Part Five: The Qualities and Characteristics of ‘A’ishah
‘A’ishah’s generosity
One day I saw ‘A’ishah giving people seventy thousand drachmas.
‘Urwah ibn az-Zubayr
Although generosity is an admirable quality, yet sometimes it is performed on the basis of a divine thought, meaning that a person voluntarily offers something to which he is attached or gives up a wish or property for the sake of God in the hope of winning His satisfaction or receiving a heavenly reward. Such a person is bound to be rewarded heavily and to receive divine satisfaction.
But if a person shows generosity for the sake of a worldly benefit such as gaining a good reputation, although his action is good in itself, yet he will not be rewarded in the next world since his action’s motive has been related to this world.
Among the Arabs it had long been customary for great men and chiefs of tribes to perform certain acts such as showing generosity in their offer of money and property. If a person came to the house of such men and returned empty-handed and disappointed, it was considered a great disgrace for the master of the house.
With the advent of Islam, such ideas were not forgotten altogether, and the people who showed generosity were divided into two groups: One group engaged in generous acts for the sake of Islamic teachings and in the way of God, and the next group did so in accordance with pagan and Arab customs, such as the generosity shown by two powerful chiefs of the Banu Tamim tribe in the caliphate of Imam ‘Ali in the region of Kufah. One of these was named Ghalib ibn Sa‘sa‘ah ad-Darami and the other Suhaym ibn Wathil ar-Riyahi. These two began to compete with each other in killing camels and feeding people for the sake of ostentation, rivalry and pride, which were based on pagan ideas. Each of them tried to excel the other in order to win fame and reputation. The contest began with the sacrifice of one camel and reached the number of one hundred camels.
The last time that this camel-killing contest took place was in the time of caliphate of the Alawite. The people of Kufah hurried with their baskets to the place of the slaughter where several hundred camels were slaughtered, to obtain free meat.
The Imam heard of this incident, and declared:“Do not eat the flesh of these camels, since they have been killed, not in the Name of God, but for the sake of pride and glory and on the basis of pagan customs.”
The declaration of the Imam is related to the verse of the Qur’an which says:“Forbidden to you is that which dies of itself, and blood and flesh of swine, and that on which any other name than that of Allah has been invoked.”
The people of Kufah obeyed the order of Imam ‘Ali and refused to partake of that flesh. They threw it all on a heap of rubbish at Kanasah of Kufah to be eaten by dogs and vultures.
In our opinion ‘A’ishah belongs to the second group since she was always desirous prestige, reputation and respect, and to gain these benefits the best way was such a show of generosity. She could not easily let all the reputation and influence which she had gained during the rule of the former caliphs, be forgotten.
Credit and greatness, too, required assets. Therefore, as we shall see, she did her utmost to tolerate hardships and sometimes indigence caused by her extravagant offers, or she found herself compelled to be indebted to the tyrannical son of Abu Sufyan for securing money to be bountiful.
The reason why we venture to make such a claim is that we find ‘A’ishah scattering as bounties the money that was repeatedly sent to her by such oppressive rulers as Mu‘awiyah and his governors. Could such riches which have been gathered by oppression, be really offered for the sake of God and His satisfaction, whereas the first Islamic and heavenly duty of ‘A’ishah would in such a case have been to keep away from Mu‘awiyah and whatever was connected to him?
Umm Dharrah, who was a woman who occasionally visited ‘A’ishah, narrates: They sent ‘A’ishah two large bags full of money. She said:“I think there must be eighty thousand or one hundred thousand drachmas in these bags.”
Then she asked to bring her a large tray. On that day she had been observing a fast. Then she began to distribute all that money, and by nightfall not a single drachma was left with her. That night she told her slave girl to bring some food to break her fast. She brought her some bread and olive oil. Umm Dharrah says: I told her:“Couldn’t you get us some meat with some of the money that you gave away to the people today, to break our fast?”
‘A’ishah said:“Don’t trouble me. If you had reminded me of it, I would have done so.”
‘Urwah, son of az-Zubayr and ‘A’ishah’s nephew, says:“One day I saw ‘A’ishah dividing seventy thousand drachmas among the people, whereas her own dress was patched.”
This extravagant bounty vexed ‘Abd Allah son of az-Zubayr, and he could not bear such squandering of money by his aunt.
Abu Nu‘aym writes: ‘A’ishah put her camels for sale. ‘Abd Allah ibn az-Zubayr said:“I will declare myself her guardian so that she can no longer take possession of her property.”
