

540 - ما يَتَرَتَّبُ عَلى‏ إحسانِ المُشرِكينَ‏ 107

540 THE CONSEQUENCE OF THE POLYTHEISTS' ACTS OF GOOD 107

Notes 107

105 - الحفظ 108

105 MEMORIZING 108

541 - نِعمَةُ الحِفظِ 108

541 THE THE BLESSING O F MEMORIZING 108

Notes 108

542 - الحِفظُ فِي الصِّغَرِ 109

542 MEMORIZATION IN CHILDHOOD 109

Notes 109

543 - ما يَزيدُ فِي الحِفظِ 110

543 THAT WHICH INCREASES ONE'S CAPACITY TO MEMORIZE 110

Notes 110

106 - الحقد 111

106 RESENTMENT 111

544 - ذَمُّ الحِقدِ 111

544 DENOUNCING RESENTMENT 111

Notes 111

545 - سُرعةُ ذَهابِ حِقدِ المُؤمِنِ‏ 113

545 THE BELIEVER'S RESENTMENT IS SHORT-LIVED 113

Notes 113

107 - التحقير 114

107 SCORN 114

546 - النَّهيُ عَن تَحقيرِ النّاسِ‏ 114

546 PROHIBITION OF SCORNING PEOPLE 114

Notes 114

547 - التَّحذيرُ مِن تَحقيرِ المُؤمِنِ‏ 115

547 CAUTION AGAINST SCORNING A BELIEVER 115

Notes 115

108 - الحقّ‏ 116

108 THE TRUTH 116

548 - الحَقُ‏ 116

548 THE TRUTH 116

Notes 116

549 - ثِقَلُ الحَقِ‏ 118

549 THE WEIGHT OF THE TRUTH 118

Notes 118

550 - وُجوبُ قَولِ الحَقِّ ولَو عَلَى النَّفسِ‏ 119

550 THE NECESSITY OF TELLING THE TRUTH EVEN TO ONE'S OWN DETRIMENT 119

Notes 119

551 - قَولُ الحَقِّ فِي الرِّضا وَالغَضَبِ‏ 120

551 SPEAKING THE TRUTH WHEN PLEASED OR ANGERED 120

Notes 120

552 - قَبولُ الحَقِ‏ 121

552 ACCEPTING THE TRUTH 121

Notes 121

553 - ميزانُ مَعرِفَةِ الحَقِ‏ 122

553 THE CRITERION OF KNOWING THE TRUTH 122

Notes 122

554 - لا يَجرِي الحَقُّ لِأحَدٍ إلّا جَرى‏ عَلَيهِ‏ 123

554 THE TRUTH CAN SIDE EQUALLY WITH OR AGAINST SOMEONE 123

Notes 123

109 - الحقوق‏ 124

109 THE RIGHTS 124

555 - حُقوقُ اللَّهِ تَعالى‏ 124

555 THE RIGHTS OF ALLAH, MOST HIGH 124

Notes 124

556 - تَقديمُ حَقِّ النّاسِ‏ 125

556 GIVING PRIORITY TO THE RIGHTS OF PEOPLE 125

Notes 125

557 - أعظَمُ الحُقوقِ‏ 126

557 THE GREATEST OF RIGHTS 126

Notes 126

558 - حُقوقُ الإخوانِ‏ 127

558 THE RIGHTS OF THE BRETHREN 127

Notes 128

110 - الاحتكار 129

110 HOARDING 129

559 - ذَمُّ الاحتِكارِ 129

559 DENOUNCING HOARDING 129

Notes 130

560 - ذَمُّ المُحتَكِرِ 131

560 THE HOARDER 131

Notes 131

111 - الحكمة 133

111 WISDOM 133

561 - فَضلُ الحِكمَةِ 133

561 THE VIRTUE OF WISDOM 133

Notes 134

562 - الحِكمَةُ ضالَّةُ المُؤمِنِ‏ 135

562 WISDOM IS THE LOST PROPERTY OF THE BELIEVER 135

Notes 135

563 - ما لا يَنبَغي لِلحَكيمِ فِعلُهُ‏ 136

563 What the Wise Man Must Not Do 136

Notes 136

564 - تَفسيرُ الحِكمَةِ 137

564 The Interpretation of Wisdom 137

Notes 137

565 - رَأسُ الحِكمَةِ 139

565 THE FOUNTAINHEAD OF WISDOM 139

Notes 139

566 - ما يورِثُ الحِكمَةَ 140

566 WHAT BRINGS ABOUT WISDOM 140

Notes 140

567 - ما يَمنَعُ الحِكمَةَ 141

567 WHAT PREVENTS WISDOM 141

Notes 141

568 - آثارُ الحِكمَةِ 142

568 THE EFFECTS OF WISDOM 142

Notes 142

569 - المُحافَظَةُ عَلَى الحِكمَةِ 143

569 PROTECTION OF WISDOM 143

Notes 143

112 - الحلف‏ 144

112 OATH-TAKING 144

570 - النَّهيُ عَنِ الحَلفِ بِاللَّهِ سُبحانَهُ‏ 144

570 PROHIBITION AGAINST TAKING OATH BY ALLAH GLORY BE TO HIM 144

Notes 144

571 - التَّحذيرُ مِنَ الحَلفِ الكاذِبِ‏ 145

571 WARNING AGAINST FALSE OATHS 145

Notes 145

572 - كَيفيَّةُ تَحليفِ الظّالِمِ‏ 146

572 HOW TO COMMIT A TYRANT TO OATH 146

Notes 146

113 - الحلال‏ 147

113 THE LAWFUL (HALAL) 147

573 - الحَثُّ عَلى‏ أَكلِ الحَلالِ‏ 147

573 ENJOINMENT TO EAT THE LAWFUL 147

Notes 147

574 - صُعوبَةُ طَلَبِ الحَلالِ‏ 148

574 THE DIFFICULTY IN SEEKING the Lawful 148

Notes 148

575 - لا يَحِلُّ مالُ المُؤمِنِ إلّا بِطيبِ نَفسِهِ‏ 149

575 THE PROPERTY OF THE BELIEVER IS Unlawful (haram) to Use Except WITH HIS CONSENT 149

Notes 149

114 - الحلم‏ 150

114 CLEMENCY 150

576 - فَضلُ الحِلمِ‏ 150

576 THE VIRTUE OF CLEMENCY 150

Notes 150

577 - ما يورِثُ الحِلمَ‏ 151

577 WHAT BRINGS ABOUT CLEMENCY 151

Notes 151

578 - ثَمَراتُ الحِلمِ‏ 152

578 THE FRUITS OF CLEMENCY 152

Notes 152

579 - تَفسيرُ الحِلمِ‏ 153

579 THE INTERPRETATION OF CLEMENCY 153

Notes 153

580 - الحِلمُ عِندَ الغَضَبِ‏ 154

580 CLEMENCY DURING ANGER 154

Notes 154

115 - الحمق‏ 155

115 FOOLISHNESS 155

581 - ذَمُّ الحُمقِ‏ 155

581 REPROACHING FOOLISHNESS 155

Notes 155

582 - صِفاتُ الأحمَقِ‏ 156

582 The Characteristics of a Fool 156

Notes 156

583 - مُصاحَبَةُ الأحمَقِ‏ 158

583 TAKING THE FOOL AS A COMPANION 158

Notes 158

584 - أحمَقُ النّاسِ‏ 159

584 THE MOST FOOLISH OF PEOPLE 159

Notes 159

585 - جَوابُ الأحمَقِ‏ 160

585 ANSWERING THE FOOL 160

Notes 160

116 - الحمام‏ 161

116 THE BATHHOUSE 161

586 - الحَثُّ عَلى الذِّهابِ إلَى الحَمّامِ‏ 161

586 ENCOURAGING TO TAKE BATH 161

Notes 161

587 - آدابُ دُخولِ الحَمّامِ‏ 162

587 THE ETIQUETTES OF ENTERING THE BATHROOM 162

Notes 162

117 - الحاجة 163

117 THE NEED 163

588 - ذَمُّ طَلَبِ الحاجَةِ 163

588 CENSURE OF ASKING FOR A NEED 163

Notes 163

589 - قَضاءُ الحَوائِجِ‏ 164

589 GRANTING NEEDS 164

Notes 165

590 - مَنِ امتَنَعَ عَن قَضاءِ حاجَةِ أخيهِ‏ 166

590 THE ONE WHO REFRAINS FROM Granting the Need of His Brother 166

Notes 166

591 - المُبادَرَةُ إلى‏ قَضاءِ الحَوائِجِ‏ 168

591 UNDERTAKING THE GRANTING OF NEEDS 168

Notes 168

592 - أدَبُ طَلَبِ الحاجَةِ 169

592 THE ETIQUETTE OF SEEKING A NEED 169

Notes 169

118 - الاحتياط 170

118 PRECAUTION 170

593 - احتَط لِدِينِكَ‏ 170

593 TAKE PRECAUTION WITH YOUR RELIGION 170

Notes 170

119 - الحياة 171

119 LIFE 171

594 - قِيمَةُ الحَياةِ 171

594 THE VALUE OF LIFE 171

Notes 171

595 - الماءُ وَالحَياةُ 172

595 WATER AND LIFE 172

Notes 172

596 - ما هُوَ خَيرٌ مِنَ الحَياةِ 173

596 That Which is Better than Life 173

Notes 173

597 - الحَياةُ الحَقيقِيَّةُ 174

597 THE REAL LIFE 174

Notes 174

120 - الحيوان‏ 175

120 ANIMALS 175

598 - حُقوقُ الحَيَوانِ‏ 175

598 THE RIGHTS OF ANIMALS 175

Notes 177

121 - الحياء 178

121 MODESTY 178

599 - فَضلُ الحَياءِ 178

599 THE VIRTUE OF MODESTY 178

Notes 178

600 - الحَياءُ وَالإيمانُ‏ 179

600 MODESTY AND FAITH 179

Notes 179

601 - الحَياءُ المَذمومُ‏ 180

601 REPREHENSIBLE MODESTY 180

Notes 180

602 - ما يَتَرَتَّبُ عَلى‏ عَدَمِ الحَياءِ 181

602 THE CONSEQUENCES OF LACK OF MODESTY 181

Notes 181

603 - الاستِحياءُ مِنَ اللَّهِ‏ 182

603 HAVING MODESTY WITH ALLAH 182

Notes 182

604 - غايَةُ الحَياءِ 183

604 THE PEAK OF MODESTY 183

Notes 183

122 - الخاتمة 184

122 THE END 184

605 - خَطَرُ الخاتِمَةِ 184

605 THE DANGER OF A BAD END 184

Notes 184

606 - موجِباتُ حُسنِ العاقِبَةِ 185

606 WHAT BRINGS ABOUT A GOOD FINAL OUTCOME 185

Notes 185

123 - الخدمة 186

123 SERVICE 186

607 - فَضلُ خِدمَةِ المُسلِمينَ‏ 186

607 THE VIRTUE OF SERVING MUSLIMS 186

Notes 186

124 - الخوارج‏ 188

124 THE KHARIJITES 188

608 - المارِقونَ‏ 188

608 THE APOSTATES 188

Notes 189

609 - الإمام عليّ عليه السلام بَعدَ مَقتَلِ الخَوارجِ‏ 190

609 Imam Ali (AS) AFTER THE KILLING OF THE KHARIJITES 190

Notes 190

610 - نهيُ الإمامِ عَن قَتلِ الخَوارجِ بَعدَهُ‏ 191

610 THE Imam'S PROHIBITION OF KILLING THE KHARIJITES AFTER HIM 191

Notes 191

125 - الخسران‏ 192

125 LOSS 192

611 - صِفَةُ الخاسِرِ 192

611 WHO IS A LOSER 192

Notes 192

612 - خَسِرَ الدُّنيا وَالآخِرَةَ 193

612 TO BECOME A LOSER IN THE WORLD AND THE HEREAFTER 193

Notes 193

613 - أخسَرُ النّاسِ‏ 194

613 THE BIGGEST LOSERS 194

Notes 194

612 - خَسِرَ الدُّنيا وَالآخِرَةَ 195

612 TO BECOME A LOSER IN THE WORLD AND THE HEREAFTER 195

Notes 195

613 - أخسَرُ النّاسِ‏ 196

613 THE BIGGEST LOSERS 196

Notes 196

126 - الخشوع‏ 197

126 HUMILITY 197

614 - فَضلُ الخُشوعِ 197

614 THE VIRTUE OF HUMILITY 197

Notes 197

615 - صِفاتُ الخاشِعينَ‏ 198

615 THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE HUMBLE 198

Notes 198

127 - الخطبة 199

127 THE SERMON 199

616 - الخُطبَةُ 199

616 THE SERMON 199

Notes 200

128 - الخطّ 201

128 HANDWRITING 201

617 - الخَطُّ 201

617 HANDWRITING 201

Notes 201

129 - الاخلاص‏ 203

129 SINCERITY 203

618 - فَضلُ الإخلاصِ‏ 203

618 THE VIRTUE OF SINCERITY 203

Notes 204

619 - صُعوبَةُ الإخلاصِ‏ 205

619 THE DIFFICULTY OF SINCERITY 205

Notes 205

620 - كِفايَةُ القَليلِ‏مِنَ‏العَملِ مَعَ الإخلاصِ‏ 206

620 THE SUFFICIENCY OF FEW ACTIONS COUPLED WITH SINCERITY 206

Notes 206

621 - مُعامَلَةُ اللَّهِ مَعَ المُخلِصينَ بِخالِصِ سِرِّهِ‏ 207

621 The Dealing of Allah With the SINCERE ONES WITH HIS SINCERE SECRECY 207

Notes 207

622 - دَورُ الإخلاصِ في قَبولِ الأعمالِ‏ 208

622 THE ROLE OF SINCERITY IN THE ACCEPTANCE OF ACTIONS 208

Notes 208

623 - تَمامُ الإخلاصِ‏ 209

623 THE PURE SINCERITY 209

Notes 209

624 - عَلاماتُ المُخلِصِ‏ 210

624 THE SIGNS OF THE SINCERE 210

Notes 210

625 - ما يورِثُ الإخلاصَ‏ 212

625 WHAT BRINGS ABOUT SINCERITY 212

Notes 212

626 - آثارُ الإخلاصِ‏ 213

626 THE EFFECTS OF SINCERITY 213

Notes 213

130 - الاختلاف‏ 214

130 DIFFERENCES 214

627 - لا مَبدَأَ لِلإخْتِلافِ فِي الفِطرَةِ 214

627 THERE IS NO BASE FOR DIFFERENCES IN NATURE 214

Notes 214

628 - الحَثُّ عَلَى‏ نَبذِ الاختِلافِ‏ 215

628 ENCOURAGEMENT TO DISCARD DIFFERENCES 215

Notes 215

629 - تَفسيرُ «اختِلافُ اُمَّتي رَحمَةٌ » 217

629 EXPLANATION OF 'THE SEPARATION OF MY COMMUNITY IS A MERCY' 217

Notes 217

630 - تَفسيرُ الجَماعةِ وَالفُرقَةِ 218

630 EXPLANATION OF CONGREGATION AND SEPARATION 218

Notes 218

631 - علَّةُ الفُرقةِ 219

631 THE CAUSE OF SEPARATION 219

Notes 219

131 - الخلقة 220

131 CREATION 220

632 - أصلُ الخِلقَةِ 220

632 THE ORIGIN OF CREATION 220

Notes 220

633 - أوَّلُ‏ 1 ما خَلَقَ اللَّهُ عزّوجلّ‏ 221

633 THE FIRST THING THAT ALLAH - GLORY BE TO HIM - CREATED 221

Notes 221

634 - خَلقُ العالَمِ‏ 223

634 The Creation of the World 223

Notes 223

635 - عَظَمَةُ ما غابَ عَنّا مِنَ الخِلقَةِ 224

635 THE GREATNESS OF WHAT IS HIDDEN FROM US OF CREATION 224

Notes 224

132 - الخالق‏ 225

132 THE CREATOR 225

636 - دَعوَةُ العَقلِ إلى‏ دَفعِ الضَّرَرِ المُحتَمَلِ‏ 225

636 THE CALL OF THE INTELLECT TO REPEL PROBABLE HARM 225

Notes 225

637 - مِنْ أدِلَّةِ إثباتِ الصَّانِعِ‏ 226

637 Some Proofs for the Existence OF THE CREATOR 226

1 - فِطرَةُ مَعرِفَةِ اللَّهِ‏ 226

1 Innate Nature Regarding Knowing Allah 226

2 - قانونُ العِلّيّةِ 226

2. The Law of Causality 226

3 - نِظامُ العالَم‏ 227

3 Order of the Universe 227

4 - فَسْخُ العزائمِ ونَقْضُ الهممِ‏ 229

4 Cancellation of Firm Intentions and Failure of Ambitions 229

Notes 229

638 - إسنادُ الخَلقِ إلَى الطَّبيعَةِ 231

638 ATTRIBUTING CREATION TO NATURE 231

Notes 231

133 - الخلق‏ 232

133 CHARACTER 232

639 - أهَمّيّةُ حُسنِ الخُلُقِ‏ 232

639 THE IMPORTANCE OF GOOD NATUREDNESS (CHARACTER) 232

Notes 232

640 - بَرَكاتُ حُسنِ الخُلُقِ في الدُّنيا 233

640 The blessing of Good Naturedness IN THIS WORLD 233

Notes 233

641 - بَرَكاتُ حُسنِ الخُلُقِ فِي الآخِرَةِ 234

641 The Blessings of Good Naturedness IN THE HEREAFTER 234

Notes 234

642 - تَفسيرُ حُسنِ الخُلُقِ‏ 236

642 Explanation of Good Naturedness 236

Notes 236

643 - معالي الأخلاق‏ 237

643 High Moral Virtues 237

Notes 237

644 - تَفسيرُ مَكارِمِ الأخلاقِ‏ 238

644 Explanation of Noble Moral Traits 238

Notes 238

645 - خَيرُ المَكارمِ‏ 239

645 THE BEST OF NOBLE TRAITS 239

Notes 239

646 - ثَمَراتُ حُسنِ الخُلُقِ‏ 240

646 The Fruits of Good Naturedness 240

Notes 240

647 - ذَمُّ سوءِ الخُلُقِ‏ 241

647 Denouncing Ill Naturedness 241

Notes 241

648 - عاقِبَةُ الخُلُقِ السَّيِّئِ‏ 242

648 THE FINAL OUTCOME OF THE ILL-NATURED PERSON 242

Notes 242

649 - أفضَلُ الأخلاقِ‏ 243

649 THE BEST VIRTUES 243

Notes 243

650 - ارتِباطُ السَّجايا بَعضِها بِبَعضٍ‏ 244

650 THE LINK BETWEEN VARIOUS TRAITS 244

Notes 244

134 - الخمر 245

134 ALCOHOL 245

651 - ذَمُّ شُربِ الخَمرِ 245

651 DENOUNCING DRINKING ALCOHOL 245

Notes 245

652 - عِلَّةُ تَحريمِ الخَمرِ 246

652 THE REASON FOR THE PROHIBITION of Alcohol 246

Notes 246

653 - عاقِبَةُ شُربِ الخَمرِ 247

653 THE CONSEQUENCE OF DRINKING ALCOHOL 247

Notes 247

654 - مُعامَلَةُ شارِبِ الخَمرِ 248

654 INTERACTING [DEALING] WITH AN ALCOHOL DRINKER 248

Notes 248

655 - صِفَةُ حَشرِ شارِبِ الخَمرِ 249

655 How an Alcohol Drinker Will be Resurrected 249

Notes 249

656 - الحَثُّ عَلى‏ تَركِ الخَمرِ ولَو لِغَيرِ اللَّهِ‏ 250

656 Enjoinment of Abandoning Alcohol even if it be for Other Than Allah 250

Notes 250

657 - حُرمَةُ ما فَعَلَ فِعلَ الخَمرِ 251

657 The Prohibition of That Which PRODUCES THE SAME EFFECTS AS ALCOHOL 251

Notes 251

135 - الخوف‏ 252

135 FEAR 252

658 - فَضلُ مَخافَةِ اللَّهِ‏ 252

658 THE VIRTUE OF FEARING ALLAH 252

Notes 252

659 - المُؤمِنُ بَينَ مَخافَتَينِ‏ 254

659 THE BELIEVER LIES BETWEEN TWO FEARS 254

Notes 254

660 - المُؤمِنُ بَينَ الخَوفِ وَالرَّجاءِ 255

660 THE BELIEVER LIES BETWEEN HOPE AND FEAR 255

Notes 255

661 - عَلاماتُ الخائِفِ‏ 256

661 THE MARKS OF THE FEARFUL ONE 256

Notes 256

662 - مَعنى‏ مَخافَةِ اللَّهِ‏ 257

662 EXPLANATION OF FEARING ALLAH 257

Notes 257

663 - ثَمَراتُ مَخافَةِ اللَّهِ‏ 258

663 THE FRUITS OF FEAR OF ALLAH 258

Notes 259

664 - التَّحذيرُ مِن مَخافَةِ غَيرِ اللَّهِ‏ 260

664 CAUTION AGAINST FEARING OTHER THAN ALLAH 260

Notes 260

