Mulla Sadra's Seddiqin Argument for the Existence of God
0%
Author: Hamidreza Ayatollahy
Publisher: Unknown
Category: Islamic Philosophy
Author: Hamidreza Ayatollahy
Publisher: Unknown
Category: visits: 10765
Download: 3696
- Preface
- Part One: Mulla Sadra and His Philosophical Views
- Background
- Later Developments in Islamic Philosophy
- Mulla Sadra and the development of Islamic philosophy1
- Notes
- The Intellectual Background of Mulla Sadra
- Notes
- Life and Works
- Introduction
- Part two: The Seddiqin Argument: Its Foundations and Developments
- Introduction
- Chapter 1: Philosophical Foundations of the "Seddiqin Argument"
- Introduction
- Existence
- Existence is self-evident
- Existence and Quiddity
- The "notion" of existence has a univocal meaning
- Existence has Analogical Gradation
- Types of Existence14
- Causality
- Introduction
- The notion of cause and caused
- How the mind obtains the notion of causality
- Divisions of cause
- The principle of causality
- Basis of the need for a cause
- Truth of the relationship between cause and caused
- How the causal relationship can be known?
- Characteristics of the Cause and the Caused or Effect
- Necessity and Possibility
- Philosophical Essential Necessity and Logical Essential Necessity
- Possibility and Ontological Poverty17
- Notes
- Chapter II: The Seddiqin Argument
- Explanation of the argument
- The Name of Seddiqin
- Avicenna's Seddiqin Argument
- The Advantages of Mulla Sadra's Seddiqin Argument over Avicenna's
- The Development of the Seddiqin Argument
- Sabzevari
- Tabatabaii
- Notes
- Chapter III: The Differences between the Ontological Argument and the Seddiqin Argument
- Notes
- Introduction
- I- Hume's objections3
- II- Kant's objections4
- The Rejection of both the Idea and the Existence of God
- a: Anselm6
- b: Descartes7
- Investigation
- Primary Essential Predication and Common Technical Predication
- That Existence Is not a Real Predication
- That the words "Necessary Being" have no consistent meaning
- That the Cosmological Argument Depends on an Invalid Ontological Argument
- That there is no being whose existence is rationally demonstrable
- That Existential Statements Are not Necessary
- That an Infinite Series Is Possible
- Notes
- Conclusion
- Bibliography