When ‘A’ishah heard this remark, she said:“I will make a vowed never to speak with him until I die.”
This separation lasted long. ‘Abd Allah begged many people to intercede with her for him, but ‘A’ishah remained obdurate and said:“By God, I will never commit a sin for his sake by breaking my vow.”
The intercessions were of no avail, and ‘A’ishah refused to admit ‘Abd Allah to her presence. A long time after this separation, one day ‘Abd Allah accompanied by Miswar ibn Makhramah and ‘Abd ar-Rahman ibn al-Aswad, while ‘Abd Allah had covered his head and face with a piece of cloth, went to ‘A’ishah’s house and begged leave to enter. Permission was given and the three of them went to her presence. ‘Abd Allah went towards and threw his arms round his aunt’s neck, and both of them began to weep. Then he begged her in the Name of God and for the sake of their kinship to speak with him. Upon his importunity and insistence, ‘A’ishah began to speak with him.
These were a few examples of ‘A’ishah’s generosity some cases of which we have already cited in connection with Mu‘awiyah’s financial considerations for her. Here we assert once more that not every bounty is followed by God’s satisfaction, since that satisfaction requires devotion and sincerity towards God. Moreover, the granted money should have been obtained legitimately, not through the offers of such a man as Mu‘awiyah who plundered Muslims’ public fund and offered them to such influential people as ‘A’ishah, Abu Hurayrah, al-Mughayrah ibn Shu‘bah, and ‘Amr ibn al-‘As so as to win their collaboration in his hostility to Imam ‘Ali ibn Abi Talib, and that to attain this end, they should reinforce his organization for forging and fabricating traditions, and inventing a fresh tradition as the circumstances required, and then attributing it to the Prophet of Islam.
‘A’ishah’s family bigotry
All that strictness and hostility of ‘A’ishah towards the enemies of her relatives, were due to her deep attachment to the latter.
As historical researches have shown, ‘A’ishah was deeply prejudiced in favour of her relatives, and loved them almost to the point of worship. In this bigotry she had climbed to the highest possible point, so that for their sake ignored all laws and regulations. All that harshness and enmity which she displayed to the enemies of her kith and kin, was the result of her intense love for her relatives. The events, which we have already cited in her life, have been a proof of the above claim, and the clear-sighted reader must have paid attention to this matter.
One of the clearest signs of this deep and excessive attachment to her relatives, are the events which have taken place in connection with her brother Muhammad ibn Abi Bakr. These two sister and brother strongly supported each other at the commencement of the public movement of the Muslims against ‘Uthman, so that these two may be regarded as the most effective personalities who directed the uprising against ‘Uthman’s rule until the mo¬ment of his assassination.
But with ‘Uthman’s death, the matter assumed a different shape, and each of them chose a different course to follow. Muhammad went under the Alawite banner and drew sword against ‘A’ishah, and never ceased his efforts to the end of the combat. As we know, the battle of Basra or battle of al-Jamal ended with the defeat of ‘A’ishah and death of her military commanders. At this time the Imam ordered Muhammad to approach the litter of his sister and treat her kindly and take charge of her affairs.
Muhammad went forth and found her sister’s litter in a corner. Then he put his head inside it to discover her condition. ‘A’ishah cried out:“Woe upon you! Who are you?”
He said:“I am he to whom you are more hostile than to all your kith and kin.”
‘A’ishah said:“Oh, then you are the son of that Khath’ami woman.”
Muhammad said:“Yes.”
‘A’ishah said:“Thank God that I see you safe and sound.”
It was not long before Muhammad was killed in Egypt and his severed head was placed in the belly of a donkey and burnt. When ‘A’ishah heard of it, despite her vexation with him, she became very sad and shed many tears. But when the matter was reported to Umm Habibah, Mu‘awiyah’s sister who was one of the wives of the Prophet, she roasted a lamb and sent it to ‘A’ishah in spitefulness, hinting thereby that her brother was killed and burnt like that lamb in revenge for ‘Uthman. On seeing the roasted lamb, ‘A’ishah exclaimed:“May God destroy the daughter of that adulteress (meaning Hind)! By God henceforth I shall never eat roasted meat!”
Then she placed her brother’s wife and children under her own protection.
al-Qasim, son of Muhammad ibn Abi Bakr, narrates:“When my father was killed by Mu‘awiyah ibn Khudayj al-Kindi and ‘Amr ibn al-‘As, the officials of the Umayyad government in Egypt, my uncle, ‘Abd ar-Rahman ibn Abi Bakr went to that land and brought back my sister to Medina with him. After arriving there, ‘A’ishah sent someone to take us from ‘Abd ar-Rahman’s horse to her. We had never seen such a kind and affectionate mother. She always held us in her arms or caressed us on her knees.