665 - ما يَنبَغي عِندَ الخَوفِ مِمّا يُهابُ‏ 261

665 HOW ONE SHOULD REACT WHEN IN FEAR OF SOMETHING AWESOME 261

Notes 261

666 - النَّوادِرُ 262

666 MISCELLANEOUS 262

Notes 262

136 - الخيانة 263

136 BETRAYAL 263

667 - التَّحذِيرُ مِنَ الخِيانَةِ 263

667 CAUTION AGAINST BETRAYAL 263

Notes 264

668 - تَفسيرُ الخِيانَةِ وَالخائِنِ‏ 265

668 EXPLANATION OF BETRAYAL AND THE BETRAYER 265

Notes 265

669 - غايَةُ الخِيانَةِ 266

669 THE PEAK OF BETRAYAL 266

Notes 266

137 - الخير 267

137 GOOD 267

670 - فَضلُ الخَيرِ 267

670 THE VIRTUE OF GOOD 267

Notes 267

671 - جَوامِعُ الخَيرِ 268

671 ACTIONS ENCOMPASSED BY GOODNESS 268

Notes 268

672 - ما يُنالُ بِهِ خَيرُ الدُّنيا وَالآخِرَةِ 270

672 HOW THE GOOD OF THIS WORLD AND THE HEREAFTER IS OBTAINED 270

Notes 270

673 - تَفسيرُ الخَيرِ 272

673 Explanation of Good 272

Notes 272

674 - إذا أرادَ اللَّهُ بِعَبدٍ خَيراً 273

674 When Allah Wants Good for a Servant 273

Notes 273

675 - إذا أرادَ اللَّهُ بِقَومٍ خَيراً 275

675 IF ALLAH WANTS GOOD FOR A COMMUNITY 275

Notes 275

676 - الحَثُّ عَلَى المُبادَرَةِ إلَى الخَيراتِ‏ 276

676 ENJOINMENT OF HASTENING TOWARDS GOOD DEEDS 276

Notes 276

677 - خَيرُ الاُمورِ 277

677 The Best of Matters 277

Notes 277

678 - النَّهيُ عَن تَحقيرِ القَليلِ مِنَ الخَيرِ 278

678 PROHIBITION OF CONTEMPT FOR LITTLE GOOD 278

Notes 278

679 - ميزانُ الخَيرِ وَالشَّرِّ 279

679 The Criteria for Good and Evil 279

Notes 279

680 - صِفاتُ أهلِ الخَيرِ 280

680 The Characteristics of Good People 280

Notes 280

681 - ما هُوَ أفضَلُ مِنَ الخَيرِ 281

681 WHAT IS BETTER THAN GOODNESS 281

Notes 281

680 - صِفاتُ أهلِ الخَيرِ 282

680 The Characteristics of Good People 282

Notes 282

138 - الاستخارة 283

138 SEEKING A GOOD OUTCOME [FROM ALLAH] 283

683 - فَضلُ الاستِخارَةِ 283

683 THE VIRTUE OF SEEKING A GOOD OUTCOME [FROM ALLAH] 283

Notes 284

139 - المداراة 285

139 AMICABLENESS 285

684 - فَضلُ المُداراةِ 285

684 The Virtue of Amicableness 285

Notes 286

140 - الدعاء 287

140 SUPPLICATION 287

685 - فَضلُ الدُّعاءِ 287

685 THE VIRTUE OF SUPPLICATION 287

Notes 289

686 - الدُّعاءُ يَرُدُّ القَضاءَ المُبرَمَ‏ 290

686 Supplication Wards Off Inescapable Fate 290

Notes 290

687 - الدُّعاءُ يَدفَعُ أنواعَ البَلاءِ 291

687 SUPPLICATION REPELS VARIOUS TYPES OF CALAMITY 291

Notes 291

688 - التَّقَدُّمُ فِي الدُّعاءِ 292

688 Priority with Supplication 292

Notes 292

689 - الحَثُّ عَلَى الدُّعاءِ في كُلِّ حاجَةٍ 294

689 ENJOINMENT OF SUPPLICATION FOR EVERY NEED 294

Notes 294

690 - الدُّعاءُ مِفتاحُ الإجابَةِ 295

690 SUPPLICATION IS THE KEY TO GRANTING [OF A REQUEST] 295

Notes 295

691 - شُروطُ استِجابَةِ الدُّعاءِ 296

691 The Conditions for the Answering OF SUPPLICATION 296

1 - المعرفةُ 296

1 Inner Knowledge: 296

2 - العملُ بما تقتضيهِ المعرفةُ 296

2 Acting According to What Inner Knowledge Necessitates: 296

3 - طِيبُ المَكسَبِ‏ 296

3 Lawful Earning: 296

4 - حضورُ القلبِ ورقّتُهُ عِندَ الدُّعاءِ 297

4 Presence of the Heart and its Tenderness During Supplication: 297

Notes 297

692 - مَوانِعُ الإجابَةِ 299

692 Factors that Prevent the Answering OF SUPPLICATION 299

1 - الذنب‏ 299

1 Sins: 299

2 - الظُّلمُ‏ 299

2 Oppression: 299

3 - مُناقَضَتُهُ لِلحِكمَة 299

3 It Opposing Wisdom: 299

4 - توصيفُ اللَّهِ بِغَيرِ صِفاتِهِ‏ 300

4 Describing Allah with Attributes Other Than His 300

Notes 300

693 - آدابُ الدُّعاءِ 301

693 The Etiquettes of Supplication 301

1 - البَسْمَلَةُ 301

1 The Basmala: 301

2 - التَّمجيد 301

2 Praise: 301

3 - الصَّلاةُ عَلى‏ مُحَمَّدٍ وآلِه‏ 301

3 Blessings upon Prophet Muhammad (SAWA) and his Family: 301

4 - الاِستِشفاعُ بِالصَّالِحينَ‏ 301

4 Seeking Intercession of the Righteous: 301

5 - الإِقرارُ بِالذَّنب‏ 302

5 Acknowledgement of Sins: 302

6 - التَّضرُّعُ والاِبتِهالُ‏ 302

6 Imploring and Begging: 302

7 - أن يُصَلِّيَ رَكعَتَينِ‏ 302

7 Performing Two Units of Prayer: 302

8 - أنْ لا يَستَكثِرَ مَطلوبَهُ‏ 303

8 Not to Regard One's Own Request as Too Much: 303

9 - أنْ يكونَ عالي الهِمَّةِ فيما يَطلُبُ‏ 303

9 To Have a High Ambition for What You Seek: 303

10 - تعميمُ الدُّعاءِ 303

10 To Supplicate for Everyone: 303

11 - الإسرارُ بالدُّعاءِ 304

11 Supplicating in Secrecy: 304

12 - الاجتماعُ في الدُّعاءِ 304

12 Supplication in Congregation: 304

13 - حُسنُ الظَّنِّ بِالإِجابَة 304

13 Being Optimistic about the Answer: 304

14 - اختيارُ الأوقاتِ المناسِبَةِ 304

14 Selecting a Suitable Time: 304

15 - الإلحاح‏ 305

15 Insistence: 305

Notes 305

694 - ما يَنبَغي عَلَى الدَّاعي تَركُهُ‏ 307

694 WHAT THE SUPPLICANT MUST NOT DO 307

1 - الدُّعاءُ لِما لا يَكونُ ولا يَحِلُ‏ 307

1 Supplication for the Impossible and the Impermissible: 307

2 - الاِستِعجالُ‏ 307

2 To Seek a Hasty Response: 307

3 - أنْ لا يُعَلِّمَ اللَّهَ ما يُصلِحُهُ‏ 307

3 Do Not Instruct Allah about What is Good for You: 307

Notes 307

695 - مَن تُقضى‏ حاجَتُهُ بِلا سُؤالٍ‏ 308

695 THE ONE WHOSE REQUEST IS GRANTED WITHOUT ASKING 308

Notes 308

696 - دورُ الرِّضا وَاليَأسِ في الإجابَةِ 309

696 The Role of Contentment AND DESPAIR IN ANSWERING 309

Notes 309

697 - مَن تُستَجابُ دَعوَتُهُ‏ 310

697 THOSE WHOSE SUPPLICATIONS are Answered 310

Notes 310

698 - الدَّعَواتُ غَيرُ المُستَجابَةِ 311

698 SUPPLICATIONS THAT ARE NOT ANSWERED 311

Notes 311

699 - أسبابُ بُطءِ الاستِجابَةِ 312

699 THE REASONS FOR DELAYED Responses 312

Notes 312

700 - عَدَمُ خُلُوِّ الدُّعاءِ مِنَ التَّأثيرِ 313

700 Supplication is not Without Effect 313

Notes 313

701 - التَّحذِيرُ مِنَ الدُّعاءِ بِغَيرِ عِلمٍ‏ 314

701 Caution Against Supplication Without Knowledge 314

Notes 314

141 - الدنيا 315

141 THE WORLD 315

702 - تَسمِيَةُ الدُّنيا 315

702 NAMING THE 'WORLD' 315

Notes 315

703 - الدُّنيا مَزرَعَةُ الآخِرَةِ 316

703 THE WORLD IS THE PLANTATION FOR THE HEREAFTER 316

Notes 316

704 - تَفسيرُ الدُّنيا 317

704 EXPLANATION OF THE WORLD 317

Notes 317

705 - الأخذُ مِنَ الدُّنيا بِقَدرِ الضَّرورَةِ 318

705 TAKING ONLY WHAT IS NECESSARY FROM THE WORLD 318

Notes 318

706 - الدُّنيا لِمَن تَرَكَها 319

706 THE WORLD BELONGS TO ONE WHO HAS ABANDONED IT 319

Notes 319

707 - ذَمُّ الدُّنيا مِن دونِ عِلمٍ‏ 320

707 CRITICIZING THE WORLD WITHOUT KNOWLEDGE 320

Notes 320

708 - خَصائِصُ الدُّنيا المَذمومَةِ 321

708 Characteristics of the Condemned Aspect of the World 321

Notes 321

709 - حُبُّ الدُّنيا رَأسُ كُلِّ خَطيئَةٍ 322

709 Love of the World is the FOUNTAINHEAD OF EVERY MISTAKE 322

Notes 322

710 - ثَمَراتُ حُبِّ الدُّنيا 323

710 The Effects of Love of the World 323

Notes 323

711 - الدُّنيا مِن وجهَةِ نَظَرِ الإمام عَلِيٍّ عليه السلام‏ 324

711 The World from the Viewpoint of Imam Ali (AS) 324

Notes 324

712 - التَّحذيرُ مِن غُرورِ الدُّنيا 325

712 WARNING AGAINST THE DECEPTION of the World 325

Notes 326

713 - إنَّما تَغُرُّ الدُّنيا الجاهِلَ‏ 328

713 VERILY THE WORLD DECEIVES THE IGNORANT 328

Notes 328

714 - التَّحذيرُ مِنَ الطُّمَأنينَةِ بِالدُّنيا 329

714 Warning against Being Satisfied with the World 329

Notes 329

715 - خَطَرُ إيثارِ الدُّنيا 331

715 The Danger of Preferring THE WORLD [OVER THE HEREAFTER] 331

Notes 331

716 - الدُّنيا سِجنُ المُؤمِنِ‏ 332

716 THE WORLD IS THE PRISON OF THE BELIEVER 332

Notes 332

717 - خَطَرُ جَعلِ الدُّنيا أكبَرَ الهُمومِ‏ 333

717 The Danger of Making Worldly AFFAIRS ONE'S GREATEST CONCERN 333

Notes 333

718 - هَوانُ الدُّنيا عَلَى اللَّهِ‏ 334

718 THE LOWLINESS OF THE WORLD IN ALLAH'S EYES 334

Notes 334

719 - تَضادُّ الدُّنيا الذَّمِيمَةِ وَالآخِرَةِ 336

719 The Difference between THE CENSURED WORLD AND THE HEREAFTER 336

Notes 337

720 - اجتماع الدُّنيا وَالآخِرَةِ 338

720 COMBINING THE WORLD AND THE HEREAFTER 338

Notes 338

721 - مَثَلُ الدُّنيا 340

721 THE PARABLE OF THE WORLD 340

Notes 341

722 - الدُّنيا دارُ مَتاعٍ‏ 342

722 THE WORLD IS THE HOUSE OF [TRIFLING] ENJOYMENT 342

Notes 343

723 - الدُّنيا دارٌ بِالبَلاءِ مَحفوفَةٌ 344

723 THE WORLD IS A PLACE SURROUNDED BY TRIALS 344

Notes 344

142 - المُداهَنةُ 345

142 PLIABILITY 345

724 - مُداهَنَةُ أهلِ المَعاصي‏ 345

724 Flattering the Transgressors 345

Notes 345

725 - عدمُ جَوازِ المُداهَنَةِ فِي الحَقِ‏ 347

725 The Prohibition of Compromising the Truth 347

Notes 347

143 - الدَّولة 348

143 STATE 348

726 - دَولَةُ الأكابِرِ 348

726 THE STATE [I.E. GOVERNANCE] OF SENIOR PEOPLE 348

Notes 348

727 - عَلامَةُ إدبارِ الدُّوَلِ‏ 349

727 Sign of the Fall of States 349

Notes 349

728 - عَوامِلُ دَوامِ الدُّوَلِ‏ 350

728 Reasons for the Stability of States 350

Notes 350

144 - الدَّواء 351

144 REMEDY 351

729 - التَّداوي‏ 351

729 TO TREAT ONESELF 351

Notes 351

730 - لِكُلِّ عِلَّةٍ دَواءٌ 352

730 There is a Cure for Every Ailment 352

Notes 352

731 - إيّاك والتَّسَرُّعَ في تَناوُلِ الدَّواءِ 353

731 Beware of Hastening towards RESORTING TO MEDICINE 353

Notes 353

732 - الحِميةُ رَأسُ الدَّواءِ 354

732 Diet Control is the Fountainhead OF REMEDIES 354

Notes 354

733 - الدَّواءُ الأكبَرُ 355

733 THE GREATEST REMEDY 355

Notes 355

734 - النَّوادِرُ 356

734 MISCELLANEOUS 356

Notes 356

145 - الدِّين‏ 357

145 RELIGION 357

735 - أهَمِّيَّةُ الدِّينِ‏ 357

735 Importance of Religion 357

Notes 357

736 - آفاتُ الدِّينِ‏ 359

736 THE BANE OF RELIGION 359

Notes 359

737 - الحَثُّ عَلَى الحِفاظِ عَلَى الدِّينِ‏ 360

737 ENCOURAGEMENT TO PRESERVE RELIGION 360

Notes 360

738 - لا دين لِهؤلاء 361

738 Those Who Have No Religion 361

Notes 361

739 - يَسارُ الدِّينِ‏ 363

739 THE SIMPLICITY OF RELIGION 363

Notes 363

740 - الدِّينُ الَّذي لا تُقبَلُ الأعمالُ إلّا بِهِ‏ 364

740 THE ONLY RELIGION THROUGH WHICH DEEDS ARE ACCEPTED 364

Notes 364

741 - المَنهَجُ في مَعرِفَةِ الدِّينِ‏ 365

741 The Correct Way to UNDERSTANDING RELIGION 365

Notes 365

742 - صِيانَةُ الدِّين بِالدُّنيا 366

742 PROTECTING THE RELIGION BY MEANS OF THE WORLD 366

Notes 366

743 - الدُّعاءُ لِتَثبيتِ القَلبِ عَلَى الدِّينِ‏ 367

743 Supplication for Affirming THE HEART TOWARDS RELIGION 367

Notes 367

744 - صِفَةُ المُستَحفِظينَ لِدِينِ اللَّهِ‏ 368

744 CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PRESERVERS OF ALLAH'S RELIGION 368

Notes 368

745 - تَأييدُ الدِّينِ بِأقوامٍ لا خَلاقَ لَهُم‏ 369

745 The Strengthening of Religion THROUGH A DISGRACEFUL PEOPLE 369

Notes 369

146 - الدَّين‏ 370

146 DEBT 370

746 - ذَمُّ الاستدانة 370

746 Denouncing Borro wing 370

Notes 370

747 - جوازُ الاستِدانَةِ مَعَ الحاجَةِ 371

747 PERMISSION TO INCUR DEBT WHEN IN NEED 371

Notes 371

748 - الحَثُّ عَلى‏ كِتابَةِ الدَّينِ‏ 372

748 ENCOURAGEMENT TO WRITE A CONTRACT FOR ANY LOAN 372

Notes 372

749 - النَّهيُ عَنِ المُماطَلَةِ فِي الدَّينِ‏ 373

749 PROHIBITION OF THE POSTPONEMENT OF REPAYING DEBTS 373

Notes 373

147 - الذِّكر 374

147 REMEMBRANCE 374

750 - فَضلُ ذِكرِ اللَّهِ‏ 374

750 THE VIRTUE OF THE REMEMBRANCE OF ALLAH 374

Notes 375

751 - الحَثُّ عَلى‏ كَثرَةِ الذِّكرِ 376

751 ENJOINMENT OF FREQUENT REMEMBRANCE [OF ALLAH] 376

Notes 376

752 - الحَثُّ عَلى‏ دَوامِ الذِّكرِ 378

752 Enjoinment of Engaging in CONTINUOUS REMEMBRANCE 378

Notes 378

753 - ذِكرُ اللَّهِ حَسَنٌ عَلى‏ كُلِّ حالٍ‏ 379

753 The Remembrance of Allah is Good at All Times 379

Notes 379

754 - الذّاكِرونَ‏ 380

754 The Ones Who Remember 380

Notes 380

755 - اُذكُرو اللَّهَ يَذكُركُم‏ 382

755 REMEMBER ALLAH AND HE WILL REMEMBER YOU 382

Notes 382

756 - ثَمَراتُ الذِّكرِ 383

756 THE FRUITS OF REMEMBRANCE 383

Notes 384

757 - الحَثُّ عَلى‏ ذِكرِ اللَّهِ في مَواقِفَ‏ 386

757 ENJOINMENT OF REMEMBRANCE OF ALLAH IN CERTAIN SITUATIONS 386

أ - عِندَ لِقاءِ العَدُوِّ 386

1 When Facing an Enemy: 386

ب - عِند دُخولِ الأَسواقِ‏ 386

2 When Entering the Market Place: 386

ج - عند الهَمِّ والحُكمِ والقِسمَةِ 386

3 During Distress, When Giving Judgment and When Distributing: 386

د - عند الغَضَبِ‏ 386

4 When in Anger: 386

ه - في الخَلَواتِ وعند اللَذّاتِ‏ 387

5 When Alone and During Pleasures: 387

Notes 387

758 - حَقيقَةُ الذِّكرِ 388

758 THE REALITY OF THE REMEMBRANCE [OF ALLAH] 388

Notes 388

759 - ما يوجِبُ دَوامَ الذِّكرِ 390

759 That Which Brings About CONTINUOUS REMEMBRANCE [OF ALLAH] 390

Notes 390

760 - مَوانِعُ الذِّكرِ 391

760 Factors that Prevent the Remembrance [OF ALLAH] 391

Notes 391

761 - آثارُ الإعراضِ عَنِ الذِّكرِ 393

761 THE EFFECTS OF DISREGARDING THE REMEMBRANCE [OF ALLAH] 393

Notes 393

762 - الذِّكرُ الخَفِيُ‏ 395

762 Silent Remembrance 395

Notes 395

148 - الذلّة 396

148 DISGRACE 396

763 - الذِّلَّةُ 396

763 DISGRACE 396

Notes 396

764 - لا يَنبَغي لِلمُؤمِنِ أن يُذِلَّ نفسَهُ‏ 398

764 A BELIEVER MUST NEVER DISGRACE HIMSELF 398

Notes 398

765 - ما يورِثُ الذُّلَ‏ 399

765 THAT WHICH BRINGS ABOUT DISGRACE 399

Notes 399

149 - الذنب‏ 401

149 SINNING 401

766 - التَّحذِيرُ مِنَ الذَّنبِ‏ 401

766 WARNING AGAINST SINNING 401

Notes 402

767 - المُجاهَرَةُ بِالذَّنبِ‏ 403

767 SINNING OPENLY 403

Notes 403

768 - أعظَمُ الذُّنوبِ‏ 404

768 THE WORST OF SINS 404

