3) The Value of the Practice and Work
Islam is a religion of practice and it has already been pointed out that faith, in spite of its power, is fruitless and a dead end without good deeds and practice. It will lose its motivation power and its liveliness gradually, if it remains out of practice. As a matter of fact, Islam supports positive not negative piety. Islam always warns against superficial concepts and rituals, against lifeless formalities and non-effective beliefs. In one representative verse God explains the full meaning of positive piety and righteousness as follows: “It is not righteousness that you turn your faces (in prayer) towards East or West; but it is righteousness to believe in God and the Last day, and the Angels and the Book, and the Messengers; to spend of your wealth – in spite of your love for it – for your kin, for orphans, for the needy, for the wayfarer, for those who ask, and for the ransom of slaves; to be steadfast in prayer and practice regular charity; to fulfill the contracts which you have made; and to be firm and patient, in pain and adversity and throughout all periods of panic. Such are the people of truth, the God – minded”
. In this verse there is a beautiful and clear description of the righteous believer. It gives an understandable indication that the effective faith should be embodied in meritorious services and behaviors, not in senseless ritual and customs, and that the practice provides faith with nourishment in return. Hence, being a truly pious and righteous Muslim requires being a good citizen by supporting charitable institutions and social organizations solidly and loyally in all circumstances, as well as being obedient to God and being generous and kind to people sincerely and with love. In short, righteousness is not merely an empty declaration but rather it must be founded on strong faith and constant practice.
4) The Dynamism of Love
The ongoing challenge amongst Islamic economists is staying focused on the price mechanism and hence the optimality of the market outcome. Where there are unlimited wants but scarcity of resources, needless to say that there should be an institution through which all claims may be adjusted by either the invisible or the visible hand to maintain a balance between limited resources and the claims on them. Moreover, this institution should fit and be in harmony with other components of the whole system as well as the worldview, the strategy, and goals for which this system is generated. Otherwise, it sounds like a package of loosely connected items!
In the ideal laissez-faire capitalist economy, as we know, the price mechanism is an exclusive efficient filter to allocate scarce resources to satisfy unlimited wants. Socialism, on the other hand, believes that the price system alone is too blind to meet socio-economic goals so it necessarily leads to frustration. Thus, under this school of thought the slow and heavy public sector undertakes the duty of resource allocation through central planning, even though this is inefficient. As a moderate point of view, some Islamic economists such as Chapra (1992) portray the Islamic economy as an ideal system in which individuals benefit from a broad array of economic freedoms, including the right to private ownership and the liberty to trade at freely negotiated terms. At the same time, it requires individuals “to pass all claims on resources through the filter mechanism of Islamic values” (p. 335). In other words, as Rice (1999, 346) illustrates Chapra’s (1992) point of view: “the Islamic worldview implies that the market system should be maintained, but that the price mechanism be complemented with a device that minimizes unnecessary claims on resources. This device is themoral filter
. This means that people would pass their potential claims on resources through thefilter of Islamic values
so that many claims would be eliminated before being expressed in the marketplace. Resources would not be allowed to be diverted to the production of luxuries until the production of necessities was ensured in sufficient quantities (Siddiqi, 1981). The definition of luxurious or extravagant is related to the average standards of consumption in a society, the idea being that large departure from the standards would not be permissible.”
I beg to differ slightly with Chapra’s argument. I think that the filter that minimizes claims on limited resources is still the price mechanism and there is no need to employ any complementary devices. Nevertheless, an ethical system always changes and impacts on the preferences pattern and consumers’ behavior hence their utility function or revealed preferences. For instance, a committed (or purposive) Muslim who loves serving people in order to seek the pleasure of God may be expected not to express demands for luxurious goods in the marketplace. In other words, his commitment requires him to shape his target function
in a way that coordinates with his mission and his ultimate goal.
Accord with this analysis, such a divine fount of revealed preferences distinguishes a typical Muslim’s behavior from that of a secular person. For instance, instead of pursuing the inter-temporal preferences of an ordinary (immature or secular) person, the Muslim’s propensity to save is quite high so that he reduces his present consumption and invests it for unborn generations’ consumption. Therefore, the market of such a society shows a much stronger demand for capital goods than for consumption goods. Thus, on the one hand, the members of an Islamic mature society increase their labor supply and employ their whole endowments to access more efficient technology in production, while on the other hand, the piety and the Islamic value of thrift drive them not to increase the demand for consumption goods. Instead, the sense of social responsibility and the commitment to new generations’ prosperity motivate them to increase the demand for capital goods and hence an equilibrium between supply and demand will appear. Therefore, the extra supply of this market is absorbed in such a way that the society’s Production Possibility Frontier (PPF) expands, due to the increase of various kind of capital and to the access to more efficient technology. In this model, there is no need to worry about theParadox of Thrift,
because the source of this paradox - the inadequateness of effective demand - is obviously absent here on account of the adequate effective demand for capital goods. More technically speaking, a society that is more farsighted and more concerned with developing future wellness programs, in order to accomplish the divine mission, requires working harder with a much higher propensity to save.
Based on the turnpike theorem and the economic literature of growth, the higher rate of propensity to save a society has, the more accelerating growth trend it can realize. Therefore, it is strongly expected that an Islamic society experiences a sharp growth trend coinciding with sustainable development when it unifies all aspects of life and all functional institutions following the Islamic worldview.
In addition, the strong love for God and for serving people, which originates from the mature form of self-interest, reduces the utility of leisure time for a devoted Muslim, because he should seize every opportunity serve people as beloved creatures of God. Thus, the motive power of love drives him to produce more and more and the characteristic function of Supply Side Economists will be satisfied. Besides, he has learned many invaluable lessons of the Islamic tradition which teach him to avoid being idle or less productive, such as:
Continual self-improvement (Imam Ali: He whose two days are equal is a sure loser.)
No tolerance for idleness (Apostle of Islam: God does not like those who spend their time for nothing.)
Excellence and quality of work, no tolerance for negligent behavior (Apostle of Islam: God likes that when someone does anything, it must be done perfectly well.)
To demonstrate the contribution of Islamic piety, in a positive sense, to wealth creation and the support of public goods in order to please Almighty God, rather than to satisfy the inferior desires that come from the mud-like self, I would like to offer two examples:
1) Both Sunni and Shiat consider Ali Ibn Abi Talib as an aesthetic detachment from worldly concerns and as a major role model for the standard of piety and nobility of character. Whereas a simple meal of a single barley loaf sufficed him when he was working hard in his plentiful farms and palms in Yanbu, Nakhilah, Wadi Tura 'a, and so on, many needy people were surviving on his income and enjoying his food (See: Al-Asqalani III p. 271). He dug many springs and cultivated many lands, but he endowed them generously in favor of poor people.
2) I consider Professor Muhammad Yunus, the founder of Grameen Bank, as a good example of positive monasticism. Detaching himself from a comfortable life as a typical professor, he dedicated and dedicates his time and his energy to provide the people of the poor class with a decent life full of human dignity.
His bank and the micro-credit policy which he adopted have greatly affected the lives of his people in Bangeladesh and beyond.