Some time passed in this manner, and the conduct of her brother and our uncle, ‘Abd ar-Rahman gave her the feeling that he had become uneasy at our being taken to her house. So she sent someone for him and when ‘Abd ar-Rahman came to her presence, ‘A’ishah said to him: “Dear brother!”
Ever since the day I brought Muhammad’s children to my house, I feel that you have been displeased with me. But I swear to God, I did not take them out of your house by transgressing upon your sanctity. I have neither had any ill feeling towards you, nor anything that might displease you. My only reason was that, as you have several wives and these children are small and cannot look after themselves, I was afraid that your wives might observe something in these children that may rouse their dislike of them. But I could treat them more kindly, and their behaviour and the incidents which are bound to occur, would not annoy me. Therefore, I felt I deserved more than anyone else to take care of them. Now that after some years they have left their childhood behind and can look after themselves, they are quite ready to be placed under your care and stay in your home. Dear brother, take care of them like Hujiyah ibn al-Mudarrab.” Then she told the story of Hujiyah ibn al-Mudarrab to her brother. He was a man of the Kanda tribe. His brother died leaving his small children behind. Hujiyah took them to his own house and acted as their guardian, and treated them even more kindly than he treated his own children.
He happened to go on a journey, and so he instructed his wife to take charge of the children, in his absence. When he returned after some months, he noticed that the children were unhappy and had become lean and weak. He said to his wife:“Woe upon you! Why do I see my nephews lean and your own children fat?”
She said:“I am not at fault! I showed no discrimination between them. They must have fallen into this condition by their negligence and naughtiness!”
Hujiyah became very angry, and when camel-drivers returned from the pasture, he said to them:“You two and my camels belong to my nephews!”
Then ‘A’ishah delivered her nephews to their uncle and begged him to treat his nephews in the way of Hujiyah ibn al-Mudarrab, and give them preference over his own children, and never cease being kind and affectionate to them.
Another example of this excessive affection was that when ‘Abd Allah ibn az-Zubayr fell into the hands of valiant man of the Kufah army, Malik al-Ashtar, in the battle of al-Jamal and managed to flee and save his life, she gave a reward of ten thousand drachmas to the man who had brought her the news of his safety.
Many such events, which had occurred in the life of ‘A’ishah show her excessive affection and bigotry towards her relatives, and her readiness to display such a self- sacrifice.
The sermons which have been quoted from her in praise of her father, and the efforts made by her for making her cousin, Talhah, assume the position of caliph, the story of which we have already narrated at length,
and some of the traditions that she has quoted from the Prophet in praise of her father and his loyal friend ‘Umar and other authorities of as-Saqifah such as Abu ‘Ubaydah ibn al-Jarrah, show this strong and irresistible conduct of ‘A’ishah. We have dealt with these traditions in some parts of this book.
‘A’ishah as an eminent orator
By God! I know of no better orator than ‘A’ishah.
Mu‘awiyah
One of the most effective means of the influence of social and political personalities on human society, is the manner of their speech. If such in¬dividuals can speak eloquently and know the value of using words in their proper place without being boring, they can produce a deep impression on the society. It should, of course, be said that the rightfulness and religious char¬acter of a person may not produce a perfect effect in this process, but every great social personality who is blessed with this gift,
can deeply influence a society even though he may be antagonistic towards God, morality and humanity.
‘A’ishah, in addition to her social and political genius, possessed this quality to a very high degree. When Mu‘awiyah was leaving ‘A’ishah’s house, as he was leaning on the arm of his slave, Dhakwan, he exclaimed:“By God! With the exception of the Prophet, I have never seen a more eloquent person than ‘A’ishah.”
al-Ahnaf ibn Qays has said:“I have heard the speech of Abu Bakr and others, but I know of no speech stronger than that of ‘A’ishah.”
One day Mu‘awiyah asked Ziyad:“Who speaks better and more eloquently than others?”
Ziyad answered:“You, O caliph!”
Mu‘awiyah said:“Swear it!”
Ziyad said:“In that case I must stay that ‘A’ishah is the most eloquent speaker.”
Mu‘awiyah said: ‘‘A’ishah has not opened a door, which she wished to shut except that she was able to close it, and she has not shut a door that she wished to open except that she opened it.”