Notes 404

769 - الذُّنوبُ الَّتي لا تُغفَرُ 405

769 UNFORGIVABLE SINS 405

Notes 406

770 - التَّحذيرُ مِنَ المَعصِيَةِ فِي الخَلَواتِ‏ 407

770 WARNING AGAINST COMMITTING ACTS OF DISOBEDIENCE IN SECRET 407

Notes 407

771 - الاستِخفافُ بِالذَّنبِ وَاستِصغارُهُ‏ 408

771 Taking One's Sins Lightly AND DEEMING THEM INSIGNIFICANT 408

Notes 408

772 - كَبائِرُ الذُّنوبِ‏ 410

772 THE GRAVE SINS 410

Notes 410

773 - الإِصرارُ عَلَى الذَّنبِ‏ 411

773 PERSISTENT SINNING 411

Notes 411

774 - الاِبتِهاجُ بِالذَّنبِ‏ 412

774 TAKING PLEASURE IN SINNING 412

Notes 412

775 - آثارُ الذُّنوبِ‏ 413

775 THE EFFECTS OF SINS 413

Notes 414

776 - الذُّنوبُ الَّتي تُعَجَّلُ عُقوبَتُها 415

776 SINS, THE PUNISHMENT OF WHICH IS HASTENED [IN THE LIFE OF THIS WORLD] 415

Notes 415

777 - دَواءُ الذُّنوبِ‏ 416

777 THE REMEDY FOR SINNING 416

Notes 416

778 - مُكَفِّراتُ الذُّنوبِ‏ 417

778 THINGS THAT EXPIATE SINS 417

1 - العُقوبةُ في الدنيا 417

1 Punishment in this World: 417

2 - الأمراضُ‏ 417

2 Illnesses: 417

3 - الأحزانُ‏ 418

3 Sorrows: 418

4 - الحَسناتُ‏ 418

4 Good Deeds: 418

5 - حُسنُ الخُلُقِ‏ 418

5 Good Character: 418

6 - إغاثةُ المَلهوفِ‏ 419

6 Bringing Solace to a Grief-stricken Person: 419

7 - استِغفارُ المَلائكةِ 419

7 The Angels' Seeking Forgiveness [on the sinner's behalf]: 419

8 - كثرةُ السجودِ 419

8 Frequent Prostration: 419

9 - الحجُّ والعُمرةُ 420

9 Performance of the Obligatory and the Voluntary Pilgrimage (hajj and umra): 420

11 - الصلاةُ على‏ محمّدٍ وآلِهِ‏ 420

10 Sending Blessings on Prophet Muhammad (SAWA) and his Household: 420

12 - الموت‏ 420

11 Death: 420

Notes 420

150 - الرئاسة 422

150 LEADERSHIP 422

779 - ذَمُّ الرِّئاسَةِ 422

779 THE CENSURE OF [THE LOVE OF] LEADERSHIP 422

Notes 422

780 - آلَةُ الرِّئاسَةِ 423

780 THE TOOL REQUIRED FOR LEADERSHIP 423

Notes 423

151 - الرؤيا 424

151 DREAMS 424

781 - بُشَرى الرُّؤيا 424

781 GLAD TIDINGS IN DREAMS 424

Notes 424

782 - أقسامُ الرُّؤيا 425

782 CATEGORIES OF DREAMS 425

Notes 425

783 - تَفسيرُ الرُّؤيا 426

783 INTERPRETATION OF DREAMS 426

Notes 426

152 - الرياء 427

152 SHOWING OFF 427

784 - ذَمُّ الرِّياءِ 427

784 THE CENSURE OF SHOWING OFF 427

Notes 428

785 - الرِّياءُ وَالشِّركُ‏ 430

785 SHOWING OFF AND POLYTHEISM 430

Notes 430

786 - سوءُ عاقِبَةِ أهلِ الرِّياءِ 431

786 THE EVIL OUTCOME OF THOSE WHO SHOW OFF 431

Notes 431

787 - عَلاماتُ المُرائي‏ 432

787 THE DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTICS OF A SHOW OFF 432

Notes 432

788 - النَّوادِرُ 433

788 MISCELLANEOUS 433

Notes 433

153 - الرأي‏ 434

153 OPINION 434

789 - ما يوجِبُ إصابَةَ الرَّأيِ‏ 434

789 THAT WHICH RENDERS AN OPINION VALID 434

Notes 434

790 - آثارُ الاستِبدادِ بِالرَّأيِ‏ 435

790 THE CONSEQUENCES OF OBSTINATELY HOLDING ONE'S OWN OPINION 435

Notes 435

791 - ما يَهدِمُ الرَّأيَ‏ 436

791 FACTORS THAT DESTROY AN OPINION 436

Notes 436

792 - الدَّولَةُ وصَوابُ الرَّأيِ‏ 437

792 THE GOVERNMENT AND THE VALIDITY OF ITS OPINION 437

Notes 437

793 - استِعمالُ الرَّأي فِي الدِّينِ‏ 438

793 ACTING ON ONE'S OPINION IN RELIGIOUS MATTERS 438

Notes 438

794 - الاجتِهادُ فِي الرَّأيِ‏ 439

794 SINCERE EFFORT REQUIRED IN FORMULATING ONE'S OPINION 439

Notes 439

154 - الربا 440

154 USURY 440

795 - التَّحذيرُ مِن الرِّبا 440

795 Warning Against Usury 440

Notes 440

796 - حِكمَةُ تَحريمِ الرِّبا 442

796 The Wisdom Behind the Prohibition OF USURY 442

Notes 442

797 - ما يوجِبُ الارتِطامَ فِي الرِّبا 443

797 That Which Leads One to Become INVOLVED IN USURY 443

Notes 443

798 - آكِلُ الرِّبا مُستَحِلّاً مُحارِبٌ‏ 444

798 THE USURER WHO JUSTIFIES HIMSELF MUST BE FOUGHT 444

Notes 444

155 - الرجاء 445

155 HOPE 445

799 - الحَثُّ عَلَى الرَّجاءِ الصّادِقِ‏ 445

799 ENJOINMENT OF TRUE HOPE 445

Notes 445

800 - التَّحذيرُ مِن رَجاءِ غَيرِ اللَّهِ‏ 447

800 Caution Against Placing One's Hopes IN ANYONE OTHER THAN ALLAH 447

Notes 447

156 - الرجعة 448

156 THE RETURN 448

801 - رَجعَةُ المَوتى‏ 448

801 THE RETURN OF THE DEAD 448

Notes 448

802 - مَن اُخبِرَ بِرَجعَتِهِ‏ 449

802 THE MENTION OF SPECIFIC PEOPLE TO BE RETURNED 449

Notes 449

803 - الرَّجعَةُ لَيسَت عامَّةً 450

803 The Return Will Not Be Universal 450

Notes 450

157 - الرَّحم‏ 451

157 COMPASSION 451

804 - الحَثُّ عَلَى التَّراحُمِ‏ 451

804 THE ENJOINMENT OF COMPASSION TOWARDS ONE ANOTHER 451

Notes 452

805 - مَن يَستَحِقُّ الرَّحمَ‏ 453

805 THOSE THAT ARE MOST DESERVING OF COMPASSION 453

Notes 453

158 - الرحمة 454

158 DIVINE MERCY 454

806 - رَحمَةُ اللَّهِ‏ 454

806 ALLAH'S DIVINE MERCY 454

Notes 454

807 - موجِباتُ الرَّحمَةِ 456

807 Factors that Elicit Allah's Mercy 456

Notes 456

159 - الرَّحِم‏ 457

159 CONSANGUINAL RELATIONS 457

808 - فَضلُ صِلَةِ الرَّحِمِ‏ 457

808 RECONCILIATION WITH ONE'S KIN 457

Notes 457

809 - آثارُ صِلَةِ الرَّحِمِ‏ 458

809 THE BENEFITS OF MAINTAING RELATIONS WITH ONE'S KIN 458

Notes 458

810 - صِلَةُ القاطِعِ‏ 460

810 RECONCILING WITH ONE WHO CUTS YOU OFF 460

Notes 460

811 - التَّحذيرُ عَن قَطيعَةِ الرَّحِمِ‏ 461

811 Caution Against Cutting Ties WITH ONE'S KIN 461

Notes 461

812 - أقَلُّ ما يوصَلُ بِهِ الرَّحِمُ‏ 462

812 The Least One Can Do To MAINTAIN RELATIONS WITH ONE'S KIN 462

Notes 462

160 - الرزق‏ 463

160 SUSTENANCE 463

813 - الرَّزّاقُ‏ 463

813 THE ALL-SUSTAINER 463

Notes 463

814 - ضَمانُ الرِّزقِ‏ 464

814 SUSTENANCE IS GUARANTEED 464

Notes 464

815 - الحِرصُ وزِيادةُ الرِّزقِ‏ 466

815 Greed and Increase in Sustenance 466

Notes 466

816 - الحَثُّ عَلَى الإجمالِ في طَلَبِ الرِّزقِ‏ 467

816 Enjoinment of Seeking One's LIVELIHOOD THROUGH DECENT MEANS 467

Notes 467

817 - الرِّزقُ وطالِبُهُ‏ 468

817 THE SEEKER OF HIS SUSTENANCE 468

Notes 468

818 - الاهتِمامُ بِرِزقِ الغَدِ 469

818 WORRYING ABOUT THE MORROW'S SUSTENANCE 469

Notes 469

819 - استِبطاءُ الرِّزقِ‏ 470

819 Impatience With Regards to One's Sustenance 470

Notes 470

820 - ما يَجلِبُ الرِّزقَ ويَزيدُهُ‏ 471

820 Factors that Elicit the Descent of SUSTENANCE AND INCREASE IT 471

Notes 472

821 - ما يَمحَقُ الرِّزقَ‏ 473

821 Things That Cut Off Sustenance 473

Notes 473

822 - الحَثُّ عَلى‏ طَلَبِ الحَلالِ‏ 474

822 Encouraging to Seek Livelihood Through Lawful (halal) Means 474

Notes 475

823 - خَيرُ الرِّزقِ ما يَكفي‏ 476

823 The Best Livelihood is That Which SUFFICES YOU 476

Notes 476

161 - الرشوة 477

161 BRIBERY 477

824 - التَّحذِيرُ مِنَ الرَّشوَةِ 477

824 Warning Against Bribery 477

Notes 478

162 - الرضاع‏ 479

162 SUCKLING 479

825 - رِضاعُ المُولُودِ 479

825 SUCKLING 479

Notes 479

826 - مَن لا يَنبَغِي استِرضاعُهُ‏ 480

826 TYPES OF WET-NURSES THAT SHOULD NOT BE EMPLOYED 480

Notes 480

163 - «الرضا بالقضاء » 481

163 SATISFACTION (1 ) 481

Satisfaction With Allah's Divine Decree 481

827 - فَضلُ الرِّضا 481

827 THE VIRTUE OF SATISFACTION 481

Notes 482

828 - ما يورِثُ الرِّضا 483

828 THINGS THAT INCITE SATISFACTION [WITH ALLAH'S DECREE] 483

Notes 483

829 - ثَمَراتُ الرِّضا 484

829 THE BENEFITS OF SATISFACTION 484

Notes 484

830 - ثَمَرَةُ عَدَمِ الرِّضا 486

830 The Outcomes of Dissatisfaction 486

Notes 486

164 - الرضا (2) «رضوان اللَّه سبحانه » 487

164 SATISFACTION (2 ) 487

Allah's Pleasure 487

831 - موجِباتُ رِضوانِ اللَّهِ‏ 487

831 FACTORS THAT ELICIT ALLAH'S PLEASURE 487

Notes 488

832 - عَلاماتُ رِضَا اللَّهِ‏ 489

832 SIGNS OF ALLAH'S PLEASURE 489

Notes 489

833 - مَرضاةُ الخَلقِ وسَخَطُ الخالِقِ‏ 490

833 Pleasing People at the Expense OF ALLAH'S DISPLEASURE 490

Notes 490

165 - الرفق‏ 491

165 LENIENCY 491

834 - فَضلُ الرِّفقِ‏ 491

834 THE VIRTUE OF LENIENCY 491

Notes 492

835 - الرِّفقُ فِي العِبادَةِ 493

835 MODERATION IN WORSHIP 493

Notes 493

836 - ثَمَراتُ الرِّفقِ‏ 494

836 THE BENEFITS OF LENIENCY 494

Notes 494

166 - المراقبة 496

166 SCRUTINY (of Man's Actions) 496

837 - مُراقَبَةُ اللَّهِ وَالمَلائِكَةِ وَالجَوارِحِ‏ 496

837 MAN'S ACTIONS ARE SCRUTINIZED BY Allah, the Angels and his Own Limbs 496

Notes 496

838 - الحَثُّ عَلَى مُراقَبَةِ النَّفْسِ‏ 497

838 ENJOINMENT OF SELF-SCRUTINY 497

Notes 498

839 - المُراقَبةُ وَالمُحاسَبةُ 499

839 SELF-SCRUTINY AND SELF-ACCOUNTABILITY 499

Notes 499

167 - رمضان‏ 500

167 RAMA?AN 500

840 - شَهرُ رَمَضانَ‏ 500

840 THE MONTH OF RAMAdaN 500

Notes 502

841 - غُفرانُ اللَّهِ في شَهرِ رَمَضانَ‏ 503

841 ALLAH'S FORGIVENESS IN THE MONTH OF RAMAdaN 503

Notes 503

168 - الروح‏ 504

168 THE SPIRIT 504

842 - مَعرِفَةُ الرُّوحِ‏ 504

842 THE SPIRIT 504

Notes 504

843 - الأرواحُ جُنودٌ مُجَنَّدَةٌ 505

843 SPIRITS ARE PRE-MOBILIZED GROUPS 505

Notes 505

844 - أحوالُ الرُّوحِ‏ 506

844 THE STATES OF THE SPIRIT 506

Notes 506

845 - الرُّوحُ عِندَ النَّومِ‏ 507

845 THE SPIRIT DURING SLEEP 507

Notes 507

169 - الراحة 508

169 COMFORT 508

846 - موجِباتُ الرّاحَةِ 508

846 Factors that Bring About Comfort 508

Notes 508

847 - طَلَبُ الرّاحَةِ فِي الدُّنيا 510

847 Seeking Comfort in This World 510

Notes 510

170 - الزراعة 511

170 AGRICULTURE 511

848 - استِحبابُ الزَّرعِ وَالغَرسِ‏ 511

848 The Divine Recommendation of Cultivation and Agriculture 511

Notes 512

171 - الزكاة 513

171 ALMS-TAX (zakat) 513

849 - وُجوبُ الزَّكاةِ 513

849 THE OBLIGATORY ALMS-TAX 513

Notes 513

850 - دَورُ الزَّكاةِ في نَماءِ المالِ‏ 515

850 THE ROLE OF THE ALMS-TAX IN THE INCREASE OF WEALTH 515

Notes 515

851 - مانِعُ الزَّكاةِ 517

851 THE ONE WHO REFUSES TO PAY THE ALMS-TAX 517

Notes 517

852 - المُستَحِقُّونَ لِلزَّكاةِ 519

852 Those Who are Entitled to Receive THE ALMS-TAX 519

Notes 519

853 - لِكُلِّ شَي‏ءٍ زَكاةٌ 520

853 There is a zakat for Everything 520

Notes 520

854 - زَكاةُ الفِطرَةِ 522

854 OBLIGATORY ALMS-TAX PAYABLE ON ?D AL-FITR 522

Notes 522

172 - الزمان‏ 523

172 TIME 523

855 - مَعرِفَةُ الزَّمانِ‏ 523

855 PERCEPTION OF TIME 523

Notes 523

856 - ذَمُّ الثِّقَةِ بِالزَّمانِ‏ 524

856 DENOUNCING HAVING TRUST IN TIME 524

Notes 524

857 - ذَمُّ مُكابَرَةِ الزَّمانِ‏ 525

857 Denouncing The Contending With Time 525

Notes 525

858 - تَعَيُّبُ الزَّمانِ‏ 526

858 CRITICISING TIME 526

Notes 526

173 - الزنا 527

173 FORNICATION 527

859 - النَّهيُ عَنِ الزِّنا 527

859 PROHIBITION OF FORNICATION 527

Notes 528

860 - آثارُ الزِّنا 529

860 CONSEQUENCES OF FORNICATION 529

Notes 529

861 - لِكُلِّ عُضوٍ حَظٌّ مِنَ الزِّنا 530

861 EVERY LIMB HAS ITS OWN SHARE OF FORNICATION 530

Notes 530

174 - الزهد 531

174 ASCETICISM 531

862 - فَضلُ الزُّهدِ 531

862 THE VIRTUE OF ASCETICISM 531

Notes 531

863 - حَقيقَةُ الزُّهدِ 532

863 THE REAL MEANING OF ASCETICISM 532

Notes 533

864 - صِفاتُ الزّاهِدِ 534

864 QUALITIES OF THE ONE WHO PRACTICES ASCETICISM 534

Notes 534

865 - موجِباتُ الزُّهدِ 535

865 FACTORS THAT ELICIT ASCETICISM 535

Notes 535

866 - ثَمَراتُ الزُّهدِ 537

866 THE BENEFITS OF ASCETICISM 537

Notes 537

867 - أزهَدُ النّاسِ‏ 539

867 THE MOST ABSTEMIOUS OF PEOPLE 539

Notes 539

866 - ثَمَراتُ الزُّهدِ 541

866 THE BENEFITS OF ASCETICISM 541

Notes 541

867 - أزهَدُ النّاسِ‏ 543

867 THE MOST ABSTEMIOUS OF PEOPLE 543

Notes 543

175 - الزواج‏ 545

175 MARRIAGE 545

868 - الحَثُّ عَلَى الزَّواجِ‏ 545

868 ENJOINMENT OF MARRIAGE 545

Notes 546

869 - ذَمُّ العُزّابِ‏ 548

869 DENOUNCING OF UNMARRIED PEOPLE 548

Notes 548

870 - ثَوابُ تَزويجِ الإخوانِ‏ 549

870 THE REWARD FOR GETTING FELLOW MUSLIMS MARRIED 549

Notes 549

871 - الحثّ على التعجيل في تَزويجِ البَناتِ‏ 550

871 Enjoinment of Urgency in THE MARRIAGE OF YOUNG WOMEN 550

Notes 550

872 - الإهتمامُ بالدِينِ في الزَّواجِ‏ 551

872 The Importance of Faith WHEN SELECTING A SPOUSE 551

Notes 551

873 - ذَمُّ غَلاءِ المَهرِ 552

873 THE CENSURE OF DEMANDING AN EXCESSIVE DOWRY 552

Notes 552

874 - الاهتِمامُ فِي اختِيارِ الزَّوجَةِ 553

874 The Importance of Being Careful IN SELECTING WIFE 553

Notes 553

875 - حُقوقُ الزَّوجِ‏ 554

875 THE RIGHTS OF THE HUSBAND 554

Notes 554

876 - حُقوقُ الزَّوجَةِ 555

876 THE RIGHTS OF THE WIFE 555

Notes 555

877 - خِدمَةُ الزَّوجِ‏ 556

877 SERVING ONE'S HUSBAND 556

Notes 556

878 - خِدمَةُ الزَّوجَةِ 557

878 SERVING ONE'S WIFE 557

Notes 557

879 - إيذاءُ الزَّوجِ‏ 558

879 MISTREATING ONE'S HUSBAND 558

Notes 558

880 - ايذاء الزوجة 559

880 MISTREATING ONE'S WIFE 559

Notes 559

881 - الصَّبرُ عَلى‏ سوءِ خُلُقِ الزَّوجِ وَالزَّوجَةِ 560

881 Tolerating Bad Character of a Spouse 560

Notes 560

882 - الزَّوجَةُ الصّالِحَةُ 561

882 THE VIRTUOUS WIFE 561

Notes 561

883 - الزَّوجَةُ السَّيِّئَةُ 562

883 THE EVIL WIFE 562

Notes 562

884 - ما يَنبَغي رِعايَتُهُ في نَفَقَةِ العِيالِ‏ 563

884 THINGS TO BE CONSIDERED WHEN SPENDING ON ONE'S FAMILY 563

Notes 563

885 - أدَبُ استِجابَةِ الدَّعوةِ إلَى العُرسِ‏ 564

885 The Etiquette of Accepting Wedding INVITATIONS 564

Notes 564

886 - الحَثُّ عَلى‏ إعلانِ النِّكاحِ‏ 565

886 RECOMMENDATION TO ANNOUNCE ONE'S MARRIAGE 565

Notes 565

176 - الزيارة 566

176 VISITING 566

887 - الحَثُّ عَلَى التَّزاوُرِ فِي اللَّهِ‏ 566