From her conversations that we have already quoted with Umm Salamah and Abu al-Aswad ad-Du‘ali
, and from ‘A’ishah’s writings, letters and sermons in the battle of al-Jamal, we can easily see her extraordinary power of oratory.
Naturally we do not wholly accept the words of Mu‘awiyah, al-Ahnaf ibn Qays and other about ‘A’ishah, since we consider them to be an exaggeration. For, on the one hand they collaborated with each other and exchanged favors, and on the other hand they were all intent on their hostility to the Prophet’s household and concealing their virtues. But what we may conclude is that ‘A’ishah was an extraordinary woman and a genius as an orator and her power of discerning the proper time and place for speaking.
In addition to her eloquence and power of expression ‘A’ishah was familiar with the Arab poetry, and very often in her talk she quoted the poems of Lubayd
who was a famous poet of pagan times. She herself has said:“I have memorized one thousand couplets of Lubayd and can recite them.”
Historians have said: Sometimes ‘A’ishah recited an ode of sixty couplets or more by heart:
a fact which showed her strong memory. Even with the limited knowledge of the time, she was familiar with medicine. ‘Urwah, son of az-Zubayr and ‘A’ishah’s nephew has said something about her aunt, which, despite its exaggeration, is an evidence of ‘A’ishah’s talent and strong memory. He says:“I know of no one who is so familiar with medicine as she is. One day I said to her: “Dear aunt! From whom have you learnt medicine?”
She said:“I have always listened to what people narrate about the words and experiences of others and commit them to my memory.”
Historians say: ‘A’ishah could read well, but not write.
In conclusion we must unfortunately state that ‘A’ishah made use of all those God-given gifts in the way of fabricating traditions in order to vanquish Imam ‘Ali and his friends, and for the promotion of her father’s party (as-Saqifah friends) in the interest of Mu‘awiyah’s caliphate organization. But as she was greatly talented, the traditions which are attributed to her in the name of the Prophet on the basis of the above-said motives, are not weak and insipid, unlike some of the traditions of Abu Hurayrah or other tradition forgers, and most of them contain eloquent and tasteful words and phrases. Consequently the task of discovering the truth of the traditions quoted from the Prophet is a very difficult one. Therefore it is very hard to get a real picture of the character of the Prophet from what our Sunni brothers and Orientalists have gathered through her traditions, since truth and lies are so mingled in them that they cannot be sifted except through many long years of research even then by an impartial and discerning scholars.
‘A’ishah as a well-dressed woman
‘A’ishah in the time of pilgrimage adorned herself with gold ornaments and was dressed in red garments.
al-Qasim ibn Muhammad ibn Abi Bakr
Before the advent of Islam, the Arab society was a poor and indigent one, and with the exception of a few who included big merchants and animal breeders of Mecca, Medina and at-Ta’if, no one possessed the comforts and magnificence of life.
When the bright sun of Islam, with all its spiritual greatness and glory, spread its warm light over the cold and spiritless life of the Arabs, no change took place in their simple way of living, since the Prophet’s intention was to build up their soul and spirit and then see to the moderate welfare of the material life of his people, not to increase its dazzling grandeur and magnificence or create a consumer community devoid of spirituality. One can even claim that some combats of Islam were intended to demolish such tendencies.
But with the decease of the Prophet and assumption of power by others, the people had to change their ways, so that in the time of ‘Uthman those Islamic ways were wholly forgotten, and the cultural ideas of the decayed Roman civilizations began to penetrate the Islamic society. The houses of great men began to be adorned; clothes became rich; and wealth was heaped up. Thus the balance which had been brought as souvenir by Islam for the society under whose auspices God was to be recognized and worshipped, was destroyed, moving toward ostentation and turning people’s thoughts and inclinations towards non-Islamic ideas and ways.
‘A’ishah, the personality under our discussion in this book, was one of those who proceeded in this direction after the Prophet passed away. Owing to her excessive and violent ambition, she resorted to every possible means in order to win public favour and greatness. All those bounties of hers, all these traditions which she quoted from the Prophet on various occasions, all her connection with the caliphate organization etc. etc. were manifestations of this strong characteristic. Here we get familiar with other examples of the manifestation of this quality in her.
At a time when all Muslim women and other wives of the Prophet dressed simply and without any gaudiness, ‘A’ishah made use of all kinds of clothes of different colors and textures. She did not abstain from wearing precious ornaments, and even on pilgrimage and during the performance of this great act of religious devotion when everyone lays aside all the material garishness, she did not abstain from wearing rich, colorful and beautiful clothes. The texts, which are quoted below, support our claim.
The author of Tabaqat quotes al-Qasim, a nephew of ‘A’ishah, saying: She wore yellow dresses and gold rings.
A Muslim woman named Shumaysah narrates that one day she went to see ‘A’ishah and saw her dressed in a yellow dress and a yellow head-cover and veil.
‘Urwah, her nephew, narrates:“ ‘A’ishah had a silk
surcoat which she wore occasionally, and she offered it to ‘Abd Allah ibn az-Zubayr.”
Muhammad ibn al-Ash‘ath, a chief of the Kindah tribe, brought a fur garment as a gift for ‘A’ishah which she wore in cold weather.
A Muslim woman named Aminah says: One day I saw ‘A’ishah wearing a red surcoat and a black head-cover.
Ma‘adhah, a woman of the Adi tribe, narrates:“I saw ‘A’ishah wearing a yellow surcoat.”
Bakrah, daughter of ‘Uqbah says:“One day I went to ‘A’ishah’s house. She was sitting down and had worn a yellow dress.”
Abu Malikah says:“I saw ‘A’ishah in a “mudarraj”
dress.” They asked:“What is “mudarraj”
?” He said:“You call it “pink”
.”
al-Qasim, son of Muhammad ibn Abi Bakr, says:“ ‘A’ishah wore a yellow dress for pilgrimage ceremony, and adorned herself with gold ornaments.”
‘Abd ar-Rahman ibn al-Qasim quotes his mother saying:“I saw ‘A’ishah in a dress, which was as red as fire, although it was during the pilgrimage ceremony.”
‘Ata’ says:“ ‘Ubaydah ibn ‘Umayr and I went to visit ‘A’ishah. She was staying in az-Zubayr mountain near the House of God, and they had installed a cupola with a cover for her there. I was only a child and saw her in a red dress.”
al-Bukhari quotes this narration with some addition and says: They asked:“What was she covered in?”
He said:“She was in a Turkish tent with a cover, which was between us and her, and I saw her in a red dress.”
‘A’ishah’s monopoly of verdicts on sucking period
‘A’ishah ordered her brother’s sister or daughters to suck the man that she wished to visit her house, so that they may be considered religiously legitimate intimates.
al-Muwatta’ of Malik
We have already seen that ‘A’ishah was considered a great authority in religious matters from the time of her father’s caliphate until the period of Mu‘awiyah, with the exception of the period of the Alawite rule. She was frequently consulted by the caliphs and was asked to issue verdicts on various questions. Consequently she was treated with a great respect, and inquirers crowded at the door of her house. Among the Prophet’s wives she was the only one who took part in the great political events of his life, and also, as we saw, she caused so much bloodshed, whereas the other consorts of the Prophet did not interfere in such affairs.
It was probably due to this reason that she quoted the Prophet’s tradition concerning the sucking period, while the other wives of the Prophet contradicted her in this matter.
According to Musnad of Ahmad, ‘A’ishah says about this tradition: Sahlah, daughter of Suhayl ibn ‘Amr and wife of Abu Hudhayfah, came to the Prophet and said: Salem, the freed slave of Abu Hudhayfah enters our house while we are not fully dressed and not properly covered. We used to call him our son, since Abu Hudhayfah had adopted him as his son, in the same way that the Prophet had adopted Zayd as his son.
The following verse of the Qur’an descended about this matter:“Assert their relationship to their fathers; this is more equitable with Allah.”
The Prophet said to Sahlah:“You may suckle your freed slave and adopted son five times; than he may be regarded as your foster son and thereby become a religiously legitimate relation.”
By relying on this tradition the narrator of which was herself, she ordered her sisters and nieces to give suck five times to the men that she wished to visit her, even though they were full-grown adults, so that thereby they could be considered as religiously legitimate intimates and be allowed to enter house without any inconvenience.
But the other wives of the Prophet abstained from this action and did not allow an adult man to visit them by means of sucking their sister’s milk, and treat them like an intimate relation. They regarded sucking as something solely related to babyhood. They said to ‘A’ishah:“We do not know. Maybe the verdict of the Prophet has been given only in the case of Salem, the slave-girl of Abu Hudhayfah and his adopted son, and it is not applicable to others.”