887 Enjoinment of Visiting Each Other FOR THE PLEASURE OF ALLAH 566

Notes 567

888 - ثَمَراتُ لِقاءِ الإخوانِ‏ 568

888 THE BENEFITS OF MEETING FELLOW BROTHERS 568

Notes 568

889 - أدَبُ الزِّيارَةِ 569

889 THE ETIQUETTE OF VISITING 569

Notes 569

177 - زيارة القبور 570

177 VISITATION OF GRAVES 570

890 - زِيارَةُ النَّبيِّ صلى اللَّه عليه وآله‏ 570

890 VISITING THE GRAVE OF THE PROPHET (SAWA) 570

Notes 570

891 - زِيارَةُ أهلِ البَيتِ عليهم السلام‏ 571

891 VISITING THE HOUSEHOLD OF THE PROPHET (SAWA) 571

Notes 573

892 - زِيارَةُ فاطِمَةَ بِنتِ موسَى الكاظِمِ‏ 575

892 Visiting the Grave of Fatima, the DAUGHTER OF Imam Musa AL-Kazim (AS) 575

Notes 575

893 - زِيارَةُ السَّيِّدِ عَبدِالعَظيمِ الحَسَنِيِّ عليه السلام‏ 576

893 VISITING THE GRAVE OF AL-SAYYID ABD AL-A?iM AL-Hasani 576

Notes 576

894 - زيارةُ قُبُورِ الصُّلَحاءِ 577

894 Visiting the Graves of Virtuous People 577

Notes 577

895 - زِيارَةُ قُبورِ المَوتى‏ 578

895 Visiting the Graves of the Deceased 578

Notes 578

896 - التَّسليمُ على‏ أهلِ القُبورِ 579

896 Greeting the People of the Graves 579

Notes 579

178 - الزينة 580

178 ADORNMENT 580

897 - التَّرغِيبُ بِالزِّينَةِ 580

897 ENCOURAGING ADORNMENT 580

Notes 580

898 - أحسَنُ الزِّينَةِ 582

898 THE BEST ADORNMENT 582

Notes 582

179 - المسؤولية 583

179 RESPONSIBILITY 583

899 - المَسؤولِيَّةُ 583

899 RESPONSIBILITY 583

Notes 583

900 - كُلُّكُم مَسؤُولٌ ! 584

Notes 584

901 - مَسؤولِيَّةُ السَّمعِ وَالبَصَرِ وَالفُؤادِ 585

901 The Answerability of the Hearing, THE SIGHT AND THE HEART 585

Notes 585

180 - السؤال (1) «طلب العلم » 586

180 ASKING (1 ) 586

[Seeking Knowledge] 586

902 - مِفتاحُ العِلمِ‏ 586

902 THE KEY TO KNOWLEDGE 586

Notes 586

903 - حُسنُ المَسألَةِ 587

903 PRODUCTIVE QUESTIONING 587

Notes 587

904 - ما لا يَنبَغي فِي السُّؤالِ‏ 588

904 That Which Should Not Be Questioned 588

Notes 588

905 - جوابُ ما لا تعلَمُ من الأسئلَةِ 589

905 Answering Questions that One DOES NOT KNOW THE ANSWER TO 589

Notes 589

181 - السؤال (2) (طلب الحاجة ) 591

181 ASKING (2 ) 591

[Requesting a Need] 591

906 - النَّهيُ عَن سُؤالِ النّاسِ‏ 591

906 PROHIBITION OF ASKING PEOPLE 591

Notes 592

907 - التَّحذيرُ مِنَ السُّؤالِ عَن ظَهرِ غِنىً‏ 593

907 Caution Against Asking (of People) IN SPITE OF BEING WELL-OFF 593

Notes 593

908 - الحَثُّ عَلَى الاستِغناءِ عَنِ النّاسِ‏ 594

908 ENJOINMENT OF SELF-SUFFICIENCY 594

Notes 594

909 - طَلَبُ المَعروفِ مِن أهلِهِ‏ 595

909 Asking a Favour from the Right Person 595

Notes 595

910 - أدَبُ السُّؤالِ‏ 596

910 THE ETIQUETTE OF ASKING 596

Notes 596

911 - التَّحذيرُ عَن رَدِّ السائِلِ‏ 597

911 Warning Against Turning a Beggar AWAY EMPTY-HANDED 597

“And as for the beggar, do not chide him.”2 597

Notes 598

182 - السبّ‏ 599

182 INSULTING 599

912 - ذمُّ سِبابِ المُؤمنِ‏ 599

912 Censure of Insulting the Believer 599

Notes 599

913 - النَّهيُ عن سَبِّ الأصنامِ والشّيطانِ‏ 600

913 PROHIBITION OF INSULTING EVEN IDOLS AND SATAN 600

Notes 600

914 - النَّهيُ عن سَبِّ النّاسِ‏ 601

914 Prohibition of Insulting People 601

Notes 601

915 - النَّهي عَن سَبّ الوالِدَين‏ 602

915 THE PROHIBITION OF INSULTING PARENTS 602

Notes 602

916 - النَّهي عَن سَبّ الأشياءِ 603

916 THE PROHIBITION OF INSULTING THINGS 603

Notes 603

183 - السجود 604

183 PROSTRATION 604

917 - دُورُ السُّجودِ فِى التَّقَرّبِ إلَى اللَّهِ‏ 604

Notes 604

918 - إطالَةُ السُّجودِ 605

918 PROLONGING ONE'S PROSTRATION 605

Notes 605

919 - أثرُ السُّجودِ 606

919 THE EFFECT OF PROSTRATION 606

Notes 606

920 - السُّجودُ عَلى‏ تُربَةِ الحُسَينِ عليه السلام‏ 607

920 PROSTRATING ON THE EARTH FROM Imam Husayn (AS)'S GRAVE 607

Notes 607

184 - المسجد 608

184 THE MOSQUE 608

921 - المَسجِدُ بَيتُ اللَّهِ‏ 608

921 The Mosque is the House of Allah 608

Notes 608

922 - عِمارَةُ المَساجِدِ 609

922 MAINTAINING THE MOSQUES 609

Notes 609

923 - ثَوابُ المَشيِ إلَى المَساجِدِ 610

923 The Reward for Walking to THE MOSQUES 610

Notes 610

924 - ثَوابُ الجُلوسِ فِي المَسجِدِ 611

924 THE REWARD FOR SITTING IN the Mosque 611

Notes 611

925 - جِوارُ المَسجِدِ وَالصَّلاةُ فيهِ‏ 612

925 Neighbouring the Mosque and Praying Therein 612

Notes 612

926 - آدابُ المَساجِدِ 613

926 ETIQUETTES OF THE MOSQUE 613

Notes 613

185 - السخاء 614

185 GENEROSITY 614

927 - فَضلُ السَّخاءِ 614

927 THE VIRTUE GENEROSITY 614

Notes 615

928 - فَضلُ السَّخِيِ‏ 616

928 THE VIRTUE OF THE GENEROUS PERSON 616

Notes 616

929 - حَدُّ السَّخاءِ 618

929 THE EXTENT OF GENEROSITY RECOMMENDED 618

Notes 618

186 - السرّ 619

186 SECRECY 619

930 - الحَثُّ عَلى‏ كِتمانِ السِّرِّ 619

930 ENCOURAGING KEEPING A SECRET 619

Notes 620

931 - مَن لا يَنبَغي إيداعُهُم سِرّاً 622

931 Those That Must Not Be Entrusted WITH A SECRET 622

Notes 622

187 - السرور 623

187 HAPPINESS 623

932 - ما يَنبَغِي السُّرورُ بهِ‏ 623

932 WHAT TO BE HAPPY ABOUT 623

Notes 623

933 - عَوامِلُ السُّرورِ 624

933 THE BASICS OF HAPPINESS 624

Notes 624

934 - مَن أودَعَ قَلباً سُروراً 625

934 ONE WHO FILLS OTHERS' HEARTS WITH HAPPINESS 625

Notes 625

935 - مَن سَرَّ مُؤمِناً سَرَّ اللَّهَ‏ 627

935 Whoever Makes Another Believer HAPPY MAKES ALLAH HAPPY 627

Notes 627

936 - ثَوابُ التَّفريجِ عَنِ المُؤمِنِ‏ 628

936 The Reward for Alleviating a Fellow Believer of His Sorrows 628

Notes 628

188 - الاسراف‏ 629

188 WASTING 629

937 - ذَمُّ الإسرافِ‏ 629

937 DENOUNCING WASTING 629

Notes 629

938 - عَلاماتُ المُسرِفِ‏ 630

938 Distinguishing Characteristics of A WASTEFUL PERSON 630

Notes 630

939 - أدنَى الإسرافِ‏ 632

939 THE LOWEST OF WASTEFULNESS 632

Notes 632

940 - ما لا يُعَدُّ مِنَ الإسرافِ‏ 633

940 That Which is Not Counted As Waste 633

Notes 633

189 - السرقة 634

189 STEALING 634

941 - السَّرِقَةِ وَحَدُّها 634

941 STEALING AND ITS LEGAL PUNISHMENT 634

Notes 634

942 - مَن لا يَجري عَلَيهِ حَدُّ السَّرِقَةِ 635

942 Those Who Are Not Liable to THE LEGAL PUNISHMENT FOR STEALING 635

Notes 636

190 - السعادة 637

190 PROSPERITY 637

943 - عَلامَةُ السَّعيدِ 637

943 The Sign of the Prosperous 637

Notes 637

944 - ما يوجِبُ السَّعادَةَ 638

944 THAT WHICH BRINGS ABOUT PROSPERITY 638

Notes 638

945 - ما يُعَدُّ مِنَ السَّعادَةِ 639

945 Things which are considered as Prosperity 639

Notes 639

946 - حَقيقَةُ السَّعادَةِ 640

946 THE REALITY OF PROSPERITY 640

Notes 640

947 - أسعَدُ النّاسِ‏ 641

947 THE MOST PROPEROUS OF PEOPLE 641

Notes 641

191 - السفر والتنزّه‏ 642

191 TRAVEL 642

948 - الحَثُّ عَلَى السَّفَرِ وَقَصرِها 642

948 Encouraging to Travel And Making IT SHORT 642

Notes 642

949 - الحَثُّ عَلَى التَّنَزُّهِ‏ 643

949 ENCOURAGING TO TRAVEL FOR RECREATION 643

Notes 643

950 - آدابُ السَّفَرِ 644

950 ETIQUETTES OF TRAVELLING 644

Notes 645

951 - السَّفَرُ المَنهِيُّ عَنهُ‏ 646

951 THE PROHIBITED JOURNEY 646

Notes 646

192 - السقي‏ 647

192 QUENCHING SOMEONE'S THIRST 647

952 - فَضلُ السَّقيِ‏ 647

952 THE VIRTUE OF QUENCHING SOMEONE'S THIRST 647

Notes 647

953 - ما يَنبَغي لِلسّاقي‏ 649

953 The Duty of One Who Quenches OTHERS 649

Notes 649

193 - السكر 650

193 INTOXICATION 650

954 - كُلُّ مُسكِرٍ حَرامٌ‏ 650

954 EVERY INTOXICANT IS PROHIBITED 650

Notes 650

955 - أنواعُ المُسكِراتِ‏ 651

955 TYPES OF INTOXICATION 651

Notes 651

194 - المَسكن‏ 653

194 HOUSING 653

956 - سَعَةُ المَسكَنِ وَضِيقُهُ‏ 653

956 Spaciousness and Smallness of A HOUSE 653

Notes 653

957 - التَّحذيرُ مِنَ البِناءِ فَوقَ الكَفافِ‏ 654

957 CAUTION AGAINST BUILDING MORE HOUSING THAN NECESSARY FOR ONE'S LIVING 654

Notes 654

958 - بَيعُ الدّارِ 655

958 SELLING A HOUSE 655

Notes 655

195 - السِّلاح‏ 656

195 WEAPONRY 656

959 - ثَوابُ صُنعِ الأسلِحَةِ 656

959 The Reward for Making Weapons 656

Notes 656

960 - السِّلاحُ والخَيرُ 657

960 WEAPONRY AND GOODNESS 657

Notes 657

961 - النَّهيُ عَن بَيعِ السِّلاحِ لِأعداءِ الدِّينِ‏ 658

961 PROHIBITION OF SELLING WEAPONS TO ENEMIES OF ISLAM 658

Notes 658

196 - السُّلطان‏ 659

196 THE RULER (THE SULTAN) 659

962 - إيّاكم ومُخالَطَةَ السُّلطانِ الجائِرِ 659

962 BEWARE OF ASSOCIATING WITH A TYRANNICAL RULER 659

Notes 660

963 - ذَمُّ الخُضوعِ لِلسُّلطانِ الجائِرِ 661

963 DENOUNCING THE SUBSERVIENCE TO A TYRANNICAL RULER 661

Notes 661

964 - فَضلُ السُّلطانِ العادِلِ‏ 662

964 THE VIRTUE OF A JUST RULER 662

Notes 662

197 - الإسلام‏ 663

197 ISLAM 663

965 - الإسلامُ دِينُ اللَّهِ‏ 663

965 ISLAM THE RELIGION OF ALLAH 663

Notes 664

966 - مَعنَى الإسلامِ‏ 665

966 THE MEANING OF ISLAM 665

Notes 665

967 - خَصائِصُ المُسلِمِ‏ 666

967 CHARASTERISTICS OF A MUSLIM 666

Notes 666

968 - قَواعِدُ الإسلامِ‏ 668

968 FUNDAMENTALS OF ISLAM 668

Notes 668

198 - السَّلام‏ 670

198 GREETING OF PEACE (SALAM) 670

969 - تَحِيَّةُ المُسلِمينَ‏ 670

969 THE GREETING BETWEEN MUSLIMS 670

Notes 671

970 - فَضلُ الابتِداءِ بِالسَّلامِ‏ 672

970 THE VIRTUE OF INITIATING THE GREETING 672

Notes 672

971 - الحَثُّ عَلى التَّسليمِ عِندَ دُخولِ البَيتِ‏ 673

971 ENJOINMENT OF GREETING UPON ENTERING ONE'S HOUSE 673

Notes 673

972 - وُجوبُ رَدِّ السَّلامِ‏ 674

972 THE OBLIGATION OF RETURNING A GREETING 674

Notes 674

973 - أدَبُ السَّلامِ‏ 675

973 THE ETIQUETTE OF GREETING 675

Notes 676

199 - التَّسليم‏ 677

199 SUBMISSION 677

974 - التَّسليمُ لإرادَةِ اللَّهِ‏ 677

974 Submission To The Will of Allah 677

Notes 678

200 - الاستِماع‏ 679

200 LISTENING 679

975 - فَضلُ الأسماعِ الواعِيَةِ 679

975 The Virtue of Attentive Ears 679

Notes 679

976 - مَن حُجِبَ سَمعُهُ‏ 680

976 THOSE WHOSE EARS HAVE BEEN SEALED 680

Notes 680

977 - حُسنُ الاستِماعِ‏ 681

977 EFFECTIVE LISTENING 681

Notes 681

978 - ما فُرِضَ عَلَى السَّمعِ‏ 682

978 THE OBLIGATION INCUMBENT ON THE HEARING 682

Notes 682

201 - الأسماء 683

201 THE NAME 683

979 - اختِيارُ الأسماءِ الحَسَنَةِ 683

979 CHOOSING GOOD NAMES 683

Notes 683

980 - استِبدالُ الأسماءِ القَبِيحَةِ 685

980 CHANGING UGLY NAMES 685

Notes 685

202 - أسماءُ اللَّه‏ 686

202 THE NAMES OF ALLAH 686

981 - بِسمِ اللَّهِ الرّحمنِ الرَّحيمِ‏ 686

Notes 686

982 - اسمُ اللَّهِ الأعظَمُ‏ 688

982 ALLAH'S GREATEST NAME 688

Notes 688

203 - السُّنَّة 689

203 Sunnah [Tradition] 689

983 - الحَثُّ عَلى‏ لُزومِ سُنَّةِ النَّبِيِ‏ 689

983 Enjoinment of Adhering TO THE PROPHET'S PRACTICES 689

Notes 689

984 - جَزاءُ مَن سَنَّ سُنَّةً 690

984 The Recompense of One WHO ESTABLISHES A HABITUAL PRACTICE 690

Notes 690

985 - النَّهيُ عَن نَقضِ السُّنَّةِ الصّالِحَةِ 691

985 Prohibition of Discontinuing A GOOD PRACTICE 691

Notes 691

204 - السَّهَر 692

204 STAYING AWAKE AT NIGHT 692

986 - السَّهَرُ 692

986 STAYING AWAKE AT NIGHT 692

Notes 692

987 - الحَثُّ عَلى‏ إحياءِ هذِهِ اللَّيالي‏ 694

987 Enjoinment of Remaining Awake ON SPECIFIC NIGHTS 694

Notes 694

205 - السَّيِّد 695

205 THE CHIEF 695

988 - خَصائِصُ السَّيِّدِ 695

988 CHARACTERISTICS OF THE CHIEF 695

Notes 695

989 - ما يوجِبُ السُّؤدَدَ 696

989 REQUIREMENTS OF CHIEFDOM 696

Notes 696

990 - ما يَمنَعُ السُّؤدَدَ 697

990 Factors that Repel Chiefdom 697

Notes 697

206 - السِّياسة 698

206 MANAGEMENT 698

991 - سِياسَةُ المُجتَمَع‏ 698

991 MANAGEMENT OF THE SOCIETY 698

Notes 698

992 - سِياسَةُ النَّفسِ‏ 700

992 MANAGEMENT OF ONE'S SELF 700

Notes 700

207 - التَّسويف‏ 701

207 PROCRASTINATION 701

993 - النَّهيُ عَنِ التَّسويفِ‏ 701

993 Prohibition of Procrastination 701

Notes 702

208 - السُّوق‏ 703

208 THE MARKETPLACE 703

994 - دارُ الغَفْلَةِ 703

994 PLACE OF NEGLIGENCE 703

Notes 703

995 - مَوعِظَةُ الإمامِ عَلِيٍّ عليه السلام لِأهلِ السُّوقِ‏ 704

995 Imam Ali (AS)'s Exhortation to MARKET TRADERS 704

Notes 704

209 - السِّواك‏ 705

209 BRUSHING ONE'S TEETH 705

996 - الحَثُّ عَلَى السِّواكِ‏ 705

996 ENJOINMENT OF BRUSHING ONE'S TEETH 705

Notes 706

997 - مَنافِعُ السِّواكِ‏ 707

997 The Benefits of Brushing One's TEETH 707

Notes 707

998 - أدَبُ السِّواكِ‏ 708

998 Etiquette of Brushing Teeth 708

Notes 708

CHAPTER TWO: between the mind and sacred texts

European and ecclesiastical heritage:

The contradiction or clash between the reasoning mind and the sacred texts is considered a European and ecclesiastical heritage, and this clash cannot be under stood except within this light. Different natures of both the sacred texts and the reasoning mind dono necessarily mean they are contradictory. For instance, we cannot say thatthee eyes would clash with the ears, or that hearing contradicts seeing, as each has its own distinctive function, which in turn might complement one another. Yet, sheets and sheets of European history and thought show that it is a deep-rooted conviction that there is contradiction or clash between the reasoning mind and the sacred texts. This was manifested three centuries before the advent of Islam and continued until the early modern era, i.e. 15 centuries. This main constituent of European history is taken for granted in the European thought and it would be hard to change it or accept ideas opposite to it.