This incident has been narrated in Sahih of Muslim within six traditions, the last of which in his own words is as follows: They said to ‘A’ishah:“By God! We consider the matter of Salim as a leave given by the Prophet to him only. Therefore we cannot in that way allow anyone to become intimately related to us.”
Salim ibn ‘Abd Allah ibn ‘Umar was one of those who, in adulthood, was allowed by means of suckling to visit ‘A’ishah. The author of Tabaqat writes: ‘A’ishah sent Salem to her sister Umm Kulthum, wife of ‘Abd Allah ibn Rabi‘ah to be given suck, so that he would legitimately be allowed to visit her and listen to some tradition.
The next tradition, which is narrated by Muslim in his Sahih, confirms the opinion of Umm Salamah and other wives of the Prophet in the question of suckling. ‘A’ishah says: One say the Prophet came in and saw a man sitting before me. He was annoyed and I could observe signs of anger on his face. I told him that the man was my foster brother. He made a remark
which is explained as follow by an-Nawawi, a famous interpreter of tradition in Sahih of Muslim:
It means: You must reflect to see whether this sucking has been effected in accordance with the required condition and laws of Islam or not. For, sucking is due to hunger, and the legitimacy of the glance is due to the face that the child is so young that his hunger is satisfied through sucking without needing any other food, whereas in the case of grown-ups milk alone would not serve as an adequate food, and they required some other food, too. Therefore, not every person who suckles the milk of a mother maybe regarded as her foster offspring, or a foster brother of her children. Thus the above legitimate intimacy can be obtained only by giving suck to a small baby.
In at-Tirmidhi’s tradition there is a sentence which means: Only that kind of sucking creates legitimacy of intimacy as a relative and bans marriage when the milk serves as the only food for the baby. Therefore its period is confined to the normal period of sucking in a baby. an-Nawawi adds that this is a well-known point in religious jurisprudence, about which there is, of course, a different of opinion.
The above tradition which we mentioned as a quotation of an-Nawawi in the book of Sahih of Muslim, has been quoted in the book of Tradition of at-Tirmidhi from Umm Salamah which makes this relationship more conditional, namely:“The state of sucking create sanctity and close relationship and prohibits marriage only if milk is offered as a substitute to food and the infant’s bones are still soft (and not become hard).”
Then Abu ‘Isa at-Tirmidhi, the famous author of the book writes: This is a correct tradition, which is acted upon by most scholar friends of the Prophet and others on the basis of the above remark of the Prophet. According to the verdict of the Prophet in reference to this tradition, they believe that if the suckling occurs in the first two years of a baby’s life, it created a legitimate intimacy, but after two full years, no intimacy is possible.
These traditions were contrary to ‘A’ishah’s views. The words which, she quoted from the Prophet could not hold out against all the traditions of others, especially as her opponents were all the wives of the Prophet. To remove this obstacle, the best way for her was to invent a Quranic verse to prove that it is possible to produce legitimate intimacy in adults with oneself through sucking.
To attain this goal, again ‘A’ishah narrates that a verse had descended about stoning to death and also about the sucking of adults in which it was said that ten suckings would be enough for obtaining legitimate intimacy. She claimed that this verse was written on a piece of paper, placed under her bed, she said:“When the Prophet was ill in bed and we were looking after him in his last hours of life, a domestic animal entered the room and ate the paper, and thus the said verse was lost.”
In other narrations quoted from ‘A’ishah by Muslim in his Sahih, ‘A’ishah says: In the Qur’an which had been descended to the Prophet, there existed the following verse:“Ten times of clear and known suckings provide legitimate intimacy.”
Then this verse was abrogated by the phrase ‘five known times’, but as this verse was being recited from the Qur’an, the Prophet passed away.
an-Nawawi, great Sunni scholar and interpreter of Muslim’s book of Sahih says: The narration means that the abrogation of ‘ten times’ for ‘five times of known suckings’ has taken place at the end of the Prophet’s life, and some people recited the phrase ‘ten times’ without knowing that it was abrogated. Then an-Nawawi describes the difference of views of the Shafi‘ite and Malikite Jurisprudents, and adds on behalf of the Malikites that Quranic words are proved by the statement of one person. Then in explaining the sucking of adult men and the manner of it, he quoted Judge ‘Ayyad that the manner of sucking took this form that the milk offering woman milked herself in a pot, and the man drank out of it, and not by sucking her breast.
In this way ‘A’ishah answered the criticism levelled at her by the other wives of the Prophet, and acted upon his own monopoly of verdicts.
Anecdotes in the life of ‘A’ishah
May God bless ‘Ali who was always with God.
‘A’ishah
Although ‘A’ishah was in her life always involved with various events and difficulties, yet she was not heedless of wit and humor in view of her delicate mind and subtlety. Some incidents are narrated about her in this connection in books of history.
Ibn ‘Abd Rabbih writes in his famous book of al-‘Iqd al-farid: One day Imam al-Hasan ibn ‘Ali visited Mu‘awiyah when ‘Abd Allah ibn az-Zubayr and Abu Sa‘id, son of ‘Aqil, were present there. When Imam al-Hasan sat down, Mu‘awiyah asked:“Abu Muhammad! Which of them was senior, ‘Ali or az-Zubayr?”
The Imam said:“They were both almost of the same age, but ‘Ali was regarded as az-Zubayr’s senior.”
‘Abd Allah, son of az-Zubayr, began to speak and said:“And May God bless az-Zubayr!”
Imam al-Hasan only smiled, since he was above such superficialities and was aware of Mu‘awiyah’s mischievous intention. But Abu Sa‘id, son of ‘Aqil, could not control his anger, and said:“Stop speaking about ‘Ali and az-Zubayr. ‘Ali invited the people to something in which he was a leader and Imam, whereas az-Zubayr invited the people to something the leadership of which was held by a woman! Then the two sides faced each other and the flame of war of kindled, and both groups prepared themselves for combat. But az-Zubayr took to his heels and fled from the field of battle before the victory of right and before his submission to right and before wrong was vanquished and before he could abandon it. Then a man seized him, who was much shorter than az-Zubayr, and cut off his head and carries away his clothes, and brought his severed head to the Imam as a souvenir.
But Imam ‘Ali, as usual served under the Prophet of God and was the vanguard of the army on that day. Therefore, may God bless ‘Ali, not az-Zubayr!”
‘Abd Allah ibn az-Zubayr said:“By God! If anyone else but you had uttered such words, I would have known what to do with him!”
The son of ‘Aqil said:“The person towards whom you committed this insolence, nobly turned away from you and your words, and thus I was compelled to speak for him.”
This incident was reported to ‘A’ishah. One day when Abu Sa‘id was passing by her house, she shouted to him and said:“You squint-eyed devil! Are you the man who spoke their biting words to my sister’s son?”
Abu Sa‘id looked round and saw no one. So he shouted:“The devil sees you, but you cannot see him.”
‘A’ishah laughed on hearing these words and said:“May God bless your father! How sharp and biting your tongue is!”
The above incident shows that Mu‘awiyah’s intention was to produce a clash between Imam al-Hasan and ‘Abd Allah ibn az-Zubayr and cause hostility. this was a policy he constantly adopted towards the Quraysh chiefs, and roused one group against another.
In the above incident ‘Abd Allah was unconsciously caught in the webs of Mu‘awiyah cunning and followed the course envisaged by Mu‘awiyah, while Imam al-Hasan, who was acquainted well with the character of Mu‘awiyah, safely escaped from his trap. The role of ‘A’ishah, too, in this incident was in accordance with what she did all her life, namely to support her kith and kin, and oppose their enemies.
Another anecdote in her life is a story narrated by Ahmad ibn Hanbal in his book of Musnad. He writes: ‘Ammar ibn Yasir accompanied by Malik al-Ashtar went to ‘A’ishah’s house and asked for admission. When they entered, ‘Ammar said:“O mother!”
‘A’ishah said:“But I am not your mother!”
‘Ammar said:“But you are, even though you dislike it.”
‘A’ishah asked:“Who is the man with you?”
‘Ammar said:“al-Ashtar.”
‘A’ishah turned to him and said:“Was it you who wanted to kill my sister’s son?”
al-Ashtar said:“Yes, he wanted to kill me, and so I desired his death.”
‘A’ishah said:“If you had killed him you would never have received salvation; for, I have heard the Prophet say: ‘Killing a Muslim is not permissible except in one of the three following cases: if he has killed someone, and he is killed, or a married man who commits adultery, or a man becomes an apostate after embracing Islam.’ “
Here ‘A’ishah should have been asked: “O mother of the faithful! Why did you not remind your sister’s son, ‘Abd Allah ibn az-Zubayr, of the Prophet’s words? Was he not eager to kill such a Muslim as al-Ashtar?
Was the consideration about the death of a Muslim confined only to the person of ‘Abd Allah, and was the verdict not applicable to thousands of Muslims who had innocently been killed in that fearful battle in the way of whim and fancy? Had their blood no worth in the eye of God and Islam?”