What facilitates understanding of this phenomenon is that the clash was not between Christianity and the mind, but between the church and the liberty of thought. This clash occurred because of the emergence of the church as a religious institution and the sole representative of Christianity. The Christian religion demands clergy to perform religious rituals and social services, like baptism, burial of the dead, prayers, marriage, offering oblation and charity, confessions…etc. that is why Christians cannot conceive their religions without the church, and they say about it, ''Our mother the Church''. This led to the monopoly of the religious professions, and personal interests began to crystallize in the church. When Constantine the Emperor converted to Christianity in 323 A.D., the church had the support of political authority, and dissenters were persecuted. In 385 A.D., the Spanish hereticPresilian was sentenced to death by the order ofMaximus the Emperor. Saint Augustine himself in 430 A.D. justified persecution based on words purportedly ascribed to Christ:''Compel them to convert to your religion ''. According to this logic, he agreed to punishing the heretic with exile, whipping, and fines. Saint Augustine had written a constitution for the church to follow to face any rational movement or thought. He says in his book titled ''Comments on the book of Genesis " that, ''…It is not conceivable to believe a view contradictory to the sacred texts, as their authority exceeds any reason of the human mind''[2] .

In 390 A.D., the bishopTheophilus destroyed a library in the city of Alexandria. One century later, Saint Cyril,Theophilus's nephew, felt the danger of the cultural activity ofHypathia who used to teach mathematics and philosophy in the city of Alexandria, and her school sessions was full of audience. Saint Cyril incited the mob against her, and the mob attacked her on her way to her teaching sessions, tore her clothes and tore her body into pieces. In 529 A.D., Justinian the Emperor ordered to close all schools of philosophy. This approach continued even when the Greek studies flourished and the European society knew the philosophy of Averroes, and the European renaissance began. The church forbade John BaptistPorta to continue his studies in physics and chemistry in the second half of the 16 th century. Scientific research societies and academies at the time in Paris, London, Napoli, and Florence, were persecuted by the church, especially DelShimento that began its sessions in Florence in 1657 under the auspices of the prince Leopold De Medici, and included the elite people of scientific research. The motto of this academy was 'Refuting any philosophical doctrine even if it was revered, and the necessity of studying natural phenomena in light of empiricism'. They applied this motto with enthusiasm, and their studies and research bore fruit. For instance, there are the contributions of Borelli in mathematics andRedi in physics and others in other branches of scientific research. All of them widened the scope of knowledge in fields like temperature, light, magnetism, electricity, gravity, digestion, pressure …etc. their approach was right in scientific research, and their academy was a fortified bastion for new knowledge. Yet theologians accused them of being heretic infidels and the president of the academy was offered the position of a cardinal to dismantle the academy. The academy resisted its opponents like a bastion for 10 years before its fall. Its members resisted until their last drop of blood. Borelli, for instance, was persecuted and forced to beg when he went broke, andOliva was forced to commit suicide to flee the torture of the Inquisition Court.[3]

Before this,Pruno was sentenced to death in 1600 because he believed the theories of Copernicus that were opposed by the Catholics and the Protestants.Pruno was the one who paved the way for the modern theory of nebula, but the court sentenced him to death without shedding his blood, that is why he was burned alive. In Florence, another reformer, named Savonarola, was killed in the same manner. With the emergence of printing, the Church began supervising and banning some printed books; for instance, the Pope Alexander V issued a decree in 1501 to ban printing books except with permission from the Pope. Henry VIII of France made printing without permission a crime punishable by death. Germany began censorship of printed books in 1529. Books were never printed in England during the reign of Elizabeth I except with permission. There were no print houses in England at the time except in London, Oxford, and Cambridge. Printing in England was supervised by the Star Chamber, and these restrictions were not removed until a century ago. [4]

With the new research in astronomy, a series of persecution ensued, from the persecution of Copernicus to the trial of Galileo. The Church was adamant in its refusal of new science due to fanaticism, narrow-mindedness, and ignorance, sticking to the Old Testament story of creation that shows the earth as a flat surface, and as the center of the universe. These matters were not in the main theological issues tackled by Christ and his disciples, yet these matters were the axis of the most powerful wave of persecution of science and mind. The stubbornness of the Church was exemplified by the sentenced uttered by one authority of the church, '' the stability of the earth is a concept thrice sacred…we can tolerate the utter disappearance of souls, the denial of the existence of God and His incarnation in a human form, yet we can never tolerate the view that the earth revolves…''[5] . Others in the Church have defined the date of the creation of the world: at nine AM, 23 rdof October in the year 4004 BC. [6]

The insistence of church authorities over such issues at that time, when horizons of knowledge opened in fields of geology, astronomy, physics, and the emergence of the evolution theory and natural selection, which were irrefutable, led to the opposition of church views. This led eventually to the defeat of the church and its alienation from the society. Its role was restricted to one hour every Sunday or in social occasions. The church lost its role as the scientific, social, and political compass of European society. This was considered a natural step and a prerequisite to modern progress and the emergence of secular states in modern age.

Accordingly, this idea of Christianity in European ecclesiastical heritage was considered applicable to all religions in the world, although Christianity was one thing, and the church was another thing, and Christianity was one thing, and the other world religions were another thing. This sweeping generalization was conveyed and applied blindly by Islamic thinkers who were influenced by European thought, and that made them consider Islam as a religion is opposed to rationalism, like all world religions. This is not true, and the same measure does not apply here.

Reason and mind in the Islamic thought:

Islam, like other religions, acknowledges the idea of divine revelation, but it is distinctive by being liberated from the three factors led to the abyss between religion and reason, mentioned in the previous chapter. The concept of divinity in Islam did not emerge from theology or an ecclesiastical hierarchy, nor the Islamic faith was based on miracles; thus, the early Muslim religious scholars had no objections or sensitivities to accept mind and reason as sources of wisdom. It was said, ''Rulings of the mind are acceptable by theSharia (Islamic legislature), and the mind is an inner prophecy, whereas the Sharia is the outer mind''. Nearly all Muslims agree on the fact that the belief in God precedes that in prophecies, and so we believe in prophecies and sacred texts after we believe in God first. That is why one of the scholastic Islamic philosophers the first mission of the believer is to reach by reasoning to the idea of the existence of God to staunchly believe in it through the mind, and accordingly the belief in prophets and their sacred texts. Hence, Islam was firstly based on the rational outlook. [7]

Sheikh M.Abdou said, ''The belief in God's existence should not be gained from sayings of the prophet or the sacred texts, but it should be gained through the mind first, and then comes next the belief in prophets''. SheikhMaraghy said, "Imitation should not be the basis of faith, otherwise it would be a faith without reasoning and work and God would not accept it''. It is acknowledged that the mind is a prerequisite to faith, and that obligations of faith are not compulsory on mad people and children who have not attained to puberty. It is said as well that the faculty of reason is the balance of god on earth.

Ibn Taymiya wrote two books on the topic of the mind and the sacred texts, one of them titled ''The Refutation of the Claimed Contradiction between the Mind and the Sacred Texts ", and the other titled "The Agreement Statement between the Mind and the Sacred Texts ".In both books, he proves that there could be no clash between the reasoning mind and the sacred texts, and there is ample room forIjtihad (reasoning and interpretive judgment) for other issues that would be new in life.

All Islamic doctrines place the mind in high status; especially theZaydi doctrine set by imamZayd Ibn Ali (Zayn El-Abdeen )Ibn Al-HusseinIbn AliIbn AbuTalib . This doctrine was misinterpreted by Shiite Muslims and shunned accordingly by Sunnite Muslims, although it was worthy of appreciation.

Zaydi doctrine offers the resolved issue of the reasoning mind as expressed in the Holy Quran. This is mentioned in the manuscript in the Egyptian Book House titled ''Gems of Chapters on the Origins ofZaydi Doctrine'' bySarim Al-Deen El-Wazir :

"Ijtihad is based on the rational, reasoning mind, and then the unanimous view of scholars, then what is known from the sacred texts and theSunna , then what is generally accepted socially, then the general understanding and measurement of subject matters, and lastly the original innocence in things …"

ImamAbou Zahra refutes and dispels in his book titled " ImamZayd " any doubts concerning the abovementioned statement, by saying:

"…We conclude that the reasoning mind and its decisive rational judgment are placed in the first rank above other sources ofIjtihad , even theSunna and the Holy Quran. This would seem strange, but we shall explain it as follows.

The reasoning mind is placed above all as through it we reach the knowledge of God's existence, the prophecy of Muhammad, and the divine origin of the Holy Quran. Logically, this precedes using theSunna and the Holy Quran inIjtihad , as the reasoning mind proves their correctness.

We resort to the reasoning mind in IslamicSharia if theSharia has no answers to the subject matter in question. The reasoning, rational mind comes primarily before the sacred texts in three aspects.

Firstly, the determined and resolved matter of the reasoning mind which cannot be refuted, and that the judgment of the mind to legalize or ban something is something relative and not absolute.

Secondly, the reasoning mind is the basis of the Islamic discourse of facts like the belief in God His prophet, His book, and His miracles. The fact that the mind is a prerequisite to holding believers responsible for their actions comes after theSharia . We conclude then that the judgment of the mind is not contradictory to what is in the sacred texts. For example, if the mind considers something as corrupt, without a text to legalize or ban it, then this thing is banned, as God does not like corruption for His believers. If the mind considers something as useful without a text to legalize or ban it, then this thing is legalized as long as it is not corrupt, because God is merciful to His believers.

Thirdly, the precedence of the reasoning mind is the basis of the generalSharia , but the mind comes later to theSharia in matters legalized or banned clearly and specifically in theSharia …"

The same author refutes the doubts cast on the precedence of unanimous view over theSunna and the Holy Quran, saying:

"Sarim Al-Deen El-Wazir mentions in his book that the unanimous view was taken in the early era of Islam by the prophet Muhammad and his companions and followers. For example, all views agree unanimously on facts like: there are five prayers daily, on the number of prostrations (Raak'at ) in each prayer, on the manner of prayer set by Prophet Muhammad, on fasting, alms ( Zakat ), pilgrimage…etc. There is noIjtihad in such matters as they are taken for granted and they could not be opposed, and they are explained plainly in the Holy Quran andSunna .

Taking these facts for granted, and in a place of precedence overIjtihad in the Holy Quran andSunna , does not mean that the unanimous view is placed in precedence over the Holy Quran andSunna . Prophet Muhammad advised us to use the mind and the unanimous view to judge things not mentioned in the Holy Quran andSunna "[8]

The author of the book titled ''Zaydi Doctrine " mentions in his talk about El-Kasim El-Rasi that " This doctrine was the first one to place the reasoning mind in precedence to the Holy Quran and the prophet Muhammad as both are known and acknowledged first through the mind, and both cannot be used to reach the mind. Hence, the mind is the main source forFiqh inZaydi doctrine, and although the rational tendency was first known in the Mo'tazala doctrine, but it does not place the mind in such high esteem as the case withZaydi doctrine. TheZaydi doctrine says that even the truth of Prophet Muhammad is known by the mind as it discerns truth from falsehoods, and hence the mind is precedent to Prophet Muhammad, theSunna and the Holy Quran. Mo'tazala and Asha'era doctrines, and Al-Razi who followed the latter doctrine, say that the reasoning mind is precedent to the sacred texts, whereas the main doctrines like Al-Hanifiya or Al -Shafeiya did not place the mind as a source for legislation precedent to the Holy Quran …" [9]

El-Kasim El-Rasi said in his description of the reasoning mind, ''…the mind is a safe haven for thoughts and the best friend to keep secrets and ideas "

Despite the fact that theZaydi doctrine was plain and clear in stating and acknowledging the fact of the mind's precedence over the sacred texts, even the Holy Quran itself, yet the essence of other Islamic doctrines does not differ much from this fact. This appeared in tackling the case of the purported contradiction between the mind and the sacred texts, and the contemporary writer sheikh M.Soad Galal cited El-Razi and said:

"…the problem is when the judgment of the mind would contradict the sacred text of the Holy Quran… "

El-Razi mentions that in the interpretation of the Holy Quran, one would use the mind, like in the verse: ''…when he came to the setting of the sun, it appeared to him that it was setting in a dark turbid sea… '' (86:18) which means the beholder has seen this scene literally. El-Razi says that the mind is the origin and theSharia is the branch of it, and if we believed in the vice-versa, then this is not true. It is through the rational mind that we prove the existence and oneness of God, and His attributes like liveliness, omniscience, omnipotence, will…etc. and His ability to send messengers to people. Hence, evenSharia is based on the reasoning mind and not the vice-versa, which is wrong.

The contemporary writer sheikh M.Soad Galal explains that the vice versa is not true as we cannot prove the correctness of the Holy Quran by the existence of God or the vice versa, as this is false logic. The existence of God and the correctness of the Holy Quran are both proven solely by the mind, not by anything in theSharia ; hence, theSharia itself can be true according to the mind as well.[10]

Islamic thought and philosophy:

It is a shame that that many Islamic thinkers made the wrong use of the encouragement of Islam to scientific thought in the only field that Islam bans considering; i.e., the attributes of God and the nature of His Being. The human mind cannot conceive this field, yet some Islamic thinkers specified a new branch of philosophy to deal with such knowledge, which is called the knowledge ofKalam (similar to Greek scholasticism: rational reexamination of faith based on Greek philosophical ideas). People ofKalam made use of the Aristotelian system of logic of premises, semantic meanings, patterns, definitions, limits, proofs, assessment, refutations…etc. to reexamineFiqh .[11]

In any simple book of the origins ofFiqh , we read that a thing cannot prove the existence or nonexistence of another thing, like the example of cleanliness before performing prayers, as performing ablution is not enough to perform prayers…etc.

TheSalafist thought imbued the Kalam philosophy and the logical and philosophical methods of thinking infiltrated in the thought of mostSalafist thinkers like, Averroes, Avicenna…etc.

Al-Ash'ari himself tried to conciliate the sacred text and rationalism and Kalam philosophy. One writer traces the infiltration ofKalam philosophy in the Islamic thought, and says:

"…After Al-Ash'ari , there was the judgeAbou Bakr El-Baklani , who wrote books like The Philosophical Premises , Gems of Wisdom , on the Kalam philosophy of Al-Ash'ari .Later on, there was El-Niasabouri (420 -478 A.H) who studied monotheism, Fiqh , and logic for 30 years and wrote books like The Ultimate End which is preserved as a manuscript in the Egyptian Book House, and El-Shamel (The Comprehensive) and its synopsis titled Book of Guidance .El-Niasabouri made use of theSalafist thought as well as Greek logic in his work tackling Kalam philosophy of Al-Ash'ari .Later on, there was his disciple, imam Al-Ghazali , the most important well-known Islamic philosopher, who died in 505 A.D. his contribution to the thought of Al-Ash'ari was to refute other philosophers who were being refuted before him by Al-Mo'tazala solely. Imam El-Khatib followed the steps of imam El-Ghazali in refuting philosophers and Al-Mo'tazala by the philosophy of Al-Ash'ari . Later on, the same philosophy and methods were used by Al-Baydawy whose book was titled Al-Tawale ' who combined other philosophies withKalam philosophy. Some of those who followed the footsteps of Al-Baydawy were non-Arab scholars and philosophers like Al-Taftazani and Al-Eigy ''.[12]

We can say that the experience of the Islamic thought in this field was unsuccessful, and holding solely to the sacred texts at the time was preferable to the reasoning mind. That was because Muslim philosophers studied the Greek philosophy to use it to prove the existence of God and His attributes. They used it to discuss many presuppositions and postulates. Later on, they tried to reconcile philosophy and faith, and they considered that wisdom brought religion and religion complements wisdom. Al-Safa brothers considered thatSharia was sullied by ignorant imposters and some aberrant ideas that should be purged by philosophy, as said by El-Sagastany . Islamic thought did not gain benefit by a book by Al-Faraby titled '' Two views of the Two Sages " and says in it, '' God saved reasonable and rational people via these two sages, Plato and Aristotle, with their clear logic to refute falsehoods and prove things with irrefutable evidence, and their books have many principles on nature and questions of divinity… " He did not even mention Islam and the message of Prophet Muhammad and the guidance of the Holy Quran and its proofs of faith that keep faith ingrained in the mind more that philosophical doctrine could keep.

This view of Al-Faraby and other philosophers who imitated him is rue concerning the Greek society, where there were no Quran or prophecy, and philosophers were quasi-prophets. This cannot apply in Islam after Prophet Muhammad and the Holy Quran, which presents new method and proofs suitable to humanity in all ages. Yet, the non-Arab origin of these Muslim scholars and philosophers led them to embrace the Aristotelian logic, as theQuranic logic was foreign to them. Their old sediments of foreign (non-Arab) thought led them to prefer the logic and wisdom of 'the two sages' to the divine wisdom of the Holy Quran. Yet, we might excuse them to a certain extent as they were suffocated by the dominance of traditional religious scholars in the Islamic thought at the time, which stifled any innovations.

Dr. M. El-Behy mentions the interpretation of Avicenna of the followingQuranic verse: "God is the Light of the heavens and the earth. The parable of His light is, as it were, that of a niche containing a lamp; the lamp is enclosed in glass, the glass is shining like a radiant star: a lamp lit from a blessed tree - an olive tree that is neither of the east nor of the west – the oil whereof is so bright that it would well-nigh give light of itself even though fire had not touched it: light upon light! God guides unto His light him that wills to be guided, and to this end God propounds parables unto men since God alone has full knowledge of all things "(35:24) and this interpretation was as follows:

"…light is either self-producing or taken from elsewhere and in both cases it leads to goodness. Avicenna says that 'the heavens and the earth' means the totality and the 'niche' means the material mind or the brain that contains the light of thought. The' lamp' means for him the method to transmit thought, and the 'blessed tree' is the power of thought. The' fire' for him means the Omnipotent Mind behind the world we see, this is the OmnipresentBeing written about by Plato ... " [13]

It is understood that this strange interpretation is far from the intended meaning of thisQuranic verse. The picture drawn by the Holy Quran is absorbed by the soul and has the right effect without this bizarre, alien interpretation of Avicenna who was taught philosophies of Aristotle and Plato. This kind of 'interpretations' is in fact a way of adding convoluted and complicated meaning of theQuranic text, which in itself simple and persuasive, with a certain impact of its intonation and shades of semantic levels of meanings.

For example, this is a quotation from the Aristotelian book titled

''Physical Nature " translated by Islamic philosophers:

"…the existent matter signifies something that exists, and shows its existence, as the matter either exists or do not exist, if the matter is white, that does not mean that the thing exists, nor the thing exists because it was nonexistent before, thus the white matter does not signify either existence or nonexistence, then the existent matter signifies many things "(!!)

This passage, said the author[14] is an effort wasted in utter nonsense, and the Islamic nation was harmed when some of its scholars abandoned the Holy Quran with its clear text and message and the easySunna to waste their time in interpreting the previous Aristotelian passage in the following paragraph:

''…the existent matter can signify many existing things, which are primarily existent as an essential fact, and this is the essence of the true nature of things. Yet if the existent matter is something not essential but accidental, it would not signify lack of existence and it has to signify the essence of itself '' (!!)[15]

Moreover, these philosophers added gratuitously in the field of IslamicFiqh many problems of other faiths and religions, which did not exist in Islam overlook by it. These problems were central to their thought and treatises, which tarnished the lucidity and clarity of Islamic thought that depended on its easy way that reached every natural disposition and mental faculty.

At the end of his book titledThe Divine Side of the Islamic Thought , Dr. M. El-Behy shows the tragedy of the Muslim thinkers who wanted to use the Greek philosophy to get a proof of God's existence:

"Muslim philosophers who roamed the East came with the deduction of the existence of God via the existence of the universe itself and the real world in addition to the evidence cited by religion itself, because of their acceptance of the Greek concept of existence. This was not done properly as they tried to conciliate Islam and philosophy in their rational endeavor and they adopted the same problematic issues inherent in the Greek thought, especially in the divine attributes of God mentioned in the Holy Quran and His divine knowledge of His realm.

Their philosophy could not be the basis of any religious guidance as it is not compatible with the thought and nature of religion. Their philosophy could not be the basis of a rational thought due to many vague, abstract, and convoluted ideas that were the result of merging many doctrines of philosophical thought.

If the Muslim philosophers knew the real value of the Greek philosophical thought and that it had been merged with poetry, legends and imagination, they would have preferred to formulate their own logic.

If they knew the result of their acceptance of the ideas of Plato and Aristotle in their interpretations of faith itself as a concept, they would have acknowledged that the Holy Quran is the only divine way to the hearts of the believers and the minds of the elite thinkers among people "[16]

If these genius minds focused its research on natural sciences likeIbn Al-Haytham , Al-Bayroni , and Al-Khawarizmi …etc. Baghdad, the capital of Abbasid Caliphate, would have accomplished what Europe had reached in the renaissance era and human knowledge would have gained ten centuries of science and gained the guidance and teachings of Islam as well. If theMo'tazala group who discussed the idea of God's divine justice discussed it about rulers or themselves, when they reached the throne and the rule, political degeneration would have been prevented and the methods of dialogue would have gained a model of argument to reach the true opinion without concerning their own views.

The futile discussion of the divine attributes of God brought nothing but struggle, chasm and division in the Islamic thought. These fruitless arguments did not benefit any true believers from ordinary people who believed in the Holy Quran like the companions of the prophet and they did not resort to mere philosophical questioning because the desired meaning had reached their hearts and filled it with faith and certitude. Other thoughts apart from this assurance and certitude would be aimless curious chattering with harmful impact. We agree in this respect with those who refused to tackle such novel issues like the divine attributes of God.Ibn Al-Jawzy says in his book titled "The Favor of Ancient Religious Scholars on the Contemporary Ones " (page 17):

"Weshould refuse to discuss and tackle novel issues like those tackled by the Mo'tazala thinkers, like the divine attributes of God and His Being in a rational method. That was more harmful than tackling the issues of fate, which is the action done by God toward people, whereas tackling His attributes is to discuss HisBeing and nature… ".

***

The reaction to the experience of Islamic thought with Greek philosophy and the ensuing futile, harmful, and even absurd arguments ofMo'tazala thinkers is the movement of Sufism as was done, for instance, by Al-Ghazaly , and the other reaction was to resort toSunna especiallyHadith . Both Sufism andSunna did not encourage rational minds in particular and hence the cultural climate that caused the tragedy of the sacred texts (i.e.Hadith ) that were triumphant over the rational mind for centuries. This tragedy is tackled in the following paragraphs.

Between the texts ofHadith and the sources:

TheHadith was first haven for the Islamic thought after the futility of its experience with philosophy was apparent. This is symbolically represented by the victory of AhmedIbn Hanbal over the group ofMo'tazala thinkers.Hadith is the most sacred texts and traditions that passed to us, after the Holy Quran of course, but the ancient scholars were more concerned with the source and narrators ofHadith and not the actual phrasing of the text ofHadith . Collectors ofHadiths acknowledged that the exactness of the source and narrators ofHadith does not necessarily mean accepting a faulty phrasing of the text of aHadith , and that faulty phrasing of the text of aHadith means it is inserted to realSunna . Yet, they practically focused on the source and narrators ofHadiths , regardless of its phrasing, even of this phrasing contradicted the rational mind. All the branches of the science ofHadiths revolve around the source and narrators ofHadiths ; their names, surnames, traits, characters...etc. as the branch of narrators. Another branch is the source of narration ofHadiths : their interpretation, phrasing, kinds, rulings, and narrators and their conditions.

We have to acknowledge that generations of ancient scholars did their best to present to usSunna andHadiths with the least amount faults and interpolations possible as they tried to verify the truth as much as they could. We cannot mention all their many methods in doing so in the limited scope of this book, but generally, their efforts revolved only around the source and narrators ofHadiths and not the meaning and phrasing of the texts ofHadiths . We cite the following example to prove this idea; here are their conditions and stipulations to accept aHadith and its guidance and judge it as a true one:

The continuity of the sources and narrators is necessary in order to excludeHadiths whose sources and chain of narrators are incomplete or doubted.

1- The narrators are not liars, cheaters, or with bad characters, as they should be truthful, pious and with good manners.

2- The narrators are regulators of sources of Hadiths .

3- The narrators are not of aberrant disposition; otherwise, one would doubt their words.

4- The words of the narrators are free of apparent elements of doubt, e.g. lack of the right sequence of narrators that is verifiable.

In sum, the trueHadith for ancient religious scholars must apply the five following conditions:

TheHadith narrators are truthful and righteous.

1- They are regulators of sources from the first to the last narrator in the sequence of narration.

2- The sequence of narration is true and verifiable.

3- The sequence of narrators is not aberrant

The sequence of narration is not doubted or faulty.[17]

Hence, the ancient scholars concerned themselves with verifying the sequence of narrators and they were not concerned if the phrasing of the text of aHadith is contrary to the rational mind. They overlooked many principles that could be the reason for not accepting a Hadith with proper justification. Their focus on the sequence of narrators and not on the text itself of Hadiths that might sometimes go against the rational mind reached a level of denying the sanctity and holiness of the Quran and the prophet. Some ancient scholars accepted a false Hadith claiming that a Jew had once bewitched the prophet, made him once recite the Quran in a faulty way, and made him inserted a phrase after a certain verse.

That they acknowledged the truthfulness of such faulty, unacceptable narrative is a proof of the dominance of the importance of narrators' sequence over the text itself and its meaning and phrasing. Even the sequence of narrators of this story is very weak and its sources are doubted.

Once the sources and narrators are cast in doubt, we cannot accept the story for a realHadith . We must apply rational principles of thought as criteria to judge aHadith to know it is true or false.

In addition to accepting weak sequence of narrators, strange tales as trueHadiths , and not judging critically and rationally their phrasing, some ancient scholars had presented to us thousands of strangeHadiths that are doubted and they cover endless ordinary, mundane topics and fields.

Later generations of religious scholars classified theseHadiths , as they tackled endless situations, in four main categories of action: legal, banned, unpleasant, and avoidable. Later on, with the passage of time, these strange, doubted Hadiths became part of the Sharia that had to be followed blindly. Muslims were obligated to imitated and follow the ancient scholars even if the required actions were outside the framework of worship and true Sharia . The mindset of contemporary Muslims became blind following of the texts and they were forbidden to think or choose. Imitation and blind following became the general accepted policy, and the faculty of reason stopped totally and it was rusted. A contemporary Muslim became like a robot controlled by doubted texts. In fact, this is the tragedy of the contemporary Islamic thought as it is overwhelmed by imitation and blind acceptance without thinking. This goes contrary to the guidance of the Holy Quran in this respect, as it denounces the monks and clergy that people made them semi gods who would legalize and forbid. The Holy Quran denounces clearly the blind following and imitations of ancestors, and such rigid thinking does as well against the teachings of Prophet Muhammad who always preferred the benefit and goodness for his followers. Prophet Muhammad ban disliked futile questioning that lead to nothing as he said clearly in this hadith , " Leave me with what I have told you (of teachings) and ask for no more ". Yet, many narrators of Hadiths did not leave any action or word of Prophet Muhammad unless they record it for guidance and obligatory following. They missed the wisdom of the teachings of Prophet Muhammad as he encouraged people to think and consider the issues of everyday life, and said that if they would reach a good judgment they would be rewarded twice, and if their judgment turned out to be wrong, they would be rewarded once for using the reasoning faculty of mind. Blind following and imitation in everything is wrong even of the prophet as this goes against his hadith mentioned above. Hence, it is clear that God urges Muslims to think and use their mental faculty and warns them against the assumed authority of clergy and ancestors.

***

It is noteworthy that the second haven for the Islamic thought after the failure of its experience with Greek philosophy was Sufism. Sufism did not contribute anything to the rational mind. On the contrary, it had no limits and it went far unbridled in the mazes of ardent passion of the divine. It resulted in the introduction of legends and lore like the holy saints and sheikhs who performed miracles like walking on water, flying in the air to cover long distances…etc. among other superstitious, ignorant tales to deceive the masses, and the shrines of the saints, martyrs and sheikhs who were made holy. Other strange Sufism mystical beliefs are infiltrated in the sermons of some mosques. Some organized bodies and orders were formed on mystical teachings and based on blind obedience to the sheikhs of the mystical order of Sufism who were made holy. These unfamiliar practices are foreign to true Islam and Sufism harmed Islam. It used strange non-Islamic, organizational disciplines to realize ends that most of them are based on infusing blind obedience, deepening imitation, and eradicating the will, character, and reasoning of people.

***

Between imitation andIjtihad :

The conflict between the phrasing ofHadiths and verifying their sources and narrators was broadened in a general way in the conflict between imitation andIjtihad (i.e. reasoning with the mind to reach religious judgments). Imitation was predominant for ten consecutive centuries andIjtihad was strictly forbidden at the time as ancient scholars saw it brought nothing but trouble, chaos, and contradictory notions. Yet, when it comes to the matters and issues of everyday life, this cannot be bearable. There were supposed to be regulating tools like a higher council or court, but such tools were unknown at the time in the Arab, Islamic societies. Since these regulating tools were absent, scholars at the time saw it fit to banIjtihad and confine themselves to old doctrines that proved its validity with the passage of time. Non-religious, political factors, and other benefits and interests had led to the dominance of certain doctrines in certain regions.

What concerns us here is that imitation continued to thrive. Imitation was defined then as ''accepting the words of the others without asking for proofs ''. Accordingly, imitators did not resort to theSunna or to the Holy Quran, but resorted to the doctrine and ideas of their imams and sheikhs who were revered or sanctified. Imitation as a tradition was so powerful that even the only doctrine that resisted imitation – Al-Zaydi doctrine – sank to imitation by later followers and adherents. Al-Shawkani said in his book titled '' Opinions on Imitation andIjtihad '', that '' Zaydi doctrine followers in Yemen tried to reinstituteIjtihad once more in the early days of this doctrine, but later generations brought moreZaydi zealots who glorified imitation of their imams and opposedIjtihad based on the Holy Quran andSunna and attacked violently and killed whoever do this… ". This was done even in a doctrine that at first encouragedIjtihad , let alone other doctrines that call for blind imitation and called it obedience of God.

Due to banning ofIjtihad , the reasoning faculty was abandoned and some people left the teachings of theSunna and the Holy Quran and preferred to them guidelines of their ancestors and old sheikhs. That was why Muslims had degenerated in the previous eras, as they shunned the Holy Quran, the source of their might, guidance and wisdom, and resorted to imitation of their ancestors and chose to follow words of clergy and those who sought worldly gains in the name of religion.

***

It is noteworthy to say that this phenomenon of degeneration of religious thought is not confined to Islam, but we find it in all ancient religions. This even began before heavenly religions when the human mind was not mature enough, but the roots and sediments of this phenomenon are so deep that it became an integral part in the course of history. Heavenly religions cam to deliver people from these distortions and deviances, yet the roots and sediments of this phenomenon in some eras were dominant or at least were present largely in heavenly religions. This impact applies to the three celestial monotheistic religions: Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. We might see it more in Catholicism than in Protestantism, but this effect is present, anyway. What lessened the harmful influence in Europe was that people there did not take Christianity seriously and its influence – both original and harmful – was weak. As for Islam, Muslims see it as the main constituent of their lives and they would never let go of it. Within this concept, initially, the true beneficial impact of Islam was present, and the harmful effect mentioned above was more powerful. In the Holy Quran we read, "…the only true religion in the sight of God is self-surrender unto Him… "(19:3) which means that God wants Islam to be a new, unique model to liberate people from harmful thoughts that sometimes cling to religions with the passage of time. Yet, Muslims reversed thisQuranic verse and made Islam as the only religion and not in the sense of the word'Islam' i.e. self-surrender to God. Hence, Islamic teachings were liable to many suppositious, ignorant ideas and sediments linked to all previous religions before Islam liberated people.

Although Islam, more than any other religions, opposed paganism, superstition, supernatural miracles and imitation, yet the idea of imitation of ancestors prevailed for ages and Muslimswith the passage of time deteriorated like followers of other religions. It was required that every century a great enlightened religious scholar would emerge to renew faith to Muslims, with varying degrees of success according to the surroundings and circumstances.

Domains of specialization:

The abovementioned facts do not intend to convey the idea that the human mind solely is the judging tool in the field of religion. Religion has a divine source of revelation, i.e. God. Revelation is an issue that cannot be proven, or even refuted, by the rational mind. This is because the existence of God is a rational self-evident truth acceptable to the mind, as God is the source of life, wisdom, rationality, and the end to which we reach finally. These divine gifts are the components of the human mind, created by God, and hence it is little wonder that revelation would reach people by God. This revelation does not contradict the components of the mind nor God's attributes. In fact, this makes the mind the link between God and people via the means of revelation. Yet, God is Unseen Himself by any human being, as the Holy Quran says, ''No human vision can encompass Him… '' (103:6), and another fact is that the human mind, due to its limitations, cannot fathom some attributes of God. We only know some of these attributes via the divine revelation, and this does not contradict the mind, but in fact agrees to its ways. Philosophy tried to discuss the nature and Being of God and His attributes were just mere outlines that led to nothing at the end and could not surpass certain limits and could not reach the unseen, unknown realm of life after death. Hence, divine revelation came to complete this aspect lacking in the human mind.

The limitations of the mind to reach facts given by the divine revelation do not mean blind acceptance of what contradicts its rational principles that could not be abandoned. Hence, we conclude that the divine revelation cannot possibly be things that contradict the human mind. We have said earlier that the presupposition that the revelation is by necessity contradictory to the mind is a wrong notion. Islamic revelation agrees to the rational mind and its principles. The proof of this is that the Islamic idea of divinity is like the notion of divinity in the thought of Descartes and other European thinkers and philosophers whotired to discover the attributes of God.

The mind does not reject an issue just because there is no rational proof to it as long as it is not contradictory to the mind. Likewise, issues like the existence of God, Resurrection, Reckoning…etc do not contradict the principles of the mind. On the contrary, these issues agree with the rational preference of existence to nonexistence, justice to injustice. Yet, the Afterlife, Paradise and Hell are issues that contradict the sensory material outlook of the rationalist philosophers. Yet, the fact that these notions are not materially verifiable doesno prove they are nonexistent. If immaterial, strange ideas can be refuted easily, people might not have believed, 200 years ago, that there could be airplanes, radios, cellular phones…etc. and they would accuseany one who would predict these invention of being insane and irrational. Likewise, concepts like the Afterlife, Judgment Day, Paradise and Hell…etc. should not be tackled rationally but accepted as they are, following the agnostic argument. Rationalist should acknowledge the fact that religion and divine revelation show to them aspects that can never be reached by the limitations of the human mind, and thus rationalism could go hand in hand with revelation to reach many aspects of the truth.

Rationalism cannot reject religion just because it cannot be proved by its tools. Likewise, religion should not deny rationalism by the faulty notion that it contradicts the mind and the religious knowledge. Rationalism was an archenemy of Christianity because it presented a view of creation opposite to what we find in the book of Genesis. If religions contain what might contradict rational thought and the principles of the mind, then this We should not prevent religion from tackling issue like natural, social and psychological phenomena, as long as this will not contradict the principles of the mind. That is because religion might reach to aspects unreachable by science. This does not mean that religion would replace science but it will reinforce it, and by necessity would not supplant rationalism. The best proof of this is manyQuranic verses that have references to natural, social and psychological phenomena that may open new vistas for scientists to explore.

It is true that the Holy Quran says God has created the Earth in six days, but the Holy Quran mentions as well that days of God in His high realm above are different from days of people on earth, as some of His days might count 1000 or even 50000 years as mentioned in the Holy Quran. Other numbers and other notions like the Throne of God are mentioned in the Holy Quran to test the fickle believers in the early days of Islam and to be symbols to convey meanings in an understandable manner to people. The narrative verse style of the Holy Quran is different from the narrative prose style of the Old Testament, which leaves no room for interpretation, unlike the case in the poetic style of the Holy Quran that allows room for different interpretations. This applied to God's attributes and actions mentioned in the Holy Quran. Fear of censure will not make us overlook this fact or never to mention it.

Anyhow, the domain of religion differs from the domain of science, and they should not mingle except on rare occasions or exceptions.

God's attribute and the Afterlife are domains of religion, and science however advanced cannot reach them, to verify or refute them, as science cannot investigate the supernatural realm or explore what is beyond the universe.

As for the many branches of science, such as mathematics, geometry, physics…etc. they are the domains of the mind to explore and present to us the latest aspects of the materialistic advancement.

This fundamental separate specialization of domains is based on the facthat the source of religious thought is both the wisdom of the mind and the wisdom of the heart, whereas the source of the scientific thought is solely the mind. Thus, we see the distinctive nature of each of them in their domains and tools by which each of them reach results. This point concerning the wisdom of the heart is tacked in details in the next chapter.