Another anecdote mentioned in history about ‘A’ishah’s life, is a story narrated by Ibn ‘Abd Rabbih in al-‘Iqd al-farid. He says: After the battle of al-Jamal, one day Umm Ufa al-‘Abdiyah of the ‘Abd al-Qays tribe many hundred famous men of which such as Hakim ibn Jabalah had been killed by ‘A’ishah’s army, visited ‘A’ishah and said to her:“O mother of the faithful! What do you say about a mother who kills her small offspring?”
‘A’ishah said:“She must receive the fire of hell.”
Umm Ufa asked:“What do say about a mother who kills twenty thousand grown-up sons of hers?”
‘A’ishah shouted:“Throw out this enemy of God!”
How hard was this reproach for ‘A’ishah to hear!
The event of the battle of al-Jamal and its greatness and fearfulness weighed like a heavy mountain on her mind, and during the rest of her life it had not lost its effect.
We have already mentioned her deep regret and penitence about participating in that war, and our subsequent reference to this matter may depict the same kind of repentance. Ibn ‘Abd Rabbih quotes a remark of ‘A’ishah about this matter in his book of al-‘Iqd al-farid. She has said:“A spindle in the hand of women is better and nobler than a spear in the hand of fighters in the way of God.”
The effect of the battle of al-Jamal on the mind and spirit of ‘A’ishah was as painful as it was exhilarating for the Umayyad party, so that they spoke of it every day and gloried in mentioning its details.
Ibn ‘Abd Rabbih writes:“Yazid ibn Munyah went to Mu‘awiyah from Basra to ash-Sham. He was a brother of Ya‘la ibn Munayh, a chief of Basra and a commander in the battle of al-Jamal, and the original owner of ‘A’ishah’s camel. She rode it and directed the combat from there. Ya‘la also had some kinship with Mu‘awiyah, for his daughter was the wife of ‘Utbah ibn Abi Sufyan, brother of Mu‘awiyah. When Yazid ibn Munayh set by Mu‘awiyah, he began complaining of his debts, and requested Mu‘awiyah to help him out of his difficulties. Mu‘awiyah said to Ka‘b: “Give him thirty thousand dinars!”
When he rose to go out, Mu‘awiyah said again:“Add to it another thirty thousand for the sake of the day of al-Jamal.”
One day ‘Amr ibn al-‘As in his conversation with ‘A’ishah said:“I wish you were killed on the day of al-Jamal?”
‘A’ishah said:“Why, you old villain?”
‘Amr ibn al-‘As answered:“Then you would have died fittingly and gone to heaven, and we could have used your death as the best excuse for pounding the Alawite front.”
Books of history narrate another encounter of ‘Amr ibn al-‘As with ‘A’ishah, namely that, one day in ‘A’ishah’s presence the talk led to the death of Dhu ath-Thadiyah at the hand of Imam ‘Ali. The narrator says: ‘A’ishah said to me:“If you visit Kufah bring me a letter of testimony from the people who have witnessed this scene.”
I went to Kufah and I chose ten people from each group and collected their testimony in a letter and took it to Medina for ‘A’ishah. When she saw it, she said:“May God damn ‘Amr ibn al-‘As! He claimed that I have killed Dhu ath-Thadiyah in Egypt.”
After narrating this story, Ibn Kathir adds: Then ‘A’ishah bent her head and wept bitterly. After she stopped crying and calmed down, she said:“May God bless ‘Ali! He was always with God. What occurred between me and him, was what often occurs between women and their husbands’ family.”
But as to why ‘Amr ibn al-‘As had made such a false claim and intended to attribute the death of Dhu ath-Thadiyah to himself, a reference to the narrations of the Prophet clarifies the matter: Writers of tradition and historians have quoted narrations from the Prophet in reproach of Dhu ath-Thadiyah and in praise of his killer. In this way ‘Amr ibn al-‘As intended to show the conformity of his own praise with that of the Prophet.
Here the survey of ‘A’ishah’s life comes to an end, and we return to the life of Mu‘awiyah in order to discover the motives for and factors of the fabrication of traditions and narrations of that period, and find out the great role of ‘A’ishah in this process. For, all our discussions and efforts are intended to recognize the traditions, which are falsely attributed to the Prophet in order to invert Islam. Therefore, without such an analysis those lies cannot be distinguished and criticized.
0%
Author: Allamah Sayyid Murtadha Askari