Thus remains two points to mention:

Firstly, Islam should incorporate human branches of knowledge in its domain. For instance, economy, sociology, and politics are scientific fields, but could serve religious aims and values to benefit people, as the neutral, abstract, and scientific outlook might not necessarily be beneficial to all people. The Islamic ideals like justice, benevolence, goodness…etc. are what distinguishes the Islamic rationalism from abstract rationalism. This point is tackled in the second part of this book.

Secondly, there is a third broad domain apart from the religious and scientific ones, which is the domain of arts and literature. It is nearer to the domain of religion that the domain of science is to religion, because one of its sources is the heart, and hence the common source between this domain and religion. Yet, each of them has a different nature, as art is without divine revelation and it is one hundred percent human. Hence, art can go unbridled without control in the realm of the imagination, unlike religion, which is supported by the divine source. As religion should not be a kind of art, arts should not be turned into a religion.

CHAPTER TWO: between the mind and sacred texts

European and ecclesiastical heritage:

The contradiction or clash between the reasoning mind and the sacred texts is considered a European and ecclesiastical heritage, and this clash cannot be under stood except within this light. Different natures of both the sacred texts and the reasoning mind dono necessarily mean they are contradictory. For instance, we cannot say thatthee eyes would clash with the ears, or that hearing contradicts seeing, as each has its own distinctive function, which in turn might complement one another. Yet, sheets and sheets of European history and thought show that it is a deep-rooted conviction that there is contradiction or clash between the reasoning mind and the sacred texts. This was manifested three centuries before the advent of Islam and continued until the early modern era, i.e. 15 centuries. This main constituent of European history is taken for granted in the European thought and it would be hard to change it or accept ideas opposite to it.

What facilitates understanding of this phenomenon is that the clash was not between Christianity and the mind, but between the church and the liberty of thought. This clash occurred because of the emergence of the church as a religious institution and the sole representative of Christianity. The Christian religion demands clergy to perform religious rituals and social services, like baptism, burial of the dead, prayers, marriage, offering oblation and charity, confessions…etc. that is why Christians cannot conceive their religions without the church, and they say about it, ''Our mother the Church''. This led to the monopoly of the religious professions, and personal interests began to crystallize in the church. When Constantine the Emperor converted to Christianity in 323 A.D., the church had the support of political authority, and dissenters were persecuted. In 385 A.D., the Spanish hereticPresilian was sentenced to death by the order ofMaximus the Emperor. Saint Augustine himself in 430 A.D. justified persecution based on words purportedly ascribed to Christ:''Compel them to convert to your religion ''. According to this logic, he agreed to punishing the heretic with exile, whipping, and fines. Saint Augustine had written a constitution for the church to follow to face any rational movement or thought. He says in his book titled ''Comments on the book of Genesis " that, ''…It is not conceivable to believe a view contradictory to the sacred texts, as their authority exceeds any reason of the human mind''[2] .

In 390 A.D., the bishopTheophilus destroyed a library in the city of Alexandria. One century later, Saint Cyril,Theophilus's nephew, felt the danger of the cultural activity ofHypathia who used to teach mathematics and philosophy in the city of Alexandria, and her school sessions was full of audience. Saint Cyril incited the mob against her, and the mob attacked her on her way to her teaching sessions, tore her clothes and tore her body into pieces. In 529 A.D., Justinian the Emperor ordered to close all schools of philosophy. This approach continued even when the Greek studies flourished and the European society knew the philosophy of Averroes, and the European renaissance began. The church forbade John BaptistPorta to continue his studies in physics and chemistry in the second half of the 16 th century. Scientific research societies and academies at the time in Paris, London, Napoli, and Florence, were persecuted by the church, especially DelShimento that began its sessions in Florence in 1657 under the auspices of the prince Leopold De Medici, and included the elite people of scientific research. The motto of this academy was 'Refuting any philosophical doctrine even if it was revered, and the necessity of studying natural phenomena in light of empiricism'. They applied this motto with enthusiasm, and their studies and research bore fruit. For instance, there are the contributions of Borelli in mathematics andRedi in physics and others in other branches of scientific research. All of them widened the scope of knowledge in fields like temperature, light, magnetism, electricity, gravity, digestion, pressure …etc. their approach was right in scientific research, and their academy was a fortified bastion for new knowledge. Yet theologians accused them of being heretic infidels and the president of the academy was offered the position of a cardinal to dismantle the academy. The academy resisted its opponents like a bastion for 10 years before its fall. Its members resisted until their last drop of blood. Borelli, for instance, was persecuted and forced to beg when he went broke, andOliva was forced to commit suicide to flee the torture of the Inquisition Court.[3]

Before this,Pruno was sentenced to death in 1600 because he believed the theories of Copernicus that were opposed by the Catholics and the Protestants.Pruno was the one who paved the way for the modern theory of nebula, but the court sentenced him to death without shedding his blood, that is why he was burned alive. In Florence, another reformer, named Savonarola, was killed in the same manner. With the emergence of printing, the Church began supervising and banning some printed books; for instance, the Pope Alexander V issued a decree in 1501 to ban printing books except with permission from the Pope. Henry VIII of France made printing without permission a crime punishable by death. Germany began censorship of printed books in 1529. Books were never printed in England during the reign of Elizabeth I except with permission. There were no print houses in England at the time except in London, Oxford, and Cambridge. Printing in England was supervised by the Star Chamber, and these restrictions were not removed until a century ago. [4]

With the new research in astronomy, a series of persecution ensued, from the persecution of Copernicus to the trial of Galileo. The Church was adamant in its refusal of new science due to fanaticism, narrow-mindedness, and ignorance, sticking to the Old Testament story of creation that shows the earth as a flat surface, and as the center of the universe. These matters were not in the main theological issues tackled by Christ and his disciples, yet these matters were the axis of the most powerful wave of persecution of science and mind. The stubbornness of the Church was exemplified by the sentenced uttered by one authority of the church, '' the stability of the earth is a concept thrice sacred…we can tolerate the utter disappearance of souls, the denial of the existence of God and His incarnation in a human form, yet we can never tolerate the view that the earth revolves…''[5] . Others in the Church have defined the date of the creation of the world: at nine AM, 23 rdof October in the year 4004 BC. [6]

The insistence of church authorities over such issues at that time, when horizons of knowledge opened in fields of geology, astronomy, physics, and the emergence of the evolution theory and natural selection, which were irrefutable, led to the opposition of church views. This led eventually to the defeat of the church and its alienation from the society. Its role was restricted to one hour every Sunday or in social occasions. The church lost its role as the scientific, social, and political compass of European society. This was considered a natural step and a prerequisite to modern progress and the emergence of secular states in modern age.

Accordingly, this idea of Christianity in European ecclesiastical heritage was considered applicable to all religions in the world, although Christianity was one thing, and the church was another thing, and Christianity was one thing, and the other world religions were another thing. This sweeping generalization was conveyed and applied blindly by Islamic thinkers who were influenced by European thought, and that made them consider Islam as a religion is opposed to rationalism, like all world religions. This is not true, and the same measure does not apply here.

Reason and mind in the Islamic thought:

Islam, like other religions, acknowledges the idea of divine revelation, but it is distinctive by being liberated from the three factors led to the abyss between religion and reason, mentioned in the previous chapter. The concept of divinity in Islam did not emerge from theology or an ecclesiastical hierarchy, nor the Islamic faith was based on miracles; thus, the early Muslim religious scholars had no objections or sensitivities to accept mind and reason as sources of wisdom. It was said, ''Rulings of the mind are acceptable by theSharia (Islamic legislature), and the mind is an inner prophecy, whereas the Sharia is the outer mind''. Nearly all Muslims agree on the fact that the belief in God precedes that in prophecies, and so we believe in prophecies and sacred texts after we believe in God first. That is why one of the scholastic Islamic philosophers the first mission of the believer is to reach by reasoning to the idea of the existence of God to staunchly believe in it through the mind, and accordingly the belief in prophets and their sacred texts. Hence, Islam was firstly based on the rational outlook. [7]

Sheikh M.Abdou said, ''The belief in God's existence should not be gained from sayings of the prophet or the sacred texts, but it should be gained through the mind first, and then comes next the belief in prophets''. SheikhMaraghy said, "Imitation should not be the basis of faith, otherwise it would be a faith without reasoning and work and God would not accept it''. It is acknowledged that the mind is a prerequisite to faith, and that obligations of faith are not compulsory on mad people and children who have not attained to puberty. It is said as well that the faculty of reason is the balance of god on earth.

Ibn Taymiya wrote two books on the topic of the mind and the sacred texts, one of them titled ''The Refutation of the Claimed Contradiction between the Mind and the Sacred Texts ", and the other titled "The Agreement Statement between the Mind and the Sacred Texts ".In both books, he proves that there could be no clash between the reasoning mind and the sacred texts, and there is ample room forIjtihad (reasoning and interpretive judgment) for other issues that would be new in life.

All Islamic doctrines place the mind in high status; especially theZaydi doctrine set by imamZayd Ibn Ali (Zayn El-Abdeen )Ibn Al-HusseinIbn AliIbn AbuTalib . This doctrine was misinterpreted by Shiite Muslims and shunned accordingly by Sunnite Muslims, although it was worthy of appreciation.

Zaydi doctrine offers the resolved issue of the reasoning mind as expressed in the Holy Quran. This is mentioned in the manuscript in the Egyptian Book House titled ''Gems of Chapters on the Origins ofZaydi Doctrine'' bySarim Al-Deen El-Wazir :

"Ijtihad is based on the rational, reasoning mind, and then the unanimous view of scholars, then what is known from the sacred texts and theSunna , then what is generally accepted socially, then the general understanding and measurement of subject matters, and lastly the original innocence in things …"

ImamAbou Zahra refutes and dispels in his book titled " ImamZayd " any doubts concerning the abovementioned statement, by saying:

"…We conclude that the reasoning mind and its decisive rational judgment are placed in the first rank above other sources ofIjtihad , even theSunna and the Holy Quran. This would seem strange, but we shall explain it as follows.

The reasoning mind is placed above all as through it we reach the knowledge of God's existence, the prophecy of Muhammad, and the divine origin of the Holy Quran. Logically, this precedes using theSunna and the Holy Quran inIjtihad , as the reasoning mind proves their correctness.

We resort to the reasoning mind in IslamicSharia if theSharia has no answers to the subject matter in question. The reasoning, rational mind comes primarily before the sacred texts in three aspects.

Firstly, the determined and resolved matter of the reasoning mind which cannot be refuted, and that the judgment of the mind to legalize or ban something is something relative and not absolute.

Secondly, the reasoning mind is the basis of the Islamic discourse of facts like the belief in God His prophet, His book, and His miracles. The fact that the mind is a prerequisite to holding believers responsible for their actions comes after theSharia . We conclude then that the judgment of the mind is not contradictory to what is in the sacred texts. For example, if the mind considers something as corrupt, without a text to legalize or ban it, then this thing is banned, as God does not like corruption for His believers. If the mind considers something as useful without a text to legalize or ban it, then this thing is legalized as long as it is not corrupt, because God is merciful to His believers.

Thirdly, the precedence of the reasoning mind is the basis of the generalSharia , but the mind comes later to theSharia in matters legalized or banned clearly and specifically in theSharia …"

The same author refutes the doubts cast on the precedence of unanimous view over theSunna and the Holy Quran, saying:

"Sarim Al-Deen El-Wazir mentions in his book that the unanimous view was taken in the early era of Islam by the prophet Muhammad and his companions and followers. For example, all views agree unanimously on facts like: there are five prayers daily, on the number of prostrations (Raak'at ) in each prayer, on the manner of prayer set by Prophet Muhammad, on fasting, alms ( Zakat ), pilgrimage…etc. There is noIjtihad in such matters as they are taken for granted and they could not be opposed, and they are explained plainly in the Holy Quran andSunna .

Taking these facts for granted, and in a place of precedence overIjtihad in the Holy Quran andSunna , does not mean that the unanimous view is placed in precedence over the Holy Quran andSunna . Prophet Muhammad advised us to use the mind and the unanimous view to judge things not mentioned in the Holy Quran andSunna "[8]

The author of the book titled ''Zaydi Doctrine " mentions in his talk about El-Kasim El-Rasi that " This doctrine was the first one to place the reasoning mind in precedence to the Holy Quran and the prophet Muhammad as both are known and acknowledged first through the mind, and both cannot be used to reach the mind. Hence, the mind is the main source forFiqh inZaydi doctrine, and although the rational tendency was first known in the Mo'tazala doctrine, but it does not place the mind in such high esteem as the case withZaydi doctrine. TheZaydi doctrine says that even the truth of Prophet Muhammad is known by the mind as it discerns truth from falsehoods, and hence the mind is precedent to Prophet Muhammad, theSunna and the Holy Quran. Mo'tazala and Asha'era doctrines, and Al-Razi who followed the latter doctrine, say that the reasoning mind is precedent to the sacred texts, whereas the main doctrines like Al-Hanifiya or Al -Shafeiya did not place the mind as a source for legislation precedent to the Holy Quran …" [9]

El-Kasim El-Rasi said in his description of the reasoning mind, ''…the mind is a safe haven for thoughts and the best friend to keep secrets and ideas "

Despite the fact that theZaydi doctrine was plain and clear in stating and acknowledging the fact of the mind's precedence over the sacred texts, even the Holy Quran itself, yet the essence of other Islamic doctrines does not differ much from this fact. This appeared in tackling the case of the purported contradiction between the mind and the sacred texts, and the contemporary writer sheikh M.Soad Galal cited El-Razi and said:

"…the problem is when the judgment of the mind would contradict the sacred text of the Holy Quran… "

El-Razi mentions that in the interpretation of the Holy Quran, one would use the mind, like in the verse: ''…when he came to the setting of the sun, it appeared to him that it was setting in a dark turbid sea… '' (86:18) which means the beholder has seen this scene literally. El-Razi says that the mind is the origin and theSharia is the branch of it, and if we believed in the vice-versa, then this is not true. It is through the rational mind that we prove the existence and oneness of God, and His attributes like liveliness, omniscience, omnipotence, will…etc. and His ability to send messengers to people. Hence, evenSharia is based on the reasoning mind and not the vice-versa, which is wrong.

The contemporary writer sheikh M.Soad Galal explains that the vice versa is not true as we cannot prove the correctness of the Holy Quran by the existence of God or the vice versa, as this is false logic. The existence of God and the correctness of the Holy Quran are both proven solely by the mind, not by anything in theSharia ; hence, theSharia itself can be true according to the mind as well.[10]

Islamic thought and philosophy:

It is a shame that that many Islamic thinkers made the wrong use of the encouragement of Islam to scientific thought in the only field that Islam bans considering; i.e., the attributes of God and the nature of His Being. The human mind cannot conceive this field, yet some Islamic thinkers specified a new branch of philosophy to deal with such knowledge, which is called the knowledge ofKalam (similar to Greek scholasticism: rational reexamination of faith based on Greek philosophical ideas). People ofKalam made use of the Aristotelian system of logic of premises, semantic meanings, patterns, definitions, limits, proofs, assessment, refutations…etc. to reexamineFiqh .[11]

In any simple book of the origins ofFiqh , we read that a thing cannot prove the existence or nonexistence of another thing, like the example of cleanliness before performing prayers, as performing ablution is not enough to perform prayers…etc.

TheSalafist thought imbued the Kalam philosophy and the logical and philosophical methods of thinking infiltrated in the thought of mostSalafist thinkers like, Averroes, Avicenna…etc.

Al-Ash'ari himself tried to conciliate the sacred text and rationalism and Kalam philosophy. One writer traces the infiltration ofKalam philosophy in the Islamic thought, and says:

"…After Al-Ash'ari , there was the judgeAbou Bakr El-Baklani , who wrote books like The Philosophical Premises , Gems of Wisdom , on the Kalam philosophy of Al-Ash'ari .Later on, there was El-Niasabouri (420 -478 A.H) who studied monotheism, Fiqh , and logic for 30 years and wrote books like The Ultimate End which is preserved as a manuscript in the Egyptian Book House, and El-Shamel (The Comprehensive) and its synopsis titled Book of Guidance .El-Niasabouri made use of theSalafist thought as well as Greek logic in his work tackling Kalam philosophy of Al-Ash'ari .Later on, there was his disciple, imam Al-Ghazali , the most important well-known Islamic philosopher, who died in 505 A.D. his contribution to the thought of Al-Ash'ari was to refute other philosophers who were being refuted before him by Al-Mo'tazala solely. Imam El-Khatib followed the steps of imam El-Ghazali in refuting philosophers and Al-Mo'tazala by the philosophy of Al-Ash'ari . Later on, the same philosophy and methods were used by Al-Baydawy whose book was titled Al-Tawale ' who combined other philosophies withKalam philosophy. Some of those who followed the footsteps of Al-Baydawy were non-Arab scholars and philosophers like Al-Taftazani and Al-Eigy ''.[12]

We can say that the experience of the Islamic thought in this field was unsuccessful, and holding solely to the sacred texts at the time was preferable to the reasoning mind. That was because Muslim philosophers studied the Greek philosophy to use it to prove the existence of God and His attributes. They used it to discuss many presuppositions and postulates. Later on, they tried to reconcile philosophy and faith, and they considered that wisdom brought religion and religion complements wisdom. Al-Safa brothers considered thatSharia was sullied by ignorant imposters and some aberrant ideas that should be purged by philosophy, as said by El-Sagastany . Islamic thought did not gain benefit by a book by Al-Faraby titled '' Two views of the Two Sages " and says in it, '' God saved reasonable and rational people via these two sages, Plato and Aristotle, with their clear logic to refute falsehoods and prove things with irrefutable evidence, and their books have many principles on nature and questions of divinity… " He did not even mention Islam and the message of Prophet Muhammad and the guidance of the Holy Quran and its proofs of faith that keep faith ingrained in the mind more that philosophical doctrine could keep.

This view of Al-Faraby and other philosophers who imitated him is rue concerning the Greek society, where there were no Quran or prophecy, and philosophers were quasi-prophets. This cannot apply in Islam after Prophet Muhammad and the Holy Quran, which presents new method and proofs suitable to humanity in all ages. Yet, the non-Arab origin of these Muslim scholars and philosophers led them to embrace the Aristotelian logic, as theQuranic logic was foreign to them. Their old sediments of foreign (non-Arab) thought led them to prefer the logic and wisdom of 'the two sages' to the divine wisdom of the Holy Quran. Yet, we might excuse them to a certain extent as they were suffocated by the dominance of traditional religious scholars in the Islamic thought at the time, which stifled any innovations.

Dr. M. El-Behy mentions the interpretation of Avicenna of the followingQuranic verse: "God is the Light of the heavens and the earth. The parable of His light is, as it were, that of a niche containing a lamp; the lamp is enclosed in glass, the glass is shining like a radiant star: a lamp lit from a blessed tree - an olive tree that is neither of the east nor of the west – the oil whereof is so bright that it would well-nigh give light of itself even though fire had not touched it: light upon light! God guides unto His light him that wills to be guided, and to this end God propounds parables unto men since God alone has full knowledge of all things "(35:24) and this interpretation was as follows:

"…light is either self-producing or taken from elsewhere and in both cases it leads to goodness. Avicenna says that 'the heavens and the earth' means the totality and the 'niche' means the material mind or the brain that contains the light of thought. The' lamp' means for him the method to transmit thought, and the 'blessed tree' is the power of thought. The' fire' for him means the Omnipotent Mind behind the world we see, this is the OmnipresentBeing written about by Plato ... " [13]

It is understood that this strange interpretation is far from the intended meaning of thisQuranic verse. The picture drawn by the Holy Quran is absorbed by the soul and has the right effect without this bizarre, alien interpretation of Avicenna who was taught philosophies of Aristotle and Plato. This kind of 'interpretations' is in fact a way of adding convoluted and complicated meaning of theQuranic text, which in itself simple and persuasive, with a certain impact of its intonation and shades of semantic levels of meanings.

For example, this is a quotation from the Aristotelian book titled

''Physical Nature " translated by Islamic philosophers:

"…the existent matter signifies something that exists, and shows its existence, as the matter either exists or do not exist, if the matter is white, that does not mean that the thing exists, nor the thing exists because it was nonexistent before, thus the white matter does not signify either existence or nonexistence, then the existent matter signifies many things "(!!)

This passage, said the author[14] is an effort wasted in utter nonsense, and the Islamic nation was harmed when some of its scholars abandoned the Holy Quran with its clear text and message and the easySunna to waste their time in interpreting the previous Aristotelian passage in the following paragraph:

''…the existent matter can signify many existing things, which are primarily existent as an essential fact, and this is the essence of the true nature of things. Yet if the existent matter is something not essential but accidental, it would not signify lack of existence and it has to signify the essence of itself '' (!!)[15]

Moreover, these philosophers added gratuitously in the field of IslamicFiqh many problems of other faiths and religions, which did not exist in Islam overlook by it. These problems were central to their thought and treatises, which tarnished the lucidity and clarity of Islamic thought that depended on its easy way that reached every natural disposition and mental faculty.

At the end of his book titledThe Divine Side of the Islamic Thought , Dr. M. El-Behy shows the tragedy of the Muslim thinkers who wanted to use the Greek philosophy to get a proof of God's existence:

"Muslim philosophers who roamed the East came with the deduction of the existence of God via the existence of the universe itself and the real world in addition to the evidence cited by religion itself, because of their acceptance of the Greek concept of existence. This was not done properly as they tried to conciliate Islam and philosophy in their rational endeavor and they adopted the same problematic issues inherent in the Greek thought, especially in the divine attributes of God mentioned in the Holy Quran and His divine knowledge of His realm.

Their philosophy could not be the basis of any religious guidance as it is not compatible with the thought and nature of religion. Their philosophy could not be the basis of a rational thought due to many vague, abstract, and convoluted ideas that were the result of merging many doctrines of philosophical thought.

If the Muslim philosophers knew the real value of the Greek philosophical thought and that it had been merged with poetry, legends and imagination, they would have preferred to formulate their own logic.

If they knew the result of their acceptance of the ideas of Plato and Aristotle in their interpretations of faith itself as a concept, they would have acknowledged that the Holy Quran is the only divine way to the hearts of the believers and the minds of the elite thinkers among people "[16]

If these genius minds focused its research on natural sciences likeIbn Al-Haytham , Al-Bayroni , and Al-Khawarizmi …etc. Baghdad, the capital of Abbasid Caliphate, would have accomplished what Europe had reached in the renaissance era and human knowledge would have gained ten centuries of science and gained the guidance and teachings of Islam as well. If theMo'tazala group who discussed the idea of God's divine justice discussed it about rulers or themselves, when they reached the throne and the rule, political degeneration would have been prevented and the methods of dialogue would have gained a model of argument to reach the true opinion without concerning their own views.

The futile discussion of the divine attributes of God brought nothing but struggle, chasm and division in the Islamic thought. These fruitless arguments did not benefit any true believers from ordinary people who believed in the Holy Quran like the companions of the prophet and they did not resort to mere philosophical questioning because the desired meaning had reached their hearts and filled it with faith and certitude. Other thoughts apart from this assurance and certitude would be aimless curious chattering with harmful impact. We agree in this respect with those who refused to tackle such novel issues like the divine attributes of God.Ibn Al-Jawzy says in his book titled "The Favor of Ancient Religious Scholars on the Contemporary Ones " (page 17):

"Weshould refuse to discuss and tackle novel issues like those tackled by the Mo'tazala thinkers, like the divine attributes of God and His Being in a rational method. That was more harmful than tackling the issues of fate, which is the action done by God toward people, whereas tackling His attributes is to discuss HisBeing and nature… ".

***

The reaction to the experience of Islamic thought with Greek philosophy and the ensuing futile, harmful, and even absurd arguments ofMo'tazala thinkers is the movement of Sufism as was done, for instance, by Al-Ghazaly , and the other reaction was to resort toSunna especiallyHadith . Both Sufism andSunna did not encourage rational minds in particular and hence the cultural climate that caused the tragedy of the sacred texts (i.e.Hadith ) that were triumphant over the rational mind for centuries. This tragedy is tackled in the following paragraphs.

Between the texts ofHadith and the sources:

TheHadith was first haven for the Islamic thought after the futility of its experience with philosophy was apparent. This is symbolically represented by the victory of AhmedIbn Hanbal over the group ofMo'tazala thinkers.Hadith is the most sacred texts and traditions that passed to us, after the Holy Quran of course, but the ancient scholars were more concerned with the source and narrators ofHadith and not the actual phrasing of the text ofHadith . Collectors ofHadiths acknowledged that the exactness of the source and narrators ofHadith does not necessarily mean accepting a faulty phrasing of the text of aHadith , and that faulty phrasing of the text of aHadith means it is inserted to realSunna . Yet, they practically focused on the source and narrators ofHadiths , regardless of its phrasing, even of this phrasing contradicted the rational mind. All the branches of the science ofHadiths revolve around the source and narrators ofHadiths ; their names, surnames, traits, characters...etc. as the branch of narrators. Another branch is the source of narration ofHadiths : their interpretation, phrasing, kinds, rulings, and narrators and their conditions.

We have to acknowledge that generations of ancient scholars did their best to present to usSunna andHadiths with the least amount faults and interpolations possible as they tried to verify the truth as much as they could. We cannot mention all their many methods in doing so in the limited scope of this book, but generally, their efforts revolved only around the source and narrators ofHadiths and not the meaning and phrasing of the texts ofHadiths . We cite the following example to prove this idea; here are their conditions and stipulations to accept aHadith and its guidance and judge it as a true one:

The continuity of the sources and narrators is necessary in order to excludeHadiths whose sources and chain of narrators are incomplete or doubted.

1- The narrators are not liars, cheaters, or with bad characters, as they should be truthful, pious and with good manners.

2- The narrators are regulators of sources of Hadiths .

3- The narrators are not of aberrant disposition; otherwise, one would doubt their words.

4- The words of the narrators are free of apparent elements of doubt, e.g. lack of the right sequence of narrators that is verifiable.

In sum, the trueHadith for ancient religious scholars must apply the five following conditions:

TheHadith narrators are truthful and righteous.

1- They are regulators of sources from the first to the last narrator in the sequence of narration.

2- The sequence of narration is true and verifiable.

3- The sequence of narrators is not aberrant

The sequence of narration is not doubted or faulty.[17]

Hence, the ancient scholars concerned themselves with verifying the sequence of narrators and they were not concerned if the phrasing of the text of aHadith is contrary to the rational mind. They overlooked many principles that could be the reason for not accepting a Hadith with proper justification. Their focus on the sequence of narrators and not on the text itself of Hadiths that might sometimes go against the rational mind reached a level of denying the sanctity and holiness of the Quran and the prophet. Some ancient scholars accepted a false Hadith claiming that a Jew had once bewitched the prophet, made him once recite the Quran in a faulty way, and made him inserted a phrase after a certain verse.

That they acknowledged the truthfulness of such faulty, unacceptable narrative is a proof of the dominance of the importance of narrators' sequence over the text itself and its meaning and phrasing. Even the sequence of narrators of this story is very weak and its sources are doubted.

Once the sources and narrators are cast in doubt, we cannot accept the story for a realHadith . We must apply rational principles of thought as criteria to judge aHadith to know it is true or false.

In addition to accepting weak sequence of narrators, strange tales as trueHadiths , and not judging critically and rationally their phrasing, some ancient scholars had presented to us thousands of strangeHadiths that are doubted and they cover endless ordinary, mundane topics and fields.

Later generations of religious scholars classified theseHadiths , as they tackled endless situations, in four main categories of action: legal, banned, unpleasant, and avoidable. Later on, with the passage of time, these strange, doubted Hadiths became part of the Sharia that had to be followed blindly. Muslims were obligated to imitated and follow the ancient scholars even if the required actions were outside the framework of worship and true Sharia . The mindset of contemporary Muslims became blind following of the texts and they were forbidden to think or choose. Imitation and blind following became the general accepted policy, and the faculty of reason stopped totally and it was rusted. A contemporary Muslim became like a robot controlled by doubted texts. In fact, this is the tragedy of the contemporary Islamic thought as it is overwhelmed by imitation and blind acceptance without thinking. This goes contrary to the guidance of the Holy Quran in this respect, as it denounces the monks and clergy that people made them semi gods who would legalize and forbid. The Holy Quran denounces clearly the blind following and imitations of ancestors, and such rigid thinking does as well against the teachings of Prophet Muhammad who always preferred the benefit and goodness for his followers. Prophet Muhammad ban disliked futile questioning that lead to nothing as he said clearly in this hadith , " Leave me with what I have told you (of teachings) and ask for no more ". Yet, many narrators of Hadiths did not leave any action or word of Prophet Muhammad unless they record it for guidance and obligatory following. They missed the wisdom of the teachings of Prophet Muhammad as he encouraged people to think and consider the issues of everyday life, and said that if they would reach a good judgment they would be rewarded twice, and if their judgment turned out to be wrong, they would be rewarded once for using the reasoning faculty of mind. Blind following and imitation in everything is wrong even of the prophet as this goes against his hadith mentioned above. Hence, it is clear that God urges Muslims to think and use their mental faculty and warns them against the assumed authority of clergy and ancestors.

***

It is noteworthy that the second haven for the Islamic thought after the failure of its experience with Greek philosophy was Sufism. Sufism did not contribute anything to the rational mind. On the contrary, it had no limits and it went far unbridled in the mazes of ardent passion of the divine. It resulted in the introduction of legends and lore like the holy saints and sheikhs who performed miracles like walking on water, flying in the air to cover long distances…etc. among other superstitious, ignorant tales to deceive the masses, and the shrines of the saints, martyrs and sheikhs who were made holy. Other strange Sufism mystical beliefs are infiltrated in the sermons of some mosques. Some organized bodies and orders were formed on mystical teachings and based on blind obedience to the sheikhs of the mystical order of Sufism who were made holy. These unfamiliar practices are foreign to true Islam and Sufism harmed Islam. It used strange non-Islamic, organizational disciplines to realize ends that most of them are based on infusing blind obedience, deepening imitation, and eradicating the will, character, and reasoning of people.

***

Between imitation andIjtihad :

The conflict between the phrasing ofHadiths and verifying their sources and narrators was broadened in a general way in the conflict between imitation andIjtihad (i.e. reasoning with the mind to reach religious judgments). Imitation was predominant for ten consecutive centuries andIjtihad was strictly forbidden at the time as ancient scholars saw it brought nothing but trouble, chaos, and contradictory notions. Yet, when it comes to the matters and issues of everyday life, this cannot be bearable. There were supposed to be regulating tools like a higher council or court, but such tools were unknown at the time in the Arab, Islamic societies. Since these regulating tools were absent, scholars at the time saw it fit to banIjtihad and confine themselves to old doctrines that proved its validity with the passage of time. Non-religious, political factors, and other benefits and interests had led to the dominance of certain doctrines in certain regions.

What concerns us here is that imitation continued to thrive. Imitation was defined then as ''accepting the words of the others without asking for proofs ''. Accordingly, imitators did not resort to theSunna or to the Holy Quran, but resorted to the doctrine and ideas of their imams and sheikhs who were revered or sanctified. Imitation as a tradition was so powerful that even the only doctrine that resisted imitation – Al-Zaydi doctrine – sank to imitation by later followers and adherents. Al-Shawkani said in his book titled '' Opinions on Imitation andIjtihad '', that '' Zaydi doctrine followers in Yemen tried to reinstituteIjtihad once more in the early days of this doctrine, but later generations brought moreZaydi zealots who glorified imitation of their imams and opposedIjtihad based on the Holy Quran andSunna and attacked violently and killed whoever do this… ". This was done even in a doctrine that at first encouragedIjtihad , let alone other doctrines that call for blind imitation and called it obedience of God.

Due to banning ofIjtihad , the reasoning faculty was abandoned and some people left the teachings of theSunna and the Holy Quran and preferred to them guidelines of their ancestors and old sheikhs. That was why Muslims had degenerated in the previous eras, as they shunned the Holy Quran, the source of their might, guidance and wisdom, and resorted to imitation of their ancestors and chose to follow words of clergy and those who sought worldly gains in the name of religion.

***

It is noteworthy to say that this phenomenon of degeneration of religious thought is not confined to Islam, but we find it in all ancient religions. This even began before heavenly religions when the human mind was not mature enough, but the roots and sediments of this phenomenon are so deep that it became an integral part in the course of history. Heavenly religions cam to deliver people from these distortions and deviances, yet the roots and sediments of this phenomenon in some eras were dominant or at least were present largely in heavenly religions. This impact applies to the three celestial monotheistic religions: Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. We might see it more in Catholicism than in Protestantism, but this effect is present, anyway. What lessened the harmful influence in Europe was that people there did not take Christianity seriously and its influence – both original and harmful – was weak. As for Islam, Muslims see it as the main constituent of their lives and they would never let go of it. Within this concept, initially, the true beneficial impact of Islam was present, and the harmful effect mentioned above was more powerful. In the Holy Quran we read, "…the only true religion in the sight of God is self-surrender unto Him… "(19:3) which means that God wants Islam to be a new, unique model to liberate people from harmful thoughts that sometimes cling to religions with the passage of time. Yet, Muslims reversed thisQuranic verse and made Islam as the only religion and not in the sense of the word'Islam' i.e. self-surrender to God. Hence, Islamic teachings were liable to many suppositious, ignorant ideas and sediments linked to all previous religions before Islam liberated people.

Although Islam, more than any other religions, opposed paganism, superstition, supernatural miracles and imitation, yet the idea of imitation of ancestors prevailed for ages and Muslimswith the passage of time deteriorated like followers of other religions. It was required that every century a great enlightened religious scholar would emerge to renew faith to Muslims, with varying degrees of success according to the surroundings and circumstances.

Domains of specialization:

The abovementioned facts do not intend to convey the idea that the human mind solely is the judging tool in the field of religion. Religion has a divine source of revelation, i.e. God. Revelation is an issue that cannot be proven, or even refuted, by the rational mind. This is because the existence of God is a rational self-evident truth acceptable to the mind, as God is the source of life, wisdom, rationality, and the end to which we reach finally. These divine gifts are the components of the human mind, created by God, and hence it is little wonder that revelation would reach people by God. This revelation does not contradict the components of the mind nor God's attributes. In fact, this makes the mind the link between God and people via the means of revelation. Yet, God is Unseen Himself by any human being, as the Holy Quran says, ''No human vision can encompass Him… '' (103:6), and another fact is that the human mind, due to its limitations, cannot fathom some attributes of God. We only know some of these attributes via the divine revelation, and this does not contradict the mind, but in fact agrees to its ways. Philosophy tried to discuss the nature and Being of God and His attributes were just mere outlines that led to nothing at the end and could not surpass certain limits and could not reach the unseen, unknown realm of life after death. Hence, divine revelation came to complete this aspect lacking in the human mind.

The limitations of the mind to reach facts given by the divine revelation do not mean blind acceptance of what contradicts its rational principles that could not be abandoned. Hence, we conclude that the divine revelation cannot possibly be things that contradict the human mind. We have said earlier that the presupposition that the revelation is by necessity contradictory to the mind is a wrong notion. Islamic revelation agrees to the rational mind and its principles. The proof of this is that the Islamic idea of divinity is like the notion of divinity in the thought of Descartes and other European thinkers and philosophers whotired to discover the attributes of God.

The mind does not reject an issue just because there is no rational proof to it as long as it is not contradictory to the mind. Likewise, issues like the existence of God, Resurrection, Reckoning…etc do not contradict the principles of the mind. On the contrary, these issues agree with the rational preference of existence to nonexistence, justice to injustice. Yet, the Afterlife, Paradise and Hell are issues that contradict the sensory material outlook of the rationalist philosophers. Yet, the fact that these notions are not materially verifiable doesno prove they are nonexistent. If immaterial, strange ideas can be refuted easily, people might not have believed, 200 years ago, that there could be airplanes, radios, cellular phones…etc. and they would accuseany one who would predict these invention of being insane and irrational. Likewise, concepts like the Afterlife, Judgment Day, Paradise and Hell…etc. should not be tackled rationally but accepted as they are, following the agnostic argument. Rationalist should acknowledge the fact that religion and divine revelation show to them aspects that can never be reached by the limitations of the human mind, and thus rationalism could go hand in hand with revelation to reach many aspects of the truth.

Rationalism cannot reject religion just because it cannot be proved by its tools. Likewise, religion should not deny rationalism by the faulty notion that it contradicts the mind and the religious knowledge. Rationalism was an archenemy of Christianity because it presented a view of creation opposite to what we find in the book of Genesis. If religions contain what might contradict rational thought and the principles of the mind, then this We should not prevent religion from tackling issue like natural, social and psychological phenomena, as long as this will not contradict the principles of the mind. That is because religion might reach to aspects unreachable by science. This does not mean that religion would replace science but it will reinforce it, and by necessity would not supplant rationalism. The best proof of this is manyQuranic verses that have references to natural, social and psychological phenomena that may open new vistas for scientists to explore.

It is true that the Holy Quran says God has created the Earth in six days, but the Holy Quran mentions as well that days of God in His high realm above are different from days of people on earth, as some of His days might count 1000 or even 50000 years as mentioned in the Holy Quran. Other numbers and other notions like the Throne of God are mentioned in the Holy Quran to test the fickle believers in the early days of Islam and to be symbols to convey meanings in an understandable manner to people. The narrative verse style of the Holy Quran is different from the narrative prose style of the Old Testament, which leaves no room for interpretation, unlike the case in the poetic style of the Holy Quran that allows room for different interpretations. This applied to God's attributes and actions mentioned in the Holy Quran. Fear of censure will not make us overlook this fact or never to mention it.

Anyhow, the domain of religion differs from the domain of science, and they should not mingle except on rare occasions or exceptions.

God's attribute and the Afterlife are domains of religion, and science however advanced cannot reach them, to verify or refute them, as science cannot investigate the supernatural realm or explore what is beyond the universe.

As for the many branches of science, such as mathematics, geometry, physics…etc. they are the domains of the mind to explore and present to us the latest aspects of the materialistic advancement.

This fundamental separate specialization of domains is based on the facthat the source of religious thought is both the wisdom of the mind and the wisdom of the heart, whereas the source of the scientific thought is solely the mind. Thus, we see the distinctive nature of each of them in their domains and tools by which each of them reach results. This point concerning the wisdom of the heart is tacked in details in the next chapter.

Thus remains two points to mention:

Firstly, Islam should incorporate human branches of knowledge in its domain. For instance, economy, sociology, and politics are scientific fields, but could serve religious aims and values to benefit people, as the neutral, abstract, and scientific outlook might not necessarily be beneficial to all people. The Islamic ideals like justice, benevolence, goodness…etc. are what distinguishes the Islamic rationalism from abstract rationalism. This point is tackled in the second part of this book.

Secondly, there is a third broad domain apart from the religious and scientific ones, which is the domain of arts and literature. It is nearer to the domain of religion that the domain of science is to religion, because one of its sources is the heart, and hence the common source between this domain and religion. Yet, each of them has a different nature, as art is without divine revelation and it is one hundred percent human. Hence, art can go unbridled without control in the realm of the imagination, unlike religion, which is supported by the divine source. As religion should not be a kind of art, arts should not be turned into a religion.


4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34